two e6's or 1 e3?
11-04-08, 12:23 AM
#1
1 Corinthians 9 V 24-27.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 28
Bikes: Dean Titanium, Mercian Audax
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
two e6's or 1 e3?
Hi all,
Just after some opinions. I currently have been using for the last few years 2 Xe6's whilst doing long distance audax rides. Because i live in Australia the new supernova e3 can't be obtained here, nor has anyone seen one operate. Apart from pictures i have seen on the net, in comparison to using my current setup 2 x e6, would a single e3 be much of an improvement in areas such as beam distance, clarity etc?
Cheers, Scott..
Just after some opinions. I currently have been using for the last few years 2 Xe6's whilst doing long distance audax rides. Because i live in Australia the new supernova e3 can't be obtained here, nor has anyone seen one operate. Apart from pictures i have seen on the net, in comparison to using my current setup 2 x e6, would a single e3 be much of an improvement in areas such as beam distance, clarity etc?
Cheers, Scott..
11-04-08, 12:50 AM
#2
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,624
Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 722 Times
in
366 Posts
See beamshots here.
E3 looks like a huge improvement.
E3 looks like a huge improvement.
