Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    296
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Long term comfort of Bianchi's C2C geometry?

    Stopped by LBS last weekend and rode about a half dozen 2006 Bianchis. Idea I had was to start pretty good (Bianchi Veloce) and work up from there until I couldn't tell the difference. Reality was that the differences were not as subtle as I thought they would be, which is a bummer for my pocketbook.

    The bike I liked best was the 928 with Campy Veloce with twin front chainrings (yes, quite a bit more $$ than I started thinking of spending). Store owner says for 2007 the C2C (Coast to Coast) has the same easier on the back/neck geometry.

    Anyone with a longer term experience on these bikes care to comment? For 2007, the 928 C2C comes with a variety of choices for components. I personally liked the Campy Veloce set, but for 2007 the choices seem more restricted, and the push toward dual chainrings in front has me concerned. The best configuration is the very pricey Chrous compact. Is Chorus that much better than Veloce, or is it just lighter? Any comments on components too, would be appreciated.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    296
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Anyone? Or, is the 928 just not usually an older person's bike?

  3. #3
    Time for a change. stapfam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
    My Bikes
    Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
    Posts
    19,915
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Smorgasbord42 View Post
    Anyone? Or, is the 928 just not usually an older person's bike?
    Can't help you out with Ride qualities- but A couple of months ago I was looking at a New bike. I looked at the Bianchi's and the 928 definitely caught my attention. Well any Bianchi would and does. Spec seemed right- Bike felt comfortable in the Shop on the rollers and the price was right in my range. Never got to test ride it though as I went elsewhere.
    How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


    Spike Milligan

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    296
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Apparently, "comfort geometries" are a fast growing segment of road bikes. In this segment, Specialized has the S-Works Roubaix and Trek has the Pilot. I'll be test riding those soon, but anyone have any comments comparing these 3 bikes?

    thanks again

  5. #5
    feros ferio John E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
    My Bikes
    1959 Capo; 1980 Peugeot PKN-10; 1981 Bianchi; 1988 Schwinn KOM-10;
    Posts
    14,772
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As I smugly ride my old lugged steel classics, I am pleased to read that relaxed geometries are becoming more prevalent on decent new road bikes.
    "Early to bed, early to rise. Work like hell, and advertise." -- George Stahlman
    Capo [dschaw'-poe]: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger, S/N 42624
    Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
    Bianchi: 1981 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
    Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069

  6. #6
    Senior Member CrossChain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,024
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by John E View Post
    I am pleased to read that relaxed geometries are becoming more prevalent on decent new road bikes.
    Consider the organized rides you've been on lately. It's like everyone is at least 40 or older. Young people may be riding, but most I see on the road are at, near, or (Hi Guys!) even past mid-life. "Comfort geometries" have arrived because we Boomers (with adequate funds and expectations for service) have arrived in greater numbers at the LBS.

    I'll be looking for a carbon bike for next year. My most fun bike is my criterium geometry bike-- well, up to about 50 miles that is. My concern is how much handling "quickness" and feeling of liveliness does one give up for a comfort carbon bike? There are major handling differences between my quick Sirrus and relaxed Romulus. Test rides in Cow Town here are limited. I'll have head out of town for test rides.

  7. #7
    just keep riding BluesDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Milledgeville, Georgia
    My Bikes
    2014 Specialized Crave Pro 29, 2014 Specialized Crux EVO Carbon Disc, 2012 Black Mountain Cycles Monster Cross, 2011 Specialized Roubaix SL3 Expert Compact, 2009 Salsa Casseroll, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB
    Posts
    12,724
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Smorgasbord42 View Post
    Apparently, "comfort geometries" are a fast growing segment of road bikes. In this segment, Specialized has the S-Works Roubaix and Trek has the Pilot. I'll be test riding those soon, but anyone have any comments comparing these 3 bikes?

    thanks again
    Fortunately it is not only the megabucks ($6-7K) S-Works version of the Roubaix that has the relaxed geometry for those who want it. The Pro, Expert, Comp, Elite and standard Roubaix models also have it for thousands less.
    The more you ride your bike, the less your ass will hurt.

  8. #8
    just keep riding BluesDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Milledgeville, Georgia
    My Bikes
    2014 Specialized Crave Pro 29, 2014 Specialized Crux EVO Carbon Disc, 2012 Black Mountain Cycles Monster Cross, 2011 Specialized Roubaix SL3 Expert Compact, 2009 Salsa Casseroll, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB
    Posts
    12,724
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CrossChain View Post
    I'll be looking for a carbon bike for next year. My most fun bike is my criterium geometry bike-- well, up to about 50 miles that is. My concern is how much handling "quickness" and feeling of liveliness does one give up for a comfort carbon bike?
    Yeah, I'm pondering the same question. I want a bike that smooths out the miles, but I don't want one that turns like a battleship. You can make an educated guess by pouring over the head angle, seat angle, fork rake and trail and other such measurements, but test rides are the real proof of the pudding. I may end up doing the same thing I did 7 years ago when I considered replacing my soul mate Bridgestone - upgrade the components on my Bridgestone.
    The more you ride your bike, the less your ass will hurt.

  9. #9
    Senior Member CrossChain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,024
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BluesDawg View Post
    I may end up doing the same thing I did 7 years ago when I considered replacing my soul mate Bridgestone - upgrade the components on my Bridgestone.
    Somehow this notion grows that a new bike will do it all....comfort, handling, lighter for climbing (no doubt there) and somehow our riding experience will be enhanced. Then I remember the hours and hours I spent experimenting with set up and parts to get the right "feel" and position on my old bike-- and I ask myself "Do I really want to start over?" to get an increase (maybe) of 5 or even 10% in, in, in whatever we call it: The Ride Experience?

    After getting accustomed and set-up, I'll jump on the bike and just go. Which is exactly what I do now.

    Still..............A New Bike

    You'd think by 60 I'd be sensible and grown-up.

  10. #10
    Squirrel solveg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Twin Cities, MN
    My Bikes
    07 Rivendell Atlantis, 80's Mondonico, 91 Cinelli ATB, 83 Schwinn Peleton, 94 Scott Cheyenne, 97 Klein Stage Comp, 81 SR Touring Bike, 80's CCM, 84 Bridgestone 200
    Posts
    4,917
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've become a firm believer in multiple bikes....

    I ride my Atlantis and my Klein pretty equally, depending on what mood I'm in and how far I'm going. If I'm putting the miles on, it's the Atlantis hands down. I could stay on it a lot longer than my legs would move me.

    But for skimming around the city and when I'm in a zoomy mood, my Klein wins.

  11. #11
    Gios
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    France
    My Bikes
    Look 586
    Posts
    138
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In one of the French bike magazines (I'm in Europe), they compared all these recently, including the Bianchi ... I don't have it in front of me, but they ALL came out very well, just different - Trek/Bianchi/Specialized. Throw in the Cannondale Synapse from the ones you didn't mention, or even the Merckx CHM, and see which one fits/rides the best. The geometries on those vary quite a bit.

    I could try and dig out the articles if you needed more info.

  12. #12
    Time for a change. stapfam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
    My Bikes
    Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
    Posts
    19,915
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Putting ride comfort on a different slant. Last year I got a Giant OCR3- a relaxed geaometry "Sport" fit bike. I was new to road biking and it seemed OK but I got a new set of wheels to replace the OM set. What a difference, mainly in the speed and less rolling resistance but the hig improvement was in the comfort of the bike.

    Then this year I got a Stiff Aluminium bike. To make it even worse I got Shimano low spoke count wheels that are not the most body friendly. No problem as the Top quality C.F.Forks and seat post take all the road buzz away from the harsh ride. Just as a test- I put the OM wheels back on the Giant and compared the ride with the New bike. There is such a vast difference in ride "Comfort" quality with the new bike that I am no longer riding the Giant.

    The quality that comes on these new bikes is Tremendous. Depends on what you are after of course- but the "Performance" of a better quality bike over a cheapie is phenominal. And providing the Selection of parts is aimed at Comfort then a test ride would confirm that "Most" new bikes are better at rider comfort than they used to be.
    How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


    Spike Milligan

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •