Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 20 of 20
  1. #1
    Junior Member tamiann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Austin, Tx
    My Bikes
    '06 Giant OCR1
    Posts
    11
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    how to convert my tire size for cyclocomputer?

    My tire size is 700x26c

    That is not a default size on my Cateye computer. And I can't figure out how to convert it into mm. These are the closest default on the computer:

    700x25c = 2105 L(mm)
    100x28c = 2136 L(mm)

    Can anyone help me out?

    Thanks
    "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those that mind don't matter and those that matter don't mind" - Dr Seus

  2. #2
    Body By Nintendo Psydotek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Videogames ruined my life. Good thing i have 2 extra lives.
    My Bikes
    Giant TCR2, Giant TCX, IRO BFSSFG SE, Salsa Casseroll, IRO Rob Roy.
    Posts
    3,191
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Can you manually enter the circumference? Most computers should have that option. Just lay out a tape measure and measure how far the tire rolls with 1 revolution. Convert to mm and enter into computer. I had to do that with my friends cyclometer.

    Quote Originally Posted by jsharr View Post
    A girl once asked me to give her twelve inches and make it hurt. I had to make love to her 3 times and then punch her in the nose.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Sir Lunch-a-lot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Saskatchewan
    My Bikes
    Customized Sekine
    Posts
    377
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Or Just take the diameter (in your case, 26 inches), and since the Circumference (C) is equivalent to the diameter (D) multiplied by Pie (pi) ( c= pi * d), you can figure out the circumference in inches by multiplying 26 inches by pi or 3.14159.

    Apparently, there are 25.4 mm for every Inch (if my math and online unit converter is working right), so you can multiply the circumference in inches by the 25.4mm/inch, and that will give you inches.

    So, if I have done my math and all else right, the total comes out to about 2075.
    Pythagorean Theorum: 24 words. Lord's Prayer: 66 words. 10 Commandments: 179 words. Gettysburg Address: 286 words. Declaration of Independence: 1,300 words. U.S. Government Regulations on the Sale of Cabbage: 26,911 words.

  4. #4
    * vpiuva's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,458
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    700c*26 is not 26". It is 622mm+26mm+26mm=674mm*pi= 2117. But if you can't enter it manually, just go with the closest 700x25. You'll be off (2117-2105)/2117=<0.6% I think you can live with this.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Retro Grouch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    St Peters, Missouri
    My Bikes
    Rans Enduro Sport, Hase Kettweisel Tandem, Merin Bear Valley beater bike
    Posts
    23,104
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The "A" answer is to roll out your tire. Mark a line on the floor, line up your valve stem with the mark and roll your bike one tire circumference. Measure that distance in millimeters and use that value. That'll give you a real accurate answer.

    The "B" answer is to interpolate between the factory numbers. In your example I'd use 2115.

    The "C" answer is to use the closest suggested circumference in the computer set-up directions. Actually, to be honest, I always use the next bigger number because I want my customers to feel like they're riding a little farther and a little faster. It won't be as precise as rolling out the tire, but it'll be plenty accurate enough for any normal use.

  6. #6
    Junior Member tamiann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Austin, Tx
    My Bikes
    '06 Giant OCR1
    Posts
    11
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yes I can enter it manually. I had input 2115, and that seems close enough.

    Thanks so much!!!
    "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those that mind don't matter and those that matter don't mind" - Dr Seus

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Oklahoma
    My Bikes
    Trek 510, Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
    Posts
    8,851
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by tamiann
    Yes I can enter it manually. I had input 2115, and that seems close enough.

    Thanks so much!!!
    Good choice. Actually rollouts aren't as accurate as they sound.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,735
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Al1943
    Good choice. Actually rollouts aren't as accurate as they sound.
    Why is that?

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Montreal
    My Bikes
    Peugeot Hybrid, Minelli Hybrid
    Posts
    6,521
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rollouts are only accurate for a particular tire pressure and weight being carried on the wheel. the figure will also change as the rubber wears off the tire. Close is good enough.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Sir Lunch-a-lot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Saskatchewan
    My Bikes
    Customized Sekine
    Posts
    377
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by vpiuva
    700c*26 is not 26". It is 622mm+26mm+26mm=674mm*pi= 2117. But if you can't enter it manually, just go with the closest 700x25. You'll be off (2117-2105)/2117=<0.6% I think you can live with this.
    Oh. Okay. My bad. I thought the 26 was the measure of diameter. I usually don't see tire sizes measured in this fasion. So... if you don't mind my asking, what does the 700c*26 indicate then?
    Pythagorean Theorum: 24 words. Lord's Prayer: 66 words. 10 Commandments: 179 words. Gettysburg Address: 286 words. Declaration of Independence: 1,300 words. U.S. Government Regulations on the Sale of Cabbage: 26,911 words.

  11. #11
    Body By Nintendo Psydotek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Videogames ruined my life. Good thing i have 2 extra lives.
    My Bikes
    Giant TCR2, Giant TCX, IRO BFSSFG SE, Salsa Casseroll, IRO Rob Roy.
    Posts
    3,191
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    700c is the wheel size, 26 is the tire width in mm i believe.

    Quote Originally Posted by jsharr View Post
    A girl once asked me to give her twelve inches and make it hurt. I had to make love to her 3 times and then punch her in the nose.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Oklahoma
    My Bikes
    Trek 510, Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
    Posts
    8,851
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by AndrewP
    Rollouts are only accurate for a particular tire pressure and weight being carried on the wheel. the figure will also change as the rubber wears off the tire. Close is good enough.
    +1
    And if the computer sensor works off of the rear wheel there will be a bigger difference between the loaded bike and the unloaded bike.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    '''96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '12 Surly Pacer, All are 3x8,9 or 10. It is hilly around here!
    Posts
    24,782
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Retro Grouch
    The "C" answer is to use the closest suggested circumference in the computer set-up directions. Actually, to be honest, I always use the next bigger number because I want my customers to feel like they're riding a little farther and a little faster. It won't be as precise as rolling out the tire, but it'll be plenty accurate enough for any normal use.
    That's funny. I use the next smaller number for my own bikes. A 700x23 is recommended by Cat-Eye at 210 cm and calculates at 209.8. I set my cyclometers at 209 because I want to be sure I've ridden at least the indicated distance.

  14. #14
    cab horn
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    1987 Bianchi Campione
    Posts
    28,298
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Who cares. Just use the number and re-verify with GPS or gmaps. It's not important to have millimeter accuracy only that it's consistent (within reason).
    Mes compaingnons cui j'amoie et cui j'aim,... Me di, chanson.

  15. #15
    * vpiuva's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,458
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Sir Lunch-a-lot
    Oh. Okay. My bad. I thought the 26 was the measure of diameter. I usually don't see tire sizes measured in this fasion. So... if you don't mind my asking, what does the 700c*26 indicate then?
    700 is just an approximate tire diameter when they came up with this crazy system. The actual rim diameter for a 700c wheel is 622mm. The tire size notation is the tread height above the rim, in this case 26cm, which you have to add twice (ie. both sides of the wheel) to obtain the actual tire diameter.
    a 700x20c tire would be 622+20+20=662cm in diameter.
    a 700x39c tire would actually be 700cm diameter

  16. #16
    Senior Member Retro Grouch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    St Peters, Missouri
    My Bikes
    Rans Enduro Sport, Hase Kettweisel Tandem, Merin Bear Valley beater bike
    Posts
    23,104
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Psydotek
    700c is the wheel size, 26 is the tire width in mm i believe.
    It is the width. If you think of a tire as being a round tube, as it gets wider it also gets a little taller. Consequently the circumference isn't the same for all 700c tires.

  17. #17
    Senior Member Retro Grouch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    St Peters, Missouri
    My Bikes
    Rans Enduro Sport, Hase Kettweisel Tandem, Merin Bear Valley beater bike
    Posts
    23,104
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by HillRider
    That's funny. I use the next smaller number for my own bikes. A 700x23 is recommended by Cat-Eye at 210 cm and calculates at 209.8. I set my cyclometers at 209 because I want to be sure I've ridden at least the indicated distance.
    So if we rode side-by-side all day, by the end of the day I would have ridden farther and faster than you. Wimp!

  18. #18
    Roadmaster Snobbery Club bhtooefr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Newark, Ohio
    My Bikes
    2002 Dahon Boardwalk 1, 2011 TerraTrike Path 8
    Posts
    753
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Myself, I just used the cyclocomputer calibration chart that Sheldon Brown has. More accurate than certain owner's manuals. (My Schwinn cyclocomputer's manual listed 27 x 1 1/4 (32-630) as 2155 mm circumference, the same as 700x32C (32-622), when it was really 2161...)
    2011 TerraTrike Path 8
    2002 Dahon Boardwalk 1 (with 1976 F&S R 2110 2-speed kickback hub)

  19. #19
    Trans-Urban Velocommando ax0n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Lenexa, KS
    My Bikes
    06 Trek 1200 - 98 DB Outlook - 99 DB Sorrento
    Posts
    2,402
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    When the only person you're trying to beat is yourself, consistancy trumps accuracy any day. Just hop on your bike and enjoy it. Give yourself some goals of riding further and faster than the month or week before if you want, and you don't need to worry too much about it.

    If you want brutally honest accuracy, go get a Garmin Edge. Even GPS can be off by a bit but it'll probably be more accurate (although arguably less consistant) than a regular wheel-rotation-counting cyclometer.
    ax0n: Geeky and bikey
    My latest tip: Carrying your laptop
    My latest geeky project: Ethernet-testing cuff links

  20. #20
    Senior Member Winter76's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    The Peg
    Posts
    664
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bhtooefr
    Myself, I just used the cyclocomputer calibration chart that Sheldon Brown has. More accurate than certain owner's manuals. (My Schwinn cyclocomputer's manual listed 27 x 1 1/4 (32-630) as 2155 mm circumference, the same as 700x32C (32-622), when it was really 2161...)
    +1 for this, I used his chart to calibrate my schwinn wireless computer, worked great!
    3 years commuting while there's no snow on the ground. 20km round trip.
    Quote Originally Posted by madfiNch
    What's the point of a bike if you can only ride it on weekends, and you can't even carry anything with you?!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •