Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 65
  1. #1
    Senior Member Tony (Michigan)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    141
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Bike too small? How do you know?

    Hi! I'm new here. 54 years oooooooold
    I have a Trek 520 road bike. I'm 5' 11" and wear 33 pant leg.

    I sometimes have knee pain. I bought the bike about 3 years ago and the knee pain was so bad I hung the bike for almost all that time.
    Now I have it out again and have been going back to the bike store I bought it from. I should have done this three years ago.

    The seat was too high so they lowered it. It has three front gears. They told me for now just keep it in the middle one and just spin. This has helped immensely.
    I believe the frame is 52cm.

    One of the mechanics there says the frame is too small.
    The other guy there told me (when the mechanic was not around) that the frame is fine.
    The mechanic told me that he was biking on a smaller bike and his knees were hurting so bad he had to walk home. And he was a young guy. He bought a larger bike and no longer do his knees hurt.

    I do a cadance of around 77 to 80 and around 11 to 14 mph.

    My seat is now just a little higher than the handlebars. Yet it feels uncomfortable on my hands to put pressure on the bars. If I got a bigger frame wouldn't the handlebars be further more from the seat causing me to lean more onto the bars?

    Any ideas?

    Thanks!
    Tony

  2. #2
    Left OZ now in Malaysia jibi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Lancashire England, but at the moment on an extended tour of South East Asia
    My Bikes
    Thorn Ravan Catlayst, Bill Nickson tourer, Bill Nickson Time Trial, Claud Butler Cape Wrath, Motobecame Tandem etc etc
    Posts
    826
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Have you got pictures of you and the bike?

    52cm does sound a tad small at 5'11''

    I would recommend a fitting but that costs.
    george
    ---------------------------------------------------
    https://sites.google.com/site/imjibi/home

    Photos of present tour of South East Asia
    http://picasaweb.google.com/georgeidf50/southeastasia

  3. #3
    Senior Member late's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Southern Maine
    Posts
    8,290
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Too small.. hard to tell if that's the culprit with your knee pain. But having had a
    bike that was too small I do know they're a pain.

    What you need to find out is the top tube length you need. It will likely be 58+/-
    We are as gods, we might as well get good at it.
    Stewart Brand

  4. #4
    Small Member maddmaxx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    My Bikes
    Leader home built hardtail, Diamondback Response
    Posts
    7,126
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    For a rough starting point...............not the final perfect fit by far.

    1 measure your inseam height using the book method.

    Find a large book, stand against the wall, push the book against the wall to keep it level and up against your crotch as hard as is comfortable. Have an assistant measure from the floor up to the top edge of the book. This is your inseam height for bike measurements. (do it with you shoes on)

    Multiply the inseam measurement by 0.67 This is the approximate starting point for your proper bike size. You can convert back and forth from inches to cm depending on the type of bike.

    In addition, you measure you overall height and devide it by your inseam height. If the answer is greater than 2.2 then you need to get a slightly larger bike than indicated in the begining. If the answer is less than 2.0 you are pointed toward a slightly smaller bike.

    None of this is to be considered as the last word in bike fit for you, merely a starting point.
    Last edited by maddmaxx; 05-20-08 at 09:45 AM.
    Just take it

  5. #5
    Senior Member Tony (Michigan)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    141
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks. By the way, when standing over the top tube my pubic bone is about 4 inches above it with shoes on. About 3 1/2 without shoes.

  6. #6
    Neil_B
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by jibi View Post
    Have you got pictures of you and the bike?

    52cm does sound a tad small at 5'11''

    I would recommend a fitting but that costs.
    george
    It seems small with that inseam. I'm 6' 1" with a 30.5/31 inseam, and I'd probably fit that bike, if the top tube were long enough.

  7. #7
    Small Member maddmaxx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    My Bikes
    Leader home built hardtail, Diamondback Response
    Posts
    7,126
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Sorry, had to edit previous post due to premature Entering.
    Last edited by maddmaxx; 05-20-08 at 09:50 AM.
    Just take it

  8. #8
    feros ferio John E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
    My Bikes
    1959 Capo; 1980 Peugeot PKN-10; 1981 Bianchi; 1988 Schwinn KOM-10;
    Posts
    15,267
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tony (Michigan) View Post
    Thanks. By the way, when standing over the top tube my pubic bone is about 4 inches above it with shoes on. About 3 1/2 without shoes.
    That sounds pretty small to me. However, if the bike has a long enough top tube for you to stretch out without banging your elbows with your knees and a long enough seatpost to give you a proper leg extension, you should be fine. Just for comparison, I wear 30" inseam trousers and find older 55cm C-T frames ideal. My 54cm Peugeot also works out well, because of its long top tube.

    The best advice you got was to use the lower gears and to keep your crank cadence up, instead of mashing the pedals.
    "Early to bed, early to rise. Work like hell, and advertise." -- George Stahlman
    Capo [dschaw'-poe]: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger, S/N 42624
    Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
    Bianchi: 1981 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
    Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069

  9. #9
    Ride Daddy Ride Jet Travis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Villa Incognito
    My Bikes
    1983 Trek 720; 1983 Trek 620; 1989 Gi Cannondale Bad Boy Ultra; LeMond Victoire; Bike Friday Pocket Rocket Pro
    Posts
    2,648
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm 5' 9". 30-inch inseam. Ride a Lemond 53, and it feels good. All other things being equal, racers seem to like smaller frames than us touring types, but that's my experience, fwiw.
    "Light it up, Popo." --Levi Leipheimer

  10. #10
    Senior Member Tony (Michigan)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    141
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Maybe it's just me but I feel like when I'm riding on a level surface and reach to grab the horns of my handlebars it is just too uncomfortable. And to reach way down to where the handlebars loop down under is too uncomfortable. So I do most of my riding by grabbing onto the handlebars that run across the top.

    The seat post can go very high. My legs were pretty much straight before when at the bottom of the pedal. Now there is about a 10 degree bend.

    I have not been wearing my lock-in shoes lately either but my feet don't move much anyway.

    For the life of me though I don't know how some can do a cadance of 90 to 100. I'd get burnt out after about 10 minutes of that speed! Maybe as I get more seasoned I can up the cadance to about 90.

    Thanks everyone for your input.

    Also I wonder if I could scavange most of my parts of my Trek 520 if I did go with a different, larger frame?

    Tony

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    6,900
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Assume the geometry is still the same as on Trek web site. There is no size 52 listed. Just S-M-L etc. The frame size should be on the seattube somewhere. The small has an effective toptube of 54cm so this bike is in the traditional LeMond frame style(longer toptube relative to other brands).

    Based on what you have said the frame is too small for your size body. However you are much better off riding a frame that is too small than one that is too large. You may be able to make the stem and seatpost adjustments that will make it work. Traditional sizing theory calls for a 5 degree knee bend when the pedal is at the bottom of the rotation. 10 degrees sounds like knee pain in the making.

    A picture of you on the bike would help greatly.

  12. #12
    Senior Member PirateJim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Tampa Bay area.
    My Bikes
    '07 Trek Pilot 5.0, ~'92 Trek Navigator 400
    Posts
    99
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just to throw in another rough measurement, you can find a pretty good starting point for seat height by setting it so if you peddle with your heel your leg is fully extended at the bottom of the stroke. This should give you about the right extension when you move your foot back to peddle on the ball of the foot. From recent personal experience, a seat that is too low will induce knee pain.

    Most road bikes are set up with the handlebars lower than the seat so that is sort of to be expected. Part of the design is intended to put part of your weight on your arms. How much lower than the seat depends on the specific model, lower roughly equates to more agressive. The extension out to the brake hoods or to the drops may just be something you haven't put in enough miles to get comfortable with. When I bought a road bike after putting in several thousand miles on a comfort bike it was a huge adjustment that I'm still working through. Only now do I find myself spending most of my time out on the hoods and only going to the bar tops to stretch or take a drink, etc. You might find a set of decent padded bike gloves is a real help, I did.
    Jim
    - - - - - - - - - - - -
    '07 Trek Pilot 5.0
    '06 West Marine Port Runner (Foldable)
    '01 Trek Navigator 400
    n + 1 = ???

  13. #13
    Senior Member CACycling's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Oxnard, CA
    My Bikes
    '08 Fuji Roubaix RC; '07 Schwinn Le Tour GS; '92 Diamond Back Ascent EX
    Posts
    4,450
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Knee problems can also be a result of the seat being too far forward. My wife was having knee pain till I moved her seat back a little bit. As for frame size, yours sounds a bit small for you. I'm 6' 1" and am comfortable on 60cm to 62cm road bikes.

    +1 on some good gloves. More comfortable and will protect your hands in case of a crash (I know this from experience).

  14. #14
    Time for a change. stapfam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
    My Bikes
    Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
    Posts
    19,915
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CACycling View Post
    Knee problems can also be a result of the seat being too far forward. My wife was having knee pain till I moved her seat back a little bit. As for frame size, yours sounds a bit small for you. I'm 6' 1" and am comfortable on 60cm to 62cm road bikes.

    +1 on some good gloves. More comfortable and will protect your hands in case of a crash (I know this from experience).
    For the rest of Us--It may be a compact frame so untill we get pics- We cannot tell.

    If you can get the saddle high enough and in the fore and aft position for the knees- then the frame can be made to fit. Now I actually ride compact frames and even go for a size that is too small. This gives me a shorter top tube and aids my neck.

    We do need pics of you on the bike- but so you don't feel too downhearted. Attachment is of my Bianchi- You can see how compact frames differ as the road bike is just one size larger.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


    Spike Milligan

  15. #15
    Banned. DnvrFox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    20,924
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sounds too small for a regular frame.

    I am about 5'11", with a pants inseam of 29" and use a 55 cm bike. However your geometry may vary.

    On a regular frame, don't worry too much about the standover height - especially for a road bike.

    You might want to get your cadence up to about 90.

    Have fun and welcome.

    (54 is YOUNG)
    Last edited by DnvrFox; 05-20-08 at 06:55 PM.

  16. #16
    The cat says Merry Xmas Pamestique's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Tustin, CA
    My Bikes
    2002 Lemond Zurich, 2006 Santa Cruz Superlight, 2010 Landshark, 2012 Santa Cruz Juliana, 2014 Juliana Premiero Origin 29er and last but not least, the "Frankenweenie"!
    Posts
    4,478
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I am a woman with longer legs than upper body, am 5' 8" and ride a 52 (and I think the bike is too small for me). I would think for your size you should be on a 56 or 58 but you need to get measured. There is no set size for everyone.
    Last edited by Pamestique; 05-21-08 at 09:10 AM.
    ______________________________________________________________

    Private docent led mountain bike rides through Limestone Canyon. Go to letsgooutside.org and register today! Also available: hikes, equestrian rides and family events as well as trail maintenance and science study.

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    SW Florida The Everglades
    My Bikes
    Rivendell Bleriot and a Panasonic 1986 7500 MTB
    Posts
    182
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Tony,

    The frame is just too small for you. I think you would be much more comfortable on a larger frame.
    4 inches of clearance over the top tube says it all. An inch is plenty. Your top tube is too short and you are all scrunched up. You don't need to spend $$$ on a fitting as there is plenty of info on the net. Try www.rivbike.com and look a LeMonde's fitting rec's too. The salesperson that sold you that bike needs to be better trained.

    I am 5'8" and ride a 55 Bleriot. I was in between a 55CM an 57CM but chose the 55. The 520 is a touring
    bike and the Riv method of fitting applies.

    http://www.trekbikes.com/us/en/bikes/2008/road/520/520/

  18. #18
    Senior Member Tony (Michigan)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    141
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Floridaboy, according to Riv and my calculations, my PBH is 35.5 inches and subtract from that about 4 inches the top of my seat to the center of my crank should be 31.5 inches but right now it is 30.5 inches so I guess I'm not too far off with that. (using PBH - 10 to 10.5 cm) where PBH = pubic bone height.

    Or if using the other method on Rivs site (PBH x 0.873= SH.) I get 35.5 x 0.873 = 30.99 inches. So I'm really close just from what I played around as to what was comfortable for me without measuring.

    Tomorrow I hope to post a pic or two of me on the bike.

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    SW Florida The Everglades
    My Bikes
    Rivendell Bleriot and a Panasonic 1986 7500 MTB
    Posts
    182
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I just find it hard to believe that your frame is a 52CM. From what you measured you seem to be close. Pics would help.

  20. #20
    His Brain is Gone! Tom Bombadil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Paoli, Wisconsin
    My Bikes
    RANS Stratus, Bridgestone CB-1, Trek 7600, Sun EZ-Rider AX, Fuji Absolute 1.0, Cayne Rambler 3
    Posts
    9,980
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm 5' 7.5" and have a 28.25" inseam. I've been laser-measured and fit by multiple shops. On a compact geometry frame, on most bikes, the proper size for me is 52cm.

    I'd guess 5'11" w/33" inseam as being no less than a 55-56, unless you have very short arms. I know guys of your size who ride 58's.
    "Too often I would hear men boast of the miles covered that day, rarely of what they had seen." Louis L'Amour

    There are two types of road bikers: bikers who are faster than me, and me. Bruce Cameron - Denver Post

  21. #21
    Peloton Dog patentcad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Chester, NY
    My Bikes
    2013 Scott Foil, 2009 Scott Addict R2, 2008 Cervelo P3 TT bike, 2008 Motobecane Fly Ti Hard Tail MTB
    Posts
    56,332
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Bombadil View Post
    I'm 5' 7.5" and have a 28.25" inseam. I've been laser-measured and fit by multiple shops. On a compact geometry frame, on most bikes, the proper size for me is 52cm.

    I'd guess 5'11" w/33" inseam as being no less than a 55-56, unless you have very short arms. I know guys of your size who ride 58's.
    I'm 5'11", 33" inseam. I ride a 56cm and 57cm road bikes, a 54 cm TT bike, an 18" hard tail MTB. I size my bikes by effective top tube, on the road bikes and MTB that's always 56-57cm (TT bikes are different).

  22. #22
    Senior Member Tony (Michigan)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    141
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by FloridaBoy View Post
    I just find it hard to believe that your frame is a 52CM. From what you measured you seem to be close. Pics would help.
    I just checked my frame and it states it is a 53.5 cm 21" frame.
    If I could find my card reader I could snag the pics off of my camera card. I'll just have to wait till tomorrow. I believe my arms are normal length.

  23. #23
    Senior Member Tony (Michigan)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    141
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Here is a picture of me on the bike

    This is me. So, what do you experts think of me on this size bike?

    Tony
    Attached Images Attached Images

  24. #24
    Neil_B
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Tony (Michigan) View Post
    This is me. So, what do you experts think of me on this size bike?

    Tony
    Your arms look locked and you look a little cramped.

  25. #25
    Senior Member ?? Beverly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Englewood,Ohio
    My Bikes
    2007 Trek Madone 5.0 WSD - 2007 Trek 4300 WSD - 2008 Trek 520
    Posts
    5,090
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tony (Michigan) View Post
    I just checked my frame and it states it is a 53.5 cm 21" frame.
    If I could find my card reader I could snag the pics off of my camera card. I'll just have to wait till tomorrow. I believe my arms are normal length.
    I'm 5'3" with a 30" inseam. I just bought a Trek 520 - 19" (48cm). They had a 21" at the LBS but it was just a tad too big for me. I could straddle the bike but I didn't have any room left between me and the bike
    =============================================================
    My cancer updates:
    https://www.mylifeline.org/beverlyow...=myupdates.cfm

    Enjoy the little things in life, for one day you may look back and realize they were the big things.
    -- Antonio Smith

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •