Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Fitting Your Bike
Reload this Page >

90's vs modern frame geometry

Notices
Fitting Your Bike Are you confused about how you should fit a bike to your particular body dimensions? Have you been reading, found the terms Merxx or French Fit, and don’t know what you need? Every style of riding is different- in how you fit the bike to you, and the sizing of the bike itself. It’s more than just measuring your height, reach and inseam. With the help of Bike Fitting, you’ll be able to find the right fit for your frame size, style of riding, and your particular dimensions. Here ya’ go…..the location for everything fit related.

90's vs modern frame geometry

Old 08-29-14, 08:58 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Boston
Posts: 2,199

Bikes: 2017 Raleigh RX 1.0, 2018 Specialized Allez

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 471 Post(s)
Liked 631 Times in 336 Posts
90's vs modern frame geometry

So I have a mid 90's bike, a 56cm frame. I like the bike for the most part, but it might be a bit more aggressive than I really want at this point. I have my saddle at 78.5cm and the drop between the saddle and bars is 5in (maxed out with the spacers using a threadless quill converter). Apparently, the stack is 53cm, the head tube about 13.5cm. Leaving aside stem options, if I were to look for a modern frame, would the bigger stack (like I see the cannondale caad8 has 57.3cm stack for the 56cm frame) and/or larger head tube be the areas where I would have the slightly less aggressive position? I am going to race in October and next season, but I like to do a lot of long rides as well. Anyway, just wanting to understand geometry a bit better so I know what I'm talking about if/when considering other options.
hubcyclist is offline  
Old 08-29-14, 10:02 AM
  #2  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,354 Times in 861 Posts
90's aint that long ago , the component companies are working to have something new that is the main difference.

'agressive' steep seat tubes & low handlebars .. old folks make different choices

seat tube angles , top tube lengths and steering . trail. are factors to consider..

I have a couple 90's bikes .. and some even older..
fietsbob is offline  
Old 08-29-14, 10:17 AM
  #3  
Have bike, will travel
 
Barrettscv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,392

Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times in 158 Posts
I have traditional steel bikes, with horizontal top-tubes and modern bikes with compact frames. I duplicate the key fit dimensions on all my bikes, so the fit is the same. I don't use spacers under the stem on the modern bikes, but my saddle to handlebar drop is not extreme.
__________________
When I ride my bike I feel free and happy and strong. I'm liberated from the usual nonsense of day to day life. Solid, dependable, silent, my bike is my horse, my fighter jet, my island, my friend. Together we will conquer that hill and thereafter the world.
Barrettscv is offline  
Old 08-29-14, 11:21 AM
  #4  
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
"Geometry" hasn't changed all that much, as I understand it. Head and seat-tube angles aren't much different. If what you want is less saddle-bar drop, that isn't so much a question of geometry as of frame size. A bigger frame will tend to put you in a slightly more upright position because your saddle height has to remain the same (determined by leg length) but the head tube will be taller. So if I were you the first thing I'd be looking at is whether your current bike is, in fact, smaller than you'd like. Ride a 58cm frame and see how that feels.
chasm54 is offline  
Old 08-29-14, 12:02 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Boston
Posts: 2,199

Bikes: 2017 Raleigh RX 1.0, 2018 Specialized Allez

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 471 Post(s)
Liked 631 Times in 336 Posts
Originally Posted by chasm54
"Geometry" hasn't changed all that much, as I understand it. Head and seat-tube angles aren't much different. If what you want is less saddle-bar drop, that isn't so much a question of geometry as of frame size. A bigger frame will tend to put you in a slightly more upright position because your saddle height has to remain the same (determined by leg length) but the head tube will be taller. So if I were you the first thing I'd be looking at is whether your current bike is, in fact, smaller than you'd like. Ride a 58cm frame and see how that feels.
Thanks, really helpful. At first I was thinking maybe I might need a 54 (mainly basing it on the competitive cyclist calculator), but was also thinking the same thing about 58.
hubcyclist is offline  
Old 08-30-14, 12:52 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,737
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 147 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
A traditional frame is sold in more increments to get correct fit. A compact or sloping top tube requires fewer sizes to do the same thing.

About all the old geometry has going for it is tradition and more sizing.
NormanF is offline  
Old 08-31-14, 06:11 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,853

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1851 Post(s)
Liked 654 Times in 498 Posts
Originally Posted by hubcyclist
Thanks, really helpful. At first I was thinking maybe I might need a 54 (mainly basing it on the competitive cyclist calculator), but was also thinking the same thing about 58.
Do you have a bike now? If so there are several ways to raise your handlebar, lower it, or extend the reach to the handlebar. Try those before you make what seems to be an arbitrary jump from 54 (if that's historically been your size) to 58. It's a big jump.
Road Fan is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jedijon
Fitting Your Bike
9
11-30-17 04:28 PM
titani
Road Cycling
12
11-20-15 11:55 AM
DBrown9383
General Cycling Discussion
15
10-12-15 11:07 PM
ColtJ
Road Cycling
12
05-19-14 12:36 AM
thook
Framebuilders
37
12-13-13 02:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.