Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Fifty Plus (50+) Share the victories, challenges, successes and special concerns of bicyclists 50 and older. Especially useful for those entering or reentering bicycling.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-21-12, 05:47 PM   #1
Shamrock
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Garden State exit 135
Bikes:
Posts: 444
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
cadence

Since I have been using a cycle computer I know my cadence.My average on flat roads 85.I shift at 80 and 90.Thats my natural cadence.Just wondering what cadence you guys have.
Shamrock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-12, 06:25 PM   #2
SammyJ 
Senior Member
 
SammyJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Summerville SC
Bikes: 2012 Caad 8 105
Posts: 507
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
I'll let you know as soon as I get my sensor fixed. (translate, new unit)
__________________
I have NEVER regretted going on a ride;
I have often regretted not going when I could have!


I am grateful for the headwind that challenged me today!
I am grateful for the tailwind that helped me go fast!


Clydesdales and Athenas Strava Club
http://www.strava.com/clubs/clydesda...bikeforums-net
SammyJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-12, 06:28 PM   #3
krobinson103
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Incheon, South Korea
Bikes: Nothing amazing... cheap old 21 speed mtb
Posts: 2,837
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I run about the same. 80-90 on the flats and more on the hills to try and keep momentum. I find anything over 90 for longer than 10-20 minutes just doesn't work for me.
krobinson103 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-12, 06:40 PM   #4
Shimagnolo
Senior Member
 
Shimagnolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Bikes:
Posts: 7,709
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 358 Post(s)
Flat/rolling roads: 90-105
Climbing: 85
Trying to overtake someone: up to 120
Shimagnolo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-12, 07:08 PM   #5
oldnslow2
Senior Member
 
oldnslow2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Bikes:
Posts: 3,845
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 206 Post(s)
80-90 on the flats.
oldnslow2 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-12, 08:39 PM   #6
BlazingPedals
Senior Member
 
BlazingPedals's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Middle of da Mitten
Bikes: Trek 7500, RANS V-Rex, Optima Baron, Velokraft NoCom, M-5 Carbon Highracer, homebuilt recumbent
Posts: 9,095
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
I'm about the same, too. 85 on the flats, 90 if I'm working harder than normal. Lower on hills, no matter how hard I'm working. I guess I'm reverting to torque for the climbs. I rarely get much over 100 rpm.
BlazingPedals is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-12, 08:42 PM   #7
fietsbob 
coprolite
 
fietsbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Bikes: 7
Posts: 22,203
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1140 Post(s)
Its Less , I don't count, kept up the effort long enough to cross many Borders ,
Amsterdam To Warsaw, and back, SW Ireland to NE Scotland.

with my touring gear..
fietsbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-12, 09:16 PM   #8
con
Older I get, faster I was
 
con's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: santa cruz
Bikes:
Posts: 654
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
On flats I run between 100 and 120 depending on my level of effort. Climbing I try hard to keep the RPMs up but I can't when the grade gets over 10%.
con is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-12, 09:32 PM   #9
SlowSpinner
Yes it is a paradox
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Western Kentucky
Bikes: Trek, Orbea,Specilized
Posts: 358
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Average 72. Flats 80 to 100. Hills 60. I have problems with hills.
SlowSpinner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-12, 09:40 PM   #10
MinnMan
Senior Member
 
MinnMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Bikes: 2016 Masi cxgr, 2011 Felt F3 Ltd, 2010 Trek 2.1, 2009 KHS Flite 220, 1991 Bianchi Osprey
Posts: 2,232
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 117 Post(s)
I haven't replaced my sensor battery all season, but I'm pretty slow - about 80 RPM or so under normal conditions. I work on getting it up faster to 90. In fact, I'm not sure I belong at 90 - though that's supposedly ideal for others, I think 85 or so would be my ideal.
MinnMan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-12, 09:44 PM   #11
krobinson103
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Incheon, South Korea
Bikes: Nothing amazing... cheap old 21 speed mtb
Posts: 2,837
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Some say over 100 is ideal but I can't ride like that for long at all. I think everyone is different and the cadence/gear combo will also be different.
krobinson103 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-12, 10:03 PM   #12
Shimagnolo
Senior Member
 
Shimagnolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Bikes:
Posts: 7,709
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 358 Post(s)
For me, the higher cadence did not come naturally. After winding up in the doctor's office due to knee problems caused by pushing gears that were not low enough for the climbs I was doing, I googled and read all I could find on the topic and realized my cadence was too low. The solution was in two parts:

1. Building my own bikes using a mix of road & mtn parts to get lower gearing in a road bike than anything available.
2. Forcing myself to spin higher cadence.

After a while the higher cadence became natural, and I could no longer stand operating at the old, lower cadence. And I have not had the knee problems in years.
Shimagnolo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-12, 10:04 PM   #13
GFish
Senior Member
 
GFish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Oregon
Bikes:
Posts: 649
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Warm-up - 90-105 rpm's (light gear)
Flats - 80 - 95 rpm's
Hill's - 60 - 80 rpm's (depending on grade)
GFish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-12, 02:53 AM   #14
stapfam
Time for a change.
 
stapfam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
Posts: 19,915
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Watched a Triathlon yesterday-The final round for the world championships- so pretty good riders and they are fit. Cadence was not that high at around 80--Then las tweek on the final day of the tour of Beijing two riders out front. One from Mountain bike background and one from track racing. Cadence was way different. The mountain biker was around 70 to 80 and the trackie at 100+.

I try to keep between 80 and 90 and am not surprised when I slip down to 70 but in a higher gear to maintain speed. But come the hills and it is low gear and start at a high cadence that gets lower and lower and lower as the hill keeps going up and energy comes down.
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


Spike Milligan
stapfam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-12, 05:25 AM   #15
ctpres 
Senior Member
 
ctpres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Creede CO in summer & Okeechobee FL in winter
Bikes: Zenetto Stealth & Vilano back-up
Posts: 394
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Still working on reaching a "normal." Seems like I will settle into mid 90's on flats and 110 about max without BB (butt bounce). Hills - no idea TX gulf coast is flat.
__________________
Retired 76 YO. Got my sub 5 ET century at 50 and sub 7 RT at 75. Just want to finish sub 10 RT at 80. USNR, USAF, USCGA - riding 2014 Zenetto Steath ZR7.1 Carbon
ctpres is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-12, 09:46 AM   #16
Esteban58
West Coast Weenie
 
Esteban58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Sunnyvale, CA.
Bikes: 2013 Caletti, Trek 7500 fx
Posts: 639
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
88.

sometimes 89.



ok... above 110 I have sloppy riding issues

below 80 doesn't feel right, but on long hills sometimes that seems to be my only option.
Esteban58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-12, 09:57 AM   #17
az_cyclist
Senior Member
 
az_cyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Arizona
Bikes: Trek Domane 4.5, Trek 1500
Posts: 1,909
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
90+ on flats. 80-85 on a 1-2 % uphill grade, and a bit lower for a steeper grade. 100 or a bit higher going down the same grade.
az_cyclist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-12, 09:58 AM   #18
volosong 
Senior Member
 
volosong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Antelope Valley, SoCal
Bikes:
Posts: 2,731
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Wow! I seem to be off the bottom of the chart. On flats, I average somewhere around 68-72. For any type of steep, extended hill, I'd be lucky to maintain 60. Rarely do I pedal downhill, (I'm going fast enough). The only time my cadence seems to be higher is when in Time Trial mode, where my cadence will be in the mid-80s. (No knee problems ... ever ... so far anyway.)
__________________
Deut 6:5

---

"Ha ha! You fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders - The most famous of which is 'never get involved in a land war in Asia'".
- Vizzini during his "battle of wits" with the Man in Black
volosong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-12, 09:59 AM   #19
JohnJ80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Minnesota
Bikes: N+1=5
Posts: 2,882
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
75-80, as low as 72 on flats. I've discovered that if I shift to a higher gear when I hit about 82, my average speed goes up and I feel the best.

J.
JohnJ80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-12, 10:06 AM   #20
AzTallRider 
I need speed
 
AzTallRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Bikes: Giant Propel, Cervelo P2
Posts: 5,550
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
On flats, I'll generally keep it in triple digits or the high 90's. I vary it quite a bit on hills: Low 90's or so when seated; much slower when standing, because that's what seems to give me the best 'break', before sitting back down and picking the cadence back up. For longer efforts, it's important to keep the cadence up to reduce the torque being applied, as pushing high torque fatigues muscles more rapidly. It's a balancing acting between muscular endurance and aerobic fitness, but as a general rule, you aren't likely to go wrong by training to use a faster average cadence.

Triathletes, and some time trialers, do tend to use lower cadences, seeking that balance between the neuromuscular and aerobic systems. Wiggins says he reduced his TT cadence this past year, but it's still up there pretty high by 'normal' standards. As I work to improve my TT performance, I'm trying to keep the cadence up towards 100. Not easy as you get towards the end of a 40K effort.
__________________
"If you're riding less than 18 MPH up a 2% grade please tell people Coggan is coaching you."
AzTallRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-12, 10:33 AM   #21
WC89
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Owings Mills, Maryland
Bikes: 2011 Trek 8.4 DS hybrid; 2012 Felt F-75 road bike; 1990 Specialized Stumpjumper MTB; 1992 Guerciotti road bike (inactive)
Posts: 494
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I try to stay at 85 - 100, except for tough climbs where I'm not so concerned about it and often unable to spin that fast anyway in the gearing that I have (lowest is 34 x 25).
WC89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-12, 11:43 AM   #22
rm -rf
don't try this at home.
 
rm -rf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N. KY
Bikes:
Posts: 3,861
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 115 Post(s)
When I'm cruising at an easy pace, I'll be at about 80 rpm, with not much pedal pressure.
The lowest I've recorded on a steep climb is 3.2 mph, 34 rpm--about one pedal stroke per second. It's getting hard to balance at that low speed. It was a 34-29 gear.

When I'm riding solo, riding fairly fast and watching cadence, low 90s seems to be the best cadence for me.

But if I see my Garmin recording of my rides, it varies a lot. I shift often, even for just a few pedal revolutions, so I would expect the cadence to be in a narrower band. But it isn't. EDIT---I watched on a recent ride. When I shift cogs when in the 50 chain ring, the cadence jumps 7 to 10 rpm. So this graph is just showing usual gear shifts. It's easier to keep an even cadence when riding solo!

Here's a fast (for me) group ride where I was just hanging on in the draft. Blue is speed, tan is cadence, and green is elevation--it's essentially flat, 10 to 20 feet per mile. I was trying to be very efficient to conserve energy, mostly riding in the drops and shifting as needed. But I'm doing anywhere from low 80s to 105 in this 3 mile section.

The chart comes from the excellent free software My Tourbook.


Last edited by rm -rf; 10-24-12 at 07:45 PM.
rm -rf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-12, 11:56 AM   #23
billydonn
Council of the Elders
 
billydonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Omaha, NE
Bikes: 1990 Schwinn Crosscut, 5 Lemonds
Posts: 3,761
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by volosong View Post
Wow! I seem to be off the bottom of the chart. On flats, I average somewhere around 68-72. For any type of steep, extended hill, I'd be lucky to maintain 60. Rarely do I pedal downhill, (I'm going fast enough). The only time my cadence seems to be higher is when in Time Trial mode, where my cadence will be in the mid-80s. (No knee problems ... ever ... so far anyway.)
Shocking!Heresy!

Actually, I'm about the same... maybe a few beats faster but not much.
billydonn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-12, 12:01 PM   #24
PatW
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 313
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It has been a long time since I have bothered to have a cadence read out on a computer. But when I did, my cadence tended to run in the high 90s up to 110.

It is always good to try to get to the point where you can ride a high cadence (over 90). But people seem to have a natural cadence and it varies.

As I recall, Lemond ran a low cadence of about 85. Merckx ran a cadence of well over 100. I am not about to say that either of these gentlemen were wrong to do so.
PatW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-12, 12:47 PM   #25
CommuteCommando
Senior Member
 
CommuteCommando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Southern CaliFORNIA.
Bikes: KHS Alite 500, Trek 7.2 FX , Masi Partenza, Masi Fixed Special, Masi Cran Criterium
Posts: 3,018
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
'Bout the same as you. I never knew for sure until I got a Garmin a couple of months ago. It only confirmed what I already suspected. It's comfortable for me, so I go with it. I do try to not go below that, and occasionally hit 120 on the downhill portions of the underpasses on the MUP's I frequent.
CommuteCommando is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:38 PM.