Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 18 of 18
  1. #1
    Berry Pie..the Holy Grail GrannyGear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Weaving thru the cowpud outside Modesto CA
    Posts
    1,123
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There's a time and place for fatter tires (28cm and above for me) and that's no doubt. Several miles on chipseal road with high pressure skinnies, or commuting on urban blight streets, will testify to that. But I've found a new angle.

    I always liked my sport-touring Rivendell Romulus but thought it a bit "dull"....not "quick" or "exciting"--- more of a road touring sedan than a turn-on-a-thought sports car. 28cm's seemed appropriate tires, like an older man wearing a fuzzy cardigan sweater instead of a t-shirt. Then I put on a pair of 25's (but probably on the narrow side given manufacturer's inaccuracy in labeling tire sizes). The bike feels different...lighter, quicker. And, yes, I know there is less rotating weight and higher pressure.......not to mention my own hopeful expectations. But I'm very pleased.

    Anyway, I'm enjoying the bike more now for those 30-40 mile rides up into the hills on reasonable pavement. For crossing the potholed junkyard they call pavement downtown, I'll stick to squishy, belted Paselas.
    David.

  2. #2
    Senior Curmudgeon
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Directly above the center of the earth
    My Bikes
    Electra Townie 1-speed with basket & fenders
    Posts
    3,306
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Amen, brother! Skinnier, higher pressure tires can put life into a familiar ride! I'm riding on lightweight, Campy rims and 23cm tires and they've put up with me (and the potholes) just fine, thank you.. The faster tires aren't for every ride - I keep a pair of 32cm tires on a spare wheel set when I want comfort. Cheap investment for a whole different-feeling bike!

  3. #3
    Time for a change. stapfam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
    My Bikes
    Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
    Posts
    19,915
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I know you are talking road, but the same applies off road aswell. 26" x 2.3 tyres may be comfortable, but to maintain grip are normally run at a lower pressure. This causes drag in a big way, and if you are unfortunate enough to ride them on the road, then you really feel it. To me, the standard offroad tyre is a 1.95 and even this has an effect on speed. If you are brave enough to try a 1.8 then the bike flys. Maybe due to the higher pressure required but even with them pumped up to 50psi (to stop snakebites) I still do not lose any traction. Then in winter, I even go to a 1.5 tyre for the mud, and even this tyre grips well. What I want to find is a 1.0 tyre with tread that does workon rough ground, but I do not think the backside could take 100psi over rocks.

  4. #4
    Macaws Rock! michaelnel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    My Bikes
    2005 Soma Doublecross
    Posts
    1,513
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    When I built my SOMA Double Cross, I first put on Panaracer Pasela TG 700x32 tires. I liked them, but I kept wondering how 28s would feel, so I bought a set.

    I installed the 700x28 Pasela TGs, and found very little difference in ride quality, but a readily detectable difference in rolling resistance and responsiveness. I think I'll be sticking with the 28s (I don't see going skinnier than that on my Mavic T519 rims as being a good move).
    ---

    San Francisco, California

  5. #5
    Senior Member DnvrFox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    20,899
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    To me the ideal tire is 700x25

    I can go through gravel and some sand, yet they are fast on the blacktop and cement. An all-round tire, IMHO.

    I have tried 700x23's, and notice little difference in speed between the 23's and the 25's, but the 23's can't take the gravel.

    And to go to a 28 or a 32 seems like driving a tank!

    So, I will stick with the 25's.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Wildwood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Seattle area
    Posts
    2,647
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DnvrFox
    To me the ideal tire is 700x25
    I have tried 700x23's, and notice little difference in speed between the 23's and the 25's, but the 23's can't take the gravel.
    And to go to a 28 or a 32 seems like driving a tank!
    I agree that 25s are the best all round size for roadies on decent pavement, but I ride 28s regularly as well (they just barely clear the brakes) and do not consider them to be "tanks" when inflated to 100-110 psi. Haven't tried the 23s in some time, probably ought to put them on again for a change.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Northern Nevada
    Posts
    3,749
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I love those Paselas, but you're right...when I swapped down on my Atlantis from 700x35 Paselas at 75 psi down even to Ruffy Tuffys at 100, it was like a different bike. I don't like it as well for a lot of stuff I do, but it was a nice change (incidentally, I went by Rivendell a couple of months ago to talk to them about a Romulus to go with the Atlantis, and I lucked out and scored a used Rambouillet, an ex-demo, cheaper than the Rom. It wears the RTs now, and I keep the Paselas on the Atlantis).
    Speaking of Paselas, if you like them, you should know that the sizes and tread designs have changed. I've used them for three or four years, and 700x35s measure about 30mm wide on my wheels. I got a new set last week, and the labeled 35s now are very close to an actual 35 mm, with a knobbier tread. Seem to work fine, but they look fat compared to what I'm used to.

  8. #8
    Rides again HiYoSilver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    W. Sacramento Region, aka, Nut Tree
    My Bikes
    Giant OCR T, Trek SC
    Posts
    3,259
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ok, other than weight. What difference does it really make if a tire is:

    28 mm
    30 mm
    32 mm
    35 mm

    Is going fast because a thin long contact patch is more efficient than a wider contact patch. Since both have the same surface area, how does the shape of the patch matter?

    Moreover, how much difference is there between a tire designed with Hi rolling resistance vs lower. Michelin has a 5 level scale of a tires rolling resistance. Most manu's do not share this info.

    Is there a real difference between speed of a slick tire versus one almost slick, or even with treads? How much is real and how much is imagination?

    Anyone know of any real tests. IHPVA had a test about 8 years ago, but mostly of bent tires. Other than heresay, any test data?

    Just thought this thread needed bumping. bump...
    Hi 'o Silver away

  9. #9
    Berry Pie..the Holy Grail GrannyGear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Weaving thru the cowpud outside Modesto CA
    Posts
    1,123
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The folks at internet-bob@bikelist.org, a retro-bike news group filled with Rivendell types-- and often great believers in fatter tires-- would assert that lower pressure, fatter tires may actually produce better (faster) times because their "softness" keeps them in touch with the road surface more consistently, more stable on descents, loose surfaces, etc. and friction is functionally of minor to non-significance.

    This seems counterintuitive, against personal experience, and I don't see many pro's on 28's. Still, these guys put in a lot of miles on bikes that are not racer-boy. In their favor, 60 miles on 28's at 90psi over a mix of road surfaces may not be so tiring as the same on 120psi 23's. And anybody who's leaned into a downhill turn and felt that rear tire go sideways a bit might long for a nice, mooshy bigger contact patch.

    With so many marginal variables which may or may not be really signicicant....heck, may as well go with personal biases and what looks cool to you.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    My Bikes
    trying to decide on sport tourer
    Posts
    107
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hi!

    I'm a newbie and presently riding 26's. I think the smallest I can get on my rims would be 25's. There probably would not be a significant difference in performance on paved roads.

    Would like to see more comment on 23's. I will need new wheels for 23's. Will I get more ease of cycling with 23's? Will it be worth it? I would probablly enjoy building new wheels for the first time.

    Sinchi

  11. #11
    Senior Member DnvrFox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    20,899
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by stonooka
    Hi!

    I'm a newbie and presently riding 26's. I think the smallest I can get on my rims would be 25's. There probably would not be a significant difference in performance on paved roads.

    Would like to see more comment on 23's. I will need new wheels for 23's. Will I get more ease of cycling with 23's? Will it be worth it? I would probablly enjoy building new wheels for the first time.

    Sinchi
    Are you, perhaps, getting wheel circumference mixed up with the width of the tire?

    Most of us refer, generally, to three or four different wheel circumference:

    16" and 20" - used on folding and kids bikes
    26" - used on mountain bikes
    700mm - used on most newer road bikes
    27" - used on older road bikes

    There are others (29" on some mtn bikes) but these are the general ones.

    For each of the above there are different widths of tires.

    For example, 26" mtn bike tires may come in 1.5" or 1.75" or 2" or 2.5", etc. Therefore, they are referred to as 26x1.75 or 26x2.25 or whatever.

    Same with the 700mm

    700 x 20 or 700 x 23 or 700 x 25 or 700 x 28, etc.

    I have never heard of a 700x26, although it maybe out there.

    Excuse me if I insulted your knowledge by this lengthy explanation. This is probably all old hat to you, but when you said you could get a 25 on a 26, it seemed like perhaps you had some things a bit out of whack.

    Thanks for listening.
    Last edited by DnvrFox; 08-22-05 at 08:25 PM.

  12. #12
    Senior Member Metieval's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    My Bikes
    Giant Cypress SX, C'Dale caad8 R1000
    Posts
    461
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I guess after I lug around on my 28c's for a couple of years while getting into shape.

    I should be able to fly and really up my average once on a road bike??? along with the other benifits that come from going from hybrid to road.
    But this is about tires.

    So I guess my comment is 28c's are good for training.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    My Bikes
    trying to decide on sport tourer
    Posts
    107
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hi denverfox,

    Yes, I have 100C rims and tires. I'm sure the tires are marked 26 mm for the cross dia, otherwise there are 25's. I bought a well working vintage bike (1990 ish) that had been sitting in the back for a number of years and the owner of the vintage LBS put on new "no name" tubes and tires (probably made in China) for me. So far they seem to ride well but are wearing noticably. I ride about 100 miles/week. I'm sure they will be work out in a thousand miles.

    Went to REI which is a four blocks from my house. The "23" mm cross dia tires were all on the pricey racing road bikes (which were all hanging so the public could'nt fondle them) which also had rims that were a lot less wide than my rims. My rims are the same size as that on the REI Randonee touring bike on the floor (but hanging not as high as the racers). The young-not-too-knowledgeable sounding but pleasant salesperson said 23's would fit on my rims. I have my doubts; but even so to get the full advantage of 23's, I guess one should use the thinner rims which should be much lighter than what I have. I would guess the durability of the 23's would be much less that what I have now.

    So, I must conclude since I'm not ever likely to be into racing, I should forget about 23's and the latest racing wheels and settle for the 25's. Maybe try ones with slicker tread patterns.

    Sinchi

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    My Bikes
    trying to decide on sport tourer
    Posts
    107
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hi,

    I took my calipers and checked my wheel width (inside width at the bead). Mine measures 17mm. According to Sheldon Brown's web site, the recommended sizes for that rim are 25 to 37mm. The two smaller standard rim sizes are 13mm for 18 to 23 mm tires, and 15mm for 23 to 32 mm tires.

    Will stay with my 17mm wide wheels and 25mm tires until I become a much better biker and purchase a newer road bike. It seems current higher end and some entry level road bikes come fitted with 23 mm tires. The catalog specs do not give rim widths. Some specialty single speed racers come with 18 mm tires. Touring bikes have wider rims and tires(usually equiped with 32 to 37mm tires).

    Sinchi

  15. #15
    Berry Pie..the Holy Grail GrannyGear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Weaving thru the cowpud outside Modesto CA
    Posts
    1,123
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Dnver and others,
    Performance is labeling one of their current house brand tires as a "700x26" but, upon mounting it, it looks like a fairly narrow "25" though I haven't taken any calipers to it. Which reminds us that tire manufacturers take a lot of liberties and their stated measurements often are skewed. Anyone familiar with older Avocets or Paselas recalls that their tires were usually one size smaller than what was labeled.

    BTW, my experience so far is the Performance tires above are a pretty good value...$18 on sale, belted, and no more flats this summer than my Conti Ultra Gators or Rivendell Ruffy Tuffy's.

  16. #16
    Senior Member DnvrFox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    20,899
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Guess I opened my mouth and should have been quiet!

    Good luck.

  17. #17
    Macaws Rock! michaelnel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    My Bikes
    2005 Soma Doublecross
    Posts
    1,513
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DnvrFox
    Guess I opened my mouth and should have been quiet!
    Happens to me all the time. "Better to remain silent and be thought an idiot than to speak and remove all doubt."
    ---

    San Francisco, California

  18. #18
    Senior Member DnvrFox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    20,899
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by michaelnel
    Happens to me all the time. "Better to remain silent and be thought an idiot than to speak and remove all doubt."
    Sadly, I have spoken many times in the past, also. I think the secret is already out!

    Have a great day.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •