Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Fifty Plus (50+)
Reload this Page >

Unbiased Review of Parrafin Chain Lubing

Notices
Fifty Plus (50+) Share the victories, challenges, successes and special concerns of bicyclists 50 and older. Especially useful for those entering or reentering bicycling.

Unbiased Review of Parrafin Chain Lubing

Old 07-08-13, 08:10 PM
  #126  
Trek 500 Kid
 
Zinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 2,565

Bikes: '83 Trek 970 road --- '86 Trek 500 road

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2904 Post(s)
Liked 380 Times in 305 Posts
Originally Posted by TromboneAl
OK, here's the official video:
This concludes my review. I've decided to use paraffin lubing from now on because
(1) It takes less time and bother than oil-based lubing
(2) I don't get chain tatoos
(3) My hands don't get dirty if I need to handle the chain on a ride
(4) I like the looks of a clean chain
(5) I expect that I will get more life out of each chain (less road grit in the rollers.
(6) I don't need to spend time wiping and re-oiling the chain after every few rides (when I'm tired)
(7) It's less expensive
Well now I'm thinking of trying it next season after I go through my bike this winter along with changing over to my new compact crankset. I'm just wondering if they make a quick link for a Sedisport ultra narrow chain since I've stashed several of them. I suppose I could break down and buy a different chain if I have to and save the Sedisports for emergencies or whatever. 800 miles is definitely more than verifying what I've heard in the past from a touring cyclist who used the method.

Last edited by Zinger; 07-09-13 at 08:43 PM.
Zinger is offline  
Old 07-09-13, 06:28 AM
  #127  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,671

Bikes: N+1=5

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 875 Post(s)
Liked 243 Times in 180 Posts
Originally Posted by TromboneAl
I put on a new chain on 4/22/13 and rode with regular chain oil for 275 miles.
I switched to paraffin lube on 5/17/13, and rode 801 miles.

I cannot detect any elongation with the tape measure. My chain check tool of course shows everything is OK.

I could tell you when it elongates enough to be replaced, but I don't think that's going to tell you anything. The elongation depends on riding style, environment, road grit type, etc, and there are wide variations even among riders who use the same lube.

My 8-speed chain only costs about $20, so improvements in chain life aren't as important to me as convenience, lack of chain tattoos, and looks.

The wear comparison, as you note, is a pretty individual thing and there is wide variance between riders. The only real basis for comparison would be lifetime of the a chain before and after on the same bike with the same rider in total miles.

I will say this though, there is a wide variance in lubes and the effect on chain wear. I used to get about 1500 miles out of a chain using Dumonde tech lube. With Chain L, I get nearly twice that so it's not a fluke and the lube matters. I'd also go a bit out on a limb here and say that a more persistent lube is going to do better for chain wear than a less persistent one - and that may be the benefit.

As far as the cleaning of the paraffin goes, I think that once you go paraffin on a chain you probably need to stay there. I don't see any way that a substance like paraffin is going to be easily cleaned out from the inside of the links and off the surfaces of the rollers. I would also think that it would make a mess if you tried to clean it, didn't get it all off (hard to see how that would happen) and then lubed with something else.

J.
JohnJ80 is offline  
Old 07-09-13, 07:24 AM
  #128  
Senior Member
 
Steve Sawyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Livonia, MI (suburban Detroit)
Posts: 519

Bikes: 2013 Specialized Seceur Elite, Soma ES custom build

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnJ80
As far as the cleaning of the paraffin goes, I think that once you go paraffin on a chain you probably need to stay there.
I'm not sure I'd agree with that. If you decide to go with something else after trying paraffin, why would you need to remove any paraffin remaining? It wouldn't interfere with any other lubricant you would use. I know that if I switch back to something else I'm sure not going to worry about any paraffin still on the chain when I do. Who knows, the combination just could be the "magic elixir" of chain lubes!
Steve Sawyer is offline  
Old 07-09-13, 11:39 AM
  #129  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,671

Bikes: N+1=5

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 875 Post(s)
Liked 243 Times in 180 Posts
I'm an engineer but not a chemist. I suppose it would cause issues with either a reaction or in preventing the other newer lube from bonding with the chain.

This is a problem with DuMonde's Lube. If you don't get the old oil based lube off, it really turns into a mess (for example).

