I've been reading on various threads about climbing hills of 2% gradient or 4% gradient,etc... What exactly does this mean? And can one calculate the %gradient of a hill one has just climbed?
I've been reading on various threads about climbing hills of 2% gradient or 4% gradient,etc... What exactly does this mean? And can one calculate the %gradient of a hill one has just climbed?
Official member of the Brotherhood of Clyde...
Lets stop diabetes! Click here: http://main.diabetes.org/site/TR/?px...nal&fr_id=8067 to donate to the Tour de Cure.
rise/run. Measure the elevation change and divide by the distance traveled. For example, if you climb a hill that has a change in elevation of 500 ft and it is 5000 ft long the gradient would be 500/5000 = 10%.
Oh! The definition of slope. Thanks for clearing that up!
Official member of the Brotherhood of Clyde...
Lets stop diabetes! Click here: http://main.diabetes.org/site/TR/?px...nal&fr_id=8067 to donate to the Tour de Cure.
That will give you the average of a slope. But I don't know of many hills that are consistently at one angle. On a 10% slope you will find parts that are steeper and some that are less.
Many moons ago I climbed Ventoux. 13 miles at an average of 7.67%---EASY.
But that did not account for the Km at 12% that followed the 2 Km at 10%.- nor the final stretch at 10%. And to be honest- The downhill bit in the middle (Or so it felt) when it slackened off to 5%
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.
Spike Milligan
Official member of the Brotherhood of Clyde...
Lets stop diabetes! Click here: http://main.diabetes.org/site/TR/?px...nal&fr_id=8067 to donate to the Tour de Cure.
Fuji S10S, Trek 1.1
"The bicycle, in the hands of a novice, is as alert and acute as a spirit-level in the detecting of delicate and vanishing shades of difference in these matters. It notices a rise where your untrained eye would not observe that one existed; it notices any decline which water will run down." -Mark Twain, "Taming the Bicycle"
Slope is rise over run. The run is the horizontal distance, not the distance along the slope, which is the hypotenuse of the triangle formed by the rise and the run.
The hypotenuse squared is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides of a right triangle.
Or something like that.
The more you ride your bike, the less your ass will hurt.
Not quite, it's a little more complex then that, if the elevation change is 500' and the distance you travelled is 5000' you have two sides of a triangle, but you need the third side, to do the calculation, so our old friend from school Pythagoras, you have side A & C, but you need A & B if a²+b²=c² then c²-a²=b² so 5000²=25,000,000 and 500² is 250,000 then b should be square root of 24,750,000 or 4,974.937185533 / 500 would be a 9.9% slope, not a 10% slope. The steeper the climb of course, the bigger the difference. Few hills are the same slope all the way up, so the best you can get is the average.
I use my GPS unit...... I guess maybe I shouldn't....
A conclusion is the place where you got tired of thinking. - S. Wright
1-2%- this ain't bad..
3-4%- okay, this is getting old..
5-7%- I didn't think this route had a climb..
8-10%- woah, I have no legs today..
11-14%- damn, what a grind, glad I went for the compact
15-18%- why? why? why?..
19% > - what a stupid, stupid sport.. Eff me, I just wanna die...
apres ride- Those climbs were awsome! What a great day!
That's how I calculate them. Backed up by my Garmin of course.
we do know that slope and grade are different?
After? I figure mine before the ride so that I know what I'm dealing with. I don't use a Garmin so I use MapMyRidedotcom. I map the ride then press elevation, it will show the grades with %'s.
I've heard you have to use at least a 1/2 mile section or it is too far from accurate. Many argue about accuracy but this way I get an idea of what I'm dealing with.
This is an image taken from the site with my snipping tool. (similar to google maps)
elevation by mrbeanz1, on Flickr
Slope is measured in degrees for road building grade is measured in percent. A 45 degree slope is a 100 percent grade. The formula is based on:
The slope is the Tangent of the angle.
Slope is rise/run, and the % grade is 100 times the slope. So a slope of 1/1 would be a 100% grade, Let us say 100 feet with 100 feet of gain, which is indeed a 45 degree angle.
So if you know the degree of the angle, just enter it into your scientific calculator then hit Tangent. Or use your Iphone in calculator mode and turn it on its side and hit "TAN"
Official member of the Brotherhood of Clyde...
Lets stop diabetes! Click here: http://main.diabetes.org/site/TR/?px...nal&fr_id=8067 to donate to the Tour de Cure.
All I did was translate what Bluesdawg said, into something someone who hasn't taken algebra in more then 35 years, would understand better.... Don't be so sure about the GPS giving you earth-is-flat distance, for bicycle riding, car driving, jogging or walking, that would be almost completely useless for anything other then figuring the grade of a hill. I never actually worry about the grade, it's more like, have I seen a hill like this one before, and was I successful in climbing it the last time, if so, then I can do it again, if not, I either need to try it or go a different route that isn't as steep. That's easiest on a topo map.
if you're measuring a 20% grade and you incorrectly use the distance traveled instead of the horizontal distance, you'll be off by 0.4%. For lesser grades, the inaccuracy is less. My conclusion: it's not exact, but it's close enough fer gov'mint work.
I just look for the sign:
For BikeForum.net purposes, use one or more of the formulas or websites given above and add 2-5%, depending on how likely it seems that anyone else knows where the hill in question is.
John, there was a post a couple of years ago of "Pictures of Your Bike with a Percent Grade Sign". It took about two years before I finally got to one of those signs. There are a few hills around here that have the "Steep Hill" sign (otherwise known as the "truck on cheese" sign), but you just won't see that percent grade on a sign around here. And the original poster is in Beaumont, which is flat as a pancake.
Teachme, a couple of other comments. Some of these electronic gizmos show the slope directly, so it's not like people run around measuring rise over run all the time. If you're interested in slope of a bridge, try photographing it from the side, then measuring on the photograph. You can also take a 2' level along, and measure from one end down and divide it out. And if there's 4 different ways to measure the slope of a hill, you're allowed to use whichever one sounds steeper. So on Church Hill, with my 2' level, I couldn't find a place on it anywhere that was over 5%, but the local cyclists are still convinced it's 7-8%.
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
The more you ride your bike, the less your ass will hurt.
I've found mapmyride to be pretty inaccurate with grades. If you go too granular it over estimates grade and if you go too broad it underestimates them, IME.
For example, here's an instance of going too granular. A quarter mile chunk of road I ride all the time. MMR says it hits 20% up near the top. It gets nowhere near that.
http://www.mapmyride.com/routes/fullscreen/40664720/
On the other hand when I have this bit of road as part of a 12 mile ride it takes too big of a stretch of road for the average and the hill comes in under 2%.
Actual grade probably peaks out around 7%. Average for the quarter mile I'd guess around 5%.
Last edited by LesterOfPuppets; 08-18-11 at 10:45 PM.
1980ish Free Spirit Sunbird fixed * 1996 Mongoose IBOC Zero-G * 1997 KHS Comp * 1990-ish Scapin * Lemond Buenos Aires Triple