Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Compact convert

  1. #1
    gone ride'n cyclinfool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Upstate NY
    My Bikes
    Simoncini, Gary Fisher, Specialized Tarmac
    Posts
    4,052
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Compact convert

    Today was the trial ride of the new group on my Simoncini. The triple Veloce group was about 12 years old with about 15K miles on it, it still worked fine but I came into a little bike money, enough to pay for a 10 spd Chorus upgrade. I finished the build yesterday, adjusted the drive train as best as I could and took it for a spin. I really like the compact crank set with the 10spd cassett, I think it will be easy to stay in the 50 ring for most riding and drop to the 34 ring for the climbs. The pedal feel is really smooth. I don't have the gears adjusted quite right - I am getting a little skipping when in the 34/23,24,25 & climbing - but I think I'll get that out with a little more fiddling. I can't wait for next weekends century. I think I am a compact convert! I'll still keep the triple on the Tarmac because thats my climber and it needs the range only a 54/39/30 triple can give but for a long distance rider, the compact is a great alternative. Since the steel Simoncini is my distance bike - I am more than pleased

    The Simoncini now sports a 50/34 crank & 25/11 Cassett. It now has a great top end and an adequate low end.
    "Of all the things I ever lost I miss my mind the most." Mark Twain
    If all you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.

  2. #2
    Let's do a Century jppe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    North Carolina
    My Bikes
    Pinarello Prince/Campy SR; Cervelo R3/Sram Red; Trek 5900/Duraace, Cervelo P2C/Duraace
    Posts
    5,987
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I enjoy having both my 50/34 and my 53/39......but definitely need the compact when riding in the mountains. I'm glad your initial impression was positive.

  3. #3
    Small Member maddmaxx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    My Bikes
    Leader home built hardtail, Diamondback Response
    Posts
    7,071
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    This is also my impression of the compact. I treat it more like a dual range crankset. Low range, most of the gears for climbing or slow speed stuff. High range for most open road riding. Cross chaining is not much of a problem as both chain rings are relatively close to the center of the cassette.

    That may be the other big advantage of the double, just about full use of the cassette from either chainwheel in addition to easier shifting.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Cleveland MS
    My Bikes
    04 Trek 2100, Ultegra, Koobi,Syntace
    Posts
    292
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Get a cassette with a 27 or 28 cog on it, and you'll have virtually the same low end as your triple, within one or two gear inches.

  5. #5
    Time for a change. stapfam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
    My Bikes
    Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
    Posts
    19,915
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Have compacts on my Hill Bike and the Distance bike. Have a triple on the OCR and I never got out of the 42- except downhills. The compact just has better gears for the hills and the flat.
    How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


    Spike Milligan

  6. #6
    gone ride'n cyclinfool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Upstate NY
    My Bikes
    Simoncini, Gary Fisher, Specialized Tarmac
    Posts
    4,052
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by luv2cruz View Post
    Get a cassette with a 27 or 28 cog on it, and you'll have virtually the same low end as your triple, within one or two gear inches.
    Yep - I did a lot of figureing before I settled on the 11/25. Since I never dropped into the 32 on this bike except for a few very steep hills I figured the 34/25 ratio will do me just fine. The low ratio on the bike was 1.28 where as now it is 1.36. The low gear on the Tarmac is 1.2 and there is only one hill I climb where I need that gear not to mention the added stiffness and 5lbs less weight the Tarmac brings.

    Worked on the adjustment tonight - I have gotten it better but it seems to want to skip the 4th or 5th ring in the cassett, I have teh skipping out of it but can't seem to find a spot where all the gears shift smooth. It does better in the big ring than in the small ring. I think I will ride it some more and see if it settles in.
    "Of all the things I ever lost I miss my mind the most." Mark Twain
    If all you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Allegheny Jet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Medina, OH
    My Bikes
    confidential infromation that I don't even share with my wife
    Posts
    5,588
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cyclinfool View Post
    Yep - I did a lot of figureing before I settled on the 11/25. Since I never dropped into the 32 on this bike except for a few very steep hills I figured the 34/25 ratio will do me just fine. The low ratio on the bike was 1.28 where as now it is 1.36. The low gear on the Tarmac is 1.2 and there is only one hill I climb where I need that gear not to mention the added stiffness and 5lbs less weight the Tarmac brings.

    Worked on the adjustment tonight
    - I have gotten it better but it seems to want to skip the 4th or 5th ring in the cassett, I have teh skipping out of it but can't seem to find a spot where all the gears shift smooth. It does better in the big ring than in the small ring. I think I will ride it some more and see if it settles in.
    Are you using a new chain and cassette?

  8. #8
    gone ride'n cyclinfool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Upstate NY
    My Bikes
    Simoncini, Gary Fisher, Specialized Tarmac
    Posts
    4,052
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Everything is new, Chain, Cassett, Crank, derailuers, Brifters, cables.
    "Of all the things I ever lost I miss my mind the most." Mark Twain
    If all you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Allegheny Jet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Medina, OH
    My Bikes
    confidential infromation that I don't even share with my wife
    Posts
    5,588
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cyclinfool View Post
    Everything is new, Chain, Cassett, Crank, derailuers, Brifters, cables.
    Could one of the cogs be in backwards? Maybe a bent dropout?

  10. #10
    Senior Member Retro Grouch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    St Peters, Missouri
    My Bikes
    Rans Enduro Sport, Hase Kettweisel Tandem, Merin Bear Valley beater bike
    Posts
    23,618
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cyclinfool View Post
    Worked on the adjustment tonight - I have gotten it better but it seems to want to skip the 4th or 5th ring in the cassett, I have teh skipping out of it but can't seem to find a spot where all the gears shift smooth. It does better in the big ring than in the small ring. I think I will ride it some more and see if it settles in.
    If it was my bike I'd check the derailleur hanger alignment. That'll sometimes make it skip a cog that way.

  11. #11
    gone ride'n cyclinfool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Upstate NY
    My Bikes
    Simoncini, Gary Fisher, Specialized Tarmac
    Posts
    4,052
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Allegheny Jet View Post
    Could one of the cogs be in backwards? Maybe a bent dropout?


    Quote Originally Posted by Retro Grouch View Post
    If it was my bike I'd check the derailleur hanger alignment. That'll sometimes make it skip a cog that way.
    Don't think it is a backwards cog as I kept the cassett mostly together when it went on - only the small ring slipped off and I had to put it back. The alignment may be the issue as I made no real attempt to align it when I bolded it up the the hanger. The hanger should be OK as the bike shifted perfectly with the old group. After working on it more last night I have it down to wanting to jump over one gear in the middle of the cassett, otherwise it is perfect - and it just does this when in the lower chain ring. I can tease it into this gear and it will stay but when moving a full click either up or down it will jump over this cog. The problem can be moved up or down a cog but I seem to have one that is not quite right.

    Anyway I will check the alignment more carefully - I think it will just take some patience. I plan to ride a century on it this weekend if the weather holds - even as it is now I will have no problem riding it and running it in might help it.
    "Of all the things I ever lost I miss my mind the most." Mark Twain
    If all you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.

  12. #12
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Cape Cod, Massachusetts
    My Bikes
    Roubaix, Pinarello Opera, Giant NRS, Schwinn Corvette, Fuji S18, Schwinn StingRay, Santana Arriva
    Posts
    18
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Make sure that you have the spacers in the right sequence. I was in a hurry once and got them off a little and had the same problem.

  13. #13
    tcs
    tcs is offline
    Palmer tcs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Parts unknown
    Posts
    4,142
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I remember Frank Berto recomending compact, small tooth count drivetrains back in the early 1980s. He's reasoning at the time was it saves grams.

    Some twenty years later, Mr. Berto did a drive train efficiency test with Dr. Chester Kyle (here, beginning on page three). They rediscovered - and empirically measured - some 100 year old knowlege about reducing tooth counts: the smaller the cogs, the lower the efficiency. Through most of the range used by cycle gear trains, the degradation is negilgible, but once the number of teeth drops under the mid-teens, it really starts to go south. A 34/11 is in the neighborhood of 10% less efficient than a 52/17 - a huge difference compared to the small amount of weight lost.

    I see your drivetrain has an impressive 123 inch top gear. At 120rpm, that would deliver ~44 mph. As I said, impressive.

    Best,
    tcs
    Last edited by tcs; 09-23-08 at 11:42 AM.
    "When man first set woman on two wheels with a pair of pedals, did he know, I wonder, that he had rent the veil of the harem in twain? A woman on a bicycle has all the world before her where to choose; she can go where she will, no man hindering." The Typewriter Girl, 1899.

    "Every so often a bird gets up and flies some place it's drawn to. I don't suppose it could tell you why, but it does it anyway." Ian Hibell, 1934-2008

  14. #14
    Small Member maddmaxx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    My Bikes
    Leader home built hardtail, Diamondback Response
    Posts
    7,071
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    ^^^^For some reason I can't get this to download past about page 3. I have to try again at home. Looks like an interesting article. I had always assumed that a roller chain drive lost very little turning corners.

    Edit: for some reason I can't get this page to download beyond about 1/2 meg........then it hangs.
    Last edited by maddmaxx; 09-23-08 at 02:15 PM.

  15. #15
    gone ride'n cyclinfool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Upstate NY
    My Bikes
    Simoncini, Gary Fisher, Specialized Tarmac
    Posts
    4,052
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by tcs View Post
    I remember Frank Berto recomending compact, small tooth count drivetrains back in the early 1980s. He's reasoning at the time was it saves grams.

    Some twenty years later, Mr. Berto did a drive train efficiency test with Dr. Chester Kyle (here, beginning on page three). They rediscovered - and empirically measured - some 100 year old knowlege about reducing tooth counts: the smaller the cogs, the lower the efficiency. Through most of the range used by cycle gear trains, the degradation is negilgible, but once the number of teeth drops under the mid-teens, it really starts to go south. A 34/11 is in the neighborhood of 10% less efficient than a 52/17 - a huge difference compared to the small amount of weight lost.

    I see your drivetrain has an impressive 123 inch top gear. At 120rpm, that would deliver ~44 mph. As I said, impressive.

    Best,
    tcs
    Since my normal RPM ranges from 80-90 that gives me a top speed in the low 30's which is correct. Infact Sunday when I had it out I was sprinting next to another rider and we were doing around 28 on the flat. It has more top end than I think i will reasonably use except when on the down grades trying to make up ground when having gotten dropped by the group on the upgrades...

    As far as efficiency is concerned, I agree that the more the chain has to roll the more loss there will be, now is it significant compared to the losses in everywhere else in the system including the wind resistance when you are in the higher gears is the real question. One should always attack the nail which sticks up the highest first.
    "Of all the things I ever lost I miss my mind the most." Mark Twain
    If all you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.

  16. #16
    gone ride'n cyclinfool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Upstate NY
    My Bikes
    Simoncini, Gary Fisher, Specialized Tarmac
    Posts
    4,052
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Finally found the problem here - the rear derailluer cable was on the wrong side of teh cable clamp and that little difference messed up the amount each click on the brifter moved the derailluer enough to cause it to skip one cog in the cassett. Once I moved it to the other side it shifted perfectly.
    "Of all the things I ever lost I miss my mind the most." Mark Twain
    If all you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •