Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Sterling, VA
    My Bikes
    Specialized and Trek bikes for now...
    Posts
    37
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Garmin Edge 500 Calories Burned Accuracy...

    Just wondering, how accurate (or as accurate can be) is the calories burned feature on the Garmin Edge 500? I just got it and went for a two hour ride. It said that I burned a total of 1241 calories.

    This was mainly on some relatively flat roads, so not a lot of effort for this first time use. So is it pretty safe to say that I lost about that much (give or take a few cals)?

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    42
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Depending on your weight that might be accurate.

    For my weight, cycling for an hour at 14-16 mph i burn about 1200 calories (using a bodybugg)

    this calculator is the most accurate one i have used.

    http://www.healthstatus.com/calculate/cbc

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Sterling, VA
    My Bikes
    Specialized and Trek bikes for now...
    Posts
    37
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by SpoonyGSR View Post
    Depending on your weight that might be accurate.

    For my weight, cycling for an hour at 14-16 mph i burn about 1200 calories (using a bodybugg)

    this calculator is the most accurate one i have used.

    http://www.healthstatus.com/calculate/cbc
    Oh wow! Thanks! According to that site, the Garmin is pretty accurate! Sweet deal!

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    42
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yea.. I take it that the garmin has the chest strap, so it is constantly taking your heart rate into calories burned.. and im sure the software that you set up, had you put in your weight and some other info.. its probably not 100 percent accurate (nothing really is), however, it will get your within 95 percent.

  5. #5
    Senior Member socalrider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Upland, CA
    My Bikes
    Litespeed Liege, Motorola Team Issue Eddy Mercxk, Surly Crosscheck Cyclocross bike, Fisher Supercaliber Mtn. Bike
    Posts
    5,002
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I found the Garmins to run high when compared to my Polar, about 10% off..

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Orange County - SoCal
    My Bikes
    2011 Cannondale CAAD10
    Posts
    1,467
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Nowhere near close....

    Unfortunately all of the numbers above are horribly innaccurate. The only real way to determine calories burned is with a power meter. After talking with some friends about the numbers their power meters were showing here is the closest website that worked for me:

    http://bikecalculator.com/wattsUS.html

    This comes out VERY close to power meter readings.

    My results from yesterday? I'm 195 pounds and rode for close to four hours, tons of climbing and high-speed intervals on the flats and I burned 1013 calories.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    10,390
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Does the Garmin calorie counter use the HR or elevation data that the Edge is monitoring? I have a Garmin Edge 305 that has a terrible calorie counter. Simple formulas like 40 calories/mile are much more accurate.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •