Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Fitting Your Bike Are you confused about how you should fit a bike to your particular body dimensions? Have you been reading, found the terms Merxx or French Fit, and don’t know what you need? Every style of riding is different- in how you fit the bike to you, and the sizing of the bike itself. It’s more than just measuring your height, reach and inseam. With the help of Bike Fitting, you’ll be able to find the right fit for your frame size, style of riding, and your particular dimensions. Here ya’ go…..the location for everything fit related.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-04-14, 09:19 PM   #1
Mbrgr1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mbrgr1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Bikes: Lightning stealth, Sun sport EZ, Banshee Paradox, Bike E recumbents, Takara, Schwinn Sierra, Bianchi Grizzly
Posts: 107
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
What do you think of these dimensions?

I am 6'5 with a long torso, 230lbs inseam on a saddle of 36.2, 34 pants inseam. It seems like most top tubes are too short for me and this frame is available possibly.

I'd love to build a road bike, unfortunately I cannot ride this first as it's only a frame. Is this a "stretch"?(no pun intended) :~) I prefer a bike on the big side.

Thanks, MK
Attached Images
File Type: jpg frame1.jpg (93.0 KB, 8 views)
Mbrgr1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-14, 03:41 PM   #2
noglider 
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: West Village, New York City
Bikes: too many
Posts: 26,675
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
It's 66cm in the seat tube and 66cm in the top tube. That's a fairly long top tube for such a big frame, so it might work. If the reach is too short, you can get a stem with a long extension.

But don't hold me responsible for any problems.

Still, I say it looks like a good fit, given what I know.
__________________
Tom Reingold, noglider@pobox.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-14, 05:31 PM   #3
Mbrgr1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mbrgr1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Bikes: Lightning stealth, Sun sport EZ, Banshee Paradox, Bike E recumbents, Takara, Schwinn Sierra, Bianchi Grizzly
Posts: 107
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by noglider View Post
It's 66cm in the seat tube and 66cm in the top tube. That's a fairly long top tube for such a big frame, so it might work. If the reach is too short, you can get a stem with a long extension.

But don't hold me responsible for any problems.

Still, I say it looks like a good fit, given what I know.
Thanks, no responsibility whatsoever! MK
Mbrgr1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-14, 06:01 PM   #4
CharlyAlfaRomeo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Bikes:
Posts: 619
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Your inseam is quite short for your height, I'm not sure that you'll be able to get the seat low enough with that tall of a seat tube.
CharlyAlfaRomeo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-14, 06:17 PM   #5
noglider 
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: West Village, New York City
Bikes: too many
Posts: 26,675
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Maybe you should try some bikes and compare their measurements with those of this frame. @CharlyAlfaRomeo has a good point. I also have short legs for my height, and I prefer a small frame. I'm almost 5'10" with a 33" inseam and 30" pants inseam. In theory, I should ride a 56 or 57cm frame, but I like it to be 54 or 55cm. I guess I like my handlebars to be close but low? I'm not sure.
__________________
Tom Reingold, noglider@pobox.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-14, 10:38 PM   #6
Leisesturm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 2,163
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
When it comes to bikes and frames there literally are no rules. I've got five bikes, seven if you count the tandems, and seat tubes and effective seat tubes are all over the map. Effective top tubes are all about 22.5". I've seen published geometry tables that use the same ETT for all the seat tube lengths except maybe the very shortest and the very longest. The Giordano Libero comes to mind as a particular example of that kind of design. I get from this that the rider is expected to use stem length and/or handlebar reach to dial in the amount of 'stretch' that feels right to them. When I'm shopping for a bike, its dimensions are not the criteria that concern me most. I can usually make most anything I find fit me, and fairly inexpensively at that, by using the right stem and bars.

H
Leisesturm is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:33 AM.