Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets HRM, GPS, MP3, HID. Whether it's got an acronym or not, here's where you'll find discussions on all sorts of tools, toys and gadgets.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-14-07, 12:09 AM   #1
DVC45
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
DVC45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 3,841
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Anyone tried the Schwinn and Bell Cyclocomputers?

Both are sold at Walmart for <$20. I'm just wondering if they are any good.
Anyone?
DVC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-07, 12:13 PM   #2
patrick07
Senior Member
 
patrick07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Michigan
Bikes: 2005 Specialized Langster, 2005 Giant TCR C3, 2006 Bianchi Castro Valley, 2007 Redline Monocog 29er, 2007 Trek 5000
Posts: 517
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
They are effective products for the price. I have one on my Langster that has been in use for over two years. My preference is for the model without the backlight and temperature features, however. YMMV
patrick07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-07, 01:34 PM   #3
Tom Stormcrowe
Out fishing with Annie on his lap, a cigar in one hand and a ginger ale in the other, watching the sunset.
 
Tom Stormcrowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Florida
Bikes: Techna Wheelchair and a Sun EZ 3 Recumbent Trike
Posts: 16,119
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I use the Schwinn,it works well for my purposes
__________________
. “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche

"We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant
Tom Stormcrowe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-07, 12:52 PM   #4
DVC45
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
DVC45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 3,841
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Thanks folks!
Which one do I get, the wired or wireless model?

Last edited by DVC45; 06-17-07 at 06:32 PM.
DVC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-07, 07:05 AM   #5
patrick07
Senior Member
 
patrick07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Michigan
Bikes: 2005 Specialized Langster, 2005 Giant TCR C3, 2006 Bianchi Castro Valley, 2007 Redline Monocog 29er, 2007 Trek 5000
Posts: 517
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
They offer a wireless version?! How much was that?

I bought the wired version for less than 10 bucks.
patrick07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-07, 11:20 AM   #6
half_bent
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Doylestown, Ohio
Bikes: Bacchetta Giro 20
Posts: 161
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have the Bell one. It works good except for having only one button I forget which setting it needs to be in to clear the current info and tend to reset the whole computer.
half_bent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-07, 12:11 PM   #7
DVC45
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
DVC45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 3,841
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by patrick07
They offer a wireless version?! How much was that?

I bought the wired version for less than 10 bucks.
yup, its made by Bell ($20). I got it last night. It works great.



Quote:
Originally Posted by half_bent
I have the Bell one. It works good except for having only one button I forget which setting it needs to be in to clear the current info and tend to reset the whole computer.
Is yours the wireless kind?
DVC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-07, 02:59 PM   #8
twobikes
Healthy and active
 
twobikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Caldwell, Idaho USA
Bikes: mid-60's Dunelt 10-speed, Specialized Allez Sport Tripple, Trek 7.2 FX
Posts: 887
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have two of the Schwinn computers (wired). I want to know my speed and distance. The average speed feature is nice, but not necessary. And, I like the clock. Sometimes duration of the ride is good to know. One is a year old. The other is six months old. Neither have needed a new battery yet. If I knew my cadence in real time I would only get depressed.
twobikes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-07, 03:03 AM   #9
Zero_Enigma
Senior Member
 
Zero_Enigma's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: North of the 49th Parallel (GPS grid soon)
Bikes: MTB Peugoet Canyon (forgot the model), Nikishi? roadbike, MTB custom build,
Posts: 1,767
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have a Shwinn wireless from Canadian Tire. Works well if you give it some space between your lights to avoid interference especially on the Bell Xeon/LED light when changing from high-low settings you'll add some phantom mileage.

I like the Swhinn model (I'll have to get the model number later) I have because you can manually adjust your KM/Miles odometer should you have to change a battery later. I always log my stats nightly so incase the bike computer is in my pocket while shopping and the buttons set pushed (happened to me before and it reset) and hold into place resetting the bike computer I can manually input my odometer mileage again for my own stats.

Edit: It has auto start/stop and power save which is very handy on saving power. However the auto start/stop only works IF you already have the unit on. Pressing any buttons turns the unit on.
Zero_Enigma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-07, 10:50 AM   #10
DVC45
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
DVC45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 3,841
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
UPDATE: I rode 24mi yeterday and the thing just quit working.

