Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    56
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Guess Low or High for Used Bike

    This is a very similar topic that I've raised before. I'm on a budget and need to buy a used endurance road bike. Will probably have my local LBS to a fitting after getting the bike. I've taken all the measurements, did the Bike Fit calculations and another system on a different website and have talked to many cyclists. At 6'1, logically I should probably go with a 58 but calculations show I should be on a 56, possibly because of longer than normal femur and upper body ratio less than my lower body. Inseam is 34.25.

    If I guess wrong, should I go low or high?

    Any ideas?

  2. #2
    Thread Killer
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    4,349
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Low, for sure.
    Chaad--'95 DeKerf Team SL, '02 Lemond Buenos Aires, '05 Novara Buzz, '73 Schwinn Collegiate, '06 Mountain Cycle Rumble, '09 Dahon Mariner D7, '12 Mercier Nano, '12 Breezer Venturi

  3. #3
    Senior Member Road Fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    My Bikes
    Terraferma 650b, Mondonico SL and ELOS, Masi Gran Criterium, Trek 610, Breezer Liberty, Georgena Terry Classic
    Posts
    11,197
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you're going for a performance ride, go low since the position will be more aero once you get reach sorted out. If you're going for endurance or long distance riding, go bigger but not too big since the bar position will be higher. It's generally (just generally, no guarantees) better for comfort over a long day in the saddle.

    If you measured your inseam correctly, your theoretical frame size is 56.6 cm to 58.3 cm (based on multiplying by factors .65 and .67). Again, this is just theoretical, and very simplistic. If you like a high handlebar go bigger, but 58 might well be max for you.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    192
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The previous two posters seem to have missed the word "endurance", which implies a more relaxed fit. If you will indeed be doing "endurance" riding, go big.

    SP
    OC, OR

  5. #5
    Senior Member Road Fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    My Bikes
    Terraferma 650b, Mondonico SL and ELOS, Masi Gran Criterium, Trek 610, Breezer Liberty, Georgena Terry Classic
    Posts
    11,197
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Please re-read - I didn't miss "endurance."

  6. #6
    Thread Killer
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    4,349
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I didn't miss it either, I just don't believe a big bike is germane to 'endurance' riding. With everyday, off-the-shelf components, even a 'race' frame can be set up comfortably.

    i also don't believe larger frames confer any ride benefits, just penalties in terms of responsiveness and weight. Comfort can be tuned more effectively via components than frame, and a solid, efficient frame is always the preferable base from which to proceed in my mind.

    As a rule, it's always possible to go up/out for fitting, but you run into frame limitations coming down/in. I don't think that's an issue here between 56 and 58cm sizes for this rider, though.
    Chaad--'95 DeKerf Team SL, '02 Lemond Buenos Aires, '05 Novara Buzz, '73 Schwinn Collegiate, '06 Mountain Cycle Rumble, '09 Dahon Mariner D7, '12 Mercier Nano, '12 Breezer Venturi

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •