Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 20 of 20
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    5
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Thanks for the good advice, another question.

    Thanks for all the great advice in my previous thread, "60 year old needs bike advice". Taking all the advice into account I have decided to go with a road bike.

    Now I would appreciate any suggestions on a road bike in the $1000.00 range that has a lower gearing than a more standard racing gear set.

    Thanks again.

    Tom

  2. #2
    just keep riding BluesDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Milledgeville, Georgia
    My Bikes
    2014 Specialized Crave Pro 29, 2014 Specialized Crux EVO Carbon Disc, 2012 Black Mountain Cycles Monster Cross, 2011 Specialized Roubaix SL3 Expert Compact, 2009 Salsa Casseroll, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB
    Posts
    12,800
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Have you visited any bikes shops to see what brands they carry and which bikes seem interesting to you? Every major bicycle manufacturer makes good bikes within your price range. You should go to every bike shop near you and ask questions. It is probably more important that you pick the right shop than which brand of bike you choose.
    The more you ride your bike, the less your ass will hurt.

  3. #3
    Senior Member gcottay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Green Valley AZ
    My Bikes
    Trice Q; Volae Century; TT 3.4
    Posts
    3,772
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    +1 on the bike shop being an important choice.

    At your price range, you can afford to find a decent frame that fits you well and then modify gearing as needed for your hills as initial fitness. As the hills flatten -- and they will -- you can gear higher.
    George
    Laissez les bon temps rouler

  4. #4
    pedo viejo
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Northern Colorado
    My Bikes
    Specialized Allez, Salsa Pistola
    Posts
    538
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    +1 again. There are a lot of manufacturers who make very similar bikes. I look for a shop where they spend as much time with the occasional rider as they do with the racer, and one of the first things they should talk about is proper fit. Ask how they do a fitting. It should be a bit involved: they should have tools for measuring you. "Stand over the frame" is not good enough.

    Good luck! The fun part is test-riding to your heart's content.

  5. #5
    Senior Member CACycling's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Oxnard, CA
    My Bikes
    '08 Fuji Roubaix RC; '07 Schwinn Le Tour GS; '92 Diamond Back Ascent EX
    Posts
    4,450
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    +1 on fit being #1. You might want to look at a triple crankset. The small ring will give you plenty of low end but you'll still have the big ring to aspire to.

  6. #6
    Rides again HiYoSilver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    W. Sacramento Region, aka, Nut Tree
    My Bikes
    Giant OCR T, Trek SC
    Posts
    3,259
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just let the bike shop advise you. Get a triple, reduce the lowest gear from a 30 tooth to 28 tooth. Your choice on whether to run with 12-27 or 11-34 on the rear. It's a trade off between having a really low gear and having smooth transitions between gears.
    Hi 'o Silver away

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    30
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I am 62 and bought a 2004 Cannondale road bike after I retired 7 years ago. I had done a reasonable amount of road cycling with friends throughout my younger years. I got it a my LBS and it had a triple crank. At the moment, I almost didn't buy the triple because my younger year macho nearly took hold of me. Reality kicked in and I have never been sorry I got the triple. I live in a realatively hilly area and there is no way I would make it up some up my local hills without the rear 26. In fact, I wish I had a 27!

    Over the last few years, I use the small chain-ring less and less, but I never look up ahead and see a hill that I know I don't have the ability to climb. I may go at it slow, but I know I can mash my way up!

    I am 6' and 200. I DO WISH I had spent more time regarding the frame size. I have a 58 cm which is fine for my height, but I have a shorter trunk in relation to my torso and I had to eventually get an adjustable stem because I was leaning to far forward and my arms and shoulders would get real sore after 30 miles or so. So the bottom line is I say make sure you go to a LBS that will take the time to make sure you get fit properly and don't be afraid to tell them about any anomilies about your body, etc. etc. I like the ones with young "kids" because they all know the latest tips, tricks and sizing methods and they love to talk cycling! Anyway, just my opinion. Good Luck

  8. #8
    Time for a change. stapfam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
    My Bikes
    Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
    Posts
    19,915
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by twray View Post
    Now I would appreciate any suggestions on a road bike in the $1000.00 range that has a lower gearing than a more standard racing gear set.

    Thanks again.

    Tom
    So what would you class as lower than standard racing gearing?

    Race gearing is a double crankset with 52/42 gearing and variations of it up to 54/42. There is a compcat double that can be had in 50/34 and this is lower or even a triple can be had with 50/39/30.

    The cassette is anotherway of altering the gearing and as "Most" bikes will be 10 speed- this can start at 11/23 and alter to as much as 12/27. There is an aftermarket cassette to be had to give 11/34 but this is expensive and not a good alternative.

    So for low gearing then a triple with 50/39/30 and a cassette with 12/27 are the Normal low gearing setups. For even the sluggards amongst us- for a road bike that is low enough. And I do regard myself as a sluggard that just climbs steep hills occasionally. But even I prefer to use the compact Crankset with 50/34 rings and a 12/27 cassette. Good enough for all my steep hills.

    But the inner crank ring can be changed to a 28 or 26 or even the complete crankset can be changed to give ridiculously low gearing if an MTB set were fitted to give 44/32/22 rings.

    So how low do you want to go?
    How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


    Spike Milligan

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Northern Nevada
    Posts
    3,749
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BluesDawg View Post
    Have you visited any bikes shops to see what brands they carry and which bikes seem interesting to you? Every major bicycle manufacturer makes good bikes within your price range. You should go to every bike shop near you and ask questions. It is probably more important that you pick the right shop than which brand of bike you choose.
    This is true, but don't expect them to divine what you want, or even to be eager to find it for you when you explain. I'm known at all our local shops (I've ridden here for more than 30 years, and bought from most of them), but when I had roughly the same criteria you did--low gears, set up for comfort rather than speed, something I could stay on all day--I practically had to hold the employees by the ears and say, "Listen: I want a triple crank, 24 tooth granny and room for big tires, and if it's not 64 or 65 cm, please don't show it to me." EVERYBODY tried to convince me I could ride a 60 or 62, and almost everyone tried to tell me I didn't need a triple (I'm in my 60s and there are 7500-foot passes all around; even if I don't need it, I WANT it, and it's my money). I had cash in hand and wanted to buy locally, but i got so frustrated I ended up buying an Atlantis frame from Rivendell and building it myself. I spent a little more than I planned and sent the money out of town, but the bike is perfect.
    Keep looking until somebody finds what you want. You might look at a cyclocross bike or hybrid, maybe with "roadier" tires for more speed if you want that.

  10. #10
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    5
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Same advice from a LBS

    Velo Dog,

    I went to a LBS to look at a Cannondale Synapse 5, it is offered in both compact and triple. Everyone in the bike shop said not to get the triple crankset, it would not shift properly, and I would not need that low of a gear.

    Well, I rented a Synapse 5 with a compact crankset and I had to use the lowest gear to climb what I thought were only moderate hills. I rode 2 days about 4-5 miles each day. Now I know no matter which road bike I get it will have a triple crankset. Your description of recommendations were accurate, I got the same advice.

    Now I hope my butt and neck can get use to a road bike.

    Tom

  11. #11
    Time for a change. stapfam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
    My Bikes
    Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
    Posts
    19,915
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You will improve with riding but if those hills are a struggle now- then get a triple. They are not difficult on changing and if it is- then all it needs is a "Sensible" mechanic to sort it. I say get a triple- but there are two forms of triple gearing.

    52/42/30 and 50/39/30. I use the lower geared form and find it better on closeness of gears- and have absolutely no problem on changing.

    Only way to improve the butt-neck and shoulders and that is to ride. Included shoulders as getting in the drops for long spells will take some training. That is if the back will bend that low initially.
    How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


    Spike Milligan

  12. #12
    Senior Member Retro Grouch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    St Peters, Missouri
    My Bikes
    Rans Enduro Sport, Hase Kettweisel Tandem, Merin Bear Valley beater bike
    Posts
    24,012
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BluesDawg View Post
    Have you visited any bikes shops to see what brands they carry and which bikes seem interesting to you? Every major bicycle manufacturer makes good bikes within your price range. You should go to every bike shop near you and ask questions. It is probably more important that you pick the right shop than which brand of bike you choose.
    That's what I think too. Don't shop for a bike, shop for a bike shop. When you find the right one, you'll know it. The people are way more important than the hardware. Listen to their advice and you'll never go wrong.

  13. #13
    gone ride'n cyclinfool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Upstate NY
    My Bikes
    Simoncini, Gary Fisher, Specialized Tarmac
    Posts
    4,052
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by twray View Post
    Velo Dog,

    I went to a LBS to look at a Cannondale Synapse 5, it is offered in both compact and triple. Everyone in the bike shop said not to get the triple crankset, it would not shift properly, and I would not need that low of a gear.

    Well, I rented a Synapse 5 with a compact crankset and I had to use the lowest gear to climb what I thought were only moderate hills. I rode 2 days about 4-5 miles each day. Now I know no matter which road bike I get it will have a triple crankset. Your description of recommendations were accurate, I got the same advice.

    Now I hope my butt and neck can get use to a road bike.

    Tom
    Too bad your results on LBS's were not great. They do tend to follow the masses. However, they are correct - a triple will not be as smooth as a double but with a little experience and adjustments it will work just fine. Also - your ability to ride steeper hills will improve. Buy what you think will suit you best, hills are still hard even with a triple but if you don't get one you will be cursing when you run out of low gears. If you do buy one you will be convinced you need to build your strength when you run out of gears.
    "Of all the things I ever lost I miss my mind the most." Mark Twain
    If all you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.

  14. #14
    Senior Member Retro Grouch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    St Peters, Missouri
    My Bikes
    Rans Enduro Sport, Hase Kettweisel Tandem, Merin Bear Valley beater bike
    Posts
    24,012
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cyclinfool View Post
    However, they are correct - a triple will not be as smooth as a double.
    I'm going to disagree with that statement.

    My wife and I just completed a week long tour in Wisconsin on our triple equipped tandem. If anything, tandems should shift less smoothly due to the longer shift cables. Ours shifted into any of the three rings every time it was bidden without complaint.

    Triples shift just fine. If you think that you'd benefit from the triple's wider range gearing, tell your bike shop to special order you a triple equipped bike. You don't have to make them happy by buying what they want to sell. It's their job to make you happy by selling you what you want.

  15. #15
    Let's do a Century jppe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    North Carolina
    My Bikes
    Pinarello Prince/Campy SR; Cervelo R3/Sram Red; Trek 5900/Duraace, Cervelo P2C/Duraace
    Posts
    6,167
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    For starters you might take a look at Trek, Giant and Fuji.

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Asheville, NC
    Posts
    244
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ltmark View Post
    I am 62 and bought a 2004 Cannondale road bike after I retired 7 years ago.
    How did you find a 2004 model 7 years ago?

  17. #17
    mud
    mud is offline
    Lurker mud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    So IL
    My Bikes
    07 Fuji Professional 2.0, Specialized Roubaix SL4 Elite
    Posts
    265
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I ride a triple with a 12-27 cassette, who cares what the younger ones think!
    I'm not old! I've always been wrinkled, balding with a spare tire.

  18. #18
    Senior Member BengeBoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Seattle, Washington, USA
    My Bikes
    2014 Pivot Mach 5.7 MTB, 2009 Chris Boedeker custom, 1988 Tommasini Prestige, 2007 Bill Davidson custom; 1988 Specialized Stumpjumper
    Posts
    6,935
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mud View Post
    I ride a triple with a 12-27 cassette, who cares what the younger ones think!
    I have a similar set-up, and on long rides in the mountains I hear the younger ones say, "I wish I had a triple today."

  19. #19
    Time for a change. stapfam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
    My Bikes
    Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
    Posts
    19,915
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mud View Post
    I ride a triple with a 12-27 cassette, who cares what the younger ones think!
    Quote Originally Posted by BengeBoy View Post
    I have a similar set-up, and on long rides in the mountains I hear the younger ones say, "I wish I had a triple today."
    Have 12/27 on the triple and the compact double. I put the triple on for the mountains but on our local hills of 10 to 12% and the occasional 15- I prefer the compact. Once the leg strength comes up (Which does not take long) 34/27 is no more difficult than 30/27- but it is faster.

    I find that when the hill gets steep- I always find my self in the lowest gear. Up to 10% and the middle ring of the triple- a 39- gets used so 39/27 is ok. But above 10 and I find the granny.

    But for the Mountains- I am setting up the 9 spd FCR with a compact 50/34 and an MTB cassette of 11/34. My 9 spd 34/34 beats your 10 spd 30/27 anyday--But it will be slower
    How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


    Spike Milligan

  20. #20
    just keep riding BluesDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Milledgeville, Georgia
    My Bikes
    2014 Specialized Crave Pro 29, 2014 Specialized Crux EVO Carbon Disc, 2012 Black Mountain Cycles Monster Cross, 2011 Specialized Roubaix SL3 Expert Compact, 2009 Salsa Casseroll, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB
    Posts
    12,800
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cyclinfool View Post
    However, they are correct - a triple will not be as smooth as a double
    Why not? My experience is that triples shift just as well as doubles, often smoother than compact doubles.
    Triple front derailleurs are harder to set up, but when the setup is right, the shifting is great.
    The more you ride your bike, the less your ass will hurt.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •