Sigma Sport ROX 10.0 GPS
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,869
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1854 Post(s)
Liked 661 Times
in
504 Posts
Did you use any of the other ROX models?
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Great timing, I was going to start a similar thread. I have used 2 Sigma products in the past including a ROX 9.0 and have been very happy. I switched to a Garmin 500 a while back as it was a gift and had GPS. I will be purchasing the ROX 10 in the near future and selling my Garmin.
Last edited by Snapperhead; 10-10-13 at 12:20 PM.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,163
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 20 Times
in
18 Posts
Snapperhead,
Those are my thoughts exactly. Have you found any of the ROX 10.0 without the cadence/heart rate bundle for sale? If everything works good with the ROX 10.0, I will be selling my Garmin edge 500 also.
Cheers
Those are my thoughts exactly. Have you found any of the ROX 10.0 without the cadence/heart rate bundle for sale? If everything works good with the ROX 10.0, I will be selling my Garmin edge 500 also.
Cheers
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Columbus, GA
Posts: 536
Bikes: 2014 Cervelo R5 Dura Ace,2014 Specialized S-Works Roubaix
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This is a very timely thread. Looking at the garmin 810 vs. the sigma rox 10. The garmin bundled is around $700, whereas the sigma looks to be under $300?
It appears the sigma can also upload to strava? ALso would this unit replace my cat eye which tells me cadence, odometer etc? Or would I need to keep that too.
It appears the sigma can also upload to strava? ALso would this unit replace my cat eye which tells me cadence, odometer etc? Or would I need to keep that too.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NJ cellphone central
Posts: 468
Bikes: Surly Ogre // (old and gone) Cannondale ST400, Rockhopper Sport
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm likely going to get one but it will be a bit yet.
This compares more with the 510 Garmin. It follows and records trails but isn't a mapping based GPS. It does ant+ cadence speed and heart rate and GPS tracking. I like the price of the bundle and I like that the software will export the .fit format for Strava.
If the quality is there, I think they have a winner. If it works with Linux as far as allowing download of the track files or they use an obvious enough protocol so that could be arranged it would be sweet.
This compares more with the 510 Garmin. It follows and records trails but isn't a mapping based GPS. It does ant+ cadence speed and heart rate and GPS tracking. I like the price of the bundle and I like that the software will export the .fit format for Strava.
If the quality is there, I think they have a winner. If it works with Linux as far as allowing download of the track files or they use an obvious enough protocol so that could be arranged it would be sweet.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,869
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1854 Post(s)
Liked 661 Times
in
504 Posts
I'm likely going to get one but it will be a bit yet.
This compares more with the 510 Garmin. It follows and records trails but isn't a mapping based GPS. It does ant+ cadence speed and heart rate and GPS tracking. I like the price of the bundle and I like that the software will export the .fit format for Strava.
If the quality is there, I think they have a winner. If it works with Linux as far as allowing download of the track files or they use an obvious enough protocol so that could be arranged it would be sweet.
This compares more with the 510 Garmin. It follows and records trails but isn't a mapping based GPS. It does ant+ cadence speed and heart rate and GPS tracking. I like the price of the bundle and I like that the software will export the .fit format for Strava.
If the quality is there, I think they have a winner. If it works with Linux as far as allowing download of the track files or they use an obvious enough protocol so that could be arranged it would be sweet.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NJ cellphone central
Posts: 468
Bikes: Surly Ogre // (old and gone) Cannondale ST400, Rockhopper Sport
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The manuals are on their site for download as are many demo screen shots showing the features.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 596
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Would be really interested to hear anyone impressions of the Sigma ROX 10.0 if you get one. I have been considering the ROX 10.0, Cateye Stealth 50 GPS, Garmin 500, or Garmin 510.
ROX 10.0 seems to hit a nice sweet point on the spec sheet for features vs price. Can save a bit over the Garmin 500 and get more features overall, Missing a few things (but also gaining some) vs the 510. Cateye Stealth 50 is a slightly cheaper option but also much less feature rich, and by the time you add sensors your not saving that much.
My only fear with the ROX is lack of reviews on it. Both the Garmins, while not perfect, are well known entities. Would really like some first hand accounts with the ROX.
ROX 10.0 seems to hit a nice sweet point on the spec sheet for features vs price. Can save a bit over the Garmin 500 and get more features overall, Missing a few things (but also gaining some) vs the 510. Cateye Stealth 50 is a slightly cheaper option but also much less feature rich, and by the time you add sensors your not saving that much.
My only fear with the ROX is lack of reviews on it. Both the Garmins, while not perfect, are well known entities. Would really like some first hand accounts with the ROX.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'll let you know. I've had a Garimin 500 for ther past couple of years so I should be able to make a fair comparison. I've had other Sigma products and they were all very nice.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NJ cellphone central
Posts: 468
Bikes: Surly Ogre // (old and gone) Cannondale ST400, Rockhopper Sport
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I got the ROX in the mail today, the full set with HR strap, cadence and speed sensors. It will be at least the weekend before I get it installed and get a ride up with it. I got the data center software installed and updated the firmware easily and poked around the settings without help of a manual. Nicely laid out and the screen should be easy to read in sunlight as it is a basic monochrome LCD.
#15
just pedal
looking forward to hearing about it... seems like a nice bit of kit... I do wonder when we'll start seeing them avl and how much it will be without the cadence/HRM bits
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 596
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I got the ROX in the mail today, the full set with HR strap, cadence and speed sensors. It will be at least the weekend before I get it installed and get a ride up with it. I got the data center software installed and updated the firmware easily and poked around the settings without help of a manual. Nicely laid out and the screen should be easy to read in sunlight as it is a basic monochrome LCD.
I am curious how the sensor are and how easily the mount. Do they mount permanently or with rubber rings? I found it odd that the speed sensor is designed to go on the front wheel.
Also curious to know how it chooses between GPS and speed sensor speed display, as I imagine there are times they do not match up.
Would also like to know if the navigation features are any good, as that is one feature that makes this look more interesting then the Garmin 500.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 596
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have seen them available online at a number of places. A few places seem to sell the computer only (useful if you have your own ANT+ accessories or just don't want the Sigma ones. This seems to go for ~$190-200. Kit seems to typically be listed for 300 though I have seen as low as $280, so a good deal if you want all the sensors.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NJ cellphone central
Posts: 468
Bikes: Surly Ogre // (old and gone) Cannondale ST400, Rockhopper Sport
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Congrats! I really look forward to hearing how you like it!
I am curious how the sensor are and how easily the mount. Do they mount permanently or with rubber rings? I found it odd that the speed sensor is designed to go on the front wheel.
Also curious to know how it chooses between GPS and speed sensor speed display, as I imagine there are times they do not match up.
Would also like to know if the navigation features are any good, as that is one feature that makes this look more interesting then the Garmin 500.
I am curious how the sensor are and how easily the mount. Do they mount permanently or with rubber rings? I found it odd that the speed sensor is designed to go on the front wheel.
Also curious to know how it chooses between GPS and speed sensor speed display, as I imagine there are times they do not match up.
Would also like to know if the navigation features are any good, as that is one feature that makes this look more interesting then the Garmin 500.
I'm curious about the GPS vs speed sensor too. I have new wheels coming so I won't install it until that happens, may be next weekend since the wheels didn't arrive today...thanks USPS.
I bought the whole bundle from Amazon for about $270, includes all sensors and the HRM strap and the software. It's priced well I think and if this unit holds up like the other Sigma computers I've run on motorcycles it should be great.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 596
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Is there dedicated software for you computer, or does it just connect to USB and allow you to upload to a website? If dedicated software, do you know if it supports Mac?
I am very curious to understand the quality of this software. I understand the Garmin has decent software and website.
I am very curious to understand the quality of this software. I understand the Garmin has decent software and website.
#20
just pedal
Is there dedicated software for you computer, or does it just connect to USB and allow you to upload to a website? If dedicated software, do you know if it supports Mac?
I am very curious to understand the quality of this software. I understand the Garmin has decent software and website.
I am very curious to understand the quality of this software. I understand the Garmin has decent software and website.
shows that its pc/mac ready
for more spcificly on the sigma software
https://sigma-rox.com/en-us/data-cent...gsanalyse.html
Last edited by donalson; 10-25-13 at 03:22 PM.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NJ cellphone central
Posts: 468
Bikes: Surly Ogre // (old and gone) Cannondale ST400, Rockhopper Sport
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
No direct connector to web uploads. You use their software to pull the logged data from the unit and export it to a format to upload to strava etc. You also load track files into the unit with the included software.
I installed on a Win7 Pro system with no trouble, it auto discovered the USB drivers and the included installer disc for the software worked fine.
Firmware updates are pushed to the device with the software too and that worked easily without having to read how to do it ( I'm an A level tech nerd though )
I installed on a Win7 Pro system with no trouble, it auto discovered the USB drivers and the included installer disc for the software worked fine.
Firmware updates are pushed to the device with the software too and that worked easily without having to read how to do it ( I'm an A level tech nerd though )
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 210
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
No direct connector to web uploads. You use their software to pull the logged data from the unit and export it to a format to upload to strava etc. You also load track files into the unit with the included software.
I installed on a Win7 Pro system with no trouble, it auto discovered the USB drivers and the included installer disc for the software worked fine.
Firmware updates are pushed to the device with the software too and that worked easily without having to read how to do it ( I'm an A level tech nerd though )
I installed on a Win7 Pro system with no trouble, it auto discovered the USB drivers and the included installer disc for the software worked fine.
Firmware updates are pushed to the device with the software too and that worked easily without having to read how to do it ( I'm an A level tech nerd though )
bike computer.
I've owned ROX 9.0 and 9.1 for years, but will probably pass on this.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
12 Posts
Agree. Bogus. With the Garmin 500 and 705, I can straightforwardly transfer route/data files (GPX, TCX, FIT) both ways between websites and my devices using my Android phone and a $1 OTG adapter cable.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NJ cellphone central
Posts: 468
Bikes: Surly Ogre // (old and gone) Cannondale ST400, Rockhopper Sport
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Got the first ride in today, put about an hour on it.
So my success with not reading the manual was not complete LOL the ANT+ sensors weren't paired, though at a skim through I thought it would be automatic. So I didn't register the cadence and HR data from this ride (speed sensor is waiting on the new wheels to arrive before I clip that on).
I did find out that it does speed pretty well just using the GPS anyway, so it doesn't require the speed sensor to log the speed or your tracks/distance etc.
Readability is good, no problems there. The mounting is either o-ring or zip-ties and I went the zip-ties route because neither me nor the bike are the delicate types. For cadence sender on the crank, you have a choice of a zip-tie pod or a small magnet that sticks to the inside of the pedal shaft bolt. I went with the pod figuring I might knock off the little magnet on trail rides.
The hour ride didn't even register as far as battery use goes, when I plugged it back into the computer it still registered as 100% so I expect the battery life on this to be quite long.
It could likely be me, but the Sigma Data Center software is not exporting either .FIT or .GPX files cleanly. It's generating corrupted file stubs with no real data in them...thus no uploads/imports to Strava until I get that sorted out. I have an email in to Sigma about it nowl.
So my success with not reading the manual was not complete LOL the ANT+ sensors weren't paired, though at a skim through I thought it would be automatic. So I didn't register the cadence and HR data from this ride (speed sensor is waiting on the new wheels to arrive before I clip that on).
I did find out that it does speed pretty well just using the GPS anyway, so it doesn't require the speed sensor to log the speed or your tracks/distance etc.
Readability is good, no problems there. The mounting is either o-ring or zip-ties and I went the zip-ties route because neither me nor the bike are the delicate types. For cadence sender on the crank, you have a choice of a zip-tie pod or a small magnet that sticks to the inside of the pedal shaft bolt. I went with the pod figuring I might knock off the little magnet on trail rides.
The hour ride didn't even register as far as battery use goes, when I plugged it back into the computer it still registered as 100% so I expect the battery life on this to be quite long.
It could likely be me, but the Sigma Data Center software is not exporting either .FIT or .GPX files cleanly. It's generating corrupted file stubs with no real data in them...thus no uploads/imports to Strava until I get that sorted out. I have an email in to Sigma about it nowl.