Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 42 of 42
  1. #26
    Senior Member rydabent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Lincoln Ne
    My Bikes
    RANS Stratus TerraTrike Cruiser
    Posts
    4,845
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Or you can do what I do. I say to the hell with someone else telling me what cadence I should be riding at. I ride with a cadence that feels right at the the time. On some up hills I might go as high as 90 or more, and down hill with the wind I often shift into my highest gear and cruise along at 50 or so rpm just to relax. Who really cares what some "expert" says?

  2. #27
    Senior Member Null66's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Garner, NC 27529
    My Bikes
    Built up DT, 2007 Fuji tourer (donor bike, RIP), 1995 1220 Trek
    Posts
    2,048
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by volosong View Post
    I've concluded that I'll just ride the way I want. My whole life, (and I've been riding my whole life), I've always ridden with lower cadences. I'm quite comfortable riding at a cadence of 65, and can do it all day long. I've tried spinning faster. Just doesn't work for me. Just yesterday, (Strava link), I rode a pretty flat metric century. My cadence average for the ride was only 70, and I thought I was pushing it a lot on that ride.

    When I get to 85 or so, I start looking for a higher gear. On some of the steeper grades around my area, I've noticed that I'm only "spinning" at 45 or 50. I won't get to the top first, but I'll get there eventually. Until I figured out how to turn it off, my old Garmin would often complain while climbing that my cadence was too low.

    p.s. Knees are fine. Has never been an issue.
    Back in the day 70-75 was considered a touring range.
    85 would be considered rather high for that purpose. Nothing wrong with holding that all day.

    There's features on my garmin I should adopt but just haven't yet.

  3. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Tucson Az
    My Bikes
    2015 Ridley Fenix, 1983 Team Fuji, 1985 Novara Strada, 2013 BD Motobecane 650ht, 90 Trek 850
    Posts
    277
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    One of these days I should buy a computer to see what my cadence is. When I jump on the Life Fitness exercise bike at the gym, I usually run around 85.

  4. #29
    Senior Member Road Fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    My Bikes
    Terraferma 650b, Mondonico SL and ELOS, Masi Gran Criterium, Trek 610, Breezer Liberty, Georgena Terry Classic
    Posts
    11,689
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by chasm54 View Post
    No, it doesn't, really. Conditions and terrain vary.

    In general, fitter and more experienced cyclists will employ a higher cadence (and therefore a lower gear) for a given speed. That is not, however, as many will tell you, because it is "more efficient".

    Actually, the most efficient cadence in terms of power generated for oxygen burned is around 60. That is why most beginners default to something close to that - it's similar to a typical walking rhythm of about two paces per second. Higher cadences burn more fuel, because irrespective of the force applied there is an energy cost to simply moving one's legs faster. So the faster you pedal, the higher the stress on the cardiovascular system. That, simply in terms of energy consumed, is "inefficient".

    However, it does have one very considerable benefit, in that pedalling faster in a lower gear means one is applying less force through each pedal stroke, and therefore stressing the muscles less. And that means one can cruise for longer without one's legs getting tired.

    So, the more aerobically fit (that is, those whose systems can deliver more oxygen to their muscles) can afford to be "inefficient" - they have oxygen to burn, and they can be profligate with it in order to spare their legs and go further, faster, at higher cadences.

    Which is a long-winded way of saying that higher cadences transfer stress from the joints and muscles to the CV system. If you're in good shape, that's a pretty good idea a lot of the time. And if your cadence is in the 90s, I'd say that it would be reasonable to conclude that you're fairly fit and riding in a way that exploits that.
    I'd agree with all that and add: Higher cadence with smooth pedaling is also more healthy for ones knees.

    And: I'm not sure that higher is better beyond a certain point. And for me, an average of 93 would be great. If your body wants to go higher, do it, but I would think there isn't much more benefit.

  5. #30
    Senior Member Road Fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    My Bikes
    Terraferma 650b, Mondonico SL and ELOS, Masi Gran Criterium, Trek 610, Breezer Liberty, Georgena Terry Classic
    Posts
    11,689
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by OldTryGuy View Post
    No, a Vespa
    Had one - I'd rather get a Ducati.

  6. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Southwestern Ontario
    Posts
    2,021
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DnvrFox View Post
    At one time this forum had about 65 fictitious characters all writing to each other and others (all written by maybe 2-3 anonymous folks, as I recall), each with his/her own character. Mods finally stopped some of the best fictional writing around, and not a word was true.

    Just sayin . . . .
    Glad someone pointed out the obvious (that's a compliment, btw); I couldn't be a_rsed ... whenever I do, I seem to get in trouble!!

  7. #32
    Avid Cyclist MickeyMaguire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    My Bikes
    Fuji Absolute2
    Posts
    319
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I maintain a cadence of 90 RPMs. Trying to get my wife to spin has always been a challenge and, now, she has been having some knee problems when she tries muscling the bike. If you can maintain your spinning rate, it means that you are letting the gears do the work for you. That's how races are won.
    If you can't do great things, do small things in a great way. ~Napoleon Hill
    Http://www.tricornpublications.com/gethappy/

  8. #33
    Senior Member volosong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Antelope Valley, SoCal
    Posts
    2,572
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Null66 View Post
    Back in the day 70-75 was considered a touring range.
    85 would be considered rather high for that purpose. Nothing wrong with holding that all day...
    Yeah, I think I'm a tourist. Just got back from a short ride. Wanted to get in a few miles. Strava says I did the 15.5 miles in just under an hour for a 16.0 mph average. The average cadence for the ride was 75, and I felt that I was really pushing it the whole time. That might have been because of the wind and the gradients. To me anyway, pedaling fast isn't very much fun. I think I'm most comfortable in the 65-70 range on the flats. Less on hills, and usually freewheel on the downhills. I'm old enough that I'm not much into seeing how fast I can go bombing down a steep mountain anymore.
    Deut 6:5

    ---

    "Ha ha! You fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders - The most famous of which is 'never get involved in a land war in Asia'".
    - Vizzini during his "battle of wits" with the Man in Black

  9. #34
    Senior Member OldsCOOL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    northern michigan
    My Bikes
    '77 Colnago Super, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760
    Posts
    8,215
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by volosong View Post
    Yeah, I think I'm a tourist. Just got back from a short ride. Wanted to get in a few miles. Strava says I did the 15.5 miles in just under an hour for a 16.0 mph average. The average cadence for the ride was 75, and I felt that I was really pushing it the whole time. That might have been because of the wind and the gradients. To me anyway, pedaling fast isn't very much fun. I think I'm most comfortable in the 65-70 range on the flats. Less on hills, and usually freewheel on the downhills. I'm old enough that I'm not much into seeing how fast I can go bombing down a steep mountain anymore.
    Some years ago I met a man on the highway pedaling slowly and moving "slowly". I clocked him at 14mph and had a cadence noticeably below 60rpm. Doing the Fredly thing of the moment I pulled up and asked him why. He says it is his 200+ mile ride pace. Pfffft. Ok, sorry I asked.
    Having a flat tire as part of the total cycling experience is highly overrated. Knowing how to fix one quickly is not.

    '85 Trek 460 road racer

    '89 Raleigh Technium PRE

    '79 Motobecane Super Mirage

  10. #35
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    SW Fl.
    My Bikes
    1982 Custom Touring Paramount, 1983 Road Paramount, 2013 Giant Propel Advanced SL3, 2002 Magna 7sp hybrid, 1976 Bassett Racing 45sp Cruiser
    Posts
    1,798
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by OldsCOOL View Post
    Some years ago I met a man on the highway pedaling slowly and moving "slowly". I clocked him at 14mph and had a cadence noticeably below 60rpm. Doing the Fredly thing of the moment I pulled up and asked him why. He says it is his 200+ mile ride pace. Pfffft. Ok, sorry I asked.
    Not my friend Freddie...The Man Who Rode to the Moon (and back) (twice) | Miles 4 Melanoma you met since his cadence was so low and speed too slow, but truth be told, cadence is a personal thing and everyone has to figure out what's best for their type of riding. There are very few people in the world who can match Freddie's accomplishments with his 80rpm that has worked very nicely for him.

  11. #36
    Senior Member trekmogul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    NW Ohio
    My Bikes
    Salsa Beargrease XX1, Trek Eqnuinox 9.9 SSL, Trek Madone 6.9 ,Trek District Carbon, Trek Boone7, Trek Fuel EX9.0,Trek Fuel 9.5, Trek Rumblefish Pro, Trek Remedy 9.9, Trek Equinox7, Trek District Belt
    Posts
    443
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    All this stuff about speed, heart rate and cadence was never on my radar for the last 4 years and 10 months, I just knew that when i came home i was tired and my legs were exausted. This all cahnged about a month ago when i purchased my 1st Bike Computer (Garmin Edge 1000). I always thought that i was doing ok however the garmin sure showed me alot i had no idea about. I like to ride by myself as most guys are still not up and moving at 430am every day..
    Trek Fuel EX9.0 Trek Fuel EX9.5 Trek Equinox 9.9SSL TTX Trek Madone 6.9 Pro Red Project One, Trek Boone 7, Trek Rumblefish Pro, Trek Remedy 9.9, Trek Carbon District

  12. #37
    Trek 500 Kid Zinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Spokane WA
    My Bikes
    '83 Trek 970 road --- '86 Trek 500 road
    Posts
    2,489
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by OldsCOOL View Post
    Some years ago I met a man on the highway pedaling slowly and moving "slowly". I clocked him at 14mph and had a cadence noticeably below 60rpm. Doing the Fredly thing of the moment I pulled up and asked him why. He says it is his 200+ mile ride pace. Pfffft. Ok, sorry I asked.
    "I never lost a race because my bike was too heavy".......George Mount

  13. #38
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    SW Fl.
    My Bikes
    1982 Custom Touring Paramount, 1983 Road Paramount, 2013 Giant Propel Advanced SL3, 2002 Magna 7sp hybrid, 1976 Bassett Racing 45sp Cruiser
    Posts
    1,798
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by trekmogul View Post
    All this stuff about speed, heart rate and cadence was never on my radar for the last 4 years and 10 months, I just knew that when i came home i was tired and my legs were exausted. This all cahnged about a month ago when i purchased my 1st Bike Computer (Garmin Edge 1000). I always thought that i was doing ok however the garmin sure showed me alot i had no idea about. I like to ride by myself as most guys are still not up and moving at 430am every day..
    Sounds like my kind of riding. Nice and quiet.

    A 0430 start, just a little late for me. 0205 last Saturday was start time for my 133 miles. Thinking about 150 this Saturday so a 0100 start would be in order.

  14. #39
    Senior Member trekmogul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    NW Ohio
    My Bikes
    Salsa Beargrease XX1, Trek Eqnuinox 9.9 SSL, Trek Madone 6.9 ,Trek District Carbon, Trek Boone7, Trek Fuel EX9.0,Trek Fuel 9.5, Trek Rumblefish Pro, Trek Remedy 9.9, Trek Equinox7, Trek District Belt
    Posts
    443
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by OldTryGuy View Post
    Sounds like my kind of riding. Nice and quiet.

    A 0430 start, just a little late for me. 0205 last Saturday was start time for my 133 miles. Thinking about 150 this Saturday so a 0100 start would be in order.
    Is that your normal start time 7 days a week 365 days a year or just for those long rides? Thats my start time 7 days a week..
    Trek Fuel EX9.0 Trek Fuel EX9.5 Trek Equinox 9.9SSL TTX Trek Madone 6.9 Pro Red Project One, Trek Boone 7, Trek Rumblefish Pro, Trek Remedy 9.9, Trek Carbon District

  15. #40
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    SW Fl.
    My Bikes
    1982 Custom Touring Paramount, 1983 Road Paramount, 2013 Giant Propel Advanced SL3, 2002 Magna 7sp hybrid, 1976 Bassett Racing 45sp Cruiser
    Posts
    1,798
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by trekmogul View Post
    Is that your normal start time 7 days a week 365 days a year or just for those long rides? Thats my start time 7 days a week..
    Not every day like you, so more power to you for sure.

  16. #41
    Senior Member trekmogul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    NW Ohio
    My Bikes
    Salsa Beargrease XX1, Trek Eqnuinox 9.9 SSL, Trek Madone 6.9 ,Trek District Carbon, Trek Boone7, Trek Fuel EX9.0,Trek Fuel 9.5, Trek Rumblefish Pro, Trek Remedy 9.9, Trek Equinox7, Trek District Belt
    Posts
    443
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by OldTryGuy View Post
    Not every day like you, so more power to you for sure.
    I DO NOT like you ride 150 and 100 mile rides ever. I am only good for about 35 to 50 miles a day and actually i am starting to get burned out like this.. I have not missed a days since back in may and i need to give my weary legs a rest i suppose..
    Trek Fuel EX9.0 Trek Fuel EX9.5 Trek Equinox 9.9SSL TTX Trek Madone 6.9 Pro Red Project One, Trek Boone 7, Trek Rumblefish Pro, Trek Remedy 9.9, Trek Carbon District

  17. #42
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    My Bikes
    Trek 7.3 FX
    Posts
    99
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Went for a fairly flat 8 mile ride this morning. I haven't gotten a cadence meter yet, but I focused on riding a gear or two lower than normal and keeping the cadence up. Found if anything I was a MPH faster than usual and got a bit more of a cardio workout. Interesting.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •