Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Senior Member TampaRaleigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    My Bikes
    1986 Raleigh Competition
    Posts
    1,908
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    New computer with vintage sensors?

    If I splice a new (Cateye Strava) computer harness to vintage sensors, do you think it would work?

    Cateye gave me the canned legal mumbo-jumbo resonse:

    Cateye does not recommend splicing, soldering or otherwise separating and rejoining the wires of CatEye bracket/sensor kits.
    I have experience in electronics repair and soldering, so that's not the issue. I'm just wondering how sensitive the head unit might be to different "pulses" that it gets from the sensors.

    (YES, I have a good reason for wanting to do this.)

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    8,401
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The wired sensor is a reed-switch that breaks a circut when the magnet passes it. There isn't any magic going on.

  3. #3
    Senior Member TampaRaleigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    My Bikes
    1986 Raleigh Competition
    Posts
    1,908
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by njkayaker View Post
    The wired sensor is a reed-switch that breaks a circut when the magnet passes it. There isn't any magic going on.
    Well... that makes it even MORE likely that my plan will work. I was thinking that there was a coil in the sensor that generated an electrical pulse when the magnet passed. I've never disassembled a sensor before.

  4. #4
    Senior Member TampaRaleigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    My Bikes
    1986 Raleigh Competition
    Posts
    1,908
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    This is my reason for wanting to undertake this splicing job:


  5. #5
    __________ seeker333's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,660
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TampaRaleigh View Post
    This is my reason...
    I say splice away.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Looigi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    6,993
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Agree. I know of no system that uses anything other than reed switches for cadence and wheel sensing. Thought there are other possibilities, I don't think they are as practical for this application.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    92
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by njkayaker View Post
    The wired sensor is a reed-switch that breaks a circut when the magnet passes it. There isn't any magic going on.
    I always thought they were really thin wire coils with the magnet generating a tiny current in the coil. The reed switch makes much more sense.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Bay Area, Calif.
    Posts
    4,708
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Looigi View Post
    Agree. I know of no system that uses anything other than reed switches for cadence and wheel sensing. Thought there are other possibilities, I don't think they are as practical for this application.
    The older Avocet cyclometers (like the '50') used a Hall effect sensor with a small ring mounted around the hub instead of the usual single magnet attached to a spoke. Those Avocets did have the advantage of responding more quickly to speed changes, but their sensor was probably less cost-effective than the reed switch used by everyone else.

  9. #9
    Randomhead
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    12,411
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I had always just assumed they used hall effect sensors. Seems like you could actually count spokes, like they do with gear teeth

    I think that attaching to the stub of a wire at the headtube end is going to be a problem

  10. #10
    Senior Member Looigi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    6,993
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think quiescent power draw is the key characteristic. Reed switches may have a limited life and slow response, but at the total usage and rate on a bicycle, they are the best current solution, IMO.

  11. #11
    Senior Member TampaRaleigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    My Bikes
    1986 Raleigh Competition
    Posts
    1,908
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by unterhausen View Post
    I had always just assumed they used hall effect sensors. Seems like you could actually count spokes, like they do with gear teeth

    I think that attaching to the stub of a wire at the headtube end is going to be a problem
    I'm going to snip the sensors off of the new harness, and draw the new wiring down the downtube. I'll pull the old and new wires out through the bottom bracket shell to solder them together (that'll give me plenty of length in case of error) and then I'll tuck it back up into the downtube and reinstall the bottom bracket.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Brooklyn NY
    Posts
    4,699
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Good luck with the wires. They are extremely thin and difficult to handle. I've tried re-wiring headphones and it is almost impossible to make it work, and I think these are even thinner. I gave up on the headphones and just bought another pair. With the cheaper wired computers I'd just bite the bullet and put in a new set. I've built a fair amount of electronic equipment too, although far from an expert, so I wasn't a noobie at soldering and handling the stuff.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    7,118
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Interesting. Is that a modified frame or full custom?

    I'm guessing it will work but like zacster mentioned, the solder job will be tedious. I know I couldn't do it but some can. When I was a kid, I remember my dad doing several custom harnesses for obscure reasons. One was putting a Campagnolo ergo brain on a bike Friday tandem. He had to extend the harness and add a disconnect,

  14. #14
    Senior Member TampaRaleigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    My Bikes
    1986 Raleigh Competition
    Posts
    1,908
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by thirdgenbird View Post
    Interesting. Is that a modified frame or full custom?

    I'm guessing it will work but like zacster mentioned, the solder job will be tedious. I know I couldn't do it but some can. When I was a kid, I remember my dad doing several custom harnesses for obscure reasons. One was putting a Campagnolo ergo brain on a bike Friday tandem. He had to extend the harness and add a disconnect,
    It's a modified 1985 Bridgestone 700. The wire routing was added sometime before 1988. (It had a California registration decal from 1988, on top of the repaint.)

    I took on the surgery last night... and it was a success! I pulled the old wires out through the bottom bracket shell, fished the new wires down the downtube, spliced and soldered, covered it all up with a couple layers of heat shrink, and put the bottom bracket back in.

  15. #15
    Oh! That British Bloke .. ThatBritBloke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Princeton, NJ, USA
    Posts
    243
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Go wireless ...
    Alan

    Oh! That British Bloke ... in central New Jersey
    http://h-i-l-l.net/BikeBlog/BikesT.png
    ohthatbritishbloke.blogspot.com

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •