Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets HRM, GPS, MP3, HID. Whether it's got an acronym or not, here's where you'll find discussions on all sorts of tools, toys and gadgets.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-03-07, 07:12 PM   #1
chtorr
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
chtorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Illinois
Bikes:
Posts: 75
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Dimmer lights with rechargable batteries?

Does the use of rechargable NiMh batteries cause some lights to be less bright compared to using alkaline or lithium batteries? I have read a couple comments like this including a customer review of the Princeton Tec Eos light, where he claimed a longer runtime with rechargables but reduced brightness.

Is this the case, and if so, why? I'm mainly referring to lights that use AA or AAA batteries.

Thanks!
chtorr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-07, 07:25 PM   #2
Jesper64
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 70
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It's my understanding that rechargeable batteries run at a lower voltage than alkaline batteries but have a longer run time. If the light that you are running is directly driven off the batteries then yes it would be dimmer. However, if your light has a voltage regulator (eg Fenix lights) the light will output a given voltage no matter what the input voltage is so they won't be any dimmer.
Jesper64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-07, 08:16 PM   #3
ViperZ
Baby it's cold outside...
 
ViperZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SK, Canada
Bikes: Trek 5000, Rocky Mountain Wedge, GT Karakoram K2, Litespeed Tuscany
Posts: 7,307
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesper64 View Post
It's my understanding that rechargeable batteries run at a lower voltage than alkaline batteries but have a longer run time. If the light that you are running is directly driven off the batteries then yes it would be dimmer. However, if your light has a voltage regulator (eg Fenix lights) the light will output a given voltage no matter what the input voltage is so they won't be any dimmer.
That's my understanding as well....
__________________
-Trek 5000* -Project Litespeed* -The Italian Job* -Rocky Wedge* -The Canadian Connection*
ViperZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-07, 08:50 PM   #4
znomit
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
 
znomit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Bikes: Giant Defy Composite,Trek 1.7c, Specy Hardrock, Nishiki SL1, Jamis Commuter
Posts: 3,309
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
A NiMH is 1.2v nominal vs 1.5v for an alkaline(ie thats whats written on the battery)
But as batteries are used the voltage drops. NiMH are actually delivering around 1.2v for most of their useful charge.

see here for some fancy graphs and stuff:
http://www.eznec.com/Amateur/1.5_vs_..._Batteries.pdf
znomit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-07, 09:18 PM   #5
ken cummings
Senior Member
 
ken cummings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: northern California
Bikes: Bruce Gordon BLT, Cannondale parts bike, Ecodyne recumbent trike, Counterpoint Opus 2, miyata 1000
Posts: 5,601
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
If the alkalines are wired in series to give 3.0, 4.5, 6.0 volts or whatever just divide the total alkaline voltage by 1.2 to get the number of NiMH batteries to get the same voltage. As in 3 common AA batteries giving 4.5 volts could be replaced by 4 NiMH batteries giving 4.8 volts. The slight over-voltage will improve light output with a slight loss of bulb life.
ken cummings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-07, 10:16 PM   #6
sv_ted
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 46
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
When I switched my LD1000 from alkaline to NiMH I noticed that the intensity was lower. Eventually, I put a regulator in my battery pack and now run from my 14.8v Li-Ion battery. This way I can set the voltage I want to run. In the case of the LD1000 I run 3.2v so it is always very bright.
sv_ted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-07, 11:43 PM   #7
znomit
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
 
znomit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Bikes: Giant Defy Composite,Trek 1.7c, Specy Hardrock, Nishiki SL1, Jamis Commuter
Posts: 3,309
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
That is correct... in general fresh alkalines will be brighter than NiMH rechargables. But the NiMH will keep their brightness and soon outshine alkalines. If your lights run for 30 hours, after 15hrs they will be brighter on NiMH (maybe after 5hrs even).
znomit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-07, 09:47 AM   #8
cyccommute 
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Bikes: Some silver ones, a black one, a red one, an orange one and a couple of titanium ones
Posts: 17,811
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 74 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by znomit View Post
That is correct... in general fresh alkalines will be brighter than NiMH rechargables. But the NiMH will keep their brightness and soon outshine alkalines. If your lights run for 30 hours, after 15hrs they will be brighter on NiMH (maybe after 5hrs even).
That's not the complete story however. Freshly charged NiMH will provide more consistent power for longer but not many of us use a light for 15 hours straight. That 15 hours might happen over 15 days. A rechargeable in an application like that is not the best choice because it will self discharge significantly over that 15 day period. They'll experience significant self-discharge in a few days.

Alkalines, on the other hand, have an insignificant self discharge. For applications such as taillights, where the demand cycle and current draw are fairly small, alkalines are a good choice. Most taillights have to be disassembled to access the batteries and that makes rechargeables inconvenient for that application. I put fresh alkalines in my taillights at the start of light season and seldom have use the battery up over the 6 months or so of usage...even when using them on steady mode.
__________________
Stuart Black
New! Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
New! Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Days of Wineless Roads. Bed and Breakfasting along the KATY
Twisting Down the Alley. Misadventures in tornado alley.
An Good Ol' Fashion Appalachian Butt Whoopin'.
cyccommute is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-07, 12:30 PM   #9
znomit
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
 
znomit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Bikes: Giant Defy Composite,Trek 1.7c, Specy Hardrock, Nishiki SL1, Jamis Commuter
Posts: 3,309
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
That was true until sanyo developed the eneloops. NiMH with very low self discharge.
znomit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-07, 05:39 PM   #10
cyccommute 
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Bikes: Some silver ones, a black one, a red one, an orange one and a couple of titanium ones
Posts: 17,811
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 74 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by znomit View Post
That was true until sanyo developed the eneloops. NiMH with very low self discharge.
The Eneloop looks interesting but the cost factor would be somewhat high. From what I have seen and the number of lights I run, it would be rather cost prohibitive to make the switch. I use around 5 taillights on my bike using a mixture of AA and AAA batteries. At $10 per 4 pack for , that's going to be 3 packs...1 AAA and 2AA...and a charger (another $30) or around $70 outlay. Plus I have 4 bikes with rear lights on them that I leave on so that's another 2 packs of AA. Total outlay for 24 batteries (I'd actually have to buy more then I need) would be around $90. A 4 pack of alkaline AA from Radio Shack cost me $4 and replacing the batteries once a year would cost me $24...even less if I buy a larger pack of 40. It'd take 4 years for me to break even on the rechargeables. Hardly worth the investment.

I may look into them for my cameras however.
__________________
Stuart Black
New! Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
New! Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Days of Wineless Roads. Bed and Breakfasting along the KATY
Twisting Down the Alley. Misadventures in tornado alley.
An Good Ol' Fashion Appalachian Butt Whoopin'.
cyccommute is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-07, 08:44 PM   #11
znomit
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
 
znomit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Bikes: Giant Defy Composite,Trek 1.7c, Specy Hardrock, Nishiki SL1, Jamis Commuter
Posts: 3,309
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Im running 24 AAs(two front LED systems using 12AAs each, road and MTB) and 6AAAs for blinkies. Cost a fortune. Got half of them just before the eneloops arrived in NZ. Damn.

Anyhooo...
Have setup my el600 cateye blinkies in the shed, one with new energiser alkalines and the other with NiMH. Camera taking a picture every hour so should have a good comparison to post tomorrow. Interestingly the NiMH was initially brighter(maybe because it was fresh off the charger?).
znomit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-07, 08:59 AM   #12
chtorr
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
chtorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Illinois
Bikes:
Posts: 75
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I can't wait to see the results of your test.

I have started buying the Rayovac Hybrid rechargables which are also slow to self-discharge (or so they claim).
chtorr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-07, 05:37 PM   #13
znomit
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
 
znomit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Bikes: Giant Defy Composite,Trek 1.7c, Specy Hardrock, Nishiki SL1, Jamis Commuter
Posts: 3,309
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
OK, a day later.
The AAA Alkalines are going strong still ... the NiMH are pretty much dead. Im surprised.
Unfortunately I set camera to take 1 photo per minute instead of per hour so no pretty pictures to post. Damn.
znomit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-07, 02:59 AM   #14
Jesper64
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 70
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
An alternative to the Eneloops that are a decent amount cheaper are GP ReCyko. They come recommended from Dan's Data which is a pretty reliable site. They can be found on Ebay amongst other places.
Jesper64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:01 PM.