Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Fifty Plus (50+) Share the victories, challenges, successes and special concerns of bicyclists 50 and older. Especially useful for those entering or reentering bicycling.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-03-04, 02:01 PM   #1
DnvrFox
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
DnvrFox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Bikes:
Posts: 20,916
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Okay, what cadence do you usually try to achieve on a flat ride on a road bike?

I know this varies a lot with wind and other circumstances.

But, your best estimate of desired cadence is:

Mine is 90-100
DnvrFox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-04, 02:04 PM   #2
Jessica
cut my gas use in half
 
Jessica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Bikes: walmart beater, Dahon boardwalk, A bike, schwinn tandem
Posts: 324
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I gear down to a cadence of 60 minimum, and when I am thinking about it closer to 80, because I get better speed and endurance from that rate. I am still slow, if I am doing 10 miles an hour, I figure I am doing good, but when I remember, I am up to about 14 mph on the flat at the higher cadence.
Jessica is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-04, 02:23 PM   #3
bnet1
'Bent Brian
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Wellington Ohio
Bikes: Trek 1000, Rans Tailwind
Posts: 560
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
For me it all depends. I've putzed along at a leisurely 60RPM. Most of the time I run mid 80's cruising and during commute mode. It seems to feel good at that rate. Climbing a hill or accelerating I run up into the 90's and have been in the low 100's for a fast quick climb, or just after a launch.

'bent Brian
bnet1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-04, 02:40 PM   #4
stapfam
Time for a change.
 
stapfam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
Posts: 19,915
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jessica
I gear down to a cadence of 60 minimum, and when I am thinking about it closer to 80, because I get better speed and endurance from that rate. I am still slow, if I am doing 10 miles an hour, I figure I am doing good, but when I remember, I am up to about 14 mph on the flat at the higher cadence.
Every body is different but you generaly find that the more experienced rider will have a higher cadence of around 100/ 110 on the road, or if offroad this may drop by around 20. There is a good reason for this, that may not seem obvious at first, but by spinning faster, less strain is being put on the legs. Initially this means that your breathing is harder, but with practice, this can improve.
The advantage of spinning faster does mean that hills, and in particular the short sharp rises that occur on the ride, can be taken easier. You may still have to change down, to keep the cadence up, but it is easier.
I am an offroader, and my cadence is lower than the road boys, but just to give an example, Ride along a trail and there is a big muddy puddle in front. If your cadence is too low, say around 60, when you hit the mud, the bike slows down and one of two things can happen. With the slowing down, your cadence drops(Just like going up a couple of gears on the Bike) and you either have to strain to turn the pedals, or you can't turn the pedals and you fall off. If your cadence was higher at say 80, you would have a chance of getting through the mud.
If you are experienced enough, you will speed up a bit to 90, then change down two gears and keep the speed up by pedalling faster, and sail through the mud without too much dropoff in speed. You can then look round and dodge the mudpies being thrown at you by your mates who are sitting in the goo that you sailed through.

Problem is that initially, a higher cadence is not natural, you have to train yourself to it, so ride at your normal speed on the road, and change down one or two gears. Then pedal faster to keep the same speed. You may not be able to do this for too long, but keep trying it. I actually go the other way on the Tandem for winter training, by putting higher gearing on the bike. I then keep up my normal cadence up the hills, but basically one gear higher than normal. Not to be recommended for too long a ride, or too steep a hill, but does improve my leg muscle strength

Incidentally, I try to keep the cadence as a minimum of 80 on the solo, but on the tandem this drops to 70 on the steepest hills. Normal flat riding is around 100 on the solo and 110 on the tandem

Last edited by stapfam; 11-03-04 at 02:46 PM.
stapfam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-04, 05:41 PM   #5
UncaStuart
Sophomoric Member
 
UncaStuart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Burlingame, California USA
Bikes: Trek 5000, Novara Randonee, Meridian Cascade
Posts: 272
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I seem to be most comfortable at 90-100, as well.
UncaStuart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-04, 08:10 PM   #6
Dchiefransom
Senior Member
 
Dchiefransom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Newark, CA. San Francisco Bay Area
Bikes:
Posts: 6,205
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Wow, I just have no idea. I know I'm a "spinner", but I don't have a cadence feature on my 'puter. Normally without wind, I'm thinking about like DenverFox.
Dchiefransom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-04, 08:32 PM   #7
witcomb
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
i also twiddle at 100 to 110, occasionally going to 120. i think i may have developed this when i rode a fixed wheel with a gear of 54 inches for about 25 years.
witcomb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-04, 08:32 PM   #8
John E
feros ferio
 
John E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Bikes: 1959 Capo; 1980 Peugeot PKN-10; 1981 Bianchi; 1988 Schwinn KOM-10;
Posts: 17,161
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 96 Post(s)
90-110 rpm
__________________
"Early to bed, early to rise. Work like hell, and advertise." -- George Stahlman
Capo [dschaw'-poe]: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger, S/N 42624
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1981 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
John E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-04, 09:29 PM   #9
DnvrFox
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
DnvrFox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Bikes:
Posts: 20,916
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dchiefransom
Wow, I just have no idea. I know I'm a "spinner", but I don't have a cadence feature on my 'puter. Normally without wind, I'm thinking about like DenverFox.
I don't have a cadence function, either. I just count for 20 seconds every now and then and multiply by 3! Gives a pretty good estimate, and, after awhile, I know pretty close without even counting.
DnvrFox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-04, 09:33 PM   #10
Dusk
LeMond Lives!
 
Dusk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Edina, MN
Bikes: In 1963 my sister taught me to ride on her girl’s frame (no wonder I shave my legs) Schwinn it was blue and it weighted a billion pounds. – Gone, 2nd bike - a Schwinn Colligate (Gold) 5 speed – Traded in, 3rd bike – 1971 Schwinn Continental (Maro
Posts: 560
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm 47 I spin at 90-120. Don't use speed on the computer, just us RPMs.

Cheers,
Dusk
Dusk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-04, 09:34 PM   #11
DnvrFox
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
DnvrFox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Bikes:
Posts: 20,916
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dusk
I'm 47 I spin at 90-120. Don't use speed on the computer, just us RPMs.

Cheers,
Dusk
Youngster!
DnvrFox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-04, 09:39 PM   #12
Dchiefransom
Senior Member
 
Dchiefransom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Newark, CA. San Francisco Bay Area
Bikes:
Posts: 6,205
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DnvrFox
I don't have a cadence function, either. I just count for 20 seconds every now and then and multiply by 3! Gives a pretty good estimate, and, after awhile, I know pretty close without even counting.
I tried counting to 20 seconds once, but it got hard to ride on the clipless pedals without my riding shoes and socks on.
Dchiefransom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-04, 12:05 AM   #13
Robert Gardner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sierra Madre, CA, USA
Bikes: Trek 5300
Posts: 303
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I don't think determining your cadence without the aid of a bicycle computer with the built in cadence is worth a hoot. For years I used to determine my cadence by various counting schemes. When I finally got an Avocet computer with cacence and more recently a Cateye computer with cadence I found my estimates were way off no matter how I did it. How I got started at trying to determine my cadence was at a time many years ago when it was thought that there was an ideal cadence. There isn't!!!!!
Robert Gardner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-04, 05:09 PM   #14
LightCycles
A cop selling bike parts
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Upstate NY....Love the Adirondacks!!!
Bikes: KHS Flite 2000 & Trek 6700
Posts: 31
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
If you'd like a 'puter that has the cadence function just give me a shout at lightrj@plattsbrugh.edu I would love to offer you guys and gals a discount! Check this out!

Sigma 1600 with optional cadence feature-

LightClycles $32.00 (with the cadence option)
Performance $29.00 cadence kit $5.99 total $34.99
Nashbar $24.95 cadence kit $4.49 total $29.44

Hmmm I'm not the lowest but if you spend 50.00 I'll give you free shipping! Need any Pearl Izumi Clothing? I'll give you 20% off of that too! Check www.pearlizumi.com Email me with any questions!
Plus I'm a cyclist helping cyclists! So from one cyclist to another....email me!

Pedal On,

Bob Light
LightCycles
LightCycles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-04, 05:11 PM   #15
LightCycles
A cop selling bike parts
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Upstate NY....Love the Adirondacks!!!
Bikes: KHS Flite 2000 & Trek 6700
Posts: 31
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Oh...sorry all I'm only 42!

Pedal On,

Bob Light
LightCycles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-04, 09:59 PM   #16
John E
feros ferio
 
John E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Bikes: 1959 Capo; 1980 Peugeot PKN-10; 1981 Bianchi; 1988 Schwinn KOM-10;
Posts: 17,161
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 96 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Gardner
I don't think determining your cadence without the aid of a bicycle computer with the built in cadence is worth a hoot. For years I used to determine my cadence by various counting schemes. When I finally got an Avocet computer with cacence and more recently a Cateye computer with cadence I found my estimates were way off no matter how I did it. How I got started at trying to determine my cadence was at a time many years ago when it was thought that there was an ideal cadence. There isn't!!!!!

Assuming one is not coasting, isn't computing one's cadence from the gear ratio and the ground speed reliable?
__________________
"Early to bed, early to rise. Work like hell, and advertise." -- George Stahlman
Capo [dschaw'-poe]: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger, S/N 42624
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1981 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
John E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-04, 06:27 AM   #17
Trsnrtr
Nefarious Reprobate
 
Trsnrtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Central Illinois
Bikes: Colnago CX, Giant Propel, Co-Motion Supremo
Posts: 8,332
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 808 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by witcomb
i also twiddle at 100 to 110, occasionally going to 120. i think i may have developed this when i rode a fixed wheel with a gear of 54 inches for about 25 years.
Ditto. I'm 53 and could have written your post. The only change was I primarily rode a fixed at 64". (I live in a flat part of the world)
__________________
Dennis T
Trsnrtr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-04, 08:23 AM   #18
Lonestar1
Senior Member
 
Lonestar1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: south central Texas
Bikes:
Posts: 210
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
At age 50, I find it fairly easy to stay in the 90-100 range. Unless, of course, I hit some "big" hills. Which around my neck of the woods, there are only a couple. More accurately could be describe as short but steep. Sometimes actually achieve 110+ on the short ones.
Lonestar1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-04, 10:00 AM   #19
Lost Coyote
Senior Member
 
Lost Coyote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Bikes:
Posts: 103
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by LightCycles
Oh...sorry all I'm only 42!

Pedal On,

Bob Light

Puppys!

Constant 90 to 100. If I go over 100 I "spin out" after a short while. I drop into the 80's only when I runout of gear!
Lost Coyote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-04, 11:43 AM   #20
gmason
Senior Member (Retired)
 
gmason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Great North Woods
Bikes: Vittorio, Centaur triple; Casati Laser Piu, Chorus Triple.
Posts: 2,671
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I try for 100 on the flats and near-flats, and 80 climbing. I had strayed lower for a while, but this is easier on the body. However, I think I am sensing a loss of "strength" now that I have returned to the higher RPMs. I have to figure that one out. It almost seems to be a choice of one or the other at times.

Cheers...Gary
gmason is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-04, 01:11 PM   #21
TysonB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Cushing, Oklahoma
Bikes: 1969 Peugeot U08, unknown MTB circa 1980, '93? Merckx MX-Leader
Posts: 628
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Guys,

What's wrong with me?

I have UPPED my cadence to the mid-80's with concentrated effort. I thought that was good. You guys are all in the 90's to low 100's. What's up with that?

I am fairly new to biking (actually returning after 25 years) but seem to run with the fairly fast pack. On my own on the flats, I run just under 20mph for an hour or more. Would I improve with more RPM?

Tyson
TysonB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-04, 01:53 AM   #22
stapfam
Time for a change.
 
stapfam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
Posts: 19,915
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TysonB
Guys,

What's wrong with me?

I have UPPED my cadence to the mid-80's with concentrated effort. I thought that was good. You guys are all in the 90's to low 100's. What's up with that?

I am fairly new to biking (actually returning after 25 years) but seem to run with the fairly fast pack. On my own on the flats, I run just under 20mph for an hour or more. Would I improve with more RPM?

Tyson
It takes trainiing to get the cadence up, but for a "Novice" rider, 80 is not a bad start. If you have just upped your slower cadence to 80, then be happy with that. The big advantage of higher cadence, is less strain on the legs, but initially, your legs will get tired, and your breathing will get laboured if you try to up it. If you are comfortable at 80, then stay at it, but in a years time, when you check again, you will find you are nearer 90.
stapfam is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:36 AM.