Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    johnliu@earthlink.net jyl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Portland OR
    My Bikes
    61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997
    Posts
    3,800
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Bike Computer, GPS Watch, or iPhone/Cyclemeter?

    I would appreciate hearing your thoughts on this issue:

    Should I go with
    1) A Garmin GPS bike computer like the 500,
    2) A Garmin GPS watch like the Forerunner 410 or 610,
    3) An iPhone running Cyclemeter.

    The background is, I'm a cyclist who hopes to start running as I start my fitness program this year. My cycling is daily commuting, spin classes during the winter, weekend rides when the weather's better, and a century or two each year. The running is to add some variety to my exercise, because cycling isn't breaking me through my weight plateau; I think my body's gotten too used to the bike. On the bike, I want to track speed, distance, course/elevation, time/splits, heartrate, and maybe cadence. I'd like to track heartrate on the spin bike too. I'm not sure what I want to track for the running - maybe nearest place to puke? - but I guess speed, distance, heartrate to start.

    The 1) Garmin bike computer would be paired with a speed/cadence sensor and a HR strap.

    The 2) Garmin watch would be similarly paired. I think these can be mounted on handlebars too.

    The 3) iPhone/Cyclemeter would be paired with speed/cadence, HR strap, and maybe a remote handlebar display (thinking about the Wahoo RFLKT) so I can keep the phone in my jersey.

    I have the phone and Cyclemeter app, everything else I'd need to buy.

    What do you think the pros and cons of these choices are? Which would you choose?
    Last edited by jyl; 01-23-13 at 09:14 PM.
    Your signature contains too many lines and must be shortened. You may only have up to 2 line(s). Long text may have been implicitly wrapped, causing it to be

  2. #2
    Senior Member Fangowolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Houston
    My Bikes
    2012 Surly LHT / Motobecane Fhantom CX 105 / Giant Cypress ST / EZ Sport AX / Trisled Touring Trike
    Posts
    406
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have used cyclemeter, the garmin 500 and a small gps watch like device.
    I went with the 500, but I do miss the cyclemeter audio alerts.
    I ride at night alot and the audio alerts in cyclemeter are nicely configurable.
    The 500 has more data and highly configurable screens that you can cycle through

    I'd only go with the watch if jogging data was very important,

  3. #3
    Certified Bike Brat Burton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Montreal, Quebec
    Posts
    4,203
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just my opinion - think you'd be better off just using the bathroom scales to record weight loss and skipping the gadgets. If your body has adjusted to the bike and you want to work harder - do what many people do while jogging or training - wear weights.

  4. #4
    Because I thought I could ks1g's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Wash DC Metro
    My Bikes
    November, Trek OCLV, Bianchi Castro Valley commuter
    Posts
    969
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've had an Edge 500 for several years and am quite pleased with it for cycling. You can use it with a spin bike for HR recording/monitoring (disable auto-stop or the lack of speed sensor or GPS data will pause it). I've been using the 500 for running and it is acceptable but has limitations - no pace display (I can convert speed displayed in my head more or less), seems succeptible to errors in instantaneous displayed speed from arm movement (recorded data is usually fine), and a bit large to wear on arm. I've kludged up a wrist strap from a spare bike mount and a elastic/velcro arm band for MP3 players. Garmin makes a wrist mount (for another of their devices) that fits the 500 that may work better. Garmin has released the 500's successor, so you may be able to pick up one on close out. I am looking at other devices that support running better (size, wrist band, pace display) including indoors (footpod). If I was starting from scratch, the Garmin and competing vendor's triathlon watches (Garmin 310x for example) might be a better choice as it is designed for running & cycling and you can take it swimming (intentionally or otherwise!) as a bonus. The dcrainmaker.com site and blog has a good set of user-oriented reviews and product comparisons.

    I am unsatisfied with the phone-based systems. You need a phone and HR strap that can communicate; this may require an additional dongle. The phone is $$$ and easier to damage than a dedicated cyclecomputer/watch. Power consumption, IMO, will be a problem on longer rides. Since I already have a good cyclecomputer, there's not much reason for me to go this route. Your situation may differ from mine. Advantage is immediate upload of ride/run data to logging & social media sites, better screen for navigation, and possibility of real-time tracking if your phone has coverage. In my case, my family are usually the only people who really care how I am doing. A simple text message: "25 miles to go" and "Done!" and the all-important "home in 0:30" suffice.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Looigi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    7,264
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jyl View Post
    ... because cycling isn't breaking me through my weight plateau; I think my body's gotten too used to the bike. ...
    Getting more/better exercise is good, but you have to eat less. Count calories and restrict your caloric intake.

  6. #6
    Member chinkroadrunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    31
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have an iPhone 4S running Cyclemeter paired with a Wahoo Speed and Cadence sensor plus a Wahoo Blue HR. No dongle required, all by Bluetooth with the phone. If you already have an iPhone 4S or 5, I highly recommend. I have never used a Garmin so I cannot compare. I am very satisfied with Cyclemeter. More there than I will ever use. Speed, distance, cadence, HR, maps are all very accurate. Elevation works pretty well also if you are on well traveled roads. Many graphs and custom layouts are available.

  7. #7
    Senior Member JackoDandy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    PNW - USA
    Posts
    226
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The BIG advantage of the Garmin 500 is battery life. 10+ hours. I guess it depends how far you plan on riding (time).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •