Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Fifty Plus (50+) Share the victories, challenges, successes and special concerns of bicyclists 50 and older. Especially useful for those entering or reentering bicycling.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-25-07, 09:43 AM   #1
stevelon
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: cocoa beach, fl
Bikes: Trek 1200 and Trek hybrid
Posts: 117
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
speed & stature

Given equal amounts of fitness, age and cardio efficiency should a taller or longer legged person be able to maintain a higher cadence or speed?
stevelon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-07, 10:02 AM   #2
stapfam
Time for a change.
 
stapfam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
Posts: 19,915
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Depends how fast they can pedal.

It makes no difference except you will find that professionals who are short can climb mountains and long legs mean you can sprint. In the real world though---
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


Spike Milligan
stapfam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-07, 10:25 AM   #3
oilman_15106
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 6,900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Higher cadence for how long?
oilman_15106 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-07, 10:43 AM   #4
maddmaxx 
Small Member
 
maddmaxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Bikes: Leader home built hardtail, Diamondback Response
Posts: 7,136
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 371 Post(s)
I gather that in the world of pro bike racing, short LIGHT riders climb well and tall BIG POWERFULL men sprint well. I don't think that cadence or speed (over some undefined distance) is the important factor but rather watts and power vs load for a given task.
maddmaxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-07, 11:23 AM   #5
Jet Travis
Ride Daddy Ride
 
Jet Travis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Villa Incognito
Bikes: 1983 Trek 720; 1983 Trek 620; 1989 Gi Cannondale Bad Boy Ultra; LeMond Victoire; Bike Friday Pocket Rocket Pro
Posts: 2,648
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
You've got guys like Heras at 125 pounds or so who could fly up mountains. And then sometimes big guys with big engines, such as Ulrich, also climb pretty darn well and aren't such great sprinters. Glad I don't have to figure all this out.
__________________
"Light it up, Popo." --Levi Leipheimer
Jet Travis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-07, 12:07 PM   #6
HAMMER MAN
Semper Fidelis
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Bikes: Tiemeyer Road Bike & Ridley Domicles
Posts: 2,993
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
believe it is a mixture of your muscle fibers, fast twitch verses slow twitch. they can be trained on which one your lacking the most power in.
I do find that those that seem to have a longer femur seem to do better in climbing than sprinting just an personal observation
HAMMER MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-07, 12:14 PM   #7
stonecrd
OnTheRoad or AtTheBeach
 
stonecrd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Weston, FL
Bikes: Ridley Noah RS, Scott CR1 Pro
Posts: 2,170
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Power to weight ratio drives much of it. Increasing power comes from genetics and training. The other factor is mental, how much pain can you take. When you put it all together you get a pro cyclist.
__________________
The problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard and the shallow end is much too large

2013 Noah RS
stonecrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-07, 01:03 PM   #8
Hermes 
Elite Rider
 
Hermes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: La Jolla, CA
Bikes: Too Many
Posts: 9,808
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Lance Armstrong was 5 foot 10 inches and typically competed between 165 and 170 pounds. He destroyed the competition in the time trials and in the mountains. It is all about the power to weight ratio at lactate threshold. He had the highest. If you have not seen it, here is Armstrong destroying the field climbing Alpe d'Huez in the 2001 TdF giving Ullrich the "Look". I only wish I could stand up that long climbing at ANY speed.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHJErrp4eOw
__________________
We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit. Aristotle

Cat: Killer
Hermes is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:02 PM.