Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Fifty Plus (50+)
Reload this Page >

Frame Size Help

Notices
Fifty Plus (50+) Share the victories, challenges, successes and special concerns of bicyclists 50 and older. Especially useful for those entering or reentering bicycling.

Frame Size Help

Old 04-16-09, 04:46 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Frame Size Help

I am getting into road biking on a budget and considering two used bikes. One is a 58cm traditional frame which may be a little small and the other is a 61cm compact frame that may be a little large. I am 6'2" with a 90cm biking inseam. I think they would both work for me with some adjustments, but in general is it better to get a smaller bike and adjust up for reach, etc., or get a larger bike and adjust down? Any help or advice would be appreciated.
Bill1 is offline  
Old 04-16-09, 05:20 PM
  #2  
feros ferio
 
John E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,793

Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;

Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1390 Post(s)
Liked 1,322 Times in 835 Posts
I generally prefer a cm or two too small over the same amount too large, but note that the top tube length is arguably more important than the seat tube length in determining how well you can fit a given frame.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
John E is offline  
Old 04-16-09, 05:27 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Good point John E. The eff top tube lengths are 57.3cm for the 58cm and 60.6cm for the 61cm compact. Can the stem be changed to make up the difference between these two?
Bill1 is offline  
Old 04-16-09, 05:40 PM
  #4  
Grumpy Old Bugga
 
europa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Adelaide, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 4,229

Bikes: Hillbrick, Malvern Star Oppy S2, Europa (R.I.P.)

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 370 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
You face two issues - the first is reach and the second is handle bar height. In this brave new world with threadless head sets, these can only be adjusted by buying new parts. If you're looking at getting the bars up at saddle height, you're in for a real fight if the headset is too low ... this is why I ride such large frames.

The other issue that has been pushed over the years is stand over height. Mate, that's utterly irrelevant. Both my main bikes (traditional flat top tubes) touch my groin when standing over them and neither has ever given me a problem (I've been riding one of them since the 80's). However, the bike I bought that was sized by a professional bike fitter, requires head stem extenders to lift the bars high enough and, strangely enough, a shorter neck than standard.

So go back to your bikes and see which one you can comfy on as far as handle bar position goes - that's AFTER you've adjusted the saddle properly fore and aft. Your decision will depend on what parts you need to buy and if they're actually available (don't assume they will be - experience speaking again).

If you're really lucky, both will fit and you'll be able to buy the one you really like, which is an important consideration too.

Richard
europa is offline  
Old 04-16-09, 05:48 PM
  #5  
Climbing Above It All
 
BikeWNC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Basking in the Sun.
Posts: 4,146
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Both guys above pretty much touch the important points. Effective TT length will also differ if the ST angles are different. Do you know the geometry of the two frames? Unless you are grossly misshaped, which at 6-2" and a 90cm bike inseam you are not, either frame may work for you. As mentioned, the head tube length will likely be the determining factor here. Chances are you will not want the bars 10cm below your saddle so compare the two HT and see how they work for you.

Post the frame geometries and let's have a look. BTW, I'm just under 6'3 with the same inseam and ride a 58.5cm TT. My other bike has a 60cm TT. Both are comfortable.
BikeWNC is offline  
Old 04-16-09, 08:04 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
BikeWNC - here are the geometry numbers for each frame:

58cm Horizontal Top Tube
Head Tube Angle 73°
Seat Angle 73.5°
Top Tube 56.9
Eff Top Tube (ctr-ctr) 57.3
Chain Stay 41.7
Fork Offset 4.5
Wheel Base (ctr-ctr) 100.4
Stand Over Height 80.8
Seat Tube (ctr-top) 58
Head Tube 14.3

61cm Compact
Head Tube Angle 74°
Seat Angle 72°
Top Tube 56.9
Eff Top Tube (ctr-ctr) 60.6
Chain Stay 41.1
Fork Offset 4.5
Wheel Base (ctr-ctr) 101.1
Stand Over Height 81.5
Seat Tube (ctr-ctr) 53.8
Head Tube 19.25
Bill1 is offline  
Old 04-16-09, 08:22 PM
  #7  
Climbing Above It All
 
BikeWNC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Basking in the Sun.
Posts: 4,146
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bill1
BikeWNC - here are the geometry numbers for each frame:

58cm Horizontal Top Tube
Head Tube Angle 73°
Seat Angle 73.5°
Top Tube 56.9
Eff Top Tube (ctr-ctr) 57.3
Chain Stay 41.7
Fork Offset 4.5
Wheel Base (ctr-ctr) 100.4
Stand Over Height 80.8
Seat Tube (ctr-top) 58
Head Tube 14.3

61cm Compact
Head Tube Angle 74°
Seat Angle 72°
Top Tube 56.9
Eff Top Tube (ctr-ctr) 60.6
Chain Stay 41.1
Fork Offset 4.5
Wheel Base (ctr-ctr) 101.1
Stand Over Height 81.5
Seat Tube (ctr-ctr) 53.8
Head Tube 19.25

First, at your height, 1º of STA will equal 1.3cm in TT length. So the smaller frame with the 73.5º STA will have a comparative TT of 59.25cm to the larger frame's 60.6.

The item that stands out the most though is the HT length of the smaller frame. 14.3cm is pretty short. I assume it has a standard headset which adds 32mm to the total. Still the larger frame with a HT length of 19.25cm is way longer even without adding the headset whether internal or standard.

So with the HT length of the smaller frame being what it is, I would say that frame would not work for you. It's just too short. Do you know how much saddle to bar drop you have now on your current bike?

I could ride the 61 frame. I would probably use a 120 or maybe a 110 stem with it but then I'm used to being stretched out. The thing that concerns me about the geometry is the use of a 4.5cm fork rake with a 74º HTA. That makes for a low trail and usually the rake used on a HTA of 74º is either 4.0 or 4.3cm. The 4.5 may create some handling issues.
BikeWNC is offline  
Old 04-16-09, 08:25 PM
  #8  
just keep riding
 
BluesDawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Milledgeville, Georgia
Posts: 13,560

Bikes: 2018 Black Mountain Cycles MCD,2017 Advocate Cycles Seldom Seen Drop Bar, 2017 Niner Jet 9 Alloy, 2015 Zukas custom road, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB, 1980ish Fuji S-12S

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 173 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times in 22 Posts
For your size, I would think the 58 would be too small. Those numbers are pretty close to what I ride at 6'0" and 87mm biking inseam (PBH). You could probably make it fit with a long stem and seatpost, but better to get something that fits well without going too far outside the normal range of fit.

Number crunching and theorizing is OK if you have no choice, but there is nothing like a test ride to tell if a bike fits or not.

Last edited by BluesDawg; 04-16-09 at 08:29 PM.
BluesDawg is offline  
Old 04-16-09, 08:44 PM
  #9  
Grumpy Old Bugga
 
europa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Adelaide, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 4,229

Bikes: Hillbrick, Malvern Star Oppy S2, Europa (R.I.P.)

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 370 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
They're both 'used' so take them both for a decent ride. Buy the one that works. If neither does, look further. I a seller doesn't want to let you ride it, and you need to offer some sort of reassurance/security that you're not going to keep going, don't buy the bike.

The ride will answer two things - firstly the fit and probably more importantly, how the bike itself works. You may not like the way it handles. You may notice that the wheels don't work at high speed or maybe the gears are rubbish. There's nothing wrong with buying a bike that's worn - provided it was maintained, a bike only gets worn by being good to ride, it's the shockers that get left in the shed. But you do need to consider the cost of doing it up - new cables, brake pads, tyres, chain and cassette might sound like a lot but if the frame, wheels and fit are good, you're laughing.

Best of luck with it. We're only guessing. Only you can answer the size issue and you can only do that on the road. Sorry, no easy answers to this one and it pays to get the right answers before you pay for it.

Richard
europa is offline  
Old 04-16-09, 09:05 PM
  #10  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks all - the information and advice were excellent. I have ridden both bikes, but just for a few minutes each. They were both in very good condition shifted well and appeared well maintained. Based on your feedback and other info from searching the forum archives, I believe the larger frame is the way to go. I will take both for a longer ride this weekend and hopefully one will follow me home and my wife will let me keep it.
Bill1 is offline  
Old 04-16-09, 10:14 PM
  #11  
Grumpy Old Bugga
 
europa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Adelaide, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 4,229

Bikes: Hillbrick, Malvern Star Oppy S2, Europa (R.I.P.)

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 370 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Bill1
... and hopefully one will follow me home and my wife will let me keep it.
Don't let it widdle on the sofa

Richard

seriously, when you lean it against the sofa, make sure the chainrings are on the outside - guess how I know this
europa is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.