Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets HRM, GPS, MP3, HID. Whether it's got an acronym or not, here's where you'll find discussions on all sorts of tools, toys and gadgets.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-29-08, 07:27 AM   #1
Fasto
Elder
Thread Starter
 
Fasto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South FLorida
Bikes: 09 Langster
Posts: 102
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
A wrist watch with heart rate AND calories burned?

Is this possible? Am I Crazy? I'm starting to think it would be hard for a watch to know how many calories you're burning on a bicycle... I mean, I don't think step counters work for distance traveled on bikes... Has anyone researched this? It would be nice to know how much I'm burning and my heartrate on the same screen... If this doesn't exist does anyone know of anything else similar? maybe not in wrist watch form, something on the handlebars? I guess I'm more concerned with getting a good estimate of the calories I've burned, I've seen threads on this matter but it's all heresey.. 40 calories/hour is standard? whose standard? at what speed? I'd rather rely on technology than what grandma says has worked for her... thanks.
Fasto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-08, 09:30 AM   #2
HuffyMan
Senior Member
 
HuffyMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Lakeside Resort in Central KY
Bikes:
Posts: 129
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I've got a polar F6 and it has the data that you need. It might also be available in some of the cheaper models by Polar but I liked the reviews on this one. The calorie count is about 30% lower than on gym machines where you enter the same data: age, weight, etc.
I tend to believe this one a little more as 1,000 kcal/hr on an elliptical machine seems a bit high. The polar comes in at about 700 or so for the same workout. The only real way to know is to get a much more accurate lab test.
I use the calories burned vs my intake and chart it against weight loss and the results show a fair amount of accuracy. Some people actually vary the weight input to show less calories burned for a given workout so you can "tune" the watch that way.
HuffyMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-08, 01:38 PM   #3
Fasto
Elder
Thread Starter
 
Fasto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South FLorida
Bikes: 09 Langster
Posts: 102
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
wow awesome, I really appreciate it
Fasto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-08, 11:47 PM   #4
bwunger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kent, WA
Bikes: '07 Specialized Tarmac Pro
Posts: 315
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have a Suunto T3 and it shows both calories burned and heart rate also. I thought most HR monitors had this feature?
bwunger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-08, 06:02 PM   #5
operator
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Posts: 28,306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Calories burned is a completely and utterly useless feature. No simple watch can tell you how many calories you're burning.
operator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-08, 07:56 AM   #6
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Bikes: Wilier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Co-Motion Robusta; Schwinn Paramount; Motobecane Phantom Cross; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Calfee Dragonfly Tandem
Posts: 29,133
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
In my experience calories burned calculations on HRMs are highly inaccurate. My Sigma HRM always read substantially higher than my Powertap, often approaching 100% high.

While there is some margin of error in Powertap data, given the varience in efficiency of converting calories to KJ of energy, it's accurate with about 5%.

The huge varience between Powertap data, and HRMS tells me the HRM data is so far off as be basically worthless.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-08, 09:43 AM   #7
JMRobertson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Morro Bay, CA
Bikes:
Posts: 346
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Calories burned is simply someone's best guess based on the available data. Since the variables are way too hard to quantify specifically, all you're getting is an approximation. It's not that the data is useless... it's just that the actual number is only a vague description of the calories burned. You should never compare the results of different machines to think that one is more accurate or a better form of excercise.
JMRobertson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-08, 09:52 AM   #8
Fasto
Elder
Thread Starter
 
Fasto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South FLorida
Bikes: 09 Langster
Posts: 102
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
What is the calories burned formula? is it distance multiplied by heart-rate over time? Maybe I don't even need a watch to tell me this if it's something I can just compute quickly to get a ball park estimate
Fasto is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:11 PM.