Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Senior Member love2pedal.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    My Bikes
    Look 586, Condor Baracchi, Litespeed
    Posts
    730
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Gearing on my Fixie

    I am converting a nice early 70s Condor Baracchi (Reynolds 531DB) into a fixie and wondering what gearing I should rig it with. Back in the day (mid 70s) my fixie (we called them fixed-gear back then) was geared at 74 inches.

    I am 30 lbs heavier, 35 years older and about 5 mph slower. I will use the bike for 15 mile (or shorter) rides over rolling terrain. The bike will probably be about 20-21 lbs

    Is 74 inches still a reasonable and common gearing for a fixie? Or should I go lower.

    My inclination is to go lower since I am in worse shape, but at the same time, I can no longer spin at a super high cadence on downhills like I did when I was 19 yrs old.

    Recommendations?

    Thanks, Dan

  2. #2
    Senior Member Retro Grouch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    St Peters, Missouri
    My Bikes
    Rans Enduro Sport, Hase Kettweisel Tandem, Merin Bear Valley beater bike
    Posts
    23,607
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sounds like a lot to me. Mine's 62 gear inches (39 X 17) but I'm a wimp.

  3. #3
    Erect member since 1953 cccorlew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Antioch, CA (SF Bay Area)
    My Bikes
    Roubaix Expert, Motobecane Fantom Outlaw turned commuter, Cannondale F500 Mtn bike, Some old French thing gone fixie
    Posts
    6,532
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Lower.
    Maybe 65.
    at 85 cadence you'll be doing 16 mph
    with your 74 inches you're at 18.7 with the same cadence. If you are just rolling along your cadence becomes super slow, and you'll have hill issues.

    Or, perhaps you are much more studly than I and 74 is good for you.
    WANTED: Not a darn thing. I've got it all. Life is good.
    Website at curtis.corlew.com Bicycle blog at ccorlew.blogspot.com

  4. #4
    Erect member since 1953 cccorlew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Antioch, CA (SF Bay Area)
    My Bikes
    Roubaix Expert, Motobecane Fantom Outlaw turned commuter, Cannondale F500 Mtn bike, Some old French thing gone fixie
    Posts
    6,532
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Retro Grouch View Post
    Sounds like a lot to me. Mine's 62 gear inches (39 X 17) but I'm a wimp.
    62 and 74 aren't a lot alike.
    WANTED: Not a darn thing. I've got it all. Life is good.
    Website at curtis.corlew.com Bicycle blog at ccorlew.blogspot.com

  5. #5
    hello roadfix's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Los Angeles
    My Bikes
    thank you for asking
    Posts
    18,502
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by love2pedal.com View Post
    I am 30 lbs heavier, 35 years older and about 5 mph slower. I will use the bike for 15 mile (or shorter) rides over rolling terrain. The bike will probably be about 20-21 lbs
    Based on this information and assuming that you're still reasonably fit 67 gear inches is the right gear for you.

    It's best if you started out around 70 and try different gear ratios.
    .cinelli.olympic.surly.long.haul.trucker.kona.ku.surly.steamroller.
    .litespeed.classic.litespeed.firenze.bianchi.pista.dean.colonel.plus.more.

  6. #6
    www.ocrebels.com Rick@OCRR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Whittier, CA
    My Bikes
    GT Edge Titanium, Mercian Vincitore, Masi Gran Criterium, GT Zaskar, Hercules 3-Speed, KHS Flight Team
    Posts
    5,218
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I use a 42 x 15 which works out to 75.6 (I'm 59 years old, 165 lb. for what that's worth). This allows a fairly comfortable 20 mph on flat ground, 27 mph on descents (yeah, spinning like a hampster in rotating cage), but is "stand up and work" on steep and/or long climbs.

    Rick / OCRR

    PS: We still call them "fixed gear" and don't use that other word . . .

  7. #7
    Senior Member oldbobcat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Boulder County, CO
    My Bikes
    '79 Gios, '80 Masi, '06 Felt, early '60s Frejus
    Posts
    2,455
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    After experimenting a little, I'm pretty happy with my 74" setup (44/16). Gives me enough inches for the downhills and I can maintain 90 rpm for the 5 mile long uphill, upwind slog back home.

  8. #8
    Senior Member love2pedal.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    My Bikes
    Look 586, Condor Baracchi, Litespeed
    Posts
    730
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for the replies.

    Since the crankset on the bike has a 42/52, I will probably keep the 42 and start out by putting on a 16 for a 69" gear and try it out (and avoid the steep downhills).

    Dan

  9. #9
    His Brain is Gone! Tom Bombadil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Paoli, Wisconsin
    My Bikes
    RANS Stratus, Bridgestone CB-1, Trek 7600, Sun EZ-Rider AX, Fuji Absolute 1.0, Cayne Rambler 3
    Posts
    9,980
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    How well do you go up the hills you tend to ride on your freewheel when you are in 42:16? That should give you some idea.
    "Too often I would hear men boast of the miles covered that day, rarely of what they had seen." Louis L'Amour

    There are two types of road bikers: bikers who are faster than me, and me. Bruce Cameron - Denver Post

  10. #10
    Senior Member Allegheny Jet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Medina, OH
    My Bikes
    confidential infromation that I don't even share with my wife
    Posts
    5,583
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Mine's 52 x 19 @ 73.9 inches. On group rides my biggest problem is staying with the group on the downhills.
    oldschool areodynamic brick

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    172
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It depends on lots of factors (hills, wind, general conditioning, etc).

    You don't say whether or not you currently have a geared bike. If you do, you can certainly tell what gear you need to go up hill. That'd be the determining factor for me. I wouldn't want to be stuck with the choice or damaging my knees, going back down or walking.

    As far as going down, as long as you have at least a front brake and aren't trying to keep up with a group, you can control your cadence with no problem. I certainly wouldn't recommend that you ride on the road without at least a front brake.

    I ride 69". The flatest 15 mile ride I can do around here is rolling with about 700' of climbing and I have no problem.

  12. #12
    Grumpy Old Bugga europa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Adelaide, AUSTRALIA
    My Bikes
    Europa, Hillbrick, Road Chief, Repco Superlite (Ol' Rusty)
    Posts
    2,920
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If track cogs are as cheap there as here, buy the one you think you'll need and one that's a bit lower. Start with the low one to get used to it again, then fit the bigger one when you need it.

    Mind you, that's the advice for those new to fixed gear, you're not, you're returning but it's a strategy that might still work.

    Richard
    I had a good bike ... so I FIXED it

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •