Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Fifty Plus (50+) Share the victories, challenges, successes and special concerns of bicyclists 50 and older. Especially useful for those entering or reentering bicycling.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-04-14, 11:48 AM   #1
Frankfast
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Frankfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: New York and San Juan
Bikes: Kestrel Talon SL, Surly Steamroller, Equipe SS/FG Beater
Posts: 480
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Compact Cranks

I'm wondering what gears most of you old timers are using. It's hilly around here where I ride and I presently have a standard crank (53-39). I recently changed my cassette from an 11-23 to a 12-29 and it helped a lot. If I changed my crank to a 50-34 do you think that it would be overkill or would I benefit more? Thanks for any advice.
Frankfast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-14, 12:55 PM   #2
bruce19
Senior Member
 
bruce19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Bikes: MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Posts: 4,574
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 98 Post(s)
It's impossible for me to venture an opinion without knowing who you are (as a cyclist) and how you ride. I can say that I went from a standard crank set to a compact and it has been a very positive change. I run the 50x34 crank set and 11x25 cassette. It has made climbing easier and faster in addition to saving me enough energy so that I am no longer wasted after 30-40 mi. It is particularly helpful in the early season when I can use all the help I can get climbing.

Something like this might help make gearing decisions. http://www.bikecalc.com/gear_inches
bruce19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-14, 01:17 PM   #3
Frankfast
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Frankfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: New York and San Juan
Bikes: Kestrel Talon SL, Surly Steamroller, Equipe SS/FG Beater
Posts: 480
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yes, my setup (39-29) calculates to 36-37 gear inches which is at the high end of recommendations for riding hills. A compact would lower it to 32-33 gear inches which concurs with recommendations. I'm asking for real world experience understanding everyone is not at the same conditioning level.
Frankfast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-14, 01:17 PM   #4
NOS88
Senior Member
 
NOS88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montgomery County, Pennsylvania
Bikes:
Posts: 6,490
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
If the 12-29 helped because it gave you a lower gear, the 34 versus 39 chain ring will give an even lower one. Overkill? I don't see how.
__________________
A conclusion is the place where you got tired of thinking. - S. Wright
Favorite rides in the stable: Indy Fab CJ Ti - Colnago MXL - S-Works Roubaix - Habanero Team Issue - Jamis Eclipse carbon/831
NOS88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-14, 01:20 PM   #5
oldnslow2
Senior Member
 
oldnslow2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Bikes:
Posts: 3,851
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 208 Post(s)
I have a compact crank (50/34) and a 11-28 cassette.

Works for me, but i'm not much of a hill climber.
oldnslow2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-14, 01:38 PM   #6
BlazingPedals
Senior Member
 
BlazingPedals's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Middle of da Mitten
Bikes: Trek 7500, RANS V-Rex, Optima Baron, Velokraft NoCom, M-5 Carbon Highracer, homebuilt recumbent
Posts: 9,099
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
A compact will help more. So will a 11-34 mountain cassette. So will a Triple. How much lower gearing do you think you need?
BlazingPedals is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-14, 02:02 PM   #7
Frankfast
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Frankfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: New York and San Juan
Bikes: Kestrel Talon SL, Surly Steamroller, Equipe SS/FG Beater
Posts: 480
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlazingPedals View Post
A compact will help more. So will a 11-34 mountain cassette. So will a Triple. How much lower gearing do you think you need?
I guess that's the point. I don't know what I need because I don't feel I'm in the best shape....yet. Right now hills are a strain but I don't want to sacrifice the bigger chainrings until I'm sure I need to change them. The recommended gear inches for hilly riding seem to point to a compact crank but before I spend the money I wanted to see how others felt.
Frankfast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-14, 02:15 PM   #8
OldsCOOL
Senior Member
 
OldsCOOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712
Posts: 11,368
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
I have a 39/53 road double cranking 12-28. We have some hills that I have wanted to try the 34/50 and yet may. It's an easy enough swap and would greatly help on the steepest. If you are riding hills that on a regular basis you end up with knee pain, swap and give it a try. If your low isnt low enough, get another "gear". The only hesitency I would have is getting accustomed to ratio changes.
OldsCOOL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-14, 02:20 PM   #9
Moyene Corniche
Senior Member
 
Moyene Corniche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Connecticut
Bikes:
Posts: 207
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm 57 and riding 53/39- 11/26 that's for the region I ride.. NE Conn. and Western Mass. I have gone up B17 climb in 39/26 so I don't see a need for anything lower.. But I'm also riding to return to racing as a Cat II and Masters 45+ to 50+. Soon I will be returning to an 11-23 as fitness reaches the goals I had set forth...

Compacts are good if you are in the hills of 10-15% most of the time, personally I would consider a triple so that your rear cassette gearing is closer and therefore more efficient... I don't like the extreme jump in a compact so to me a triple makes more sense...

Hey if the Pro's use a triple on some of the ridiculous grinds in the Vuelta than it says something about equipment choice...

You should 1st figure out where your optimal cadence is ( 80-90rpm ) then consider your terrain and then chooses your gearing for 75% of your cycling terrain... Don't base your choice on what someone else is riding, there are too many factors that are unequal..
Moyene Corniche is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-14, 02:28 PM   #10
mercator
In the wind
 
mercator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Calgary AB
Bikes: Giant TCR Advanced Team, Lemond Buenos Aires, Giant TCX, Miyata 1000LT
Posts: 940
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
I've been riding my older steel bike with a compact 50/34 and 12-26 cassette for a few years now, and I like to climb even though I suck mightily at it. My main complaint is that I can't seem to find an 11-25 or similar 8 speed cassette and I frequently spin out with the 50-12 combination.

On my 10 speed carbon bike I'm running a 53/39 crank with an ultegra 12-30 cassette and it seems to be working very well for me. Of course, the bike is also about 7 lbs lighter, which probably skews my perceptions a bit.
mercator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-14, 02:29 PM   #11
raqball
Senior Member
 
raqball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Bikes:
Posts: 693
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Currently have a 50/34 11-32.. Works pretty good for climbs but there are times where I wish I had a wee bit lower choice for them massive climbs...
raqball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-14, 02:35 PM   #12
bikemig 
Senior Member
 
bikemig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Bikes: A lot of old bikes and a few new ones
Posts: 10,902
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 747 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankfast View Post
I guess that's the point. I don't know what I need because I don't feel I'm in the best shape....yet. Right now hills are a strain but I don't want to sacrifice the bigger chainrings until I'm sure I need to change them. The recommended gear inches for hilly riding seem to point to a compact crank but before I spend the money I wanted to see how others felt.
If you're straining up hills, that would point towards a compact. You're knees aren't getting any younger and you want them to last a long, long time. Plus a 50 running on an 11 gives you a high of 120 inches; that's a pretty good high gear.

Compacts make a lot of sense with 9, 10, or 11 on the back. You have plenty of in between gears and a very useful low and high. The jump is a bit big at 16 teeth which is why you might prefer a cross type set up (say 46-36 or 48-36).
bikemig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-14, 02:50 PM   #13
HunkerDown
Senior Member
 
HunkerDown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Bikes: Pinarello Dogma 65.1 Think 2
Posts: 72
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm amazed they can sell standard cranks anywhere outside Florida and Kansas. Absolutely, go with the compact crank and an 11-28 or even an 11-32 if your derailleur can handle it. I have the compact/11-32 setup and when I get to where I spin out on the descents I'm just about hitting my personal speed limit anyway...

HD
HunkerDown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-14, 02:58 PM   #14
Retro Grouch 
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Posts: 26,914
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 213 Post(s)
So when's the last time that you really used the 53/12?

Back in my road bike riding days switching from a standard crank to a compact turned out to be my best equipment change ever. I traded some big gears that I NEVER used for some easier hill climb gears that I did use.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
Retro Grouch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-14, 03:01 PM   #15
oldnslow2
Senior Member
 
oldnslow2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Bikes:
Posts: 3,851
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 208 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by HunkerDown View Post
I'm amazed they can sell standard cranks anywhere outside Florida and Kansas.
My son rides a standard crank with a 11-25.

He's 23 and a animal in the saddle. He does Olympic distance Tri's and knows if there are hills, he'll easily make up for his average swim time.

BTW... he went to college in western New York and trained on the hills there.
oldnslow2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-14, 03:16 PM   #16
fietsbob 
coprolite
 
fietsbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Bikes: 7
Posts: 22,221
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1146 Post(s)
Quote:
I'm wondering what gears most of you old timers are using
Rohloff Hub.. small chainring on the big wheel , small wheel has a big chainring. gear range the same.

Biz Note:
What goes on bikes is what the component maker offers the best price on ... but once its your bike you can change any part you wish .

you have my blessings ..

White industries VBC crank White Industries - Road Cranks Opens up more combinations than a 110 bolt circle
by machining a slot in the outer ring rather than a hole .. inner ring 24 to 38t , outer ring from 38t to 52t .. you can pick any 2..

my roadie bike got a 50,40,30>24t Campag Race triple years ago.... 13-28t (freewheel)

in the 80s, I built from a mix of a *Gippiemme triple as a double 36 and a 52t rings ,

with a polished Campag chainguard as the outer , it works fine other than the big gap .. back then 13t was the high gear cog.

*will Sell, Its really pretty and shiny ..

Last edited by fietsbob; 05-05-14 at 01:08 PM.
fietsbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-14, 04:09 PM   #17
dendawg
Senior Member
 
dendawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 1,266
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
I've had a triple on my bike with an 11 for the seven years I've owned it5 rear for the seven years I've owned. Just went for a new compact double 11 speed with an 11-32 rear and love it. A lot less gears to shift through and yes the hills feel easier.
dendawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-14, 04:20 PM   #18
Frankfast
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Frankfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: New York and San Juan
Bikes: Kestrel Talon SL, Surly Steamroller, Equipe SS/FG Beater
Posts: 480
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
"So when's the last time that you really used the 53/12?"

I have used it but not very often. I'd get more use out of a 50-12 and 34-29 where I ride. Thanks guys for the input. Looks like a compact is in my future.
Frankfast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-14, 04:31 PM   #19
mercator
In the wind
 
mercator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Calgary AB
Bikes: Giant TCR Advanced Team, Lemond Buenos Aires, Giant TCX, Miyata 1000LT
Posts: 940
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Retro Grouch View Post
So when's the last time that you really used the 53/12?
Last weekend I did three rides in the mountains in Montana, 53/12 is pretty useful on the downhills.
mercator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-14, 04:56 PM   #20
JohnJ80
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Minnesota
Bikes: N+1=5
Posts: 2,882
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankfast View Post
I'm wondering what gears most of you old timers are using. It's hilly around here where I ride and I presently have a standard crank (53-39). I recently changed my cassette from an 11-23 to a 12-29 and it helped a lot. If I changed my crank to a 50-34 do you think that it would be overkill or would I benefit more? Thanks for any advice.

A 50-34 compact crank set with a 12-27 (assuming 10 speed) would give you one gear lower than your current set up AND you'd have much nicer spacing between gears which would give you the ability to fine tune your cadence more precisely. Personally? I think this would be much better.

Here's a comparison showing how the two sets would compare. Note that the jumps between gears would be a lot smaller with the compact crank so it would be easier to find the 'right' gear to spin your way up the hill.

http://www.gear-calculator.com/#KB=3...UF=2099&SL=2.5

Not knowing how you ride or where you ride exactly, but from what you describe, I'd do this in a heartbeat. I had an old racing bike I had built up in the 80's and I changed the small chain ring down to a 39 and did much as you did. When I get a compact crank on a newer bike, I really loved the difference and made riding much more enjoyable. I don't need the upper end big chain ring like I would if I were racing.

J.
JohnJ80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-14, 06:06 PM   #21
Frankfast
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Frankfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: New York and San Juan
Bikes: Kestrel Talon SL, Surly Steamroller, Equipe SS/FG Beater
Posts: 480
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mercator View Post
Last weekend I did three rides in the mountains in Montana, 53/12 is pretty useful on the downhills.

But how's that 39/27 or 29 on the uphills?
Frankfast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-14, 06:32 PM   #22
qcpmsame 
Cycling Saved My Life
 
qcpmsame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Bikes: '12 CAAD 10 Ultegra, '78 Medici Pro Strada
Posts: 9,830
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 180 Post(s)
I am using a compact, 50/36 and my cassette is an 11-26, came into this, from a pretty much "normal" 53/39 on an old 8 speed cassette, when I bought the new bicycle in 2012. I am coming up on needing a new cassette and I cannot justify the 11 tooth cog any longer, no ricing in the future I can see. I'll be getting a 12-28 most likely in the next few weeks.

I like the compact just fine, I haven't missed the top end that much. I've always been more into spinning gears than mashing big gears as it makes my knees ache. If I needed I could go to the mid-compact being used by some, a 52/36 or 38, I suppose.

Bill
__________________
I Can Do All Things Through Christ Who Strengthens Me. Philippians 4:13

"I did not choose to have Parkinson's Disease, I do choose not to allow it to control my life." Davis Phinney

Semper Fi, USMC, November 10, 1775, Tun Tavern, Philadelphia, PA.

qcpmsame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-14, 06:52 PM   #23
ColnagoC40
Senior Member
 
ColnagoC40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: North Carolina
Bikes: Vitus 979 x 2, Vitus 992, Colnago C40, Colnago C60
Posts: 362
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankfast View Post
I guess that's the point. I don't know what I need because I don't feel I'm in the best shape....yet. Right now hills are a strain but I don't want to sacrifice the bigger chainrings until I'm sure I need to change them. The recommended gear inches for hilly riding seem to point to a compact crank but before I spend the money I wanted to see how others felt.
From a training and improvement program point of view, it is always a good idea to learn to spin easy gears up the hills first. As you improve, you will learn to spin heavier gears at the same cadence. That will be when you no longer need the compact, or you can keep it as a spare for that real hilly century somewhere in the future.
ColnagoC40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-14, 07:34 PM   #24
BluesDawg
just keep riding
 
BluesDawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Milledgeville, Georgia
Bikes: 2015 Specialized AWOL Comp frameset (custom build), 2015 Zukas custom road, 2014 Specialized Crave Pro 29, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB, 1980ish Fuji S-12S
Posts: 13,275
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
I have a 34-50 compact crank on my road bike with a 12-30 cassette. We have a lot of short and steep hills and some longer ones around here. My newest dirt road bike has a 34-50 crank with a 12-32 cassette. I am planning to build a custom anyroad bike and I will likely run a White Industries VBC crank with 30-46 rings and a 11-32 cassette. I like having low gears available when I need them.
BluesDawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-14, 08:22 PM   #25
mercator
In the wind
 
mercator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Calgary AB
Bikes: Giant TCR Advanced Team, Lemond Buenos Aires, Giant TCX, Miyata 1000LT
Posts: 940
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankfast View Post
But how's that 39/27 or 29 on the uphills?
Actually, the 39-27 is about the same as the 34-24, and I find the 39-30 to be low enough for most of the stuff I run into.
Here's a comparison of the gearing between my two road bikes, the range is pretty comparable.
mercator is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:56 AM.