Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Folding Bikes Discuss the unique features and issues of folding bikes. Also a great place to learn what folding bike will work best for your needs.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-12-07, 04:50 PM   #1
EriktheFish
Silly Party Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NH
Bikes: Rans Stratus XP
Posts: 345
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
bad law in NJ against 20" wheels

Apparently there's a law pending against selling bikes with 20" wheels in NJ. It is intended against child bikes for some reason, but to make the language work they changed it to 20" wheels, not thinking adults ride folders and recumbents with 20" or smaller wheels. If you are in NJ, check it out and respond to your legislators:
http://www.bentrideronline.com/messa...t=30157&page=2
EriktheFish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-07, 05:08 PM   #2
randya
Senior Member
 
randya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: in bed with your mom
Bikes: who cares?
Posts: 13,689
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
what do they want kids to ride, if not 20" bikes? Seems like NJ has quite the raft of anti-bike legislation disguised as 'public safety' issues pending (see thread on proposed NJ law banning quick release wheels in A&S), what's up with that???
randya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-07, 05:54 PM   #3
Bacciagalupe
Professional Fuss-Budget
 
Bacciagalupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 6,438
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
You are slightly misinterpreting the law.

Basically, the prohibition is against selling bikes with 20" wheels and a quick release. No QR, no problem. I assume it will add $5 - $10 to the cost of a folder, and I don't see why the shop can't separately throw in the QR that comes in the bike kit.

Still sucks, but not that big a deal.
Bacciagalupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-07, 06:20 PM   #4
bookishboy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 391
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Ok, this is the first time that I actually looked up the unit conversion from mm to inches. Am I guessing wrong that the ERTO 406 stands for 406 mm? and same for the 451? I just tried converting this, and they came out to approx 16" and 17.75" respectively.

What's the actual diameter on a 406" wheel? Does the law include tire width, or just the rim? If the inflated tire is actually more than 20", does it pass the litmus test of "still OK to sell with a QR"?
bookishboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-07, 11:43 AM   #5
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Posts: 15,661
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
It's just a stupid law. I have written to my assemblymen (one of whom is a co-sponsor of this bill) and presented my arguments against it (in my usual verbose fashion-- which means they probably won't read it. Oh, well).

I encourage other NJ residents to do the same. The bill is called A2686.

Rudi
rhm is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:33 PM.