Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Hills! speedlever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Rolling hills of Piedmont NC
    My Bikes
    2008 Trek Madone 5.5, 2006 Trek Pilot 5.2 (deceased), 2005 Marin Novato, Trek 7100, Schwinn Frontier, Trek 800 sport, Trek 220, Trek MT 60
    Posts
    874
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Mapping sites and ride data

    I posted the msg below over at the Garmin forums, but figured I'd get a wider response here at bikeforums.net
    ***************************

    I have an Edge 305 (2 years old).

    I upload my data to GTC, Garmin Connect, and SportTracks.

    I have always had issues determining (with any degree of accuracy) what sort of climbing data I experience and is being reported.

    Here's an example of a ride I did yesterday: 63 miles.

    GTC reports 2789 total ascent.
    Garmin Connect reports 3234 elevation gain
    Bikeroutetoaster reports 1430 ft ascent
    RidewithGPS reports 2638 ft elevation.

    Of course, SportTracks reports different values depending on the amount of data smoothing applied, so I left that out.

    I'm not sure why I keep bashing my head against the wall on the elevation issue, except that maybe I hope that by doing the same thing over and over, I'll get a different result one day.

    Have you guys found any particular mapping program to report reliable elevation for the route? My numbers above are ridiculous.

    Edit:

    I mapped the same ride on the following sites:
    MayMyRide: 1132 ascent
    Veloroutes: no elevation data that I could find
    bikely: no elevation data
    GPSies: 1988 ft
    bikemap.net: no elevation

    Training Peaks: 4593 elevation gain

    More data... just all over the place.
    Last edited by speedlever; 06-07-10 at 09:42 AM. Reason: mapped same ride on more sites

  2. #2
    Some guy with a bike serra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    California
    Posts
    276
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That's very odd, I guess I can't rely on elevation tracking either...This and this agree, and this is 10% off (100 feet difference over 1000 feet). I think I'll stick with mapmyride since I've already used it a bit. I just mapped the same route with bikeroutetoaster and it agrees with the first two, so me thinks those three are the most accurate.

  3. #3
    Senior Member dorkypants's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    390
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's not a simple matter to know what the "right" number is. This Excel table http://www.caltriplecrown.com/ClimbingDoubles.xls of altitude gain readings from California double centuries over many years from many cyclists using a wide variety of devices shows just how much variability there is in raw readings from barometric altimeters, let alone how GPS mapping algorithms decide how big/small an increase must be to qualify as a sufficient change to incorporate into the total gain.

  4. #4
    Hills! speedlever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Rolling hills of Piedmont NC
    My Bikes
    2008 Trek Madone 5.5, 2006 Trek Pilot 5.2 (deceased), 2005 Marin Novato, Trek 7100, Schwinn Frontier, Trek 800 sport, Trek 220, Trek MT 60
    Posts
    874
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    When I have a few spare minutes, I'll map that same ride into some other mapping sites and update the original post with the results.

  5. #5
    ...into the blue...
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    My Bikes
    Thorn Nomad 2, LHT, Jamis Quest, ....
    Posts
    436
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have a VDO 1.0+ computer, does altitude by pressure changes. It's usually within 10% on the same ride repeated.

    bikeroutetoaster gives me readings very near the VDO.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •