Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Fifty Plus (50+)
Reload this Page >

speed & stature

Search
Notices
Fifty Plus (50+) Share the victories, challenges, successes and special concerns of bicyclists 50 and older. Especially useful for those entering or reentering bicycling.

speed & stature

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-25-07, 09:43 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: cocoa beach, fl
Posts: 117

Bikes: Trek 1200 and Trek hybrid

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
speed & stature

Given equal amounts of fitness, age and cardio efficiency should a taller or longer legged person be able to maintain a higher cadence or speed?
stevelon is offline  
Old 04-25-07, 10:02 AM
  #2  
Time for a change.
 
stapfam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Posts: 19,913

Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Depends how fast they can pedal.

It makes no difference except you will find that professionals who are short can climb mountains and long legs mean you can sprint. In the real world though---
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


Spike Milligan
stapfam is offline  
Old 04-25-07, 10:25 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Higher cadence for how long?
oilman_15106 is offline  
Old 04-25-07, 10:43 AM
  #4  
Boomer
 
maddmaxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,214

Bikes: Diamondback Clarity II frame homebuilt.

Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16098 Post(s)
Liked 1,457 Times in 1,064 Posts
I gather that in the world of pro bike racing, short LIGHT riders climb well and tall BIG POWERFULL men sprint well. I don't think that cadence or speed (over some undefined distance) is the important factor but rather watts and power vs load for a given task.
maddmaxx is offline  
Old 04-25-07, 11:23 AM
  #5  
Ride Daddy Ride
 
Jet Travis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Villa Incognito
Posts: 2,648

Bikes: 1983 Trek 720; 1983 Trek 620; 1989 Gi Cannondale Bad Boy Ultra; LeMond Victoire; Bike Friday Pocket Rocket Pro

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
You've got guys like Heras at 125 pounds or so who could fly up mountains. And then sometimes big guys with big engines, such as Ulrich, also climb pretty darn well and aren't such great sprinters. Glad I don't have to figure all this out.
__________________
"Light it up, Popo." --Levi Leipheimer
Jet Travis is offline  
Old 04-25-07, 12:07 PM
  #6  
Semper Fidelis
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,000

Bikes: Tiemeyer Road Bike & Ridley Domicles

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
believe it is a mixture of your muscle fibers, fast twitch verses slow twitch. they can be trained on which one your lacking the most power in.
I do find that those that seem to have a longer femur seem to do better in climbing than sprinting just an personal observation
HAMMER MAN is offline  
Old 04-25-07, 12:14 PM
  #7  
OnTheRoad or AtTheBeach
 
stonecrd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Weston, FL
Posts: 2,170

Bikes: Ridley Noah RS, Scott CR1 Pro

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Power to weight ratio drives much of it. Increasing power comes from genetics and training. The other factor is mental, how much pain can you take. When you put it all together you get a pro cyclist.
__________________
The problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard and the shallow end is much too large

2013 Noah RS
stonecrd is offline  
Old 04-25-07, 01:03 PM
  #8  
Version 7.0
 
Hermes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 13,127

Bikes: Too Many

Mentioned: 297 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1340 Post(s)
Liked 2,482 Times in 1,457 Posts
Lance Armstrong was 5 foot 10 inches and typically competed between 165 and 170 pounds. He destroyed the competition in the time trials and in the mountains. It is all about the power to weight ratio at lactate threshold. He had the highest. If you have not seen it, here is Armstrong destroying the field climbing Alpe d'Huez in the 2001 TdF giving Ullrich the "Look". I only wish I could stand up that long climbing at ANY speed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHJErrp4eOw
Hermes is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.