Rear Lights Testing Continues
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 95
Bikes: Nishiki Adult Manitoba
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I ordered the Cygolite hotshot pro 100 from amazon. its showing a estimate shipping date of 8/22
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,687
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1126 Post(s)
Liked 253 Times
in
204 Posts
While everything else related to cycling goes skyrocketing in prices, LED lights are getting brighter and cheaper.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 4,347
Bikes: Felt TK2, Felt Z5
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 943 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 20 Times
in
20 Posts
Hmm...What you said about the Rapid X3 has me scratching my head. A couple months ago I came up on a guy using a very interesting rear lamp. I was sitting at a stop light when I noticed the cyclist over at the light to my right. I noticed at the time that his rear light was very visible from the front as he was at a good 45° angle to my right. His light changed first and I watch him go through the light. ( night time, urban setting with street lamps ) When my light changed I had a chance to view his light directly from behind. Not bad, visible but not overwhelmingly bright. I'm sure in a darker setting there would of been more contrast. When I caught him at the next light I looked at his light but didn't know at the time what brand it was. I just knew it had two separate panels of leds, angled slightly on each side. This light was VERY bright from the sides with almost a 360° visible output. Later I saw pictures of the Cateye X3 and figured that was the light I saw. Okay it's bright but it's a micro-led paneled light. As such the light is VERY dispersed, even more so because the panels are angled. Anyway, just my take on the X3.
#29
Senior Member
I have the standard solas. It is apparently a 30 lumens light. The badging is simply for niterider solas like the following:
https://www.niterider.com/product/solas-30/
Now niterider has 100 and 150 lumens versions of the solas. Will it be worth it to upgrade? Obviously my current solas is working perfectly.
Also wondering if the cygolite 150 would be a significant upgrade. I don't doubt the 150 versions are a bit better, but perhaps not 5X better.
https://www.niterider.com/product/solas-30/
Now niterider has 100 and 150 lumens versions of the solas. Will it be worth it to upgrade? Obviously my current solas is working perfectly.
Also wondering if the cygolite 150 would be a significant upgrade. I don't doubt the 150 versions are a bit better, but perhaps not 5X better.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 7,085
Bikes: Cervelo Prodigy
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 478 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 87 Times
in
67 Posts
Well the Cygolites look to be the better for daytime, no doubt about that and that's pretty much what I would have expected ( given the lamps you have ). The Vis 180 doesn't even look like it's on. I've never seen the Hotshot 80 in action before so I'm impressed with that. I have a feeling the when the Hotshot 150 comes out in a couple weeks a lot of people will be springing for those.
#31
Senior Member
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,687
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1126 Post(s)
Liked 253 Times
in
204 Posts
#33
Senior Member
J.
#34
Senior Member
That's the thing about lights. The human eye does not react to light in a linear fashion. Just because something has twice the output doesn't mean it will actually look twice as bright. My brightest self-contained rear lamp is supposedly 60 lumen. It uses a single optic and to me it looks very bright. The Cygolite 150 which I have on pre-order should have more than twice the output....Still, I don't expect it to look twice as bright but I do expect it to look brighter. If I can detect a noticeable increase in brightness from a good distance I'll be satisfied. If it's noticeable but barely noticeable I might be sending it back.
You should notice a big difference with the Cygolite 60-150 presuming they are honest about the intensity. Especially since they concentrate it the beam down range with their optics, it ought to be VERY noticeable a long way down range during the day.
J.
#35
Senior Member
You can count on it. Niterider has already upgraded their Solas to 150 and are including another ( the Sentinel ) with 150 as well. Only difference between those two I see is that the Sentinel includes a "laser lane" option. I bought a cheap-o Chinese laser tail light about a year ago just for kicks. I see no added advantage of having something put skinny red lines on the road. People in cars aren't going to notice those or react to them even if they can see them. They will however notice a bright tail light.
Anyway, the Niterider Solas 150 is claiming 7 hrs on high and 6hrs on flash. This has me wondering... Usually the flash modes are longer running. I can only assume that the high mode ( steady? ) is not using the full output of the lamp and perhaps the flash mode is? With run time in mind it will be interesting to see how the Cygolite Hotshot 150 is handling the mode outputs. The Cygolite 150 is listing a run time on high as 2hrs and flashing 75hrs.... Does this mean the Cygolite is brighter on high ( steady ) than the Solas 150 (?)...and is the Solas 150 brighter on flash modes than the Cygolite 150? Going to be interesting see how that pans out. Freek!...75hrs on FLASH! Do any self-contained rear lamps currently available run anywhere near 75hrs on flash!!? Now I know you can space the flashes very wide apart with the Cygolites if you choose to do that but still, something not right here. I don't know about anyone else but I want full output on flash ( or at least the option for full output on flash ).
Anyway, the Niterider Solas 150 is claiming 7 hrs on high and 6hrs on flash. This has me wondering... Usually the flash modes are longer running. I can only assume that the high mode ( steady? ) is not using the full output of the lamp and perhaps the flash mode is? With run time in mind it will be interesting to see how the Cygolite Hotshot 150 is handling the mode outputs. The Cygolite 150 is listing a run time on high as 2hrs and flashing 75hrs.... Does this mean the Cygolite is brighter on high ( steady ) than the Solas 150 (?)...and is the Solas 150 brighter on flash modes than the Cygolite 150? Going to be interesting see how that pans out. Freek!...75hrs on FLASH! Do any self-contained rear lamps currently available run anywhere near 75hrs on flash!!? Now I know you can space the flashes very wide apart with the Cygolites if you choose to do that but still, something not right here. I don't know about anyone else but I want full output on flash ( or at least the option for full output on flash ).
Last edited by 01 CAt Man Do; 08-20-16 at 06:29 PM.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 95
Bikes: Nishiki Adult Manitoba
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,687
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1126 Post(s)
Liked 253 Times
in
204 Posts
Speaking of LED's the strangest thing happened to me last week, I bought a 4 pack of 60 watt (equivalent) LED bulbs's from Home Depot (I went to Lowes and Home depot looking for something and got mixed up where I got the bulbs from) for just $4.95, I think this week their just $7.97.
Last edited by rekmeyata; 08-20-16 at 06:37 PM.
#38
Senior Member
Yes, it said the same thing about a week ago when I ordered mine so who knows when it will actually ship? ( they're not updating the posted arrival date ) I'm in no real hurry but I'd like it by first week of Sept. if possible.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 569
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 242 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
That's the thing about lights. The human eye does not react to light in a linear fashion. Just because something has twice the output doesn't mean it will actually look twice as bright. My brightest self-contained rear lamp is supposedly 60 lumen. It uses a single optic and to me it looks very bright. The Cygolite 150 which I have on pre-order should have more than twice the output....Still, I don't expect it to look twice as bright but I do expect it to look brighter. If I can detect a noticeable increase in brightness from a good distance I'll be satisfied. If it's noticeable but barely noticeable I might be sending it back.
Exactly right. A doubling of light is like a 1-fstop change on a camera. You really need to get light doublings to make a big difference. Less than that is often not very noticeable. Last year, I sprung for a Lupine Betty. I programmed it with three steps - 1000 lumens, 2000 lumens and 5000 lumens. THat gives a nice gradation between steps even though it's roughly a doubling each time.
You should notice a big difference with the Cygolite 60-150 presuming they are honest about the intensity. Especially since they concentrate it the beam down range with their optics, it ought to be VERY noticeable a long way down range during the day.
J.
You should notice a big difference with the Cygolite 60-150 presuming they are honest about the intensity. Especially since they concentrate it the beam down range with their optics, it ought to be VERY noticeable a long way down range during the day.
J.
These new 150 lumens lights, at around $50, seem like serious competition for the much more expensive $200 dinotte, 200 lumens at 4X the price. The niterider and cygolite with 150 lumens at $50 seem like superior values.
NEW Quad RED Taillight with built in battery ? DiNotte Lighting USA Online Store
I'm going to test out my solas 30 in daylight. I just assumed this light wouldn't be very effective in daylight, but maybe I'm wrong.
#40
Senior Member
I was just now messing about with all the rear lamps I have. The original Hotshot I have beyond a doubt has the more intense throw of any of the other rear lamps I own ( when used on the flash/Pulse mode ). The Axiom Pulse 60 I have comes a very close second but has a much more usable beam pattern since it projects a slightly wider beam pattern. The Gemini IRIS I have ( supposedly 160 lumen on high ) has about twice the beam width of the Pulse 60. This is why I use it on the helmet. If the IRIS were using an optic similar to the Pulse 60 it would likely blow the others out of the water for throw. Since I'm expecting the HS 150 to have a similar beam pattern to the Pulse 60, the HS 150 should indeed end up being the better all-around rear light.
If the future I'd like to see the makers of these lamps sell them with a choice of user-replaceable optics. If the Hotshot 150 could be fitting with the same optic as the original Hotshot I have no doubt that the end result would be a fully functional "Full Daylight-Daytime" ( long distance ) visible lamp. Right now I have to hold my breath and wait to see just how wide the new HS 150 is going to be. If it's too wide, like the IRIS, the distance throw will suffer. The rear lamps with wider optics are stellar for night time use though.
#41
Non omnino gravis
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 7,085
Bikes: Cervelo Prodigy
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 478 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 87 Times
in
67 Posts
Is it possible to design the rear light to be configured as a "wrap-around"? a U-shaped light that puts out the throw beam in the middle with the two other lights more like wide beam?
And then each light can be regulated as blinking or constant. There would be a single mount, on the seat post. The rear bag would be eliminated and put elsewhere.
And then each light can be regulated as blinking or constant. There would be a single mount, on the seat post. The rear bag would be eliminated and put elsewhere.
#43
Senior Member
I'm hoping you're right about that. Keep in mind both the Cygolite Hotshot ( original ) and the current Hotshot Micro look like they are both narrow. The Hotshot 80 ( if you look at the photo on post #1 ) you'll notice the optic is designed for a slightly wider beam pattern. The Hotshot 150 will likely have the same optic as the HS 80.
I was just now messing about with all the rear lamps I have. The original Hotshot I have beyond a doubt has the more intense throw of any of the other rear lamps I own ( when used on the flash/Pulse mode ). The Axiom Pulse 60 I have comes a very close second but has a much more usable beam pattern since it projects a slightly wider beam pattern. The Gemini IRIS I have ( supposedly 160 lumen on high ) has about twice the beam width of the Pulse 60. This is why I use it on the helmet. If the IRIS were using an optic similar to the Pulse 60 it would likely blow the others out of the water for throw. Since I'm expecting the HS 150 to have a similar beam pattern to the Pulse 60, the HS 150 should indeed end up being the better all-around rear light.
If the future I'd like to see the makers of these lamps sell them with a choice of user-replaceable optics. If the Hotshot 150 could be fitting with the same optic as the original Hotshot I have no doubt that the end result would be a fully functional "Full Daylight-Daytime" ( long distance ) visible lamp. Right now I have to hold my breath and wait to see just how wide the new HS 150 is going to be. If it's too wide, like the IRIS, the distance throw will suffer. The rear lamps with wider optics are stellar for night time use though.
I was just now messing about with all the rear lamps I have. The original Hotshot I have beyond a doubt has the more intense throw of any of the other rear lamps I own ( when used on the flash/Pulse mode ). The Axiom Pulse 60 I have comes a very close second but has a much more usable beam pattern since it projects a slightly wider beam pattern. The Gemini IRIS I have ( supposedly 160 lumen on high ) has about twice the beam width of the Pulse 60. This is why I use it on the helmet. If the IRIS were using an optic similar to the Pulse 60 it would likely blow the others out of the water for throw. Since I'm expecting the HS 150 to have a similar beam pattern to the Pulse 60, the HS 150 should indeed end up being the better all-around rear light.
If the future I'd like to see the makers of these lamps sell them with a choice of user-replaceable optics. If the Hotshot 150 could be fitting with the same optic as the original Hotshot I have no doubt that the end result would be a fully functional "Full Daylight-Daytime" ( long distance ) visible lamp. Right now I have to hold my breath and wait to see just how wide the new HS 150 is going to be. If it's too wide, like the IRIS, the distance throw will suffer. The rear lamps with wider optics are stellar for night time use though.
Where I ride is a very rural area with both winding hilly roads and long straight sections. So I kind of need both the distance downrange and the wide pattern. What I'm thinking would work great is a Hotshot with it's narrower optics and my Orfos Flare with it's wide and bright spread. That would be a pretty awesome package.
That's what I wish for in the next version of the hi-bright taillights - a narrow optic with maybe a 2W emitter behind it followed up by 300 lumens of high bright wide angle (180 degree or more) emitters as well. In a gross sense, a Hotshot Pro Micro to 100 glued on top of a Flare.
J.
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,687
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1126 Post(s)
Liked 253 Times
in
204 Posts
I think that if a tail light can put out 150 lumens, which seems a bit excessive to me, that instead of directing all that light in a spot type of beam they should indeed make the optics so that the light can be seen easily from 90 degrees or more off center. I know that my L&M Vis180 (not the Micro) puts out 70 lumens and they made the light so it's easily seen 90 degrees off center, and other manufactures do the same thing but not all do like the Hotshot. Of course not sure if the new 100 and 150 lumen Hotshot has that sort of capability or not.
#45
Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 27
Bikes: Trek 7.4fx, Motobecane Ti LeChampion
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Great post. I have the Blitzu, which I'm happy with. Though would have loved to have seen this post before buying it.
#46
Senior Member
I think that if a tail light can put out 150 lumens, which seems a bit excessive to me, that instead of directing all that light in a spot type of beam they should indeed make the optics so that the light can be seen easily from 90 degrees or more off center. I know that my L&M Vis180 (not the Micro) puts out 70 lumens and they made the light so it's easily seen 90 degrees off center, and other manufactures do the same thing but not all do like the Hotshot. Of course not sure if the new 100 and 150 lumen Hotshot has that sort of capability or not.
We're gotten used to thinking in terms of dinky dim lights as cyclists because of the limitations of the available technology. I'm glad we're now to the point where the technology is starting to catch up and we're able to approach the lighting that other vehicles have. From experience, I think that the high bright tail lights may just about be the best thing you can do for safety at night in the presence of other vehicles.
J.
#47
Señior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13,749
Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
150 lumens is not that much if you are talking about daylight visibility. It's basic visibility in full sun.
I'd probably want to dial it back to 75 or so at night, ideally with a strobe over steady pattern.
I'd probably want to dial it back to 75 or so at night, ideally with a strobe over steady pattern.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,687
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1126 Post(s)
Liked 253 Times
in
204 Posts
The Blitzu light has had several increases in lumens over the last few years so it's hard to tell which one he showed, i think the newest one now has 168 lumens. BUT the problem with these generic Chinese made LED lights, front or rear, is that they way over rate the lumens, so a tail light with 168 rated lumens is probably a lot closer to 50 to 60 lumens. However as time goes by the generic Chinese manufactures are learning that they can't misrepresent their lumens ratings as much as the use to because people are buying from other manufactures, so the lumen gap is slowly getting more narrower.
#49
Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 27
Bikes: Trek 7.4fx, Motobecane Ti LeChampion
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yeah, I couldn't tell you the lumens. On it's highest setting it's blindingly bright. The drawback is that people say the battery won't last much longer than 30 min which is useless for anything but a short commute. That's another worthwhile factor to consider on these lights -- the battery life.
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 569
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 242 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I tested out 3 tail lights in the dark:
Cree XML rigged with a red lens.
Solas 30
el cheapo $1 taillight from eBay
New Waterproof 5 LED Lamp Bike Bicycle Rear Safety Flashlight | eBay
Surprisingly, the Solas 30 fared the WORST of the 3! This is probably because the light droops down attached to a bag and is not quite vertical. An easy fix, but it's startling that it's not much more effective than a $1 light, as it's normally attached.
The $1 eBay special was VERY visible, better than the Solas. This is likely because the clip to the seabag actually props the light up just a touch so that it actually stands vertical on the bag. The clip is the absolute worst. I've broken a couple of clips off, and just learned to tape the clip to the light with clear packing tape.
The Cree (claimed 6000 lumens) was the largest and brightest of the bunch. However, encased in it's housing, off axis visibility to the sides is non existent. It could be a great day time light however. It's a very bulky light, with a mount designed for a handlebar, and adds the bulk of it's attached battery pack. OK, so maybe I won't use it often as a tail light, but may keep it as a novelty. I'd have to stuff the battery pack inside the seabag and maybe attach the light to the side of the seat post, where it would unfortunately be obscured by the saddle bag.
Cree XML rigged with a red lens.
Solas 30
el cheapo $1 taillight from eBay
New Waterproof 5 LED Lamp Bike Bicycle Rear Safety Flashlight | eBay
Surprisingly, the Solas 30 fared the WORST of the 3! This is probably because the light droops down attached to a bag and is not quite vertical. An easy fix, but it's startling that it's not much more effective than a $1 light, as it's normally attached.
The $1 eBay special was VERY visible, better than the Solas. This is likely because the clip to the seabag actually props the light up just a touch so that it actually stands vertical on the bag. The clip is the absolute worst. I've broken a couple of clips off, and just learned to tape the clip to the light with clear packing tape.
The Cree (claimed 6000 lumens) was the largest and brightest of the bunch. However, encased in it's housing, off axis visibility to the sides is non existent. It could be a great day time light however. It's a very bulky light, with a mount designed for a handlebar, and adds the bulk of it's attached battery pack. OK, so maybe I won't use it often as a tail light, but may keep it as a novelty. I'd have to stuff the battery pack inside the seabag and maybe attach the light to the side of the seat post, where it would unfortunately be obscured by the saddle bag.