Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Folding Bikes Discuss the unique features and issues of folding bikes. Also a great place to learn what folding bike will work best for your needs.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-29-07, 08:10 PM   #1
DVC45
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
DVC45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 3,839
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Dahon Cadenza vs. Swift Xootr

I know they have two different wheel size but I'm more concerned about component quality, customer support and overall feel/handling. Fold size is not an issue either.
Anyone had test rode both? I appreciate any feedback.
DVC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-07, 04:34 AM   #2
maunakea
too many bikes
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hawaii
Bikes:
Posts: 662
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I own and ride both. My steel Swift is so good I haven't changed a thing. The only remaining stock parts on my Cadenza are the frame and seatpost (see the M'Kadenza thread). I wanted a folding road bike, which the M'Kadenza is after a complete rebuild. The stock Cadenza (harshness alert) is more like a Xootr Scooter than a bike.

Last edited by maunakea; 04-30-07 at 08:07 AM.
maunakea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-07, 07:36 AM   #3
Bacciagalupe
Professional Fuss-Budget
 
Bacciagalupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 6,438
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
So the steel Swift has a better ride than the Cadenza? Weird. Any idea which components contribute to that?

Similarly, any idea how a steel Swift compares to a stock Xootr Swift (aluminum)?
Bacciagalupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-07, 08:14 AM   #4
maunakea
too many bikes
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hawaii
Bikes:
Posts: 662
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Bacci, yep, the Swift is hands down the better ride, as in night and day better with 100 psi tires on the Swift and the OE Contis at 85 psi on the Cadenza (before the rebuild). I think the two major factors are the steel frame vs. the alu frame, and the forks. The rebuilt M'Kadenza with 120 psi tires and CF forks is certainly faster than the Swift for the same watts, but even with the sus seatpost on the M'Kadenza, I prefer the ride of the Swift. One confounding fun factor is the Swift is my only bike with a gear hub, which I love except for the requirement to ease up when shifting. I'll post some pix of me and the Swift in Vienna, but I'm still traveling (now in the UK, via KLM, not the Swift). I love !!! the ability to pack the Swift with frog pedals mounted. Open the n'Flite to riding in the time it takes to put the saddle on the seatpost, screw in the pivot bolt, and mount the front wheel ... maybe 5 mins.
maunakea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-07, 04:42 PM   #5
DVC45
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
DVC45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 3,839
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Thanks Maunakea!
So the Cadenza's bigger wheel didn't help a bit? Would you expect the same result if you had an alluminum Swift?
DVC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-07, 10:32 PM   #6
mosquito
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 365
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
hey maunakea how much did you pay for the bike and what parts came with it? was it stock or did you specify what you wanted?
mosquito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-07, 01:53 PM   #7
maunakea
too many bikes
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hawaii
Bikes:
Posts: 662
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVC45
Thanks Maunakea!
So the Cadenza's bigger wheel didn't help a bit? Would you expect the same result if you had an alluminum Swift?
DVC, I think the harshness is directly linked to the OE forks on the Cadenza. The harshness on the 26", lower psi tires surprised me, and the major change between the OE bike and the rebuilt bike with ISO 620, but much higher psi tires, is the CF fork. If you get a Cadenza, change the fork to CF.... the best single improvement you can make. I see "old version" (maintube fold) Cadenzas on eBay from time to time.

An alu Swift still has the Swift steel fork .... so I think even an alu Swift would ride better than a Cadenza.

I'll reiterate what all Swift owners know.... the Swift is incredible. Feels as stable as a MTB.


Quote:
Originally Posted by mosquito
hey maunakea how much did you pay for the bike and what parts came with it? was it stock or did you specify what you wanted?
I was lucky to find a steel Swift on eBay about a year ago. 7 speed S-A gear hub. I paid the Buy It Now price of $700 the instant I saw it. It was barely ridden, no sign of wear on the rear tire, much less the front.
maunakea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-07, 02:51 PM   #8
spambait11
Seņor Mambo
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fremont, CA
Bikes: Ti Sports roadie, Cannondale CAAD 3, Tern Cargo Node, Helix (soon)
Posts: 1,344
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by maunakea
I was lucky to find a steel Swift on eBay about a year ago. 7 speed S-A gear hub. I paid the Buy It Now price of $700 the instant I saw it. It was barely ridden, no sign of wear on the rear tire, much less the front.
So that's the story huh?
Damn! That's a GREAT find, mk!
spambait11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-07, 11:47 PM   #9
Donkey Hodie
I like chrome.
 
Donkey Hodie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northeast
Bikes: 1983 Specialized Stumpjumper, 1986 Mongoose ATB
Posts: 285
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I would like to know how the aluminum xootr swift and the 2007 aluminum cadenza compare. The eccentric bottom bracket and disc mounts on the new 07' cadenza look attractive(not to mention the rest of the bike).

I think a comparison of the aluminum xootr swift and the 2007 aluminum cadenza would be more of a fair comparison than an all steel swift vs. the older cadenza.
The '07 cadenza's frame is completely different than the previous year's cadenzas.
Donkey Hodie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-07, 11:50 PM   #10
DVC45
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
DVC45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 3,839
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donkey Hodie
I would like to know how the aluminum xootr swift and the 2007 aluminum cadenza compare. The eccentric bottom bracket and disc mounts on the new 07' cadenza look attractive(not to mention the rest of the bike).

I think a comparison of the aluminum xootr swift and the 2007 aluminum cadenza would be more of a fair comparison than an all steel swift vs. the older cadenza.
The '07 cadenza's frame is completely different than the previous year's cadenzas.
' agree!
DVC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-07, 02:37 PM   #11
james_swift
All ur bike r belong Enki
 
james_swift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Fransicko
Bikes:
Posts: 816
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donkey Hodie
The eccentric bottom bracket...on the new 07' cadenza look attractive(not to mention the rest of the bike).
Oh man, I smell a fixed-gear conversion with this bike.
james_swift is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-07, 03:40 PM   #12
spambait11
Seņor Mambo
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fremont, CA
Bikes: Ti Sports roadie, Cannondale CAAD 3, Tern Cargo Node, Helix (soon)
Posts: 1,344
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
For the '07 Cadenza, you are not going to get a better component spec or better overall frame design at that price. The Swift is not only more expensive, but can crack at the seat stays because of a seatpost modification (though the OP did not explicitly say what he did exactly), which does not appear to be an issue with a Cadenza. Besides, if fold size is not an issue, why would you not want a full-sized bike which you know uses standard parts - parts which are usually cheaper with better variety?
spambait11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-07, 11:51 PM   #13
DVC45
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
DVC45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 3,839
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by spambait11
Besides, if fold size is not an issue, why would you not want a full-sized bike which you know uses standard parts - parts which are usually cheaper with better variety?
' my thoughts exactly, but I wanted to know if the Swift has more to offer because of its price.
Looks like the Cadenza is it.
DVC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-07, 03:57 AM   #14
JonathanG
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Providence, RI
Bikes:
Posts: 68
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by spambait11
Besides, if fold size is not an issue, why would you not want a full-sized bike which you know uses standard parts - parts which are usually cheaper with better variety?
Aside from the seatpost the Swift does take all standard parts. I have ridden the aluminum Xootr Swift (now undergoing a fixed gear conversion), and it is very and comfortable and responsive. This past September I did the New York City Century with my brother, who was on a cross bike, and it was fine.

I haven't tried or seen a Cadenza, which sounds like a good bike, but I'm not sure a reason to choose it over a Swift would be availability of component upgrades.

Jonathan
JonathanG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-07, 05:29 AM   #15
maunakea
too many bikes
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hawaii
Bikes:
Posts: 662
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
There's a fundamental difference between the new Cadenza and all Swifts... a Swift folds, and Cadenza does not. A Cadenza separates. If you don't need to fold, buy a Cadenza and mod it. If you need to fold, as in daily multi-mode, the new Cadenza would be a regrettable choice.
maunakea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-07, 05:45 AM   #16
Donkey Hodie
I like chrome.
 
Donkey Hodie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northeast
Bikes: 1983 Specialized Stumpjumper, 1986 Mongoose ATB
Posts: 285
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by maunakea
There's a fundamental difference between the new Cadenza and all Swifts... a Swift folds, and Cadenza does not. A Cadenza separates. If you don't need to fold, buy a Cadenza and mod it. If you need to fold, as in daily multi-mode, the new Cadenza would be a regrettable choice.
Are you sure about this? I thought it actually did fold, but you needed an hex tool to do so. Could you link to a source that verifies weather or not the cadenza separates or folds?
Donkey Hodie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-07, 07:08 AM   #17
jur
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 6,855
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by maunakea
There's a fundamental difference between the new Cadenza and all Swifts... a Swift folds, and Cadenza does not. A Cadenza separates. If you don't need to fold, buy a Cadenza and mod it. If you need to fold, as in daily multi-mode, the new Cadenza would be a regrettable choice.
From the Cadenza description at the Dahon site:
Quote:
New LockJaw™ frame technology delivers an incredibly stiff frame that folds in seconds so you'll always have instant mobility.
jur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-07, 11:00 AM   #18
spambait11
Seņor Mambo
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fremont, CA
Bikes: Ti Sports roadie, Cannondale CAAD 3, Tern Cargo Node, Helix (soon)
Posts: 1,344
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonathanG
Aside from the seatpost the Swift does take all standard parts.
You're right for the most part, but as a folding bike, it's all a matter of degrees. The Swift seems better in the standardization area than some; I only see odd sizes for the seatpost and handlebar post (as in you just can't walk into an LBS and pull one off the shelf), but then again, I don't own one. Tires and tubes can be significantly cheaper for full-sized bikes than for folding bikes, though, with better variety.

Also if you do a component by component comparison between a Cadenza and a Swift, then take a look at the prices, I think there's no comparison. Plus I doubt the ride of a Cadenza is any less worse than a Swift (the Cadenza looks to have a mountain bike-like wheelbase: comfy), but that seems to be what the OP's trying to find out for sure.
spambait11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-07, 11:04 AM   #19
spambait11
Seņor Mambo
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fremont, CA
Bikes: Ti Sports roadie, Cannondale CAAD 3, Tern Cargo Node, Helix (soon)
Posts: 1,344
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The Cadenza looks like it folds to me as well, but that hinge by the bottom bracket looks like a weak point. Maybe Thor could shed more light?
spambait11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-07, 12:15 PM   #20
dalmore
Neat - w/ ice on the side
 
dalmore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Big Ring. Little Cog.
Bikes: 2005 Dahon Speed TR, 2006 Dahon Mu SL, 2000 GT XiZang, 1999ish Rock Lobster, 2007 Dean Animas CTI
Posts: 1,200
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Looks like a fold to me too.
__________________
Current favorite bumper sticker: Wag more. Bark less.

Change you can believe in - Bigfoot Nessie 08
dalmore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-07, 09:35 PM   #21
Donkey Hodie
I like chrome.
 
Donkey Hodie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northeast
Bikes: 1983 Specialized Stumpjumper, 1986 Mongoose ATB
Posts: 285
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Another reason an eccentric bottom bracket is attractive, is because you can run it as a single speed or with an internally geared hub along with disc brakes without having to re-align or readjust the disc brake when making the chain tension tighter. With rear facing or horizontal drop outs, a rear disc brake is not a great thing because it goes out of alignment when you move the wheel back in the dropouts when you need to make the chain tension tighter. With an eccentric bottom bracket, you move the bottom bracket to adjust chain tension instead of the rear wheel which in turn keeps the rear disc brake in alignment with the rear wheel.

This is definitely an advantage the cadenza has over the swift imo.
Donkey Hodie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-07, 09:36 PM   #22
Donkey Hodie
I like chrome.
 
Donkey Hodie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northeast
Bikes: 1983 Specialized Stumpjumper, 1986 Mongoose ATB
Posts: 285
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Does anyone know if the Cadenza will be available in the U.S. as a frame set?
Donkey Hodie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-07, 10:10 PM   #23
spambait11
Seņor Mambo
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fremont, CA
Bikes: Ti Sports roadie, Cannondale CAAD 3, Tern Cargo Node, Helix (soon)
Posts: 1,344
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yes to the frameset (the last time I inquired - early 2007), but with the component spec, you're probably better off buying the whole bike.
spambait11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-07, 12:14 AM   #24
Donkey Hodie
I like chrome.
 
Donkey Hodie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northeast
Bikes: 1983 Specialized Stumpjumper, 1986 Mongoose ATB
Posts: 285
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by spambait11
Yes to the frameset (the last time I inquired - early 2007), but with the component spec, you're probably better off buying the whole bike.

Yeah, your probably right. That def makes sense.
Donkey Hodie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-07, 04:09 PM   #25
maunakea
too many bikes
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hawaii
Bikes:
Posts: 662
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My mistake about folding ... maybe half a mistake. The new Cadenza requires a hex key to unlock the hinge (I got it confused with the Ritchie BreakAway bikes Dahon makes).

In my book, using a hex key to unlock the hinge is not a true folder. I had relegated the new Cadenza to the "non-folder" segment of bicycle memory.

[Added: Getting a hex key out to me means putting a folder in a suitcase for travel. I think I would rebuild a Jack rather than deal with a hex key every time I folded.]

Last edited by maunakea; 05-08-07 at 03:23 PM.
maunakea is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:47 PM.