Social Security Riders
What's been the general experience of over 62 bike riders taking on long distance touring -1000 miles plus?
|
I guess that I don't understand the question. What does being 62 have to do with it?
I'll admit to never having bicycled that far on one continuous trip but I don't see why that would be any different than taking 3 350 mile trips on consecutive weeks. I have an acquaintance who decided to fly to Alaska, bicycle until it stopped being fun and then hop a Grayhound home. He said got to Key West before it stopped being fun. |
Originally Posted by Retro Grouch
(Post 6139971)
I guess that I don't understand the question. What does being 62 have to do with it?
I'll admit to never having bicycled that far on one continuous trip but I don't see why that would be any different than taking 3 350 mile trips on consecutive weeks. I have an acquaintance who decided to fly to Alaska, bicycle until it stopped being fun and then hop a Grayhound home. He said got to Key West before it stopped being fun. |
62
62 has to do with it because that is the age many people retire. Many men that I work with who are near 62 are not capable of much physical exertion. The question is focused on how many 62 + riders are taking long touring trips. I see you know one. That seems like a beautiful ride to me. I hope this reply helps you understand.
|
Originally Posted by JoeMan
(Post 6139587)
What's been the general experience of over 62 bike riders taking on long distance touring -1000 miles plus?
(I'm teasing. I know what you really meant by "over 62.") |
Originally Posted by JoeMan
(Post 6140318)
62 has to do with it because that is the age many people retire. Many men that I work with who are near 62 are not capable of much physical exertion.
The reason for my comment was because, to the people who take these trips, it's really not a big deal. Just do it! |
I ride with a lot of riders who are my age or older. Quite a few do tours in Colorado such as the Bicycle Tour of Colorado or Ride the Rockies. These rides are usually 400 +/- 50 miles all in one week. I'm 64 and plan on riding til I drop. If you plan a 1K trip and are reasonably healthy it shouldn't be a problem. When I finally retire I plan on doing "credit card camping" meaning that I will go for the bed and shower every night and hope to even do a cross country trip. Do a lot of research on equipment, food, health, and training and you won't have any problems.
|
Originally Posted by JoeMan
(Post 6140318)
62 has to do with it because that is the age many people retire. Many men that I work with who are near 62 are not capable of much physical exertion. The question is focused on how many 62 + riders are taking long touring trips. I see you know one. That seems like a beautiful ride to me. I hope this reply helps you understand.
Many of the people I ride with are retired. We don't let age keep us from doing longer tours. We're currently planning on a bike trip around Lake Erie (700+ miles), XOBA (Across Ohio) and TOSRV. TOSRV is 210 miles in 2 days. |
Originally Posted by Beverly
(Post 6144090)
Age is not the determining factor in undertaking a long distance cycling trip. The most important factor is physical condition. I know people in their 30's and 40's who aren't capable of much physical exertion.
|
I am 61, and commute 25 mi. R/T 98%+ of the time, and have for the last 3 years Completed a short tour from Jacksonville to Cape Coral this past October....403 mi. in 4 days. I have 2 more short (300 Mi) tours scheduled this spring/summer and will leave San Diego on the Southern Tier starting at the end of Sept. this year. I would do more but can't break away from my office enough. I am certainly not as fast as some, but I certainly am faster than many.
I pass most other riders......all except for two 8 year olds that I see on my way home many evenings......they come out to race me down the block......I downshift so my feet seem really fast pedaling and hold just behind them so they win.......think they are on to me though as they have mentioned that they have seen me coming across the river on Veteran's bridge going a whole lot faster....for now they still are happy to win! (Thier father's put lights on their bikes so they could ride in the early evening when I come by....often their parents are at the end of the block waiting to see them "win"!!!) Age just means we have more experience. |
Originally Posted by JoeMan
(Post 6140318)
62 has to do with it because that is the age many people retire. Many men that I work with who are near 62 are not capable of much physical exertion. The question is focused on how many 62 + riders are taking long touring trips. I see you know one. That seems like a beautiful ride to me. I hope this reply helps you understand.
|
Social Security cut my assistance income off completely for having too many trikes- considered them vehicles (added up to more financial property than I was allowed); so I had to get rid of all of them and re-apply- which worked. I saw Social Security and thought "Uh Oh!" Be very careful.
countersTrike |
JoeMan,
I turned 62 last year and rode from my home in Melbourne, Fl. to Eugene, Or (just over 4000mi). It was my second solo unsupported cross country ride in three years. As long as you do some training prior to departure, all will be well. And the experience will be more than worth the training invested. |
I read the OP as maybe asking two questions:
1. physical ability and requirements due to age. 2. financial issues such as receiving monthly checks and maintaining a bank account while living on the road with no direct mailing address. For #1 I'm not that old yet (but on some days I feel like I am), for #2 I'd suggest looking at some books on live-a-board boating and RV lifestylers who hit the road when they retire and no longer have a permanent address. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:49 PM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.