Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Fifty Plus (50+)
Reload this Page >

I think I'll quite exercising

Search
Notices
Fifty Plus (50+) Share the victories, challenges, successes and special concerns of bicyclists 50 and older. Especially useful for those entering or reentering bicycling.

I think I'll quite exercising

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-27-13, 08:35 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Doug64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,489
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1182 Post(s)
Liked 833 Times in 435 Posts
My recommendation would be to keep your powder dry.
Good advice-- thanks, I removed inappropriate remark.

Last edited by Doug64; 02-27-13 at 09:09 PM. Reason: Correction
Doug64 is offline  
Old 02-27-13, 08:42 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Dudelsack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: South Hutchinson Island
Posts: 6,647

Bikes: Lectric Xpedition.

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 146 Post(s)
Liked 96 Times in 46 Posts
Also, the fates have determined this will come up. All political discussions MUST include a mention of the Nazis, and all fitness discussions MUST generate a violent dispute about whether glucose can be derived from fat metabolism. So here ya go: https://blog.cholesterol-and-health.c...rom-fatty.html
Whether the author is accurate or not, I make no claims other to recognize that some experiments using radiolabeled markers actually do show that fat metabolism can result in glucose production.

But what do I know. They can have my bottle of raspberry extract when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
__________________
Momento mori, amor fati.




Dudelsack is offline  
Old 02-27-13, 08:58 PM
  #28  
Administrator
 
BillyD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 33,001

Bikes: Merlin Cyrene '04; Bridgestone RB-1 '92

Mentioned: 325 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11969 Post(s)
Liked 6,646 Times in 3,483 Posts
Originally Posted by sreten
Its far easier to lose weight by restricting calorie intake than
trying to burn off calories by exercise for an average person.
Indeed.

I've come to find out lots of guys bike to eat instead of the reverse.
__________________
See, this is why we can't have nice things. - - smarkinson
Where else but the internet can a bunch of cyclists go and be the tough guy? - - jdon
BillyD is offline  
Old 02-27-13, 09:11 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Terex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 7600' Northern New Mexico
Posts: 3,680

Bikes: Specialized 6Fattie, Parlee Z5, Scott Addict

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Liked 34 Times in 24 Posts
Originally Posted by Doug64
I'm just passing along what I read. It was published in a well regarded book on the science of cycling. There are other fuels besides fat that have to be depleted before the muscles start using fat. If you can not maintain a high intensity workout long enough to deplete these other fuels the fat is not used. At least that is the message I got from a more complex discussion of the topic in Wilson's book.

I know there are some people on this forum that regard research as a form of voodoo that can't be trusted. But I have not found anything anywhere else that would lead me to think that this information is not reliable. Do you have any thing, other than anecdotal accounts that does not agree with his premise?
You haven't done any research. You've looked at one book, originally written in by an engineer in 1982 and updated in 2004. Nothing other than compiling stuff he cribbed from other sources, now almost 10 years out of date. No science involved. Google "myths of fat burning" for a start. Then, if you want to take a stab at "research", look at medical data bases listed at https://www.cochrane.org/about-us/evi...aphy/databases You can start with the National Institute of Health's PubMed.

In summary, in general, the more intense the exercise, a lower the per cent of fat may be burned relative to energy from carbs, but absolute amount of fat burn increases as intensity increases.
Terex is offline  
Old 02-27-13, 10:38 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Doug64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,489
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1182 Post(s)
Liked 833 Times in 435 Posts
I'm actually pretty familiar with the Cochrane website. I used it quite a bit when I was working, trying to apply systematic evidence review principles to another discipline.

I did a cursory search and did not find any relevant summaries. Could you give me a direct link to the specific review you are talking about?

I never said or implied that I did any research, exercise physiology is way out of my realm of expertise. What I did say is that I read................... and gave the reference for folks to make their own call. I respect your perspective.

Last edited by Doug64; 02-27-13 at 11:00 PM.
Doug64 is offline  
Old 02-28-13, 03:27 AM
  #31  
Spin Meister
 
icyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: California, USA
Posts: 2,651

Bikes: Trek Émonda, 1961 Follis (French) road bike (I'm the original owner), a fixie, a mountain bike, etc.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Liked 41 Times in 16 Posts
Terex wrote: "The more I exercise, at least aerobically, the less I want to eat. When I'm not exercising, I'm starved all the time."

That is, though, counter to the way it works with just about everyone else in the world.

That said, I'm not hungry after a bike ride, or a run, or a long, hard hike. At least I'm not hungry immediately after I stop exercising. Soon enough, though, my hunger matches how much I've exercised.
__________________
This post is a natural product. Slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and are in no way to be considered flaws or defects.
icyclist is offline  
Old 02-28-13, 04:24 AM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Bikey Mikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Newport News, VA USA
Posts: 3,325

Bikes: Diamondback Edgewood LX; Giant Defy 1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Calorie restriction will promote weight loss, but you will hit a wall, or rather a slowdown, in weight loss after a while. The body will slow down the metabolism to compensate for the reduction in calories(starvation mode). You overcome this slowdown with exercise. Exercise, besides making you healthier, and calorie/portion control is the best way to loose weight or maintain a healthy weight. Additionally, if you exercise regularly, you actually burn more calories just sitting than someone sedentary simply at rest. But, even if you have met your goal or are lean, one should exercise to be healthier.
Bikey Mikey is offline  
Old 02-28-13, 04:55 AM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
gif4445's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Kearney NE
Posts: 600

Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Specialized Diverge, Volagi Liscio, LHT, Trek 1.2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 142 Post(s)
Liked 46 Times in 33 Posts
I was lost in SC Nebraska, looking for the main highway and stopped at a local Git n Go. Asked the attendant how I could get to 183. He told me diet and exercise. Ok, not so funny. But really, it takes both for us simple people. For us numbers type people, a good tool is the smartphone app MyFitnessPal, or its equivalent. I established a weight loss goal and max net calorie intake level and input my food and exercise. It has helped me lose the last 20 lbs and hopefully will get me to 183. I know it's not for everyone, but it does eliminate some guess work, while also tracking other important nutritional intakes. I would strongly recommend it.
gif4445 is offline  
Old 02-28-13, 05:07 AM
  #34  
Time for a change.
 
stapfam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Posts: 19,913

Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by icyclist
Terex wrote: "The more I exercise, at least aerobically, the less I want to eat. When I'm not exercising, I'm starved all the time."

That is, though, counter to the way it works with just about everyone else in the world.

That said, I'm not hungry after a bike ride, or a run, or a long, hard hike. At least I'm not hungry immediately after I stop exercising. Soon enough, though, my hunger matches how much I've exercised.
When I first started riding- we used to do 30 to 40 miles and always stopped for breakfast. I was new to cycling and unfit and the others had been riding for quite a while. That breakfast-While everyone else was having the Full Monty--I had a piece of fruit cake and I struggled with that. I knew I had cycling fitness when I could eat a full breakfast and still had a couple of cereal bars on the way home.

Now I have to have my porridge before a long ride and breakfast has to come in there somewhere on the ride. Either that or my pockets are stuffed with dried fruit- Cereal bars- Packet of Fig Newtons and on the longer rides- something more substantial for the 65 to 70 mile break. And then after the rides- or at least the hard ones- it has to be KFC or Fish and chips--Something nice and greasy as that is what I crave.
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


Spike Milligan
stapfam is offline  
Old 02-28-13, 10:28 AM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
jmccain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 597

Bikes: Kvale, Peugeot, Cervelo, Bridgestone

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GeorgeBMac
I take the opposite approach:

"Better to burn it off than starve it off"

Starving it off is not only not fun -- but does nothing for the fitness that we need to be healthy.
Where did I write anything about starving?
jmccain is offline  
Old 02-28-13, 12:19 PM
  #36  
dbg
Si Senior
 
dbg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Naperville, Illinois
Posts: 2,669

Bikes: Too Numerous (not)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 8 Posts
Ditto on the "exercise makes me eat better." I also notice that beginning a new exercise regimen (like when I used to start training for the spring marathon) I would initially gain weight (from muscle mass increase).

And burning off that last little bit of spare tire was extremely hard to do. Unless I cranked the mileage way up or severely restricted carbs (not good during training), I had trouble getting to that super lean, emaciated, sickly look.
dbg is offline  
Old 02-28-13, 12:57 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
MinnMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 5,752

Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease Carbon Deore 11, 2020 Salsa Warbird GRX 600, 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX disc 9.0 Di2, 2020 Catrike Eola, 2016 Masi cxgr, 2011, Felt F3 Ltd, 2010 Trek 2.1, 2009 KHS Flite 220

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4390 Post(s)
Liked 3,016 Times in 1,865 Posts
Originally Posted by icyclist
Terex wrote: "The more I exercise, at least aerobically, the less I want to eat. When I'm not exercising, I'm starved all the time."

That is, though, counter to the way it works with just about everyone else in the world.
Perhaps it's not true for many or most, but as my post above expressed, I eat larger meals but fewer nasty snacks when I'm exercising a lot. If you sum my daily calories, I think they go up when I'm off the bike. So Terex isn't alone.
MinnMan is offline  
Old 02-28-13, 03:15 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
Steve Sawyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Livonia, MI (suburban Detroit)
Posts: 519

Bikes: 2013 Specialized Seceur Elite, Soma ES custom build

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BadBurrito
I wasn't biking because of the cold/ice/snow, I quit running because the puppy is too young still to start that (maybe in a month or two I'll start up again). and I well frankly, I hate going to the pool (even though it's heated and all) when it's a sub-zero outside. So the only exercise I'm currently doing is walking the dog a couple times a day - not much of a calorie burn there.
As others have said, I think you're right on the money re the relationship between diet and weight, but the value of exercise, particularly for us oldsters is a) keeps the metabolism working at a higher rate so you burn more calories even when you're NOT exercising, and b) helps to counteract the loss of muscle tone and muscle mass that's just part of aging.

What I've found works well for me when I can't be on my bike is to join a class. I work harder, burn more calories, and do so more consistently when I've signed up and paid for an instructor-led class. 8-week classes (1 per week) at our local rec center only run about $40, so it's not expensive. I take three classes every 8-week session during the cold months, and I change things up a bit each session though I always have a spinning class in the mix just to keep my bum and pedaling muscles ready to hit the road when it gets warm again.
Steve Sawyer is offline  
Old 02-28-13, 08:14 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
Terex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 7600' Northern New Mexico
Posts: 3,680

Bikes: Specialized 6Fattie, Parlee Z5, Scott Addict

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Liked 34 Times in 24 Posts
Originally Posted by icyclist
Terex wrote: "The more I exercise, at least aerobically, the less I want to eat. When I'm not exercising, I'm starved all the time."

That is, though, counter to the way it works with just about everyone else in the world.

That said, I'm not hungry after a bike ride, or a run, or a long, hard hike. At least I'm not hungry immediately after I stop exercising. Soon enough, though, my hunger matches how much I've exercised.
See : https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/ar...sts-claim.html

And: https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/0...etite-workout/

When I'm very fit, and eating very healthy, I just don't get very hungry. Right now I could go for some Ruffles Ridges with french onion sour cream dip.

Last edited by Terex; 02-28-13 at 08:43 PM.
Terex is offline  
Old 02-28-13, 09:21 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
GeorgeBMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,061

Bikes: 2012 Trek DS 8.5 all weather hybrid, 2008 LeMond Poprad cyclocross, 1992 Cannondale R500 roadbike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Terex
See : https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/ar...sts-claim.html

And: https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/0...etite-workout/

When I'm very fit, and eating very healthy, I just don't get very hungry. Right now I could go for some Ruffles Ridges with french onion sour cream dip.
Thanks! That is pretty much what I have experienced -- but I always thought I must be nuts.

Actually when I get home from a ride I do tend to eat. But mainly it's because I think SHOULD feel hungry rather than because I actually am hungry...

Thanks for sharing those articles -- and your personal experience...
GeorgeBMac is offline  
Old 02-28-13, 09:35 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
Terex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 7600' Northern New Mexico
Posts: 3,680

Bikes: Specialized 6Fattie, Parlee Z5, Scott Addict

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Liked 34 Times in 24 Posts
Originally Posted by Doug64
I'm actually pretty familiar with the Cochrane website. I used it quite a bit when I was working, trying to apply systematic evidence review principles to another discipline.

I did a cursory search and did not find any relevant summaries. Could you give me a direct link to the specific review you are talking about?

I never said or implied that I did any research, exercise physiology is way out of my realm of expertise. What I did say is that I read................... and gave the reference for folks to make their own call. I respect your perspective.
Sorry! Overstated a bit. See https://velonews.competitor.com/2010/...ng-zone_134214

Too tired to look for base studies. Fat burning MAY drop off as intensity increases during exercise, but you have to look at overall metabolic effects, including post exercise.

In addition, maximal fat oxidation during exerciseis highly variable on an individual basis ("...lies between 60.2% and 80.0% of the maximal heart rate.". https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19855335

And, just found a ref to the questionable nature of the original study identifying those maximal fat oxidation zones, or Fatmax :

Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2007 Apr;32(2):249-56.
Determination of "Fatmax"with 1 h cycling protocols of constant load.
Meyer T, Gässler N, Kindermann W.

Institute of Sports Medicine, University of Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany. tim.meyer@uni-paderborn..de

Several earlier studies were aimed at determining an exercise intensity that elicits maximal fat oxidation (Fatmax). However, these studies employed few different intensities or used exercise periods of too short a duration. All investigators described intensity with reference to maximal ergometric values, which might lead to metabolically inhomogeneous workloads between individuals. The aim of this study was to determine Fatmax by overcoming these methodological shortcomings of earlier investigations. Ten healthy recreational athletes (29 +/- 5 y; 75 +/- 6 kg; 1.81 +/- 0.04 m) conducted an initial incremental cycling test to determine VO2 peak (59.2 +/- 6.1 mL.min-1.kg-1) and individual anaerobic threshold (IAT; 221 +/- 476 W). Within 4 weeks, 5 constant-load tests of 1 h duration were carried out at 55%, 65%, 75%, 85%, and 95% IAT. During all tests indirect calorimetry (MetaMax I, Cortex, Leipzig, Germany) served to quantify fat oxidation. Capillary blood sampling for lactate measurements was conducted every 15 min. All subjects remained in a lactate steady state during the constant load tests, which minimized influences from excess CO2. There was no difference between the 5 intensities for the percentage of energy from fat metabolism (p = 0.12). Additionally, the intensities led to similar absolute amounts of oxidized fat (p = 0.34). However, there was a significant increase in fat metabolism with increasing exercise duration (p = 0.04). It is impossible to define one theoretical optimal intensity for fat oxidation that is true in all individuals. It is thus mandatory to perform an individual assessment with indirect calorimetry. Intra-individual day-to-day variation might render the use of several tests of long duration less applicable than incremental testing with stages of sufficient duration. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1...ubmed_ResultsP anel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum)

Last edited by Terex; 02-28-13 at 10:03 PM.
Terex is offline  
Old 03-01-13, 03:09 AM
  #42  
Beicwyr Hapus
 
Gerryattrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Caerdydd
Posts: 1,527

Bikes: Genesis Equilibrium, Genesis Datum, Whyte 901 Dawes 701,1973 Harry Hall

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 152 Post(s)
Liked 36 Times in 16 Posts
Originally Posted by Terex
Sorry! Overstated a bit. See https://velonews.competitor.com/2010/...ng-zone_134214

Too tired to look for base studies. Fat burning MAY drop off as intensity increases during exercise, but you have to look at overall metabolic effects, including post exercise.

In addition, maximal fat oxidation during exerciseis highly variable on an individual basis ("...lies between 60.2% and 80.0% of the maximal heart rate.". https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19855335

And, just found a ref to the questionable nature of the original study identifying those maximal fat oxidation zones, or Fatmax :

Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2007 Apr;32(2):249-56.
Determination of "Fatmax"with 1 h cycling protocols of constant load.
Meyer T, Gässler N, Kindermann W.

Institute of Sports Medicine, University of Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany. tim.meyer@uni-paderborn..de

Several earlier studies were aimed at determining an exercise intensity that elicits maximal fat oxidation (Fatmax). However, these studies employed few different intensities or used exercise periods of too short a duration. All investigators described intensity with reference to maximal ergometric values, which might lead to metabolically inhomogeneous workloads between individuals. The aim of this study was to determine Fatmax by overcoming these methodological shortcomings of earlier investigations. Ten healthy recreational athletes (29 +/- 5 y; 75 +/- 6 kg; 1.81 +/- 0.04 m) conducted an initial incremental cycling test to determine VO2 peak (59.2 +/- 6.1 mL.min-1.kg-1) and individual anaerobic threshold (IAT; 221 +/- 476 W). Within 4 weeks, 5 constant-load tests of 1 h duration were carried out at 55%, 65%, 75%, 85%, and 95% IAT. During all tests indirect calorimetry (MetaMax I, Cortex, Leipzig, Germany) served to quantify fat oxidation. Capillary blood sampling for lactate measurements was conducted every 15 min. All subjects remained in a lactate steady state during the constant load tests, which minimized influences from excess CO2. There was no difference between the 5 intensities for the percentage of energy from fat metabolism (p = 0.12). Additionally, the intensities led to similar absolute amounts of oxidized fat (p = 0.34). However, there was a significant increase in fat metabolism with increasing exercise duration (p = 0.04). It is impossible to define one theoretical optimal intensity for fat oxidation that is true in all individuals. It is thus mandatory to perform an individual assessment with indirect calorimetry. Intra-individual day-to-day variation might render the use of several tests of long duration less applicable than incremental testing with stages of sufficient duration. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1...ubmed_ResultsP anel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum)
Does that mean it's OK to have pie after a ride or not?
Gerryattrick is offline  
Old 03-01-13, 06:36 AM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
GeorgeBMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,061

Bikes: 2012 Trek DS 8.5 all weather hybrid, 2008 LeMond Poprad cyclocross, 1992 Cannondale R500 roadbike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gerryattrick
Does that mean it's OK to have pie after a ride or not?
+1
GeorgeBMac is offline  
Old 03-01-13, 08:56 AM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
Terex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 7600' Northern New Mexico
Posts: 3,680

Bikes: Specialized 6Fattie, Parlee Z5, Scott Addict

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Liked 34 Times in 24 Posts
Originally Posted by Gerryattrick
Does that mean it's OK to have pie after a ride or not?
In the 50+ category it's always OK to have pie. If I find the study, I'll post.
Terex is offline  
Old 03-02-13, 09:21 AM
  #45  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Bob Nichols's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Union City, TN
Posts: 255

Bikes: Trek 7.5 FX, Trek Navigator 2.0

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Just got back from the gym. I not really going to quit.
Bob Nichols is offline  
Old 03-03-13, 08:38 AM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 247
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Good for you! Unless you are going to do harm to yourself then why quit?
Jimbo47 is offline  
Old 03-04-13, 08:43 AM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
Blanchje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 239

Bikes: GT Carbon Grade, Jamis Nova Pro, Giant Sedona

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gerryattrick
Does that mean it's OK to have pie after a ride or not?
It is nearly mandatory.
Blanchje is offline  
Old 03-04-13, 08:57 AM
  #48  
Senior Member
 
Blanchje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 239

Bikes: GT Carbon Grade, Jamis Nova Pro, Giant Sedona

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ericm979
Weight lifting is important for older people. It maintains muscle bulk and strength as well as bone density. So I would not give it up entirely. But it doesn't burn many calories. You need to do something else for that.
This is a very important point. Cycling is great in so many ways but you need to work your other muscles as well.
Blanchje is offline  
Old 03-06-13, 09:58 PM
  #49  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kansas
Posts: 13

Bikes: Trek Domane

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gif4445
I was lost in SC Nebraska, looking for the main highway and stopped at a local Git n Go. Asked the attendant how I could get to 183. He told me diet and exercise. Ok, not so funny. But really, it takes both for us simple people. For us numbers type people, a good tool is the smartphone app MyFitnessPal, or its equivalent. I established a weight loss goal and max net calorie intake level and input my food and exercise. It has helped me lose the last 20 lbs and hopefully will get me to 183. I know it's not for everyone, but it does eliminate some guess work, while also tracking other important nutritional intakes. I would strongly recommend it.
Absolutely! I had a hard time losing weight until I started counting calories with Myfitnesspal. Exercise caused me to want to over-eat. What calories I was burning I was eating back. By keeping track of what I was eating I realized that I was eating too much. I lost 20lbs in 3 months.
Maxpilot is offline  
Old 03-11-13, 04:10 AM
  #50  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Bob Nichols's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Union City, TN
Posts: 255

Bikes: Trek 7.5 FX, Trek Navigator 2.0

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I guess one problem is that I didn't start back riding my bike just for the exercise or to lose weight, although they are good benefits. I just love riding my bike and can't quit.
Bob Nichols is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
baldilocks
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
8
12-03-15 02:38 AM
billiamUK
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
41
07-23-15 07:25 PM
Axiom
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
16
04-10-14 07:45 PM
goldfinch
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
31
02-18-12 07:32 AM
XCSKIBUM
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
14
03-17-10 04:34 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.