OT: Cutting a CD in 50+ Language
#1
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 20,917
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
OT: Cutting a CD in 50+ Language
OT: Cutting a CD in 50+ Language (I don't want to post this elsewhere, because I won't understand a word they say!)
My a cappella 9 member gospel singing group is exploring cutting a CD.
While the CD might be sold, it most likely will be given as either wanted or unwanted gifts to those we think ought to remember us fondly???
I have been exploring how a CD might be cut, and find there may be a range of quality levels (and related cost to us).
A fellow group records for two days, with each person and instrument having their own mike, and then spends time "mastering" the CD, putting all the tracks together, adjusting tone, volume and pitch and rhythm, etc. This, of course, is not cheap, and they do sell their CD's, although I don't think they sell a lot - (they are an excellent group).
I have heard of others simply recording the entire group and transcribing it to a CD. Simple but rather non-professional sounding.
I believe we can handle the copying of the CD's and the packaging and the labels and jewel case inserts ourselves, for the small quantity we will likely need.
I would appreciate anyone with more advanced knowledge (that wouldn't be hard) of making a CD to share their knowledge with me.
I see all sorts of ads on Craigslist for CD production, - i.e., $300 - but have NO basis for evaluating.
TIA
My a cappella 9 member gospel singing group is exploring cutting a CD.
While the CD might be sold, it most likely will be given as either wanted or unwanted gifts to those we think ought to remember us fondly???
I have been exploring how a CD might be cut, and find there may be a range of quality levels (and related cost to us).
A fellow group records for two days, with each person and instrument having their own mike, and then spends time "mastering" the CD, putting all the tracks together, adjusting tone, volume and pitch and rhythm, etc. This, of course, is not cheap, and they do sell their CD's, although I don't think they sell a lot - (they are an excellent group).
I have heard of others simply recording the entire group and transcribing it to a CD. Simple but rather non-professional sounding.
I believe we can handle the copying of the CD's and the packaging and the labels and jewel case inserts ourselves, for the small quantity we will likely need.
I would appreciate anyone with more advanced knowledge (that wouldn't be hard) of making a CD to share their knowledge with me.
I see all sorts of ads on Craigslist for CD production, - i.e., $300 - but have NO basis for evaluating.
TIA
Last edited by DnvrFox; 12-23-08 at 07:48 PM.
#2
Erect member since 1953
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Antioch, CA (SF Bay Area)
Posts: 7,000
Bikes: Trek 520 Grando, Roubaix Expert, Motobecane Ti Century Elite turned commuter, Some old French thing gone fixie
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 121 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 38 Times
in
21 Posts
GarageBand: Free multichannel recording software that comes on most consumer Macs.
Mics cost, but borrow if you can.
You can burn your own CD right out of Garage Band. You'd be amazed how good it can sound. Though pros scoff, some artists are actually using it to record.
Burn the CD out of GarageBand. Unless you're making a ton, burn 'em yourself, or have your fellow members burn a few each.
You really can do this for almost no money. You can also spend as much as you want.
You might want to find a hobbiest or semi-pro recordist through Craigslist and, again, not pend a fortune.
Have fun!
Mics cost, but borrow if you can.
You can burn your own CD right out of Garage Band. You'd be amazed how good it can sound. Though pros scoff, some artists are actually using it to record.
Burn the CD out of GarageBand. Unless you're making a ton, burn 'em yourself, or have your fellow members burn a few each.
You really can do this for almost no money. You can also spend as much as you want.
You might want to find a hobbiest or semi-pro recordist through Craigslist and, again, not pend a fortune.
Have fun!
#3
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 20,917
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
GarageBand: Free multichannel recording software that comes on most consumer Macs.
Mics cost, but borrow if you can.
You can burn your own CD right out of Garage Band. You'd be amazed how good it can sound. Though pros scoff, some artists are actually using it to record.
Burn the CD out of GarageBand. Unless you're making a ton, burn 'em yourself, or have your fellow members burn a few each.
You really can do this for almost no money. You can also spend as much as you want.
You might want to find a hobbiest or semi-pro recordist through Craigslist and, again, not pend a fortune.
Have fun!
Mics cost, but borrow if you can.
You can burn your own CD right out of Garage Band. You'd be amazed how good it can sound. Though pros scoff, some artists are actually using it to record.
Burn the CD out of GarageBand. Unless you're making a ton, burn 'em yourself, or have your fellow members burn a few each.
You really can do this for almost no money. You can also spend as much as you want.
You might want to find a hobbiest or semi-pro recordist through Craigslist and, again, not pend a fortune.
Have fun!
#4
Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 327
Bikes: Litespeed, O'Brien, Specialized, Fuji
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
9 Posts
You have found the 2 divergent recording techniques for non-pop music recording. However, if you have no experience doing this, you are guaranteed amateur results.
The multi-track method allows nearly unlimited ability to tweak every instrument and singer, and the expense of billable hours. Pretty much every pop recording is done this way. It can take months of work to fix everything up after the fact.
Anything that actually sounds good live can be recorded live to stereo for a CD. There is absolutely no reason for this to not sound professional if you have the right engineer. Much of the same equipment may be used, but everything must be done perfectly, live, direct to stereo. While this puts pressure on the engineer to get it right - right now, it's commonly done for classical recordings. Most proponents argue that recording live groups results in a better musical performance, whereas multi-tracking usually has musicians playing in a little room by themselves with headphones, listening to prerecorded material or click tracks. The trick is finding a decent engineer who works like this, and it should cost less than having someone work for weeks afterwards.
CD duplicating is not rocket science. For quantities roughly below 200, duplicators with use towers of multiple CD burning computer drives. An inkjet printer prints the design on each CD. Printed materials can be done in color Xerox. If you are real low budget, you can do this on home equipment.
For larger quantities, it pays to press the CDs as there is a one-time charge for a CD glass master. Then it also usually pays to have a printer do the inserts and the artwork on the CD is silkscreened. https://www.discmakers.com/ is the nation's gorilla for small batch CDs.
The multi-track method allows nearly unlimited ability to tweak every instrument and singer, and the expense of billable hours. Pretty much every pop recording is done this way. It can take months of work to fix everything up after the fact.
Anything that actually sounds good live can be recorded live to stereo for a CD. There is absolutely no reason for this to not sound professional if you have the right engineer. Much of the same equipment may be used, but everything must be done perfectly, live, direct to stereo. While this puts pressure on the engineer to get it right - right now, it's commonly done for classical recordings. Most proponents argue that recording live groups results in a better musical performance, whereas multi-tracking usually has musicians playing in a little room by themselves with headphones, listening to prerecorded material or click tracks. The trick is finding a decent engineer who works like this, and it should cost less than having someone work for weeks afterwards.
CD duplicating is not rocket science. For quantities roughly below 200, duplicators with use towers of multiple CD burning computer drives. An inkjet printer prints the design on each CD. Printed materials can be done in color Xerox. If you are real low budget, you can do this on home equipment.
For larger quantities, it pays to press the CDs as there is a one-time charge for a CD glass master. Then it also usually pays to have a printer do the inserts and the artwork on the CD is silkscreened. https://www.discmakers.com/ is the nation's gorilla for small batch CDs.
#5
Senior Member
Once you have a recording, you can put it up for sale at Amazon.com by logging in here...you wouldn't even have to produce the CD yourself.
https://www.createspace.com/
https://www.createspace.com/
#7
Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 327
Bikes: Litespeed, O'Brien, Specialized, Fuji
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
9 Posts
There are many factors to consider. If you go the multitrack route, usually the recording is done in a dead room, and reverberation is added electronically. If you record the group performing "live", you need a good room, with acoustics that complements the style of music. Sometimes electronic reverb is added to this, too, but the original acoustics can't be taken out. You need good microphones, but also good mic preamplifiers and good analog-to-digital converters. Good examples of these are not cheap, although workable examples for many people can be affordable, in the hundreds of $ instead of thousands. You need to know how many microphones to use, and where to place them, which is not always obvious.
If you ask around from similar singing groups and listen to their recordings, you can likely find a few engineers who might fit your style and budget. Not unlike trying to find a good bike mechanic or fitter. If you want to give it hand yourself, it may be great fun and a learning experience, but I think it unlikely you'll get great results.
#9
Senior Member
You're showing your generation...you CUT records but you BURN CD's.
__________________
Last edited by Monoborracho; 12-23-08 at 11:37 PM.
#11
Senior Member
Our church produced a CD earlier this year. Our music minister is a very talented song writer and we have many talented singers and musicians in our congregation. They found a recording studio that got behind it and donated a lot of time to the project so the price wasn't too bad.
As a sound technician in my earler life, I did a lot of recording work in the 70s and can tell you there is a lot of talent in good mixing which can make all the difference in the final product. My one suggestion is go for it. No matter which way you go, as long as you are willing to spend the required time the end result will be something you can be proud of.
As a sound technician in my earler life, I did a lot of recording work in the 70s and can tell you there is a lot of talent in good mixing which can make all the difference in the final product. My one suggestion is go for it. No matter which way you go, as long as you are willing to spend the required time the end result will be something you can be proud of.
#12
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 20,917
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
Our church produced a CD earlier this year. Our music minister is a very talented song writer and we have many talented singers and musicians in our congregation. They found a recording studio that got behind it and donated a lot of time to the project so the price wasn't too bad.
As a sound technician in my earler life, I did a lot of recording work in the 70s and can tell you there is a lot of talent in good mixing which can make all the difference in the final product. My one suggestion is go for it. No matter which way you go, as long as you are willing to spend the required time the end result will be something you can be proud of.
As a sound technician in my earler life, I did a lot of recording work in the 70s and can tell you there is a lot of talent in good mixing which can make all the difference in the final product. My one suggestion is go for it. No matter which way you go, as long as you are willing to spend the required time the end result will be something you can be proud of.
#13
Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 327
Bikes: Litespeed, O'Brien, Specialized, Fuji
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
9 Posts
Typically, you would interview several engineers who did recordings you've heard and liked, and see who you get along with and fits your budget. It could be that they recommend a hybrid technique, such as giving everyone a separate mic, but recording directly to stereo and only editing as needed to get to CD. Or they might prefer to multitrack, but it usually costs much more and takes much more time. It could be at a studio or on location. You'll learn lots if this is your first project - ask as you go, most folks are glad to tell you what they are doing and why.
Sadly, many people with a computer and a few mics think they know all about recording all types of music, and they are almost always wrong. I would look for recordings you like and see who did them, even if you have to reject them for cost, perhaps they'll have other referrals. Also, try asking local classical groups or colleges about recordists you can interview. Acoustic music such as yours is a different matter than a punk grunge band.
Sadly, many people with a computer and a few mics think they know all about recording all types of music, and they are almost always wrong. I would look for recordings you like and see who did them, even if you have to reject them for cost, perhaps they'll have other referrals. Also, try asking local classical groups or colleges about recordists you can interview. Acoustic music such as yours is a different matter than a punk grunge band.
#14
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 20,917
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
Thanks again.
Each of these responses is being forwarded to the members of our singing group. They are very helpful.
BTW, we are tremendously better in our singing than the live single mike recordings on our web site. They were recorded a couple of years ago, and we have improved!!
Each of these responses is being forwarded to the members of our singing group. They are very helpful.
BTW, we are tremendously better in our singing than the live single mike recordings on our web site. They were recorded a couple of years ago, and we have improved!!
#15
just keep riding
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Milledgeville, Georgia
Posts: 13,560
Bikes: 2018 Black Mountain Cycles MCD,2017 Advocate Cycles Seldom Seen Drop Bar, 2017 Niner Jet 9 Alloy, 2015 Zukas custom road, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB, 1980ish Fuji S-12S
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 173 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times
in
22 Posts
The few recordings I've been part of were done by someone with a small studio or a mobile rig making a live take from the sound board mixed with ambient mics around the room at a live gig. I have done the kind of studio recording where you aren't there at the same time as the rest of the instruments and vocals. I hated it. Seemed soulless, although the results can sound very good.
I would bet that there are several small recording studios in your part of the world. Hopefully you can find one who can do a decent job for a reasonable fee. Maybe start by asking around at local music shops. Kind of like asking the guys at your LBS for good places to ride.
I would bet that there are several small recording studios in your part of the world. Hopefully you can find one who can do a decent job for a reasonable fee. Maybe start by asking around at local music shops. Kind of like asking the guys at your LBS for good places to ride.
#16
Banned.
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Southern california
Posts: 3,498
Bikes: Lapierre CF Sensium 400. Jamis Ventura Sport. Trek 800. Giant Cypress.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Thanks again.
Each of these responses is being forwarded to the members of our singing group. They are very helpful.
BTW, we are tremendously better in our singing than the live single mike recordings on our web site. They were recorded a couple of years ago, and we have improved!!
Each of these responses is being forwarded to the members of our singing group. They are very helpful.
BTW, we are tremendously better in our singing than the live single mike recordings on our web site. They were recorded a couple of years ago, and we have improved!!
#17
Senior Member
You have found the 2 divergent recording techniques for non-pop music recording. However, if you have no experience doing this, you are guaranteed amateur results.
The multi-track method allows nearly unlimited ability to tweak every instrument and singer, and the expense of billable hours. Pretty much every pop recording is done this way. It can take months of work to fix everything up after the fact.
Anything that actually sounds good live can be recorded live to stereo for a CD. There is absolutely no reason for this to not sound professional if you have the right engineer. Much of the same equipment may be used, but everything must be done perfectly, live, direct to stereo. While this puts pressure on the engineer to get it right - right now, it's commonly done for classical recordings. Most proponents argue that recording live groups results in a better musical performance, whereas multi-tracking usually has musicians playing in a little room by themselves with headphones, listening to prerecorded material or click tracks. The trick is finding a decent engineer who works like this, and it should cost less than having someone work for weeks afterwards.
CD duplicating is not rocket science. For quantities roughly below 200, duplicators with use towers of multiple CD burning computer drives. An inkjet printer prints the design on each CD. Printed materials can be done in color Xerox. If you are real low budget, you can do this on home equipment.
For larger quantities, it pays to press the CDs as there is a one-time charge for a CD glass master. Then it also usually pays to have a printer do the inserts and the artwork on the CD is silkscreened. https://www.discmakers.com/ is the nation's gorilla for small batch CDs.
The multi-track method allows nearly unlimited ability to tweak every instrument and singer, and the expense of billable hours. Pretty much every pop recording is done this way. It can take months of work to fix everything up after the fact.
Anything that actually sounds good live can be recorded live to stereo for a CD. There is absolutely no reason for this to not sound professional if you have the right engineer. Much of the same equipment may be used, but everything must be done perfectly, live, direct to stereo. While this puts pressure on the engineer to get it right - right now, it's commonly done for classical recordings. Most proponents argue that recording live groups results in a better musical performance, whereas multi-tracking usually has musicians playing in a little room by themselves with headphones, listening to prerecorded material or click tracks. The trick is finding a decent engineer who works like this, and it should cost less than having someone work for weeks afterwards.
CD duplicating is not rocket science. For quantities roughly below 200, duplicators with use towers of multiple CD burning computer drives. An inkjet printer prints the design on each CD. Printed materials can be done in color Xerox. If you are real low budget, you can do this on home equipment.
For larger quantities, it pays to press the CDs as there is a one-time charge for a CD glass master. Then it also usually pays to have a printer do the inserts and the artwork on the CD is silkscreened. https://www.discmakers.com/ is the nation's gorilla for small batch CDs.
Your mikes are probably directional or cardioid (heart-shaped sensitivity pattern). It will be simplest if you only use two. The key things I watch for (I didn't go in the business, but I've recorded my wife's high-school singers quite a bit) are to focus on the performers and get stereo differentiation. I like to place the mikes so the distance between them and the performers is a third to a fifth of the distance to any other sound sources. Examples of undesireable other sources include people working in the kitchen (when recording at home), audiences coughing, chatting, or otherwise not paying attention (when recording a high school concert). Another example is a conductor moving pages, huffing and puffing, and whispering instructions or even singing with the singers. You don't want that stuff to stand out.
Directional mikes are most sensitive on their centerlines, and for about 40 degrees to either side. This cone must be pointed at the performers. For stereo, put the two mikes very close to each other but pointed in directions that are 90 degrees apart. This will get you a distinct separation of stereo content. For even coverage of all your singers, arrange them on the stage so they're fairly evenly spaced from the mike cluster. You don't want any of them to stick out. For a recording session in a home or even better a church sanctuary or community room, this should work out pretty well. In live recording you are constrained in where the singers can be.
Take some time to set the recording levels so the CD does not distort on the musical peaks, and that it generates enough volume that people can listen to it in their cars. Allow some "headroom" for the excitement of a live performance - performers are usually louder on peaks when the audience is present and responsive. Turn down the volume when the applause starts -- it WILL distort.
CU Denver has a pretty good recording engineering program. It used to be run by Bill Porter, who engineered Elvis' hits and a lot of Roy Orbison's. I took his course. I don't know who runs it now, but they had a good baseline to follow.
Contact me if you want to discuss.
Road Fan
#18
just keep riding
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Milledgeville, Georgia
Posts: 13,560
Bikes: 2018 Black Mountain Cycles MCD,2017 Advocate Cycles Seldom Seen Drop Bar, 2017 Niner Jet 9 Alloy, 2015 Zukas custom road, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB, 1980ish Fuji S-12S
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 173 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times
in
22 Posts
Although I did mention recording at live concerts, my recommendation of live recording was for "live in-studio".
#19
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 20,917
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
From our very excellent church musical director, who is also chairman of the music department at our new local high school. He has heard us now for almost 3 years. For us, given who we are, this makes a lot of sense.
Thanks, everyone for all the ideas. I have learned a lot (as usual) from all of your input.
Hi Denver, I think that if you get a good sound person you can get an excellent recording as a group. There is a guy in Parker who has a very nice studio, and is pretty reasonable. His wife is the principal's secretary at the new middle school. You may want to give him a call. I plan on using him for my choir and orchestra audition cd's. He is a really nice guy,and could answer all of your questions.
https://www.Covestudios.com
Thanks, everyone for all the ideas. I have learned a lot (as usual) from all of your input.
Hi Denver, I think that if you get a good sound person you can get an excellent recording as a group. There is a guy in Parker who has a very nice studio, and is pretty reasonable. His wife is the principal's secretary at the new middle school. You may want to give him a call. I plan on using him for my choir and orchestra audition cd's. He is a really nice guy,and could answer all of your questions.
https://www.Covestudios.com
Last edited by DnvrFox; 12-24-08 at 11:32 AM.
#20
legs full of molasses
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: grand central ohio
Posts: 250
Bikes: 1982 Nishiki Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Your church music director may also have a lead, if the one he gave you doesn't work out, to a large church in your area that is active in producing Christian music recordings. There are many across the country who have invested in the equipment to produce good recordings in their buildings.
This sounds like a fun project.
This sounds like a fun project.
#22
Council of the Elders
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 3,759
Bikes: 1990 Schwinn Crosscut, 5 Lemonds
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
...
Anything that actually sounds good live can be recorded live to stereo for a CD. There is absolutely no reason for this to not sound professional if you have the right engineer. Much of the same equipment may be used, but everything must be done perfectly, live, direct to stereo. While this puts pressure on the engineer to get it right - right now, it's commonly done for classical recordings. Most proponents argue that recording live groups results in a better musical performance, whereas multi-tracking usually has musicians playing in a little room by themselves with headphones, listening to prerecorded material or click tracks. The trick is finding a decent engineer who works like this, and it should cost less than having someone work for weeks afterwards.
....
Anything that actually sounds good live can be recorded live to stereo for a CD. There is absolutely no reason for this to not sound professional if you have the right engineer. Much of the same equipment may be used, but everything must be done perfectly, live, direct to stereo. While this puts pressure on the engineer to get it right - right now, it's commonly done for classical recordings. Most proponents argue that recording live groups results in a better musical performance, whereas multi-tracking usually has musicians playing in a little room by themselves with headphones, listening to prerecorded material or click tracks. The trick is finding a decent engineer who works like this, and it should cost less than having someone work for weeks afterwards.
....
#23
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 20,917
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
A response from a studio:
Hi Denver,
Thank you for the email. I also got your voice mail message. I would love to work with your group. I have done many CD projects and yours sounds wonderful. I would also agree with Kurt Stroman that the best way to record a 9 voice group would be to record everyone at the same time. It should be pretty straight forward once we get the mics in the right position and a sound that you all like.
For Studio time I charge $40 an hour. If you have a specific budget amount I can try to work with in it. Normally I would estimate a project like you have described as follows:
Number of songs?
From the hip, an estimate for you project would be somewhere between $500 and $1000 for the recording, mixing and mastering and providing you with a Gold Master CD.
If you are well rehearsed and can perform the songs in 2-3 takes I think we would be closer to the $500 mark.
If you want to have the CD duplicated in mass at a production house you will need to make sure you have all necessary copy write information. I looked over your web site and the music examples there. Most of them would fall in the public domain area so that is good.
Recording during the day is not a problem, I would like to discuss over the phone in more detail. Could we set up a time for Friday after the Christmas Holiday for a phone call?
Thanks
Hi Denver,
Thank you for the email. I also got your voice mail message. I would love to work with your group. I have done many CD projects and yours sounds wonderful. I would also agree with Kurt Stroman that the best way to record a 9 voice group would be to record everyone at the same time. It should be pretty straight forward once we get the mics in the right position and a sound that you all like.
For Studio time I charge $40 an hour. If you have a specific budget amount I can try to work with in it. Normally I would estimate a project like you have described as follows:
Number of songs?
From the hip, an estimate for you project would be somewhere between $500 and $1000 for the recording, mixing and mastering and providing you with a Gold Master CD.
If you are well rehearsed and can perform the songs in 2-3 takes I think we would be closer to the $500 mark.
If you want to have the CD duplicated in mass at a production house you will need to make sure you have all necessary copy write information. I looked over your web site and the music examples there. Most of them would fall in the public domain area so that is good.
Recording during the day is not a problem, I would like to discuss over the phone in more detail. Could we set up a time for Friday after the Christmas Holiday for a phone call?
Thanks
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central Coast, CA
Posts: 3,392
Bikes: Surly LHT, Specialized Rockhopper, Nashbar Touring (old), Specialized Stumpjumper (older), Nishiki Tourer (model unknown)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
A few years ago I bought a Tascam 788 for about $800, plus a CD drive/burner for another $200. It's a great machine. It records 8 tracks digitally. You can bounce tracks many times with no loss of quality. It has many, many virtual tracks (I can't remember how many) so you can really record unlimited numbers of tracks, then mix them down to eight, then master them to two. It has lots of effects, like reverb, compression, etc. I bought a couple of pretty good condenser mics and have used the whole setup to record my elementary school choir. We put out CD's every year. The kids get a cheap souvenir, and we make a buck or two off each one to go into our new equipment fund.
Now the same rig is going for much cheaper on Ebay and there are other similar setups, brand new, at any music store. Tascam now has a similar digital recorder, only with 24 tracks, built-in CD recorder, and updated capabilities for about the same price as my old 788.
On a whole other topic, there are also lots of choices for doing quality recordings with your PC, some not too expensive.
I'm just saying that, if you like technology and toys you might consider buying a little equipment and doing your own recording. These days it's not that hard. What I would have given to have had access to this stuff 30 years ago when I was a professional musician.
Now the same rig is going for much cheaper on Ebay and there are other similar setups, brand new, at any music store. Tascam now has a similar digital recorder, only with 24 tracks, built-in CD recorder, and updated capabilities for about the same price as my old 788.
On a whole other topic, there are also lots of choices for doing quality recordings with your PC, some not too expensive.
I'm just saying that, if you like technology and toys you might consider buying a little equipment and doing your own recording. These days it's not that hard. What I would have given to have had access to this stuff 30 years ago when I was a professional musician.