Garmin 500
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 947
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 286 Post(s)
Liked 261 Times
in
129 Posts
Garmin 500
Am I correct that when using this computer on the road you do NOT need the speed/cadance sensor to track speed (because this is monitored via GPS)?
If I were to use this computer on the trainer indoors, I assume the speed sensor would be needed if I wanted to track speed.
Thanks.
If I were to use this computer on the trainer indoors, I assume the speed sensor would be needed if I wanted to track speed.
Thanks.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 382
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Use a sensor. You don't NEED it to track speed when outdoors, but the GPS-only calculations are not nearly as accurate compared to when you use the sensor. The sensor is necessary if you are using a trainer or rollers to give you some speed-like measurements.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,712
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Am I correct that when using this computer on the road you do NOT need the speed/cadance sensor to track speed (because this is monitored via GPS)?
If I were to use this computer on the trainer indoors, I assume the speed sensor would be needed if I wanted to track speed.
Thanks.
If I were to use this computer on the trainer indoors, I assume the speed sensor would be needed if I wanted to track speed.
Thanks.
I would think a cadence sensor would be much more useful for indoor riding since you aren't actually going anywhere and a good workout is the goal.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
12 Posts
Here's a relevant article in the New York Times that talks about running with GPS. Basically, at slow speeds and over tortuous routes, GPS errors add up to reduce the accuracy. Can't use a wheel sensor running, but you can on a bike.
https://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/20/he...EXCITE&ei=5043
https://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/20/he...EXCITE&ei=5043
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,712
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The foundation of the article is mis-directed at best. It concentrates on how the GPS is "wrong" and that differenct GPS units are "wrong" to different extents. In fact, what is happening, and which is briefly mentioned, is that the GPS is being used in a wrong way. GPS navigation is extremely accurate and is used in aviation, shipping, military guidance, surveying, etc. But, like all tools must be used correctly. By the way Google Maps is not a suitable reference if a person wants To The Foot accuracy.
In that regard instead of following the time honored Forum practice of arguing the point I suggest that if you are really interested spend some time researching in the areas I mentioned. There is a wealth of material available.
In the end I'll bet you come to the conclusion that for cycling speed and location the 500 gives perfectly adequate data.
People don't tend to criticize wheel speed sensor accuracy because it is seldom evaluated. But, once through the setup and you'll see it has its' own problems.
Me? I've found that over the typical 30-60 mile routes I ride there is an insignificant difference between my 705 GPS input reading and the reading from the wheel speed sensor input.
In that regard instead of following the time honored Forum practice of arguing the point I suggest that if you are really interested spend some time researching in the areas I mentioned. There is a wealth of material available.
In the end I'll bet you come to the conclusion that for cycling speed and location the 500 gives perfectly adequate data.
People don't tend to criticize wheel speed sensor accuracy because it is seldom evaluated. But, once through the setup and you'll see it has its' own problems.
Me? I've found that over the typical 30-60 mile routes I ride there is an insignificant difference between my 705 GPS input reading and the reading from the wheel speed sensor input.
Last edited by ModeratedUser150120149; 12-22-11 at 03:00 PM.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 325
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Here is how gps works. Taken from a website: A GPS receiver's job is to locate four or more of these satellites, figure out the distanc*e to each, and use this information to deduce its own location. This operation is based on a simple mathematical principle called trilateration. So if you drop or have bad signal you suffer erros in data. So just do what Looigi says and supplement with sensors. If you don't care that much don't put the sensors on. I ride with a buddy who never put the sensors on his bike.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 2,654
Bikes: 2008 Trek Madone 5.5, 2009 Cervelo R3SL tdf edition, Cervelo R5 with Di2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I never bother with the wheel sensor. GPS is plenty good enough for me. It's easier to swap the unit to different bikes, or swap different wheels on the bike without having to mess around with wheel sensors.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,712
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Me too. Once I realized just how little difference there was as related to a recreational rider I stopped worrying about the sensor. If it is a recreational ride GPS is plenty good. If it is training it still is plenty accurate. If it is a competition the course should be surveyed with something more precise than either the GPS or the speed sensor that has its' own inaccuracies.
But, I can remember those bad old days when I, too, got all twisted around the axle with pseudo precision and tracking everything to the knats behind. Then I realized what I was doing was akin to the carpenter who measured with a micrometer, marked with a crayon and cut with an axe.
But, I can remember those bad old days when I, too, got all twisted around the axle with pseudo precision and tracking everything to the knats behind. Then I realized what I was doing was akin to the carpenter who measured with a micrometer, marked with a crayon and cut with an axe.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: GTA, Canada
Posts: 313
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Am I correct that when using this computer on the road you do NOT need the speed/cadance sensor to track speed (because this is monitored via GPS)?
If I were to use this computer on the trainer indoors, I assume the speed sensor would be needed if I wanted to track speed.
Thanks.
If I were to use this computer on the trainer indoors, I assume the speed sensor would be needed if I wanted to track speed.
Thanks.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
damo78
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
3
02-11-19 11:33 PM
ssmorol
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
5
08-13-17 05:59 PM
woodcycl
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
4
04-04-10 01:30 PM