Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1
    Senior Member retnav94's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Dothan, Alabama
    Posts
    172
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    carbon or alloy?

    I am considering a road bike yet again. The Cannondale Synapse looks to be the one I am presently zeroing in on. I intend to ride both the alloy and the carbon version of the synapse 5 but will most likely be limited to a very short ride. For those who have had the opportunity to ride both carbon and alloy bikes for distance, is there a noticeable difference for us older (54) folks or should I save the extra cash?
    2010 Motobecane Fantom 29
    2005 Cannondale CAAD7 R700
    2004 Ironhorse Sage
    1992 Botteccia ADR replica


    http://tickers.TickerFactory.com/ezt...dGt/weight.png

  2. #2
    Banned.
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Southern california
    My Bikes
    Lapierre CF Sensium 400. Jamis Ventura Sport. Trek 800. Giant Cypress.
    Posts
    3,498
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I haven't tried the Cannondale but I have had two Lapierres one in Scandium and one in CF. The Scandium was a bit stiffer but had a CF fork to take some of the buzz out on less than perfect road surfaces. Neither frame precluded longer rides, I have done centuries on both and still have an aluminum Jamis that I ride on easy rides on the weekend. The CF bike does seem to absorb vibration better and I am just a bit less fatigued on rides from 50 to 100 miles.

    Bottom line is if I had to choose just one frame for most conditions I would pick the CF between the two materials you asked about. It will be interesting to see what direction this question takes.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    My Bikes
    Cervelo RS
    Posts
    260
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm also 54 and recently started riding a carbon bike (Cervelo RS) after riding an alloy hybrid (Marin Fairfax) for the last year. I find I can cover longer distances with less effort on the RS, but that would be true even if it had an alloy frame due to the other efficiencies (road vs hybrid bike). There is something about riding a carbon frame that is very nice, apart from the quick acceleration and ease of climbing hills, in that it seems to soak up the road vibrations while remaining very stiff. I don't see much of a downside to carbon other than the higher cost and you have to be more careful with it when tightening fasteners (get a torque wrench if you don't have one). I would be interested in reading you report after riding both the alloy and carbon synapse. I test rode 2 other bikes before buying the RS, first was a Felt Z5 (ride one of these if you can), then a Synapse Carbon 3, but after my 2nd ride on the Cervelo I knew I had to have it.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    NW AR & Central LA
    Posts
    2,594
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have an aluminum bike and a CF bike with very similar frames, and they both relaxed geometry and have curved seat stays.

    For two days in a row, I rode the same 20-mile loop after work. The loop has some chip seal and results in some road buzz. Day 1 was aluminum, Day 2 was CF. The ride was nicer on Day 2.

    The CF is about 5 lbs lighter than the aluminum. That helps a little but not necessarily in terms of ride quality.

    The aluminum is my old road bike. I've got a little over 10,000 miles on it and have ridden several centuries on it.

    The CF is a Synapse Carbon 5. I really do like this bike.

    Knowing what I know now, I would buy a CF. Back then, I was getting into road bikes and didn't want to spend any more money than I had to in order to determine if road bikes were for me. The aluminum is a fine bike. It will go the distance. The CF just rides a little better and is a little lighter.

  5. #5
    Time for a change. stapfam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
    My Bikes
    Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
    Posts
    19,915
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Two good bikes Giant TCR-C and a Boreas Ignis in aluminium

    Boreas is a race Geometry frame and in road trim weighs in at 16lbs. It is a lightweight frame with lightweight C.F. forks and seat post. Parts selected on the custom build are mainly Ultegra and Known durable L/W parts. Wheels are Ultegra low spoke count- 16F and 20R and "Hand" rebuilt. This bike is my ride of choice. It is comfortable up to a Metric Century but does cause a bit of Neck ache after that.

    B2..jpg

    The TCR-C was built up with a similar spec to Boreas but Using 105 parts and in ride trim is 17 1/2 lbs. I Had to change the wheel to stop it skitting around as the frame is pretty stiff and with me only weighing 150lbs- it was too stiff. But this bike is setup slightly different to Boreas. It is comfortable for the longer rides and it goes uphills a dream. Boreas does climb well but the TCR just flies up hills. Doesn't descend as well though and I take care as I approach 40mph.

    B1..jpg

    Then I have the Giant OCR. The basic bike that got me started. I have done 100milers on it and it has got me up mountains- but that was 4 years ago. Heavy at 19 1/2lbs- stiff as a rock and cheap components. Frame is Aluminium and pretty thick material at that. It rides well even for a lowly bike.

    So test ride the bikes you are thinking of. I would also suggest trying a Specialised Roubaix as a Comparison. They are made in Ally and C.F and are a very popular bike within this group. Must be a reason for that.
    How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


    Spike Milligan

  6. #6
    Banned. The Weak Link's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Post-partisan Paradise
    My Bikes
    GF Wahoo '05, Trek T1000 '04, Lemond Buenos Aires '07
    Posts
    4,936
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Uh oh. Shouldn't this thread be over on P&R?



    j/k Another vote for carbon.

  7. #7
    I need speed AzTallRider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    My Bikes
    Giant Propel, Cervelo P2
    Posts
    5,455
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Don't worry Weak... it will get there. Haven't you figured out yet that the mod's have a search to find any thread you post to, and automagically move it to P&R?
    "If you're riding less than 18 MPH up a 2% grade please tell people Coggan is coaching you."

  8. #8
    Bike Junkie roccobike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    South of Raleigh, North of New Hill, West of Harris Lake, NC
    My Bikes
    Giant OCR-C, Specialized Tarmac, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR, Stumpjumper Comp, 05 Rockhopper, 88 & 92Nishiki Ariel, 01 Bianchi Campione, 87 Centurion Ironman, 92 Paramount, 97 Lemond
    Posts
    8,868
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I went from Cannondale Aluminum to Giant CF (OCR-C). After two and a half seasons on Carbon, I can tell you I actually think hard before taking out one of the alloy bikes. I added a CF seat post to the Cannondale and that helped, but it is no match for the Giant. I also obtained a used carbon LeMond. It too is way more comfortable than the Cannondale. I tried another Cannondale, an 03 R400. It's not much better than the older Cannondale. Any ride over 50 miles and I ride a carbon bike (1st choice) or steel (2nd choice). I won't ride alloy over 50 miles.
    Along the way I picked up a steel Bianchi Campione. It rides very smooth, very comfortable, but the additional weight does take a toll. For ride comfort I'll go with either steel or carbon. I'm seriously thinking of selling one of the two Cannondales I have because I don't think I'll be riding it much.
    In summary, IMHO go carbon.
    Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator

  9. #9
    gone ride'n cyclinfool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Upstate NY
    My Bikes
    Simoncini, Gary Fisher, Specialized Tarmac
    Posts
    4,052
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Now if the choice was between CF & steel....
    "Of all the things I ever lost I miss my mind the most." Mark Twain
    If all you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.

  10. #10
    Senior Member MorganRaider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Loveland, Ohio
    My Bikes
    '10 TREK 7.7 FX
    Posts
    153
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Get the bike that you think you will "crave" to ride. In the end, it will probably make you fitter just because you will want to ride it more often.

  11. #11
    Team Poseur Metric Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Beaumont, CA
    My Bikes
    2012 Motobecane Ti SRAM Red/2008 Trek Madone SRAM Force
    Posts
    1,330
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Carbon...
    The thoughts and opinions expressed by this poster are his own and should not be misconstrued as gospel. They are and were not meant to inflame, enrage or otherwise tick anyone off, usually.
    2012 Ti Motobecane with SRAM Red 2013~2008 Trek Madone with SRAM Force~2010 Specialized Hardrock 29er~2006 Trek 4300~Garmin 800 CTR
    Mark

  12. #12
    Senior Member sojourn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    San Marcos, CA
    My Bikes
    Madone 6.2
    Posts
    825
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Carbon...

  13. #13
    Sore saddle cyclist Shifty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Eugene, OR
    My Bikes
    Road, touring and mountain
    Posts
    3,746
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Carbon.....well worth the extra cost. It does have a nicer ride.
    Those voices in your head aren't real, but they have some great ideas

  14. #14
    just keep riding BluesDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Milledgeville, Georgia
    My Bikes
    2014 Specialized Crave Pro 29, 2014 Specialized Crux EVO Carbon Disc, 2012 Black Mountain Cycles Monster Cross, 2011 Specialized Roubaix SL3 Expert Compact, 2009 Salsa Casseroll, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB
    Posts
    12,713
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    These days, this question comes up more often about wheels than frames.
    The more you ride your bike, the less your ass will hurt.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    No Va but ride also in So Md
    My Bikes
    Cervelo SLC-SL, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
    Posts
    8,285
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't think the material makes that much difference by itself. Rather it's more what the builder does with the material. CF can be formed and the fiber layed in a manner that it can provide both performance and comfort.
    You're just trying to start an argument to show how smart you are.

  16. #16
    Time for a change. stapfam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
    My Bikes
    Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
    Posts
    19,915
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BluesDawg View Post
    These days, this question comes up more often about wheels than frames.
    Have to agree- My C.F. bikenearly got sold after a monthas it was not a pleasant ride. Found the wheels that stopped it bouncing all over the road and it is now fine.
    How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


    Spike Milligan

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •