computer with HRM and wired cadence and speed
05-03-09, 03:28 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 2,324
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
computer with HRM and wired cadence and speed
Hi,
Am looking for a decent cycle computer which has wired cadence and speed and also has a HRM. It needs to be able to have settings for 2 bikes and I need to be able to buy extra mounts for it.
I found the cateye strada which has everything but HRM. Is it time to look for a separate HRM unit - if so any cheap recommendations?
Thanks
Daven
Am looking for a decent cycle computer which has wired cadence and speed and also has a HRM. It needs to be able to have settings for 2 bikes and I need to be able to buy extra mounts for it.
I found the cateye strada which has everything but HRM. Is it time to look for a separate HRM unit - if so any cheap recommendations?
Thanks
Daven
05-14-09, 02:56 PM
#2
Cycling Scientist
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Why does it have to be wired? I have used the Cateye v3 wireless (HRM, cadence, speed, etc.) for over a year now.
05-14-09, 03:14 PM
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 2,324
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
1) I don't want to have to deal with lots of batteries
2) My last wireless one broke because the sensor slipped down the fork and got battered by my spokes!
3) Wired ones have always worked for me
4) I want 2 bike mounts and wired ones are generally cheaper
I found the cateye strada which should be fine, and I guess a separate HRM unit will be cheap enough to justify.
2) My last wireless one broke because the sensor slipped down the fork and got battered by my spokes!
3) Wired ones have always worked for me
4) I want 2 bike mounts and wired ones are generally cheaper
I found the cateye strada which should be fine, and I guess a separate HRM unit will be cheap enough to justify.
