A conclusion is the place where you got tired of thinking. - S. Wright
Favorite rides in the stable: Indy Fab CJ Ti - Colnago MXL - S-Works Roubaix - Habanero Team Issue - Jamis Eclipse carbon/831
If true it might bring his uppity attitude down a bit. A bit too full of himself I'd say.
(Life is too short to play crappy guitars) 2006 Raleigh Cadent 3.0, 1977 Schwinn Volare, 2010 Windsor tourist. ( I didn't fall , I attacked the floor)
The "insider knowledge" group have been muttering about this under their collective breaths for quite sometime. The podcasters I listen to won't be shocked, that's for sure.
I decided Contador was an a-hole a couple of years ago. Too cocky.
Last edited by RonH; 09-30-10 at 06:02 PM.
My bikes: 2001 Litespeed Tuscany---2015 Cannondale SuperSix EVO carbon
If you worried about falling off the bike, you’d never get on. -- Lance Armstrong
If this is true, I'm going to have to quit following cycling, and follow a 'clean' sport. Like baseb....uh no. Footb.... nope. I got it! Hocke..... not that one either. Any one for Ice Dancing?
The rumors have been going around for some time about his use of banned substances.
His theme song from my Ipod playlist: Mr. Lucky Man by The Kennedys
It is also a non-steroidal anabolic and metabolism accelerator, through a mechanism not well understood. Its ability to increase the muscle-to-fat body ratio makes its illegal use in livestock popular to obtain leaner meats.
That is from Wikipedia
A UCI official stated they think it is from bad food.
The level required to be a violation is 400 times that found in Contador.
Don't rush to judgement yet, unless that is what you like to do.
Rawland Drakkar 650B love it with 38mm Soma tires
2009 Specialized Roubaix Ultegra
Santana Fusion Tandem
2010 Specialized TriCross
Challenge Concept Trike
One knee scoped so far.
Homophobia is so gay.
I'd love to see Andy win the Tour, but not this way - it just tarnishes the whole affair.
The more you ride your bike, the less your ass will hurt.
It'll be interesting to see how this plays out. I don't know enough to know whether the fact that his results were fine both the day before and the day after really means anything. Ditto for the extremely low percentage. Could be residual from using it to train, and it was so low it only appeared on the one test because of other factors? Who knows, but the sport sure didn't need this!
"If you're riding less than 18 MPH up a 2% grade please tell people Coggan is coaching you."
But every time I start following a Professional rider- they get caught by some drugs test. One reason why I just enjoy the sport and admire their skills.
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.
Found the report dismaying.... He was supposed to ride with us in the Dempsey Challenge here in Maine this weekend, I'll give him the benefit of the doubt re: 1/400th amount found in the sample. But we've raised over $1,300,000.00 for a great cause, and I and over 1500 others are going to enjoy the day!
Innocent until proven guilty or in this case banned from cycling. I despise character assassination based upon speculation. Let the guys whose job it is to figure this out, complete the investigation and come to a conclusion.
What I find annoying is that an alleged doping story in cycling eclipses in the media all other possible stories. Right now the world championships are going on and people are focused on Contador's positive. Give me a break.
What do I think? I think professional athletes push the limit on all fronts from dirty playing, cheating and drugs. It is up to the officials and the watchdogs to keep them in line and punish the offenders.
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." Einstein
I'm not a Contador fan. However, in this case I'm inclined to believe him, not that my opinion matters. But, I've been fooled before.
I sort of believe him to be honest. I am not a big fan of him either.
Let they officials do their thing and let the cards fall as they will.
I mean 1/400th?Get real.
no goals , just ride
As I read this thread and associated information, it appears that a pro cyclist is allowed to have a certain concentration of this compound in his or her blood stream or urine without penalty as long as the concentration does not reach a certain threshold. If the concentration of this compound in the sample was indeed 1/400 (or 0.25%) of the threshold, then I'm wondering why the big fuss and why it was even reported in the news. Based on the data, it would appear that there is no violation. I must be missing something here.
Here is a good column from Velonews with interesting answers to some of the questions all this raises. My take is that it's accidental, but the general public sure won't see it that way and it's another huge black eye for the sport.
^^^^ Looks as if I was indeed missing something. Thanks for posting.