Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets HRM, GPS, MP3, HID. Whether it's got an acronym or not, here's where you'll find discussions on all sorts of tools, toys and gadgets.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-17-10, 09:42 AM   #1
ARider2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 263
Garmin 500/800 in the woods

Has anyone used a Garmin 500 (or 800) in the woods? Is there any problem with GPS reception in a wooded area, or does it work well enough?
ARider2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-10, 11:28 AM   #2
NoRacer
Isaias
 
NoRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Essex, MD
Bikes: Ridley X-Fire (carbon, white)
Posts: 5,178
I think I've noticed some flakiness under tree covered trails with my Garmin 500 for realtime speed measurement. It prompted me to start using a ANT+ wheel sensor and magnet. Now, the readings seem more consistent. But, average speed on the 500 is probably just a function of time and distance.
NoRacer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-10, 04:16 PM   #3
ARider2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 263
Thanks NoRacer. Have you used the 500 to map your off-road adventures? That was what I was thinking of doing with it, but I was wondering if I would be able to do it in tree covered areas in the woods.
ARider2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-10, 04:17 PM   #4
CCrew
Older than dirt
 
CCrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Winchester, VA
Bikes: Too darn many.. latest count is 11
Posts: 5,343
500 for me was affected by woods, and hi-ten power lines. Oddly enough that in the same daily commute my 305 never had an issue. Ultimately returned the 500 and went back to using my 305.


Although the 500 did make me look like a beast..when it would toggle from GPS to the wheel sensor it whacked the top speed readings every time. My best top speed was 2,407mph
CCrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-10, 06:02 PM   #5
ARider2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 263
Haha, that's pretty good, 2,407mph
ARider2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-10, 06:16 AM   #6
NoRacer
Isaias
 
NoRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Essex, MD
Bikes: Ridley X-Fire (carbon, white)
Posts: 5,178
Quote:
Originally Posted by ARider2 View Post
Thanks NoRacer. Have you used the 500 to map your off-road adventures? That was what I was thinking of doing with it, but I was wondering if I would be able to do it in tree covered areas in the woods.
It still gets the position fairly well, it's just that the calculated speed seemed off compared to my perceived effort.

"Fairly well" is subjective. I've seen tracks that my Garmin recorded where echoes from buildings while in the city made it look like I rode through buildings. You can experience the same thing in the woods or in landscape where signal reflections can occur (i.e., surrounded by rock faces).
NoRacer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-11, 10:31 AM   #7
Watchdog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Burnaby
Bikes: Rocky Mountain Blizzard, Haro Roscoe (sold), Giant TCX Rabobank, Cervelo RS
Posts: 152
Quote:
Originally Posted by CCrew View Post
500 for me was affected by woods, and hi-ten power lines. Oddly enough that in the same daily commute my 305 never had an issue. Ultimately returned the 500 and went back to using my 305.


Although the 500 did make me look like a beast..when it would toggle from GPS to the wheel sensor it whacked the top speed readings every time. My best top speed was 2,407mph
Pretty hilarious, but I'm wondering when you downloaded the data into the Garmin software did that screw up your data or was it just for a brief moment and the software had a way of averaging out your speed so the data was ok.
Watchdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-11, 05:29 PM   #8
dwilbur3
Freewheelin' Fred
 
dwilbur3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sacramento
Bikes: Surly Cross Check
Posts: 742
I know it's not the same item, but my Garmin 305 does terrible in trees or around tall buildings.
dwilbur3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-11, 06:10 PM   #9
chasmm 
Senior Member
 
chasmm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Bikes: '85 Rossin Super Record, '88 Specialized Sequoia, '10 Raleigh Cadent FT2, '10 Specialized Roubaix Elite
Posts: 1,598
From what I understand both the 500 (which I have) and the 800 use "smart" recording intervals if you do not have a power meter. This can be pretty evident if you ride a trail that does a lot of zig-zags. When you upload your ride, the Garmin software will attempt to display the trail using these breadcrumbs and if there was too long a gap, it will just end up drawing a straight line between the recorded points.
__________________

Make a donation or just check out my blog. Every little bit counts!
http://main.diabetes.org/goto/charlesmmorgan
chasmm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-11, 06:55 PM   #10
Phil85207
Century bound
 
Phil85207's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Mesa Arizona
Bikes: Felt AR4 and Cannondale hybrid
Posts: 2,253
Interesting.
Phil85207 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-11, 03:48 AM   #11
CCrew
Older than dirt
 
CCrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Winchester, VA
Bikes: Too darn many.. latest count is 11
Posts: 5,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by Watchdog View Post
Pretty hilarious, but I'm wondering when you downloaded the data into the Garmin software did that screw up your data or was it just for a brief moment and the software had a way of averaging out your speed so the data was ok.
It was a really odd ride. We were geocaching by bike, so we were doing a lot of stopping and I think the GPS just got really, really confused. That and where we were was a rail trail with a lot of high rock walls on either side.

Or I'm really a beast and went that fast...... naaaaaaa
CCrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-11, 07:54 AM   #12
hammond9705
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 1,416
If you do a lot of riding in the woods, you will probably want a speed/cadence sensor to get more accurate speed and distance reporting. You can get it pretty cheap on Amazon.
hammond9705 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-11, 09:26 AM   #13
Watchdog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Burnaby
Bikes: Rocky Mountain Blizzard, Haro Roscoe (sold), Giant TCX Rabobank, Cervelo RS
Posts: 152
I bought a Garmin 500 last week with the speed/cadence sensor.

When I first started using it on my trainer, it appear the speed sensor was not working and giving really odd/inconsistent readings. I'd look down and one second it says my cadence is near zero and I'm going 5 km/hr, then I look down 2 seconds later and I'm going 30 km/hr and a normal cadence.

This persisted for the first 20 min and then it appears to have worked properly since. Is that normal?
Watchdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-11, 03:22 PM   #14
sjvcycler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 329
I hope you all know its more than just tree canopy. If you can't see the horizon you will not get many satellites. If you are in a deep v shaped valley you won't get many. Its much more than tree cover. I've used 10K+ GPS equipment in the forest to do work for the USFS and we still had to move to a good point and offset back to the point we were trying to get. Don't expect to get great GPS in any forest that has dense tree cover..
sjvcycler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-11, 06:23 AM   #15
JimF22003
Senior Member
 
JimF22003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Northern VA
Bikes: 2008 Trek Madone 5.5, 2009 Cervelo R3SL tdf edition, Cervelo R5 with Di2
Posts: 2,654
I have a 705. I rarely lose the satellites despite riding in lots of tree cover. However I've lost it occasionally in some very puzzling locations, like a spot or two on Skyline Drive in Shenandoah NP. I was riding on the side of the mountain. I guess it was the time of day and the location of the satellites relative to the mountainside. When I reviewed the data later it looked like I took a shortcut that took me off the road and right over the top of the mountain
JimF22003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-11, 07:51 AM   #16
ARider2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 263
Based on some responses, it seems like some riders GPS units work OK even under fairly thick tree cover.
ARider2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-11, 02:56 AM   #17
Buckeye Jim
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Central North Carolina
Bikes: Motobecane Ti
Posts: 59
Ordered my 800 Monday should be Wedensday. Hope its worth it.
Buckeye Jim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-11, 10:07 AM   #18
Looigi
Senior Member
 
Looigi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 8,943
Check out the Garmin Forums. There's a lot of good info there and many helpful experienced users.

https://forums.garmin.com/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Looigi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-11, 05:18 PM   #19
sjvcycler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 329
so far so good for my new edge 500
sjvcycler is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:13 PM.