J.
JohnJ80 is offline  
Old 07-11-13, 06:03 PM
  #130  
Señor Blues
 
on the path's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: upstate NY
Posts: 1,598

Bikes: Cannondale CAAD 10, Breezer Venturi Custom Build, IRO Singlespeed

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 127 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
I've been following this thread, and I think I want to do it. I just changed a cassette and I've measured and cut the new chain to length. But...

As you probably know, new chains typically come with a waxy, greasy kind of coating. It's my understanding that the reason for the coating is mainly to prevent stored, new chains from rusting, and is not really meant for lubrication while functioning. Whatever the reason, my question is, should I somehow try to remove the coating before dipping the chain in the hot wax? Or, will the hot parraffin remove or otherwise displace the waxy coating? I hope I can get some kind of response from those who have done this. My plan is to do this tomorrow (Friday) if possible. Thanks for any help.
on the path is offline  
Old 07-11-13, 06:15 PM
  #131  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brighton UK
Posts: 1,662

Bikes: 20" Folder, Road Bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by TromboneAl

I wonder if a thin coat of WD-40 occasionally would prevent rust, yet not accumulate road grime.

I'll redo the paraffin soon, so stay tuned for a video showing exactly how much time it takes.
Hi,

I can't see WD40 causing grime pick up, it does stop things rusting.

rgds, sreten.
sreten is offline  
Old 07-11-13, 06:46 PM
  #132  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,771
Mentioned: 125 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1454 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times in 40 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnJ80
The wear comparison, as you note, is a pretty individual thing and there is wide variance between riders. The only real basis for comparison would be lifetime of the a chain before and after on the same bike with the same rider in total miles.
And this is where the thread falls down. While it might seem unbiased, it isn't because it relies almost totally on subjective assessments of visual appearance and noise. The true measure is still the length of the chain. We have a base point now to deal with because one measurement has indicated the length of the chain is the same after a certain number of miles.

People know that different conditions will influence chain wear irrespective of the lubricant used.

People like you also say you get 1500miles out of a chain. But we don't have the other metrics that count -- such as number of speeds, manufacturer, design, and most importantly, the point at which you say the chain is worn out.

I can say I have got 11,000km out of a chain, and all I used was motor oil, but would it be any use to you?

PS: I think TromboneAl has covered a lot of these metrics, and now the length. I hope he continues to measure length. Sometimes a chain will suddenly wear a lot more quickly after appearing to be OK for many miles.

Oh, and I might add in relation to chain checkers, a favourite story of mine. A colleague brought in his chain-checker in to work one day, and unsolicited, measured the wear on my bike's chain. He stood up and said: "No, that's too worn. You have to get a new one". I pointed out the chain was new and had been on the bike a week.
Rowan is offline  
Old 07-11-13, 07:15 PM
  #133  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
TromboneAl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Far, Far Northern California
Posts: 2,873

Bikes: 1997 Specialized M2Pro

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rowan
And this is where the thread falls down. While it might seem unbiased, it isn't because it relies almost totally on subjective assessments of visual appearance and noise.
Something can be subjective, yet unbiased.

My point was that at the start of this experiment, I had no bias. I was neutral as to which was better. I was not prejudiced towards paraffin or oil. If it had been more trouble and effort, I would have reported that in an unbiased way. If I were a paraffin manufacturer, I'd be biased, and my subjective evaluations could not be trusted.

Note that I am no longer unbiased. I like paraffin much better than oil now.
TromboneAl is offline  
Old 07-11-13, 07:31 PM
  #134  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,771
Mentioned: 125 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1454 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times in 40 Posts
Originally Posted by TromboneAl
Something can be subjective, yet unbiased.

My point was that at the start of this experiment, I had no bias. I was neutral as to which was better. I was not prejudiced towards paraffin or oil. If it had been more trouble and effort, I would have reported that in an unbiased way. If I were a paraffin manufacturer, I'd be biased, and my subjective evaluations could not be trusted.

Note that I am no longer unbiased. I like paraffin much better than oil now.
Don't get me wrong, I am not denigrating what you are doing in any way, shape or form.

As I said after you measured the chain, my interest was piqued. Genuinely.

I, too, have been in the camp which says it seems all too hard, and the results all too short and doubtful. Heck, I have used motor oil for years and even WD40, all with what I consider to be acceptable results, but in the face of vehement arguments against both.

But I like to think I have an open mind on many things, and if you can prove to me through this thread that paraffin works in terms of reduced wear, longevity and cleanliness, I will give it a try even though my conditions may well be a little more arduous than yours.

One of the things I really like is that you are servicing the thread, rather than just saying your were going to do, then let it trail off after first week.
Rowan is offline  
Old 07-11-13, 07:45 PM
  #135  
Señor Blues
 
on the path's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: upstate NY
Posts: 1,598

Bikes: Cannondale CAAD 10, Breezer Venturi Custom Build, IRO Singlespeed

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 127 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
TromboneAl, I have some questions, please see post #130 .

Thanks,

Trumpet John
on the path is offline  
Old 07-11-13, 07:54 PM
  #136  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,671

Bikes: N+1=5

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 875 Post(s)
Liked 243 Times in 180 Posts
Originally Posted by Rowan
And this is where the thread falls down. While it might seem unbiased, it isn't because it relies almost totally on subjective assessments of visual appearance and noise. The true measure is still the length of the chain. We have a base point now to deal with because one measurement has indicated the length of the chain is the same after a certain number of miles.

People know that different conditions will influence chain wear irrespective of the lubricant used.

People like you also say you get 1500miles out of a chain. But we don't have the other metrics that count -- such as number of speeds, manufacturer, design, and most importantly, the point at which you say the chain is worn out.

I can say I have got 11,000km out of a chain, and all I used was motor oil, but would it be any use to you?

PS: I think TromboneAl has covered a lot of these metrics, and now the length. I hope he continues to measure length. Sometimes a chain will suddenly wear a lot more quickly after appearing to be OK for many miles.

Oh, and I might add in relation to chain checkers, a favourite story of mine. A colleague brought in his chain-checker in to work one day, and unsolicited, measured the wear on my bike's chain. He stood up and said: "No, that's too worn. You have to get a new one". I pointed out the chain was new and had been on the bike a week.
Yes it would if I told you how much more or less chain life I got with a different lube. Just like I did in the same post from which you snipped the part that you quoted and was, therefore, out of context.

Originally Posted by JohnJ80

I used to get about 1500 miles out of a chain using Dumonde tech lube. With Chain L, I get nearly twice that so it's not a fluke and the lube matters.



That would mean that it's the same rider, same bike, same terrain, same riding habits, same chain model, but different lube. The lube would be responsible for the difference.

Pay attention.

J.
JohnJ80 is offline  
Old 07-11-13, 08:33 PM
  #137  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,771
Mentioned: 125 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1454 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times in 40 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnJ80
Yes it would if I told you how much more or less chain life I got with a different lube. Just like I did in the same post from which you snipped the part that you quoted and was, therefore, out of context.



That would mean that it's the same rider, same bike, same terrain, same riding habits, same chain model, but different lube. The lube would be responsible for the difference.

Pay attention.

J.
Ooooo... consider me suitably chastised.
Rowan is offline  
Old 07-11-13, 08:49 PM
  #138  
Trek 500 Kid
 
Zinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 2,565

Bikes: '83 Trek 970 road --- '86 Trek 500 road

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2904 Post(s)
Liked 380 Times in 305 Posts
Originally Posted by sreten
Hi,

I can't see WD40 causing grime pick up, it does stop things rusting.

rgds, sreten.
It would stop rust but here's what I know about using WD40 on micrometers:

The solvent in it evaporates leaving a film that's attractive to dust and it's not recommended for either micrometers or clocks (from what I've read) for that reason.
And I can verify the mess that it leaves inside a mic because I've taken the spindles out and seen it. You'd do better using motor oil on a micrometer.

Now if you were to coat a chain with it before waxing, however, I'm not sure how that might work. If a film stayed under the wax that might work out. But I suspect it would interfere with the parrafin's bonding to the chain and if you spayed it onto the waxed chain the solvents in the WD40 might break down the wax coat. It would be interesting to hear from anyone who tried it. I'm still considering whether I'm going over to parrafin or not. It's not like I'm not happy with what I've got but the cleaner chain and less maintenance is appealing....The rust not so much.

When I first started cycling I remember using WD40 on chains without anything else (as well as motor oil) and, as I recall, it did pick up more grit than the Starrett M1 that I replaced it with as does generic aerosol silicone to some degree (but not so much as the WD40). It also didn't work so good at lubricating by itself. I've never tried mixing WD40 with other lubes though.

Last edited by Zinger; 07-12-13 at 01:17 AM.
Zinger is offline  
Old 07-12-13, 12:52 PM
  #139  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brighton UK
Posts: 1,662

Bikes: 20" Folder, Road Bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Zinger
It would stop rust but here's what I know about using WD40 on micrometers:

The solvent in it evaporates leaving a film that's attractive to dust and it's not recommended for either micrometers or clocks (from what I've read) for that reason.
And I can verify the mess that it leaves inside a mic because I've taken the spindles out and seen it. You'd do better using motor oil on a micrometer.

Now if you were to coat a chain with it before waxing, however, I'm not sure how that might work. If a film stayed under the wax that might work out. But I suspect it would interfere with the parrafin's bonding to the chain and if you spayed it onto the waxed chain the solvents in the WD40 might break down the wax coat. It would be interesting to hear from anyone who tried it. I'm still considering whether I'm going over to parrafin or not. It's not like I'm not happy with what I've got but the cleaner chain and less maintenance is appealing....The rust not so much.

When I first started cycling I remember using WD40 on chains without anything else (as well as motor oil) and, as I recall, it did pick up more grit than the Starrett M1 that I replaced it with as does generic aerosol silicone to some degree (but not so much as the WD40). It also didn't work so good at lubricating by itself. I've never tried mixing WD40 with other lubes though.
Hi,

I'm no expert but if you wax a chain and it is going rusty WD40 should help.

WD40 is often recommended for cleaning off wax, just done a little experiment
and it certainly does. I'd spray it into a dropper bottle and use that to apply it very
sparingly (no wiping) a while after the waxing to try to extend the waxing intervals.

Gumming up clocks and micrometers (which some claim is eventual breakdown
of small quantities of organic oil additives) is not the same as the limited life
of a bicycle chain and not really relevant.

rgds, sreten.

I'll also note the relubing/waxing process has no mechanism I can
see to remove wear particles from inside the chain and IMO needs
to be repeated a of number of times before making any judgement.

Last edited by sreten; 07-12-13 at 01:04 PM.
sreten is offline  
Old 07-12-13, 05:38 PM
  #140  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
TromboneAl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Far, Far Northern California
Posts: 2,873

Bikes: 1997 Specialized M2Pro

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
This might be an option:

Rust-resistant chain ($28).

I do know that I want my next chain to be very shiny.
TromboneAl is offline  
Old 07-13-13, 01:38 PM
  #141  
Trek 500 Kid
 
Zinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 2,565

Bikes: '83 Trek 970 road --- '86 Trek 500 road

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2904 Post(s)
Liked 380 Times in 305 Posts
Originally Posted by TromboneAl
This might be an option:

Rust-resistant chain ($28).

I do know that I want my next chain to be very shiny.
Well I just ordered two nickel plated Sram PC 870 6/7/8 speed replacement chains for my Sedisports to try it with the parrafin next season after I tear everything down this winter for a complete going over.

You've sold me on trying it Al

Last edited by Zinger; 07-14-13 at 03:15 AM.
Zinger is offline  
Old 09-20-13, 09:05 AM
  #142  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
TromboneAl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Far, Far Northern California
Posts: 2,873

Bikes: 1997 Specialized M2Pro

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Here's an update:

I now have 2,090 miles on this chain, and it is still fine. I checked for stretching, and it still hasn't reached the .75 point on my Bike Hand gauge. But remember that chain stretch depends on so many variables, that this doesn't tell you anything about wear with wax.

It does get some rust on it, but I've never heard any squeaking.

Last night I thought I'd try soaking it in Ospho to remove the rust. That was probably a mistake. This morning it was a green and black goopy mess, and somewhat fused together! I'll see if I can get it cleaned up, but if not, I've already purchased this chain for the rainy season. That should solve the rust problem.
TromboneAl is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ToiletSiphon
General Cycling Discussion
31
07-28-19 05:58 PM
mrblue
Bicycle Mechanics
23
04-28-15 08:48 AM
ColinL
Road Cycling
8
07-12-12 07:44 AM
sibeliusnick
Bicycle Mechanics
56
04-01-12 09:35 AM
hhnngg1
Road Cycling
29
06-25-11 08:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.