The magnet didn't move out of its position. The computer turns on and all buttons seems to work but it quit doing what its supposed to be doing. I'm returning it and try the wired one. If that turns out a POS also, Cateye Astral 8 it will be.
DVC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-07, 05:37 PM   #11
wrafl
Senior Member
 
wrafl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Western Burbs of Chicago
Bikes:
Posts: 945
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have a wireless that I bought before I went with the cable set up. The wireless does have limitations like the distance of the sensor to the unit and I worry also of the interference that are caused by other devices out there such as garage door opener signals, etc. I have more confidence with the wired model and in fact I need to add another computer just to see if the one I have now is accurate. I found out the other day when I have the computer and GPS mounted side by side, they did not agree on the total mileage I rode. GPS odometer showed 50 miles whereas the cycle computer showed I did 66 miles. Electrical interferance caused the disparity? Your thoughts please.
wrafl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-07, 10:51 PM   #12
Zero_Enigma
Senior Member
 
Zero_Enigma's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: North of the 49th Parallel (GPS grid soon)
Bikes: MTB Peugoet Canyon (forgot the model), Nikishi? roadbike, MTB custom build,
Posts: 1,767
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrafl
I have a wireless that I bought before I went with the cable set up. The wireless does have limitations like the distance of the sensor to the unit and I worry also of the interference that are caused by other devices out there such as garage door opener signals, etc. I have more confidence with the wired model and in fact I need to add another computer just to see if the one I have now is accurate. I found out the other day when I have the computer and GPS mounted side by side, they did not agree on the total mileage I rode. GPS odometer showed 50 miles whereas the cycle computer showed I did 66 miles. Electrical interferance caused the disparity? Your thoughts please.
If you use wireless and wave your GPS over it watch the phantom mileage roll FAST. Like 0-97 kph in 2 secs.
Zero_Enigma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-07, 06:48 AM   #13
Torgrot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lansing, IL
Bikes: Fuji Grand Fondo 2.0
Posts: 245
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Now why would a GPS which is a passive device and emits no electronic signal cause a wireless computer to count. I have had a Garmin mounted next to my VDO wireless in the past and I mean right next to each other with no interference from one to the other.

Now if you ride a rail trail and have a low price computer, there is some possibility that if you ride under or near high tension towers that the low price computer may show an erroneous speed.

torgrot
Torgrot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-07, 08:35 AM   #14
wrafl
Senior Member
 
wrafl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Western Burbs of Chicago
Bikes:
Posts: 945
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Torgrot
Now why would a GPS which is a passive device and emits no electronic signal cause a wireless computer to count. I have had a Garmin mounted next to my VDO wireless in the past and I mean right next to each other with no interference from one to the other.

Now if you ride a rail trail and have a low price computer, there is some possibility that if you ride under or near high tension towers that the low price computer may show an erroneous speed.

torgrot
You got it wrong. I am currently using the the wired computer and never really got a chance to install the wireless due to it's limitations on signal strength, (no more than 24" from the unit). I ride a folding bicycle and the distance from the handle bar to the fork where the sensor is mounted exceed the 24" limitation of the device. Instead of exchanging the wireless, I bought a wired computer for the folding bicycle and intend to use the wireless on my other bike. I am trying to find the disparity between the GPS and computer since I recorded 51 MPH as my top speed while the computer top speed was 25.9 and in addition to total miles recorded. I also ride the bike path parallel along power lines but any interference could not have caused the difference since the computer is wired. My other concern was that the GPS was probably not receiving signals when I go through streets that are lined with trees on each side. The total activity hours was the only area of measurement the GPS and computer agreed. And the GPS I have
is the Garmin Legend C which was actually for the boat that I thought I should compare by mounting on the bike to determine if the the unit correspond with their measurements or calibratred.
wrafl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-07, 07:10 AM   #15
Torgrot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lansing, IL
Bikes: Fuji Grand Fondo 2.0
Posts: 245
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I am not familiar with the Garmin Legend, I use the Edge 305. I have found with the Edge it is necessary to wait for a satellite lock before taking off. It has given me some quite odd readings as position can change significantly between while waiting for the lock. My Edge has always given me excellent reception under heavy forest canopy. I don't know how accurate or reliable a GPS built for use on a boat would be. There are some very different design principles between a bike GPS and a boat GPS. Trees being one of them.

As for the 24" limit on most wireless computers that is why I always recommend the newer VDO computers. They have a range of about 2 meters or 80". The batteries are cheap and both are the sender and reciever are the same.

torgrot
Torgrot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-07, 07:51 AM   #16
DieselDan
Senior Member
 
DieselDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Beaufort, South Carolina, USA and surrounding islands.
Bikes: Cannondale R500, Motobecane Messenger
Posts: 8,521
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have two "cheap" computers, a Schwinn and a Back Trails (Target brand). Both are identical and will work on either mount.
DieselDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-07, 08:25 PM   #17
StephenH
Uber Goober
 
StephenH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Dallas area, Texas
Bikes:
Posts: 11,325
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
I just bought the Schwinn version at Walmart a week or two ago- first one I've used. Works okay so far. The coil has to be adjusted to be the right distance from the magnet, which can take a try or two (adjustable by sliding up and down the fork/spoke).
StephenH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-07, 07:57 AM   #18
twobikes
Healthy and active
 
twobikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Caldwell, Idaho USA
Bikes: mid-60's Dunelt 10-speed, Specialized Allez Sport Tripple, Trek 7.2 FX
Posts: 887
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The Schwinn cyclometer is identical to an Ascent cyclometer. You can search the Internet and find a download site for the Ascent manual in PDF. I did that so I can find the manual more easily when I want to check something. Also, the numbers in the tables for setting the computer to your wheel size are simply the circumference of your wheel in millimeters. For more accuracy and less confusion, mark your tire and mark the sidewalk. Have someone watch while you roll the bike bearing your full weight and measure the length of sidewalk covered by one rotation of your tire. You may not get the same exact figure in the tables, but it will be an accurate setting for your wheels.
twobikes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-07, 09:41 PM   #19
Azndude51
Senior Member
 
Azndude51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Indiana
Bikes:
Posts: 153
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm using that $20 Bell wireless from Wal-mart. It works decently well, but seems pretty laggy when you accelerate or decelerate. I don't really like the round shape though, seems bulky. It's also pretty susceptible to interference (as with most wireless computers), for example when I'm stopped at a stop light, the computer usually goes crazy saying I'm going 40MPH because of the interference from the stop light sensors in the ground. Overall though, it's pretty decent if you're looking for a basic, cheap wireless computer. Oh and it has temperature too which is kinda nice.
Azndude51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-07, 11:11 PM   #20
DVC45
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
DVC45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 3,841
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
I'm really happy with my Schwinn wired version that I bought two more for my other bikes.
I might try the wireless cyclo computer versions again in 10 years. Hopefully by then, the glitches will be all ironed out.
DVC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-07, 02:27 AM   #21
bmclaughlin807
Crankenstein
 
bmclaughlin807's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Spokane
Bikes: Novara Randonee (TankerBelle)
Posts: 4,038
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I've used the wired versions of both the Schwinn and Bell computers from Walmart. Both worked acceptably well over several thousand miles of riding, and the Bell served me well during my brevet series last summer.

I don't want wireless on my bikes... too many chances for them to get messed up. Like the guy I was riding with who leaned his bike up against the outside of the convenience store where one of our checkpoints was located. He came out to get ready to leave and his wireless comp was showing 97 mph. Needless to say we went off of my computer for distances for a while.
__________________
"There is no greater wonder than the way the face and character of a woman fit so perfectly in a man's mind, and stay there, and he could never tell you why. It just seems it was the thing he most wanted." Robert Louis Stevenson
bmclaughlin807 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-07, 04:22 AM   #22
operator
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Posts: 28,306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVC45 View Post
Both are sold at Walmart for <$20. I'm just wondering if they are any good.
Anyone?
Why bother with them when you can get the MEC DB4L for much cheaper. Larger and more lines displayed.
operator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-07, 10:00 AM   #23
DVC45
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
DVC45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 3,841
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by operator View Post
Why bother with them when you can get the MEC DB4L for much cheaper. Larger and more lines displayed.
Link?
DVC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-07, 06:51 AM   #24
hy_tek
Apprentice Peddler
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Plainfield, Illinois
Bikes: Giant Nutra
Posts: 49
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by twobikes View Post
The Schwinn cyclometer is identical to an Ascent cyclometer. You can search the Internet and find a download site for the Ascent manual in PDF. I did that so I can find the manual more easily when I want to check something. Also, the numbers in the tables for setting the computer to your wheel size are simply the circumference of your wheel in millimeters. For more accuracy and less confusion, mark your tire and mark the sidewalk. Have someone watch while you roll the bike bearing your full weight and measure the length of sidewalk covered by one rotation of your tire. You may not get the same exact figure in the tables, but it will be an accurate setting for your wheels.
This is true and the Ascent is more than 2X the price of the 12 function Schwinn wired model. For $9.32 at Walmart how can you go wrong? If it fails after a year or 2 just toss it and buy another one. I realize that there are some who require advanced features but when the dust clears I think most riders only need a basic unit like the Schwinn. It just amazes me how much some of you gentleman are willing to spend on a cyclocomputer when they all do pretty much the same thing except for cadence. Then again I am a recreational rider and for my needs a basic unit like the Schwinn suffices. Who really cares if your computer measures distance in .001 mile increments in real world use?

Last edited by hy_tek; 10-01-07 at 01:56 PM.
hy_tek is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:39 PM.