Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Fifty Plus (50+)
Reload this Page >

Michelin Krylion vs. Conti Gatorskin / 700x23 vs. 700x25??

Search
Notices
Fifty Plus (50+) Share the victories, challenges, successes and special concerns of bicyclists 50 and older. Especially useful for those entering or reentering bicycling.

Michelin Krylion vs. Conti Gatorskin / 700x23 vs. 700x25??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-08, 11:50 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
PirateJim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Tampa Bay area.
Posts: 99

Bikes: '07 Trek Pilot 5.0, ~'92 Trek Navigator 400

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Michelin Krylion vs. Conti Gatorskin / 700x23 vs. 700x25??

I’m planning to buy some new tires. With less than 900 miles on the new bike I’ve had three puncture related flats and I’m still nursing several nasty patches of road rash and a bruised hip from the one on Monday afternoon (which is no doubt at the root of the decision to shop tires). The bike came with 700x23 Bontrager Race Lite tires. I’m thinking of going to a 25mm tire and after weighing the Michelin Krylion Carbon and the Continental Ultra Gatorskin I think I’m going to go with the Michelins.

I have read a lot of good comments (BF search is my friend :-) about both, and interestingly, a few negative comments about both that were pretty similar, mostly centered around sidewall issues. I am leaning toward the Michelin because they are a bit lighter and, to my eye, a bit more attractive

My reasoning for going to 25mm is mostly for a somewhat softer ride and I’m sorta hopeful that a slightly higher volume tire will provide a bit more of a “tell” as it is going flat. (I took the spill when heading around a corner on what I now believe to have been a fairly rapidly deflating tire. I had picked myself and the bike up and was standing on the side of the road wondering what was going on before I found the tire to be flat.)

Would anyone care to talk me out of this, validate the decision, or offer an alternative suggestion?
PirateJim is offline  
Old 07-11-08, 12:08 PM
  #2  
Hills!
 
speedlever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rolling hills of Piedmont NC
Posts: 1,040

Bikes: 2008 Trek Madone 5.5, 2005 Marin Novato, Trek 7100

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Jim,

Are those flats on your Pilot 5.0? I have an '06 Pilot 5.2 with probably the same tires (except mine are 700x25) and with 2700+ miles have yet to have my first flat with them (knock on wood).

I bought some Conti GP4000 tires to replace the Bontragers, but the Bonti's just won't quit... yet. The rear is starting to look a bit squared off, but I think I have a lot more miles left in them.

Maybe I'm just lucky. If so, I'll take lucky over skill anytime.
speedlever is offline  
Old 07-11-08, 12:11 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
RoyIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Waxahachie, Texas
Posts: 508

Bikes: Gios Compact Pro 10 Chorus, Gios single speed, Pedal Force RS2 10 chorus, CAAD5 10 Centaur, Diamondback dirt bike, Fuji Fixed Gear.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'd get the Michelin Krylons, 25. I run a set of those and they are fine tires.
RoyIII is offline  
Old 07-11-08, 12:43 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Terrierman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SWMO
Posts: 3,185
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1400 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I do not have any experience with the michelins, but am running 700 x 28 ultra gatorskins at present. Lots fewer flats than I had with Vittoria Zifferelli's in the same size on the same riding conditions. If that can be considered helpful at all....
__________________
It's all downhill from here. Except the parts that are uphill.
Terrierman is offline  
Old 07-11-08, 03:46 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: S.E. Pennsylvania, USA
Posts: 1,737
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've run both, and find the Gatorskins a bit tougher, The Krylons look better to me to, but the way a tire looks ranks dead last in my book when it comes to avoiding road rash. Oh, yeah,,, I also found the Gatorskins to be a bit more supple in freezing weather.
BSLeVan is offline  
Old 07-11-08, 04:29 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Rober's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 389

Bikes: 1986 Univega Grand Touring; 1983 Puch A/D Pacifica; 2006 LeMond Sarthe

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have had both. The Gatorskins are trial to get on the first time and are slow, but they're almost puncture-proof. The Michelins (at 120 PSI) are even slower (softer, mushier, no fun) and are just as prone to puncture as the original stock Bontragers (race lite) that came with the bike. Even "tire liners" made of kevlar didn't make any difference. I have Vittoria Rubinos now (700x23 - 130 PSI) - no flats, fast, light, and much more fun.
Rober is offline  
Old 07-11-08, 04:40 PM
  #7  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Our bikes also came with Bontrager Race Lites and we got 4 flats in the first three weeks we rode. We replaced the tires with the Michelins and have 2400 miles each on two bikes with only one flat, and that wasn't even discovered until the following morning. The tire is a bit of a rough ride - we have been going 20PSI in the front and 10PSI in the rear under what Michelin recommends to soften the ride.

I've also used the UltraGatorskins with similar results but only went about half the mileage before I sold them (and the bike they were attached to).
stephen1254 is offline  
Old 07-11-08, 05:00 PM
  #8  
Time for a change.
 
stapfam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Posts: 19,913

Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Going to a 25 will soften the ride but only if you drop the pressures a bit. I only use 23's- because that is what I like but then again- I do not use any of the tyres you have mentioned.

I use Michelin Pro Race 2's at 130 to 140 psi. Most run them at around 100 to 120. Depends on your weight but a heavier rider will need more pressure to stop Snakebites. I am only 150lbs but still run the higher pressures.

If you want a "Performance" tyre then it appears that there is a popular choice of 2 Mich PR2's and Conti 4000s (The s is important) The ride of both of them is good and puncture resistance occurs with both.
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


Spike Milligan
stapfam is offline  
Old 07-11-08, 05:35 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
late's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 8,941
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12192 Post(s)
Liked 1,495 Times in 1,107 Posts
The brakes are large enough for Rivendell Ruffy Tuffy 27c tires. If the frame
has the room, they are a great choice. They are big enough for low pressure, light enough to keep up.

https://chicogino.blogspot.com/2007/0...ffy-tuffy.html
scroll down for a brief review

I ran the tires for 4 years and loved them.
late is online now  
Old 07-11-08, 06:52 PM
  #10  
gone ride'n
 
cyclinfool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 4,050

Bikes: Simoncini, Gary Fisher, Specialized Tarmac

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I vote gatorskins. I totally disagree with the post that said they are slow, I run them on my Simoncini and they are not slow! I am going to switch to them on my Tarmac at the end of this season when the stock tires are shot - and thats my sprinting bike. What makes a tire "slow" is when you can't trust it at speed, around a fast turn or in questionable conditions, I find the Gatorskins rock solid.
cyclinfool is offline  
Old 07-11-08, 07:05 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Rober's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 389

Bikes: 1986 Univega Grand Touring; 1983 Puch A/D Pacifica; 2006 LeMond Sarthe

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cyclinfool
I vote gatorskins. I totally disagree with the post that said they are slow, I run them on my Simoncini and they are not slow! I am going to switch to them on my Tarmac at the end of this season when the stock tires are shot - and thats my sprinting bike. What makes a tire "slow" is when you can't trust it at speed, around a fast turn or in questionable conditions, I find the Gatorskins rock solid.
They are slow.
Rober is offline  
Old 07-11-08, 07:34 PM
  #12  
Hills!
 
speedlever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rolling hills of Piedmont NC
Posts: 1,040

Bikes: 2008 Trek Madone 5.5, 2005 Marin Novato, Trek 7100

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Pardon my ignorance, but how is a bicycle tire fast or slow? Is it a feel issue.. or does it really affect the speed?
speedlever is offline  
Old 07-11-08, 07:55 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,936
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
A person who gets many flats with any tire is either very unlucky, or is riding too close to the edge of the road where all the debris and tiny glass shards are lurking. One thing about road bikes is that unless you've got a van with spare wheels following you, you have to pay attention to where you're riding.

I'm in the camp of people who say that really flat resistant tires tend to be slow because they have more rolling resistance. They just seem sluggish to me. But it may or may not matter to you. 23 or 25... not sure I would sit here and say it makes that much difference to the ride. And I can almost guarantee that for any given model of tire, whether it's a 23 or a 25 is going to make ZERO difference in terms of the number of flats you get.

All in all, mention any tire, and you will find people who have never flatted with theirs, and some who have flatted a lot and will swear off that model or brand forever. It's like saddles. My best advice, I think, would be to buy a good quality, "training tire" and go with that. If you want a nice ride, ignore the naysayers and get a tire with a 127 tpi casing.

And then, don't inflate it any harder than you have to for your weight.

Last edited by Longfemur; 07-11-08 at 07:58 PM.
Longfemur is offline  
Old 07-11-08, 08:04 PM
  #14  
just keep riding
 
BluesDawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Milledgeville, Georgia
Posts: 13,560

Bikes: 2018 Black Mountain Cycles MCD,2017 Advocate Cycles Seldom Seen Drop Bar, 2017 Niner Jet 9 Alloy, 2015 Zukas custom road, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB, 1980ish Fuji S-12S

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 173 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times in 22 Posts
+1
What Longfemur said.
BluesDawg is offline  
Old 07-11-08, 08:17 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,868
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by BluesDawg
+1
What Longfemur said.
+2
Louis is offline  
Old 07-11-08, 09:21 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
BikeArkansas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Maumelle, AR
Posts: 1,075

Bikes: 2012 Scorpion FX trike, 2016 Catrike 700

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I am currently riding the Michelin 25 tires. I will buy another set just like these. Working great for me.
BikeArkansas is offline  
Old 07-12-08, 05:57 AM
  #17  
gone ride'n
 
cyclinfool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 4,050

Bikes: Simoncini, Gary Fisher, Specialized Tarmac

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Louis
+2
+3

As far as one tire being "slower" than another - it's all about rolling resistance and weight. The weight differential is negligable for a ruggid tire like the gatorskin (they weigh the same as the Vittorios mentioned) and the rolling resistance although slightly more for a kevlar belted tire is also negligable and can be offset with a few extra lbs pressure if you choose (and I don't). If these two items do make a difference to you then go get lighter wheels as well. I would rather have a ruggid tire on a fast descent or in a paceline and there are several out there that give you a good tradeoff and are considered good training tires - the gatorskin being one of several. I use to run GranPrix's which are more of a performance tire but they don't hold up as well. I could not see any speed difference on my standard training rides when I switched to the gatorskin - maybe I am just slow on everything. I have not tried the Vittorios but may when need new tires.
cyclinfool is offline  
Old 07-12-08, 07:36 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 368
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I am riding the Michelins in 23. I am very happy with them.
Hask12 is offline  
Old 07-12-08, 12:55 PM
  #19  
Lincoln, CA
 
Mojo Slim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lincoln, CA
Posts: 2,229

Bikes: 94 Giant ATX 760, 2001 Biachi Eros, 2005 Giant OCR2 Composite +

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
I used Gatorskins for years with great results. Fewer flats and 2500+ miles. I got 5000 on a front. The Michellins I had years ago got cut up easily. I just switched to the Conti GP 4000 S, on the recommendation of a local bike guru. After 1400 miles, I like them fine. They are supposed to roll better than the Gators because of their little beads.
__________________
Truth is stranger than reality.
'96 Giant ATX 760 MTB
'01 Bianchi Eros
'05 Giant OCR Llimited Carbon Fiber + upgrades
Mojo Slim is offline  
Old 07-12-08, 02:02 PM
  #20  
Hills!
 
speedlever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rolling hills of Piedmont NC
Posts: 1,040

Bikes: 2008 Trek Madone 5.5, 2005 Marin Novato, Trek 7100

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Do they make the GP4000S in 25mm size? I couldn't find that size so got the std GP4000 instead. (at ProBike). I may have missed it. But I wanted to stay with the 25 size.
speedlever is offline  
Old 07-12-08, 02:45 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: rockford, il
Posts: 2,646

Bikes: Trek 7700, C'dale R2000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Observing all tires mentioned above on two 3,000 mile tours. All these tires will have flats. Just some have fewer. The Michelin seemed to have fewer than most with Continental close behind.

Bontrager may have fine qualities. Long lasting life is not one of them. The Bontrager Hard Case tire lasted less than 1,000 miles as were as the Michelin and Continental lasted the whole tour.
When I say Bontrager do not last I mean that the rubber starts flaking off and frequent flats occur.
BTW, I had the same experience with the Bontrager Race Lite tire as well as the standard Schwalbe Road tire. My complaints to the LBS were answered with: Yeah, they are good for racing but not long distance touring. Our touring was no load touring at 120 miles/day.
will dehne is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.