Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets HRM, GPS, MP3, HID. Whether it's got an acronym or not, here's where you'll find discussions on all sorts of tools, toys and gadgets.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-08-14, 07:13 PM   #51
rscamp
Senior Member
 
rscamp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Bikes:
Posts: 251
What is the efficiency of the system in generating electrical power supplied to the light?
rscamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-14, 08:35 PM   #52
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Bikes:
Posts: 12,229
If you find out, tell us.
Road Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-14, 08:37 PM   #53
rscamp
Senior Member
 
rscamp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Bikes:
Posts: 251
The 800 pound gorilla...
rscamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-14, 08:39 PM   #54
zacster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brooklyn NY
Bikes:
Posts: 4,953
Quote:
Originally Posted by Road Fan View Post
I agree that it is an amazing invention. Spoke current is an interesting thought, that there is an electric circuit that involves the spokes. So a potential is created, current flows through the spokes, fork blade, brake caliper, and the body of the Magnic. In order to close the circuit across the gap between the Magnic and the rim, the current would have to be an AC current, not a DC current.

I don't know if I agree, but it's an interesting hypothesis, not implausible. It could easily be tested by making sure the mount of the Magnic is not conductive. If it isn't conductive, current cannot flow and the light won't work. If the mount is already non-conductive and the light does work, then Unter's spoke circuit hypothesis would be disproven. There is a plastic element in the mounting system, the little snap-bracket that looks like the one that holds a Planet Bike taillight to a seat stay bracket. If anyone with a Magnic can measure the resistance (with an ohmmeter or DMM with this function) from the Magnic to the hub, we could test this hypothesis.

Another hypothesis is that the passage of the rim through the magnetic field creates a potential along the rim, spanning the width of the assembly of magnets. A current should then be present in the rim, circulating through its circumference and spokes. Impedance of the spokes should be a lot higher than that of the rim, so rim current should be the dominant effect. But unless that current is AC and the magnet and windings serve as a sort of gapped transformer sensing the current in the rim, I don't see how energy represented by rim current is transferred to the Magnic, to power a small dynamo that actually runs the LEDs.
No, you have it completely wrong. The spokes have nothing to do with it, there is no complete circuit through the spokes or frame. The rim does NOT hold a current generated by magnets. It is entirely the other way around. The rim generates eddy currents, all moving conductors do, and the magnets in the light unit spin with the spinning rim because of it. These magnets then drive the dynamo inside the light itself. The entire circuit is inside the light unit. You can hold it in your hand next to a spinning rim and it will work without touching anything else. It is totally self-contained. The beauty of this thing is that he was able to harness the power from something that most people didn't know exists.

Magnic is a play on magnet and magic.
zacster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-14, 08:47 PM   #55
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Bikes:
Posts: 12,229
I f I could tell you something concrete, I would be!
Road Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-14, 08:58 PM   #56
zacster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brooklyn NY
Bikes:
Posts: 4,953
So I just put more of my money into this. I signed up for another rear light on Kickstarter. It really was a really cool light. Maybe I'll again be the only BF'er that has one, unless someone else bought into it.
zacster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-14, 11:10 PM   #57
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Bikes:
Posts: 12,229
Quote:
Originally Posted by zacster View Post
No, you have it completely wrong. The spokes have nothing to do with it, there is no complete circuit through the spokes or frame. The rim does NOT hold a current generated by magnets. It is entirely the other way around. The rim generates eddy currents, all moving conductors do, and the magnets in the light unit spin with the spinning rim because of it. These magnets then drive the dynamo inside the light itself. The entire circuit is inside the light unit. You can hold it in your hand next to a spinning rim and it will work without touching anything else. It is totally self-contained. The beauty of this thing is that he was able to harness the power from something that most people didn't know exists.

Magnic is a play on magnet and magic.
Fine, so the first hypothesis is wrong, because your test with the lamp hand-held disproves it. Good, that's progress.

If you know something concrete and detailed about how it works, please share. I think we'd all like to know something concrete about this. It's not enough to say "it's eddy currents." Of course it's eddy currents. The question is, what about the rest of it? And from a product point of view, how good is it really?

I did not state the hypotheses are correct. Hypotheses are expected to be wrong. Only a few will ever be correct. Scientific method is to propose them and test them to weed out explanations that do not describe reality, like Sherlock Holmes. You've helped me do that, thank you.

Please explain in detail how the Magnic works. I'm especially curious about the electromagnetics. How can the energy transfer be efficient compared to a hub dynamo when the primary magnetic system, unlike both hubs and bottles is based on a solenoidal geometry and hence has huge leakage fluxes? Air core magnetics are not used for reliable, efficient power systems for this reason - flux linkage is usually quite poor compared to using cores to direct the flux.
Road Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-14, 11:11 PM   #58
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Bikes:
Posts: 12,229
Quote:
Originally Posted by rscamp View Post
The 800 pound gorilla...
Yes, that question IS the 800 # gorilla!
Road Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-14, 01:07 AM   #59
JonnyHK 
Senior Member
 
JonnyHK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: London
Bikes: Baum Romano, Colossi xCr, Homemade Bamboo!
Posts: 2,225
Quote:
Originally Posted by Road Fan View Post
Please explain in detail how the Magnic works.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddy_current

And watch the video on the Magnic website.


It works. Don't ask us to explain it - because unless anyone here is a high school physics teacher I don't think we could.
JonnyHK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-14, 07:22 AM   #60
zacster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brooklyn NY
Bikes:
Posts: 4,953
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/...ess-bicycle-dy

Just watch the video. It shows how it is assembled, plus the critical part of how the magnets pick up the eddy current.
zacster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-14, 08:56 AM   #61
wphamilton
rugged individualist
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Posts: 9,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by Road Fan View Post
...

Please explain in detail how the Magnic works. I'm especially curious about the electromagnetics. How can the energy transfer be efficient compared to a hub dynamo when the primary magnetic system, unlike both hubs and bottles is based on a solenoidal geometry and hence has huge leakage fluxes? Air core magnetics are not used for reliable, efficient power systems for this reason - flux linkage is usually quite poor compared to using cores to direct the flux.
I don't know the details any more than you do, and this was my first thought also. But then, why really care? The eddy currents will generate heat and we'll ultimately feel that as a drag, as in magnetic brakes - given that the lights have an acceptable brightness, the drag is the only real issue. I could be wrong but I don't see leakage inductance as looming very large in this application.
wphamilton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-14, 12:02 PM   #62
zacster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brooklyn NY
Bikes:
Posts: 4,953
There is no noticeable drag when using a single rear light. In fact, when I lost the light I didn't notice that it was no longer operating. Before I lost it when I lifted the bike off the ground and gave the wheel a spin it kept going as if nothing were there. Multiply that by three (2 front, one rear) and maybe, just maybe, the cumulative effect will be perceptible. More likely though is you'll feel the effect of your slightly unzipped jacket catching the wind before you'd feel that.

People say the same things about dynamo hubs, and I don't believe them either. I'm going to find out on my own. Lights on vs. off, dynamo wheel vs. no dynamo. The only dynamo hub I've ever used was on a Citibike and they are so loaded down anyway they don't count.
zacster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-14, 01:31 PM   #63
wphamilton
rugged individualist
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Posts: 9,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by zacster View Post
There is no noticeable drag when using a single rear light. In fact, when I lost the light I didn't notice that it was no longer operating. Before I lost it when I lifted the bike off the ground and gave the wheel a spin it kept going as if nothing were there. Multiply that by three (2 front, one rear) and maybe, just maybe, the cumulative effect will be perceptible. More likely though is you'll feel the effect of your slightly unzipped jacket catching the wind before you'd feel that.

People say the same things about dynamo hubs, and I don't believe them either. I'm going to find out on my own. Lights on vs. off, dynamo wheel vs. no dynamo. The only dynamo hub I've ever used was on a Citibike and they are so loaded down anyway they don't count.
There will always be drag, starting with the power output to the light and increased by the inefficiencies. Dynamo hubs can have 3 to 9 watts worth roughly speaking, which can be noticeable (moreso at lower speeds). I suspect that there is less drag with this technology than for dynamos with equivalent power outputs.
wphamilton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-14, 03:36 PM   #64
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 9,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by wphamilton View Post
There will always be drag, starting with the power output to the light and increased by the inefficiencies. Dynamo hubs can have 3 to 9 watts worth roughly speaking, which can be noticeable (moreso at lower speeds). I suspect that there is less drag with this technology than for dynamos with equivalent power outputs.
Yes, there has to be drag. As far as I can tell, the big advantage of this approach is that it's easy to install. I suspect there might be a low limit to how much power is available from the eddy currents (lower than what is possible for a dynamo).
njkayaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-14, 04:16 PM   #65
wphamilton
rugged individualist
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Posts: 9,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by njkayaker View Post
Yes, there has to be drag. As far as I can tell, the big advantage of this approach is that it's easy to install. I suspect there might be a low limit to how much power is available from the eddy currents (lower than what is possible for a dynamo).
That's my guess. It just stands to reason that the magnetic fields from induced eddy currents cannot be as strong as the fields from the original magnets. And they're also going to be further away from induction coils. So the power generated would be lower. They compensate by using high quality magnets. Whether that can fully compensate for the weaker magnetic fields, I don't know.

Another advantage over bottle generators is no roller surface, and no bearings and seals. That's really what attracts me to it.
wphamilton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-14, 04:32 PM   #66
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 9,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by wphamilton View Post
That's my guess. It just stands to reason that the magnetic fields from induced eddy currents cannot be as strong as the fields from the original magnets. And they're also going to be further away from induction coils. So the power generated would be lower. They compensate by using high quality magnets. Whether that can fully compensate for the weaker magnetic fields, I don't know.
One might suspect that they would have made it brighter if it was possible (being bright appears to make things easier to sell). That it isn't brighter suggests that there's limited power available.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wphamilton View Post
Another advantage over bottle generators is no roller surface, and no bearings and seals. That's really what attracts me to it.
It's interesting.
njkayaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-14, 04:57 PM   #67
prathmann
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Bikes:
Posts: 5,937
Quote:
Originally Posted by wphamilton View Post
There will always be drag, starting with the power output to the light and increased by the inefficiencies. Dynamo hubs can have 3 to 9 watts worth roughly speaking, which can be noticeable (moreso at lower speeds). I suspect that there is less drag with this technology than for dynamos with equivalent power outputs.
I'd be surprised if it's less for the same power output. The best dynamo hubs have been measured to have efficiency of up to 65% and I'd think that would be hard to achieve with this approach. OTOH, the power output from this device is much lower (according to the maker it has an output of under a Watt at 30 km/h) and partially makes up for that with very high efficiency LEDs - so it might still have less drag than the higher power output hubs.
prathmann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-14, 07:28 PM   #68
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 9,437
How much higher efficiency are the LEDs than what other dynamo lights are using?

Last edited by njkayaker; 01-09-14 at 09:47 PM.
njkayaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-14, 09:00 PM   #69
zacster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brooklyn NY
Bikes:
Posts: 4,953
I'll say it again, there is no discernable drag from this light. You out it on and you forget that it's there.
zacster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-14, 12:15 AM   #70
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Bikes:
Posts: 12,229
Quote:
Originally Posted by wphamilton View Post
There will always be drag, starting with the power output to the light and increased by the inefficiencies. Dynamo hubs can have 3 to 9 watts worth roughly speaking, which can be noticeable (moreso at lower speeds). I suspect that there is less drag with this technology than for dynamos with equivalent power outputs.
There will always be drag, but will it always be perceptible? Hub dynamos and bottles have cogging as the poles interact with the permanent magnets. This causes noticeable vibration that is mistaken for drag but really doesn't add to drag, since it is an energy storage effect. The Magnic (I assume) has no vibration, so the drag should feel smooth, like very gentle braking.

I don't really see why the efficiency in this system will be a lot better, if at all, than that of a recent SON or SP. Slowing down the rider is slowing down the rider, whether or not the rider can perceive it. If into the bargain it puts out half the light or half the illumination (this group still hasn't grasped which of these performance metrics is actually important), then it is not a step forward despite the novel technology. Not even when version 2 brings its functional spec close to the level where Germany could consider certifying it. The performance target is still to match a SON/Edelux 2, SON/Luxos, or a SON with one of the other top-level B&M lights. If we want to argue about price/performance, just substitute the Shutter Precision PV-8 for the SON, at $130 each versus $200+ each, with a Lyt or other mid price but high-end B&M. I still think "efficiency" is a case that must be proven: Lumens per mechanical watt or illuminance per mechanical watt.

Last edited by Road Fan; 01-10-14 at 07:07 AM.
Road Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-14, 07:01 AM   #71
zacster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brooklyn NY
Bikes:
Posts: 4,953
Quote:
Originally Posted by Road Fan View Post
like very gentle braking.
Not even like very gentle braking. Maybe if you are coasting you'll stop about a foot short.
zacster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-14, 07:12 AM   #72
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Bikes:
Posts: 12,229
Quote:
Originally Posted by wphamilton View Post

Another advantage over bottle generators is no roller surface, and no bearings and seals. That's really what attracts me to it.
How well is the Magnic sealed? It contains an electronic circuit board, so water ingress could damage circuit boards unless they are waterproofed. And in mass production it's difficult to conformal coat all surfaces except the ones that provide electrical contact and maintain optical integrity. Or does it have a good drip control system?
Road Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-14, 07:55 AM   #73
tcs
Palmer
 
tcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parts unknown
Bikes:
Posts: 4,660
The LED lighting revolution has come upon us pretty quickly, and aplications are still being sorted out. Everybody seems to be all over Magnic's eddy current thing, but IMO the true evolutionary step is a new design paired dynamo and headlamp with power and regulation optimized to work as a single, cohesive unit.

(The Velogical rim dynamo is another, different step in this direction: optimized to work with a short list of modern LED headlamps.)

Most other tire and hub dynamos are legacy designs expected to power anything from modern LED headlamps to old 3W filament bulbs, and modern LED headlamps are designed to be powered by anything from a Shutter Precision PD-7 to a 60 year old Soubietz bottle dynamo.

With a hand-in-glove matched optics, LED, electronics and purpose designed, dedicated dynamo, I think there even might be some life left in the all-in-one headlamp and tire driven dynamo design, well under the price point of Magnic. Or maybe not!

One thing Magnic could learn from the past: redesign the heads to place the lamps above or below the dynamo, rather than out to the side. Magnic's current layout with the lamps on the same horizontal plane as the tire/rim maximizes shadowing.

Last edited by tcs; 01-10-14 at 08:08 AM.
tcs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-14, 08:46 AM   #74
wphamilton
rugged individualist
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Posts: 9,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by Road Fan View Post
...
I don't really see why the efficiency in this system will be a lot better, if at all, than that of a recent SON or SP. Slowing down the rider is slowing down the rider, whether or not the rider can perceive it.... I still think "efficiency" is a case that must be proven: Lumens per mechanical watt or illuminance per mechanical watt.
Because a bottle generator will have bearing friction, the magnets or coil spinning on an axis. It will also have some loss in the rolling surface interfacing with the tire. In this kickstarter generator it's the magnetic eddies that are moving, the flux lines cutting across fixed coils, so there is no mechanical friction. When I visualize this, all of the drag is directly related to the power generated, so I expect it to be more efficient in that sense than bottle generators. A hub generator, maybe not much difference but depending on the engineering.

We already know that the drag is greater than the ultimate power consumed by the light and we've got some pretty good data, here and there, on drag from various dynamos so that side doesn't really need any proving. The actual drag from this tech, yes I agree that we need some measurements to put the question to rest. That may be a little tricky for DIY tests though, since a coast-down doesn't get precise enough for that small amount of rolling drag and simply spinning the wheel unloaded doesn't actually translate to the drag on a loaded wheel. So we may have to wait for someone with more sophisticated equipment and a little time on their hands.
wphamilton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-14, 08:50 AM   #75
himespau 
Senior Member
 
himespau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Bikes:
Posts: 9,362
I see they have a mount for V-brakes. I wonder if it'd work for cantilevers too.
himespau is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:53 PM.