Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Fifty Plus (50+) Share the victories, challenges, successes and special concerns of bicyclists 50 and older. Especially useful for those entering or reentering bicycling.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-04-04, 06:21 AM   #1
DnvrFox
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
DnvrFox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Bikes:
Posts: 20,916
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
One more poll posted here with categories such as:

Under 18

18 - 24

25 - 34

35 - 44

45 - 54

55 - 64

Over 65

Almost all polls use the same format. Most with even closer age ranges for those between 18 and 65, for example, every 5 years.

Which means:

A 3 year-old's answer has the same value in the poll as a 17 year-old

A 66 year-old's answer has the same value as a 80 or 85 year-old.

Yet, a 54 year-old's answer has a different value than a 55 year-olds, etc.

Now, most poll software allows one to evenly distribute ages as one desires, and avoid this issue.

I believe that using age ranges such as the above (under 18; over 65)

1. Is a form of subtle discrimination against both younger and older folks.

2. Loses potentially valuable information. It is important for society to know, for example, that a 90 yo person is regularly riding a bicycle (or participating in whatever activity). With the age ranges described, the pollster would never know this rather significant fact.

3. Implies that responses from those over 65 are not very important, nor even desired.

I think it is also interesting that folks in ages over 50 seem to think it is sort of "cute" to be called "geezer" and "old fart" and whatever by other folks, and they seem to take pride in it. Like it is some sort of "Badge of Honor."

To me, it is demeaning. It represents a societal mindset about old, bumbling, foolish folks.

Now, this is not the end of the world, and this issue is not equal to the issue of world peace or nuclear proliferation. But it still rubs me the wrong way!

How about you?

(Standing by to avoid the brickbats and miscellaneous stones and sticks)!

Last edited by DnvrFox; 10-04-04 at 12:03 PM.
DnvrFox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-04, 06:35 AM   #2
bnet1
'Bent Brian
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Wellington Ohio
Bikes: Trek 1000, Rans Tailwind
Posts: 560
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I agree. I think the polls should be divided in such a way as to farther break down the demographics at each end of the age spectrum. If this is not done then the poll would be "lopsided" toward the middle age groups.

'bent Brian
bnet1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-04, 06:50 AM   #3
H23
Senior Member
 
H23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Baltimore
Bikes: bianchi
Posts: 1,101
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
So, how would you partition the 65+ age group?
H23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-04, 06:56 AM   #4
DnvrFox
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
DnvrFox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Bikes:
Posts: 20,916
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by H23
So, how would you partition the 65+ age group?
I would prefer to simply have a blank entry space where each responder just entered their age - for ALL ages. Then the pollster has the option of dividing ages as they need, and NO valuable age information is lost.

I.e.,

Please enter your age: _____
DnvrFox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-04, 09:14 AM   #5
operator
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Posts: 28,306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
What DenvrFox said.
operator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-04, 09:28 AM   #6
stokell
Senior Member
 
stokell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: On the Road
Bikes: Custom built tourer, custom electric bike, beaters everywhere
Posts: 1,260
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
operator,
Glad to see Richmond Hill has been annexed by Toronto. Send us your tax money.

I personally find polls to be poorly written and I don't participate.
stokell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-05, 05:05 PM   #7
webist
Huachuca Rider
 
webist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Bikes: Fuji CCR1, Specialized Roubaix
Posts: 4,275
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
An answer from any 3 year old participating in the poll clearly has at least as much value as my answer
__________________
Just Peddlin' Around
webist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-05, 03:07 AM   #8
Travelinguyrt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 832
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Don't like polls? think they discriminate?

Simple. Don't answer them

I kinda think those who do participate do so only to feel self important, that one's

opinion may be worth something, when in actuality its only important the the dude

getting paid to collect the responses.

They want my response letem pay for it if its so important. Same thing with jury duty.

Yeh sure its the backbone of the justice(?) system. Then why do the judges have the

best parking spots??
Travelinguyrt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:34 AM.