Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Fifty Plus (50+) Share the victories, challenges, successes and special concerns of bicyclists 50 and older. Especially useful for those entering or reentering bicycling.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-12-09, 07:32 PM   #1
cyclinfool
gone ride'n
Thread Starter
 
cyclinfool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Upstate NY
Bikes: Simoncini, Gary Fisher, Specialized Tarmac
Posts: 4,051
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
A tale of two bicycles

It was the best of rides, it was the worst of rides. The climb was steep, the descent was glorious. The wind held me back, the wind pushed us along. For last Sunday I rode hill #4 in a series of what I call the Glennville 6 each progressively harder. In early April I started with #1 and each weekend (when I have been able) tackled the next one. #4 rises 900' with a terraced grade ranging from 4% to 12%. The ride started with a 25 mph wind in my nose which was gusty and never let up the entire ride. It was cold and I wore a windbreaker. While riding the 14 miles out to #4 I had times where I was down in the drops pushing hard and only doing 10 mph on the flats with my jacket billowed out. The climb up #4 had the wind on my side as I headed north east. When I crested the top I was hopeing for a fast descent but the wind was so strong and gusty I had to stay on the brakes to keep on the road - the best I could do was 17mph where I would usually hit 40. Then I got down and made the turn east - with the wind at my back I could do 30mph. This loop neted my 38 miles that day - but the average was only 14 where 16 would have been expected. It has indeed a ride with many contrasts.

But what about the two bicycles? Well, because I will ride a metric on Sunday I wanted to test my old steel bike out - I had only done one short ride on it this season and I needed to see if all the adjustments were right. I really felt just how much more comfortable that bike is over the CF Tarmac, the steel bike has such a great natural suspension and the compact campy chorus is just so smooth. But it does not climb like the Tarmac nor does it have that feel of being as much of a natural extension to your being as the Tarmac - the Tarmac almost leaps out when you hit the pedals. It is amazing just how different these two bike feel and how it took two years of riding them before I could put my finger on each of thier strengths and weaknesses. I can't imagine myself selling either of these two great machines but just like the ride above, they are a indeed bikes with many contrasts.
cyclinfool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-09, 09:42 PM   #2
BigBlueToe
Senior Member
 
BigBlueToe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central Coast, CA
Bikes: Surly LHT, Specialized Rockhopper, Nashbar Touring (old), Specialized Stumpjumper (older), Nishiki Tourer (model unknown)
Posts: 3,393
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
'Tis a far, far better ride you rode than you have ever ridden before.
BigBlueToe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-09, 09:55 PM   #3
Tom Bombadil
His Brain is Gone!
 
Tom Bombadil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Paoli, Wisconsin
Bikes: RANS Stratus, Bridgestone CB-1, Trek 7600, Sun EZ-Rider AX, Fuji Absolute 1.0, Cayne Rambler 3
Posts: 9,980
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Steel bikes are made of ever so many parts welded together.
Tom Bombadil is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:44 AM.