Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 54
  1. #1
    Senior Member BikeArkansas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Little Rock, AR
    My Bikes
    2007 Tirreno Razza 2000
    Posts
    866
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Can a lighter bike help a heavier cyclist?

    Each time I see or participate in a thread concerning cutting the weight of a bike there are always a number of comments about losing weight before cutting the weight of the bike.

    Therefore, I am beginning to wonder if a heavier cyclists should bother with riding a lightweight bike. Are riders that carry any weight at all regulated to 20 plus pound cruisers?
    I started riding my bike to get healthy. Now I try to stay healthy so I can ride my bike.

  2. #2
    Senior Member big john's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    In the foothills of Los Angeles County
    Posts
    10,835
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Weight is weight and taking a couple pounds off of your bike will make climbing a little easier, at least in theory. Whether this small difference will be worth it to you is another story.
    Wouldn't it be cool to lose weight off the bike and the body?

  3. #3
    Senior Member digibud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Further North than U
    My Bikes
    Spec Roubaix, three Fisher Montare, two Pugs
    Posts
    1,528
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think so. After years of riding a touring bike, a mtn bike and a recent fat tire bike, I finally got a carbon fiber road bike for my wife and I. Wow. Huge difference. It was one of those dramatic changes that you end up going, "Damn. I wish I'd done this years ago." We still have snow on the ground and ice on the roads so I'm still riding my mtn bike with studded tires and I am so very much looking forward to getting back on my road bike. I still need to drop another 30lb but regardless of who you are, there is a huge difference between a typical mtn bike and a lightweight full carbon bike. It's totally spoiled me. My wife and I both love the speed and feel. I recommend a lightweight road bike for everyone! .

  4. #4
    Senior Member OldsCOOL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    northern michigan
    My Bikes
    '88 Cannondale Criterium, Trek Pro Series
    Posts
    5,202
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Get the road bike!

    I lost 30lbs from April to August last summer. It made a huge difference. The biggest change was when riding in the drops and my knees did scrub on my belly. I'm 5'9 and was 200 when starting. Each 10lbs loss could be felt in acceleration and hillclimbs.
    Having a flat tire as part of the total cycling experience is highly overrated. Knowing how to fix one quickly is not.

    '85 Trek 460 road racer

    '89 Raleigh Technium PRE

    '79 Motobecane Super Mirage

  5. #5
    Senior Member late's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Southern Maine
    Posts
    8,260
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Get specific.

    If you are cutting the weight in half, you're going to see a big improvement.

    Most of the time, when people ask this, they want to go from 20 pounds to 18.
    Old Man Maine

  6. #6
    Senior Member Gravity Aided's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    2,564
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    All things being equal, the least expensive way to shed weight from the bike is to shed weight from you . All things are not equal, though, and lighter frames may provide a faster ride, along with thinner tires . Lightweight road bikes are more responsive and quicker, and CF frames may be even more comfy . Way lighter and faster than loaded touring . You might look around, and see if bike dealers are having demo days as they do in the Spring ,and give one a try.

  7. #7
    Travelling hopefully chasm54's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Uncertain
    Posts
    7,066
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What late said. Obviously, if you weigh 200lbs and the bike weighs 20lbs, buying a 16lb bike is going to take less than 2% off the overall weight. Barely noticeable. But equally obviously, the difference between my 18lb road bike and my 35 lb expedition tourer is very noticeable indeed.

    More important, buy a bike that feels like fun to ride. The more you like it, the more you'll ride it, and then there's more chance of the weight coming off the rider.
    There have been many days when I haven't felt like riding, but there has never been a day when I was sorry I rode.

  8. #8
    Have bike, will travel Barrettscv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Windy City
    My Bikes
    A road bike for every purpose
    Posts
    9,183
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by OldsCOOL View Post
    Get the road bike!

    I lost 30lbs from April to August last summer. It made a huge difference. The biggest change was when riding in the drops and my knees did scrub on my belly. I'm 5'9 and was 200 when starting. Each 10lbs loss could be felt in acceleration and hillclimbs.
    +1. I lost 50 LBS and it really improved my cycling... and everything else!

    Spending $1500-2000 for a well-fitted and comfortable 18 LBS road bike with solid wheels is a good investment and can improve your cycling substantially. Buying a lighter bike might not provide much of an improvement for many cyclists.
    Last edited by Barrettscv; 03-29-12 at 09:06 AM.
    2014 Trek DS.1: "Viaggiatore" A do-it-all bike that is waiting in Italy
    2012 Pedal Force CG2: "Secolo Bicicletta" the modern carbon fiber road bike
    2012 Pedal Force CX2: "Carbone CX" the carbon fiber CX bike
    2010 Origin 8 CX 700: "Servizio Grave" Monstercross/29er bike
    1997 Simoncini Special Cyclocross: "Little Simon" lugged Columbus steel CX bike
    1987 Serotta Nova Special X: "Azzurri" The retro Columbus SPX steel road bike

  9. #9
    Senior Member BlazingPedals's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Middle of da Mitten
    My Bikes
    Trek 7500, RANS V-Rex, Optima Baron, Velokraft NoCom, M-5 Carbon Highracer, homebuilt recumbent
    Posts
    7,220
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You will notice the difference immediately if you get a better, lighter bike. You can always lose weight later, too!

  10. #10
    Senior Member NOS88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Montgomery County, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    6,427
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think to summarize the advice that has been given here and in other threads over the years, the answer is yes. I lighter bike can be an improvement for anyone. If you can shed body fat, however, you may notice a much bigger improvement. In terms of it being worth it, only the individual can decide that. We each have our own levels of income, sense of how much things are worth, etc. If it were me, I'd use losing weight as an incentive. Once I reached my goal, I'd treat myself to the new ride. Having done that, I can tell you that the first ride on the new, well-earned bike was spectacular.
    A conclusion is the place where you got tired of thinking. - S. Wright

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    217
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    not to mention that each pound of extra body weight has miles of blood vessels in it, and has to be supported by your heart too. do what I am doing: set a weight loss goal, then reward yourself with a new bike when you make the goal. it is motivating me.

  12. #12
    Senior Member bigbadwullf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    West, Tn.
    Posts
    1,763
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Any weight loss is a plus. As a bicycle rep once told me: "How low do you want to go? It's only $$" . But it's a LOT easier to lose weight from you than the bike and you save money losing it on you. Eat less, it costs you less. Buy light-weight components and it costs you a LOT. For me it would only make sense to lose the weight from me until I reach the healthy minimum I should be, THEN cut weight on the bike. But if I had the $$ I'd certainly buy the lightest bike I could afford(which isn't the case).
    When it comes down to it, the ultimate choice is your's.
    But to answer your question, yes it would help.

    http://tickers.TickerFactory.com/ezt...S/exercise.png

    2012 Specialized Tarmac Elite Rival Mid Compact
    2007 Cannondale Caffeine 29er Lefty. Crank Bros pedals, wireless cateye. Specialized body geometric seat(uh, saddle)

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    S.E. Iowa
    My Bikes
    all diamond frames
    Posts
    1,169
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Whats far more important than weight is geometry, bb stiffness, etc. And generally when you get a more aggressive design, lighter will be part of the equation. If you want to ride faster, get a bike designed for that purpose.

  14. #14
    Watching and waiting. jethro56's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Mattoon,Ill
    My Bikes
    Trek 7300 Giant Sedona E-Bike Trek Madone 4.5 Surly Cross Check
    Posts
    1,977
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    No mountains to climb in central Illinois so weight isn't the biggest factor. Lightweight wheels and tires will make a difference if you have to accelerate often because of the flywheel effect. For flat-land riders wind is the biggest enemy. Getting more aero pays huge dividends and the geometry to get there most often comes with a lightweight bike. I ride a Trek 4.5 Madone which is a compromise between comfort and lightweight. There's much more aero bikes out there but until the engine gets stronger it'd be a waste to move that direction.

  15. #15
    Starting over CraigB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Indianapolis
    My Bikes
    1990 Trek 1500; 2006 Gary Fisher Marlin; 2011 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 105; 2012 Catrike Trail
    Posts
    4,081
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    When it comes to bikes, I'm all about the fun. Ask anyone. Because I personally find lighter bikes more fun to ride than heavier bikes, I say go for the lightest bike you can afford (assuming it meets all your other criteria). Then have fun while you work to shrink yourself.
    Craig in Indy

  16. #16
    I need speed AzTallRider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    My Bikes
    Giant Propel, Cervelo P2
    Posts
    5,498
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Malcolm Forbes once said "Everyone should get to experience driving a 12 cylinder car." The cycling equivalent is that "Every cyclist should get to experience riding a 15 pound bike." For the full experience, you also need a set of wheels in the 1,200g range. While weight is weight when you're climbing, and you can reduce your body weight more, a lighter bike just feels better all around, and is more fun to ride. It is more instantly responsive. People talk a lot about how quickly a wheel spins up, and frankly there isn't much scientific support for that. But there is a clear difference in turning moment as wheel weight is reduced, and that dramatically affects responsiveness. Ride a set of light aero tubulars, and heavier wheels feel like they are wallowing.

    In other words: "Try it, you'll like it."
    "If you're riding less than 18 MPH up a 2% grade please tell people Coggan is coaching you."

  17. #17
    Si Senior dbg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Naperville, Illinois
    My Bikes
    Too Numerous (not)
    Posts
    2,419
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I did the "superlight carbon" thing last summer and loved it. AND-- I discovered I was motivated to lose some weight and do extra training just to be "worthy" of it. The result was a hugely noticeable improvement in speed and climbing, and the bike was sooo smooth and nimble. Sure, you can just lose a little weight, but I'd say go for it all!
    David Green, Naperville, IL USA "The older I get, the better I used to be" --Lee Trevino

  18. #18
    Resident Alien Racer Ex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Let me check.
    My Bikes
    Of course.
    Posts
    11,340
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bigbadwullf View Post
    But it's a LOT easier to lose weight from you than the bike and you save money losing it on you. Eat less, it costs you less.
    If losing body weight was "easier" there wouldn't be 500 products and plans on the market to help you do it. And cheap food is often much more fattening than expensive food. Go buy a pound of 25% fat hamburg and then see what you can buy in a tuna steak for the same amount.

    I can type out a 500 word piece in a couple hours, get paid, then saunter down to my bike shop and knock a pound off my bike with the money I earned. Pretty easy. Knocking off an couple of kilos to get ready for the Tour of the Gila is flipping hard by comparison.

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    My Bikes
    2007 Trek Navigator 3.0 2008 Specialized Sequoia Elite
    Posts
    64
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's a LOT easier to lessen the weight of a bike as opposed to a body , just WAY more expensive , since the first of this year I've
    shaved approx. 1.7 lbs of my ride @ a cost in the neighborhood of 1350.00 dollars , bike is still around 18lbs. my bodyweight has dropped 5lbs.
    and not nearly the fun of spending money and bolting on shiny new parts

  20. #20
    Senior Member goldfinch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Minnesota/Arizona and between
    My Bikes
    Trek Madone 4.7 WSD, 1969 Schwinn Collegiate, Cannondale Quick 4, Terry Classic, Gary Fisher Marlin, Dahon Jetstream XP
    Posts
    3,909
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jethro56 View Post
    No mountains to climb in central Illinois so weight isn't the biggest factor. Lightweight wheels and tires will make a difference if you have to accelerate often because of the flywheel effect. For flat-land riders wind is the biggest enemy. Getting more aero pays huge dividends and the geometry to get there most often comes with a lightweight bike. I ride a Trek 4.5 Madone which is a compromise between comfort and lightweight. There's much more aero bikes out there but until the engine gets stronger it'd be a waste to move that direction.
    I spent this winter riding where it was flat and now recently, quite windy. I rode with guys who I would say were about at my fitness level, though of course that is a guess. But we all felt evenly matched on the flats with minimal wind and we all felt comfortable doing about the same mileage. I weigh about half of what any of them weighed, just because I am a small woman. I could go faster then they could going up hill, rare and short as they were. Downhill they always could pass me by. Not a surprise. What was interesting is that they did better than I going into the wind. I almost always had to ride one of their wheels to keep up.

  21. #21
    Senior Member BlazingPedals's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Middle of da Mitten
    My Bikes
    Trek 7500, RANS V-Rex, Optima Baron, Velokraft NoCom, M-5 Carbon Highracer, homebuilt recumbent
    Posts
    7,220
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dbg View Post
    I did the "superlight carbon" thing last summer and loved it. AND-- I discovered I was motivated to lose some weight and do extra training just to be "worthy" of it.
    I understand what you're saying, and you're right - a nice bike can motivate you to work harder on the engine. But I really HATE the idea that someone isn't worthy of the bike they're riding. The only ones who aren't worthy of the nicest bike they can afford are the ones who use it for a bit of extra bling on top of their SUVs instead of riding it.

  22. #22
    Senior Member nkfrench's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Fort Worth, TX
    My Bikes
    2006 Specialized Ruby Pro aka "Rhubarb" / and a backup road bike
    Posts
    1,515
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Light bikes don't get all emotionally distraught and go on binges sneak-eating french fries and gain #5.
    I bought a nice very light road bike to replace a vintage 27# steel schwinn road bike and have never regretted the decision.
    In 30+ years the schwinn got less than 1,000 miles on it. The "new" bike has almost 12,000 miles in about 3.5 years. It's that much more fun to ride.

  23. #23
    Senior Member Retro Grouch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    St Peters, Missouri
    My Bikes
    Rans Enduro Sport, Hase Kettweisel Tandem, Merin Bear Valley beater bike
    Posts
    23,897
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BlazingPedals View Post
    You will notice the difference immediately if you get a better, lighter bike.
    Once you get up to speed bike weight doesn't make much difference. HOWEVER, every single ride starts at zero miles per hour. The more often you find yourself accelerating from 0 to 10 MPH, the more you'll notice and appreciate a lighter bike.

  24. #24
    Senior Member Bikey Mikey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Newport News, VA USA
    My Bikes
    Diamondback Edgewood LX; Giant Defy 1
    Posts
    3,215
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Retro Grouch View Post
    Once you get up to speed bike weight doesn't make much difference. HOWEVER, every single ride starts at zero miles per hour. The more often you find yourself accelerating from 0 to 10 MPH, the more you'll notice and appreciate a lighter bike.
    ...or when climbing hills.

  25. #25
    blt
    blt is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    209
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Racer Ex View Post
    If losing body weight was "easier" there wouldn't be 500 products and plans on the market to help you do it. And cheap food is often much more fattening than expensive food. Go buy a pound of 25% fat hamburg and then see what you can buy in a tuna steak for the same amount.

    I can type out a 500 word piece in a couple hours, get paid, then saunter down to my bike shop and knock a pound off my bike with the money I earned. Pretty easy. Knocking off an couple of kilos to get ready for the Tour of the Gila is flipping hard by comparison.
    To be fair, most people can't go out and work 2 extra hours and have the money needed to knock a pound off the bike.

    Also, losing a pound of body weight really isn't that hard. You'll find that the product and plans on the market to help people lose weight don't say, "Lose 1 pound and keep it off!!" Really, not a big deal. For people who are able to maintain their weight (admittedly, not always the easiest thing itself), going down 1 pound and then maintaining it isn't a big deal, no products or plans or lifestyle changes needed. For most, I'm not sure losing 1 pound off the bike through money is easier than losing 1 pound of body weight.

    The main thing, though, is that for most of us, it is "easier" to lose 20-25 pounds of body weight than it is to lose 20-25 pounds off the bike. It isn't easy, it is very difficult, but I know I can lose 20-25 pounds of body weight.

    When we're not looking at 1 pound, but a lot higher numbers, it is easier to lose body weight than the same amount of bike weight, not because losing body weight is "easy," but because the "difficult" is always "easier" than the "impossible."

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •