Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    __________ seeker333's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,690
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    warning for vetta tsl-c owners

    Don't install your batteries backwards.

    I accidentally reverse-polarized mine the other day. That night I discovered the light's battery holder body melted/distorted. Unable to remove batteries due to distortion. The heat generated even left a faint dimple in my SKS fender that the light rested upon.

    I had to saw it in half and beat it apart with hammer for the autopsy.

    Batteries installed backwards. No other apparent clues to failure.

    I had done this before but had discovered it right away as I was heading out for ride and had to turn light on. In this final case, I installed batteries (backwards) and came back to ride hours later, damage already done by then.

    IMO these things should have RP protection in the control circuit. Can't cost much, and it's not that hard to throw batteries into these holders backwards.

  2. #2
    Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk znomit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    My Bikes
    Giant Defy Composite,Trek 1.7c, Specy Hardrock, Nishiki SL1, Jamis Commuter
    Posts
    2,883
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by seeker333 View Post
    IMO these things should have RP protection in the control circuit. Can't cost much, and it's not that hard to throw batteries into these holders backwards.
    Yeah, thats pretty poor design.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    22
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    On sale at Amazon for $34.99.

  4. #4
    __________ seeker333's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,690
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Vetta sells them directly for less. Got mine for $25+5 s/h, on "sale".

    http://www.vetta.com/product_show.asp?ptype=whole&id=60

    The run-times are actually much shorter than claimed, btw.

    I think I know why they're on sale now.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •