Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Fifty Plus (50+) Share the victories, challenges, successes and special concerns of bicyclists 50 and older. Especially useful for those entering or reentering bicycling.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-26-11, 12:04 PM   #1
leob1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Middle of the road, NJ
Bikes:
Posts: 2,543
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
An Embarrassing Question

Which I'll ask here because I hope to be flamed less than the other forums.
Here goes, When sizing a bike in cm, such as a 54 cm frame, what is being measured.
For instance, my old bike is an 18 inch frame, the seat tube is 18 inches long. But if you convert that to cm it would be 46. Now my wifes bike is a 50 cm frame, and it is way to small for me. So my question is what does that 50 represent?
This is something I really should know already, but I don't.
Asbestos under pants are on.
leob1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-11, 12:55 PM   #2
CACycling
Senior Member
 
CACycling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Oxnard, CA
Bikes: '08 Fuji Roubaix RC; '07 Schwinn Le Tour GS; '92 Diamond Back Ascent EX
Posts: 4,565
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The problem is that there really isn't a standard. And with the introduction of frames with sloping top tubes, seat tube measurements aren't that helpful anyway. Typically you see MTBs measured in inches from center of BB along seat tube to top of top tube and road bikes are measured in centimeters from center of BB long seat tube to center of top tube.

Some will measure frames with sloping top tubes from center of BB to a point that would be the top tube if the top tube was not sloping. Top tube length is typically a better indicator of fit than seat tube given the nature of frames nowadays.
CACycling is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-11, 12:59 PM   #3
stapfam
Time for a change.
 
stapfam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
Posts: 19,915
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Don't know what your old bike is but MTB "Type" bikes are normally measured in inches and road/ comfort/ hybrids in Cms. You can convert inches to Cms as you have done and come up with the seat tube length.---But there is a difference between MTB and Road bikes in other dimensions. The top tube on an MTB (Size for size) is longer. although both frames are sold in Seat tube length- it is the top tube length that denotes how well a frame will fit you.

So your old 18" frame that fits you is a 46cm. So you would think that a 50cm road bike would make for a bigger fit- but it doesn't.

Looking at the Giant Specs and geometry--An 18" MTB Frame (46 cms) will have a top tube length of 23.4"- That equates to TT in metric of 594mm.

The road bike of 46.5cms has a top tube length of 530mm.

Perhaps it would be better if the two types of bike were both measured in the same scale but I think it would cause problems. I ride a 51 cm road frame. If I were to get an MTB frame in that size- I might be stretching for the bars a bit. Hence I ride a 15" MTB Frame instead of the 20" that 51cm equates to in Seat tube

Now if you just ride an odd sized road bike- then all the above is rubbish so disregard it.

Attached are my MTB and My main Road ride. Both fit me and I would not like to ride either bike in a different size.


Attached Images
File Type: jpg B2.jpg (51.0 KB, 7 views)
File Type: jpg Bianchi2.jpg (41.1 KB, 9 views)
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


Spike Milligan

Last edited by stapfam; 05-26-11 at 02:22 PM.
stapfam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-11, 01:01 PM   #4
CraigB
Starting over
 
CraigB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Bikes: 1990 Trek 1500; 2006 Gary Fisher Marlin; 2011 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 105; 2012 Catrike Trail
Posts: 4,081
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Even in the days of level top tubes, the measurement could have different meanings, depending on the manufacturer's preferred method of measuring. Some measured center-to-center, which was from the center of the bottom bracket to the centerline of the top tube where it met the seat lug (the intersection of the centerlines of the top tube and the seat tube). Others measured center-to-top, which measured from the same bottom bracket centerline to the top of the top tube at the seat lug. Now, with sloping top tubes, the numbers (IMO) are all suspect and have to be examined individually on a bike-by-bike basis.
CraigB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-11, 01:13 PM   #5
StanSeven
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: No Va but ride also in So Md
Bikes: Cervelo SLC-SL, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Posts: 11,769
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
I won't repeat what has already been said except recap that and add that three ways exists to measure size by seatpost - center of bottom bracket to center of top tube, center to top of top tube, and center to top of seat tube (Fuji is one that did this a lot until recently). Sloping top tubes throw this off but practically all manufacturers include data on the virtual seat tube size by extrapolating what the size would be if the top tube was horizontal. If that isn't availble, you can approximate the size by using the top tube length since the majority of bikes in recent years use a "square" methodology in sizing (the top tube and seat tube lengths are the same).
StanSeven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-11, 01:13 PM   #6
ahsposo 
Big Blubbery Member
 
ahsposo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: On a floe
Bikes: A Home Built All Rounder, Bianchi 928, Specialized Langster, Dahon Folder
Posts: 7,063
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 79 Post(s)
Like CAC notes there is no real standard. Some bikes with sloping top tubes come small, medium and large.

Some questions for you:

What kind of bike are you interested in?

What's your size?

Here's a video that covers basically fitting a road bike:

ahsposo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-11, 01:15 PM   #7
NOS88
Senior Member
 
NOS88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montgomery County, Pennsylvania
Bikes:
Posts: 6,490
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
You might enjoy reading Sheldon Brown's Revisionist Theroy of Bicycle Frame Size. http://www.sheldonbrown.com/frame-sizing.html
__________________
A conclusion is the place where you got tired of thinking. - S. Wright
Favorite rides in the stable: Indy Fab CJ Ti - Colnago MXL - S-Works Roubaix - Habanero Team Issue - Jamis Eclipse carbon/831
NOS88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-11, 01:16 PM   #8
ahsposo 
Big Blubbery Member
 
ahsposo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: On a floe
Bikes: A Home Built All Rounder, Bianchi 928, Specialized Langster, Dahon Folder
Posts: 7,063
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 79 Post(s)
BTW, the only flaming you'll get from me is the misleading title to your thread. I thought this was gonna be about erectile dysfunction, 'roids, severe halitosis, or being ridden down by a bunch of girl scouts...
ahsposo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-11, 01:23 PM   #9
StanSeven
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: No Va but ride also in So Md
Bikes: Cervelo SLC-SL, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Posts: 11,769
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Or is it okay to tuck your jersey inside the waist of shorts? Or maybe wearing full length socks with cycling shoes.
StanSeven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-11, 01:41 PM   #10
Allegheny Jet 
Senior Member
 
Allegheny Jet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Medina, OH
Bikes: confidential infromation that I don't even share with my wife
Posts: 5,708
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by StanSeven View Post
Or maybe wearing full length socks with cycling shoes.
That I find disturbing just thinking about. Shame on you for bring it up here.

Back to the OP's question. It is my opinion that the measurements in cm are not true as stated by others but used for suggesting a size. Some manufacturers use XS, S, SM, M etc... describing a frame size. However, many buyers are leery of that and want to see a # that associates the bike size with something they already can equate to. Remember when we were young and got our little league team baseball caps in the spring and they had sizes in them? Now-a-days the fitted hats are S, M, Lg, XL and not something like 6 or 7 .
__________________
oldschool areodynamic brick
Allegheny Jet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-11, 02:21 PM   #11
BluesDawg
just keep riding
 
BluesDawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Milledgeville, Georgia
Bikes: 2015 Specialized AWOL Comp frameset (custom build), 2015 Zukas custom road, 2014 Specialized Crave Pro 29, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB, 1980ish Fuji S-12S
Posts: 13,213
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Assuming the traditional sizing standards of seat tubes from center of BB to center or top of top tube, the differences you see are because MTB/hybrid sizing allows for more top tube clearance than road bikes. In traditional sizing, I ride a 19" (48.3cm) MTB and a 58cm (22.8") road bike. Nowdays, with sloping top tubes and such, there are so many different ways bikes are measured that it is hard to tell the size of a bike without comparing several different measurements. You can't be sure if it is an actual measurement or a virtual measurement.
BluesDawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-11, 02:23 PM   #12
BluesDawg
just keep riding
 
BluesDawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Milledgeville, Georgia
Bikes: 2015 Specialized AWOL Comp frameset (custom build), 2015 Zukas custom road, 2014 Specialized Crave Pro 29, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB, 1980ish Fuji S-12S
Posts: 13,213
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by StanSeven View Post
Or is it okay to tuck your jersey inside the waist of shorts? Or maybe wearing full length socks with cycling shoes.
Watch out or we'll get the mods to ban you!
BluesDawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-11, 02:25 PM   #13
HawkOwl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Bikes:
Posts: 2,635
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by leob1 View Post
Which I'll ask here because I hope to be flamed less than the other forums.
Here goes, When sizing a bike in cm, such as a 54 cm frame, what is being measured.
For instance, my old bike is an 18 inch frame, the seat tube is 18 inches long. But if you convert that to cm it would be 46. Now my wifes bike is a 50 cm frame, and it is way to small for me. So my question is what does that 50 represent?
This is something I really should know already, but I don't.
Asbestos under pants are on.
Size from manufacturer to manufacturer and sometimes even in product lines within a specific manufacturer are not directly comparable. Or, so say several dealers and mfg reps. From personal experience I know that from three different manufacturers I take three different sizes for bikes that fit. So, there is only one way to know what the right size is for you; ride the bike.

It is your money and your fun. Spend it as you wish. Just ride whatever you are thinking of buying enoiugh before you buy to have a reasonable chance of being happy with your purchase. Oh yes, don't worry about the Bike Snobs who think you have to dress a certain way or wear certain clothes, have certain equipment, or whatever. It is your ride, not theirs.
HawkOwl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-11, 02:34 PM   #14
stapfam
Time for a change.
 
stapfam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
Posts: 19,915
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by StanSeven View Post
Or is it okay to tuck your jersey inside the waist of shorts?


Definitely not with shorts. You can't reach the pockets----------------




BIBS? Now that would look different and get you noticed.
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


Spike Milligan
stapfam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-11, 02:39 PM   #15
FlatSix911
Senior Member
 
FlatSix911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Los Altos, CA
Bikes:
Posts: 1,737
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
A image is worth a thousand words ...

FlatSix911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-11, 04:53 PM   #16
alanknm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Toronto
Bikes: Specialized SL2 Roubaix Comp
Posts: 707
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahsposo View Post
BTW, the only flaming you'll get from me is the misleading title to your thread. I thought this was gonna be about erectile dysfunction, 'roids, severe halitosis, or being ridden down by a bunch of girl scouts...
You left out "Prevention of accidental bisection by idiotically long retractable dog leashes"
alanknm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-11, 05:37 PM   #17
HawkOwl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Bikes:
Posts: 2,635
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
By the way, in addition to "sizing" being, at best a somewhat measure that has questionable usefulness I forgot to post one thing. Asbestos underpants are definitely a BAD idea. Not only are they stiff they have a tendency to chafe those parts of the body that may be especially sensitive. Or, so I've been told.
HawkOwl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-11, 10:35 AM   #18
leob1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Middle of the road, NJ
Bikes:
Posts: 2,543
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Thanks for all the responses, sometimes a picture is what it takes.
BTW, what is wrong with full length socks? Some times, that's the only option.
leob1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-11, 02:25 AM   #19
bruce19
Senior Member
 
bruce19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Bikes: MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Posts: 4,399
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by leob1 View Post
Thanks for all the responses, sometimes a picture is what it takes.
BTW, what is wrong with full length socks? Some times, that's the only option.
There's always pantyhose.
bruce19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-11, 06:24 AM   #20
CraigB
Starting over
 
CraigB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Bikes: 1990 Trek 1500; 2006 Gary Fisher Marlin; 2011 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 105; 2012 Catrike Trail
Posts: 4,081
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by leob1 View Post
...what is wrong with full length socks? Some times, that's the only option.
Nothing, if you're in the British army and posted to one of the subtropical colonies.

CraigB is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:03 PM.