Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Folding Bikes
Reload this Page >

BMW Q6.s folder

Search
Notices
Folding Bikes Discuss the unique features and issues of folding bikes. Also a great place to learn what folding bike will work best for your needs.

BMW Q6.s folder

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-14-09, 08:23 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
BMW Q6.s folder

A bit different folder....BMW mountain bike, 27 speeds, hydrayulic discs, XTR drivetrain, and a very cool adjustable BMW Telelever front suspension, and rea adjusts as well.....

folded:


Ready to ride:


Leave it to BMW to build a bike that will fit in the trunk of a Z3 or Z4...
RZ94 is offline  
Old 01-14-09, 09:49 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Under the Downunder
Posts: 1,014

Bikes: MTBs, BMX, Pocket MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
^ I had seen that bike in a magazine ad several years ago. I didn't realize it could fold!... well... sort of fold...

Are they pricey?
Pocko is offline  
Old 01-14-09, 09:50 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 205
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Isn't telelever about eliminating stiction? Then why the stanchions?
And that's hardly a "folding" bike. Any rear-suspension MTB will fold, and the wheels come off.
joseff is offline  
Old 01-15-09, 01:20 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Under the Downunder
Posts: 1,014

Bikes: MTBs, BMX, Pocket MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
^ Think automotive McPherson Strut for the front suspension of this bike. The spring and hydraulic damping characteristics and capabilities come directly from the coil-over-shock unit connected to the lever. The stanchions are only there to keep the "fork" and front wheel from folding inwards/backwards during normal operation. The bushings/seals where the stanchions and sliders mate would function more like "sliders." They will still probably have some degree of stiction, but not as much as a "true" telescopic fork because it doesn't have to seal air-pressure or oil. I would say those stanchions and sliders are empty and light weight.

There is no "head set" or head tube to hold the fork, rather just two "ball joints" (top and bottom) just like those found in the front wheel axle of a car suspension unit.

BMW obviously employed slider stanchions in order to elliminate the second wishbone (telelever).



.

Last edited by Pocko; 01-15-09 at 01:27 AM.
Pocko is offline  
Old 01-15-09, 02:36 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 205
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pocko
BMW obviously employed slider stanchions in order to elliminate the second wishbone (telelever).
My bad... this is telelever. The double-wishbone setup is duolever.
joseff is offline  
Old 01-15-09, 05:06 AM
  #6  
Bicycling Gnome
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: 55.0N 1.59W
Posts: 1,877
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Am I wrong, or would it be possible to crush yourself badly in that front suspension system. I don't think it is safe to have a nut cracker like that so near where you could put your hands or other body parts? In a crash you might get all sorts caught in there.

EvilV is offline  
Old 01-15-09, 05:23 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 205
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The front suspension setup's been on BMW motorbikes for quite a while.
And more power to BMW for actually building a bike with a uniquely BMW feature. As opposed to Mercedes/Subaru/GM/Ferrari badge-engineering.
joseff is offline  
Old 01-15-09, 08:49 AM
  #8  
New usename ThorUSA
 
brakemeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Southern Illinois USA
Posts: 2,469
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
BMW has its name on it but they didnt do all the important design work ... they employed a German Bike maker to do this project and after years of design work, they took the finished bike and shipped it to China...In the meantime the German bike company had ordered ( and received) 5000 SHimano XTR grouppos for the orders from BMW which they had in hand, but were worthless ....
( do the math 5000 x estimated OEM price of XTR group= MEGABUCKS )


It basically ruined the bike company ...... while BMW claims all the design work for themselves.

That is one reason I dont own a BMW

thor
__________________
www.thorusa.com
Dahon : Freedom Unfolds
Tern : all about the ride
brakemeister is offline  
Old 01-15-09, 01:34 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Under the Downunder
Posts: 1,014

Bikes: MTBs, BMX, Pocket MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EvilV
Am I wrong, or would it be possible to crush yourself badly in that front suspension system. I don't think it is safe to have a nut cracker like that so near where you could put your hands or other body parts? In a crash you might get all sorts caught in there.
It should be fairly safe, as it presents no more danger than the rear suspension mech. The occasional air-born nature of mountain biking has seen many a rider fall into the gap between the top/front of the rear tire and the back of the seat tube... with their crotch!

There's the "nutcracker" right there...


.
Pocko is offline  
Old 01-15-09, 01:41 PM
  #10  
Bicycling Gnome
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: 55.0N 1.59W
Posts: 1,877
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pocko
It should be fairly safe, as it presents no more danger than the rear suspension mech. The occasional air-born nature of mountain biking has seen many a rider fall into the gap between the top/front of the rear tire and the back of the seat tube... with their crotch!

There's the "nutcracker" right there...


.
Ayyeeeeeeeee!!
EvilV is offline  
Old 01-15-09, 04:58 PM
  #11  
Folding Bike Guy
 
FoldingCyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
BMW has offered several folding bikes over the years, none of which to my knowledge was actually
designed by them (same for Mercedes by the way). In addition to the Q6.S, there was the Q5.T (photo
below). In 1996 BMW OEM'd folding bikes from Montague. One model was the "Official Mountain Bike" of
the 1996 Olympic games in Atlanta. It was given out to VIPs and Olympic officials. They also also had a
BMW folding tandem (brochure scan below), which I think was made by Montague as well but I'm not
entirely certain.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
BMW-Q5.T.jpg (39.4 KB, 33 views)
File Type: jpg
BMW-tandem.jpg (63.5 KB, 18 views)
FoldingCyclist is offline  
Old 01-15-09, 08:36 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Under the Downunder
Posts: 1,014

Bikes: MTBs, BMX, Pocket MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
^ FoldingCyclist, that blue pic of the Q6.s seems to have a revamped front suspension mech. Is this the newer version?

I love the way the shock unit now mimics a head tube... but more surprisingly, I just realized that both the old and new telelever mechanisms offer "TRUE" fork/head-angle adjustability... had they provided a way to shorten or lengthen the wishbone swing arm (lever) - in a manner similar to a steering tie-rod.

Wow... I wonder why this didn't catch-on in mainstream MTBs?

.
Pocko is offline  
Old 01-16-09, 11:51 AM
  #13  
Folding Bike Guy
 
FoldingCyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
^Pocko - the first photo is a Q5.T, a different model than the Q6.S, I think it either preceded the Q6.S
or was just part of a range of models, I can't be sure. I believe the genesis of both bikes was the
"Super-tech" also referred to as the "High-tech" as depicted in the brochure scans below from 1998.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
BMW-high-tech-01.jpg (76.1 KB, 19 views)
File Type: jpg
BMW-high-tech-02.jpg (48.9 KB, 17 views)
FoldingCyclist is offline  
Old 01-16-09, 01:30 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
gringo_gus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NW England/Aveiro
Posts: 638

Bikes: Joey Sport; Mezzo D9;Curve D3; Surly LHT self build cargoesque

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
the way the back wheel folds under the frame it is obviously a brompton rip-off

no doubt we'll see the merc crushers happy to take BMW on
gringo_gus is offline  
Old 01-17-09, 02:26 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Under the Downunder
Posts: 1,014

Bikes: MTBs, BMX, Pocket MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FoldingCyclist
^Pocko - the first photo is a Q5.T, a different model than the Q6.S, I think it either preceded the Q6.S
or was just part of a range of models, I can't be sure. I believe the genesis of both bikes was the
"Super-tech" also referred to as the "High-tech" as depicted in the brochure scans below from 1998.
Cheers, FoldingCyclist! Very interesting... this history...

That rear suspension design on the early versions has appeared and disappeared in MTB designs over the years. The BB as you can see is on the swingarm and has some anti-bob merits... but in the end of the day, placing the entire weight of the rider (when standing up) as part of the "unsprung weight" of the rear mech was never going to be ideal. I would've thought BMW should've known better even back in the early days of MTB evolution.

Anyway, looks like they got their act together in the end, with the Q6.S

.
Pocko is offline  
Old 04-20-09, 12:59 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 339
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 105 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 38 Times in 20 Posts
One of my club members owns this rare bike.
It is now discontinued, and its retail price was around $5000 AFAIK



Raxel is offline  
Old 04-20-09, 11:31 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Under the Downunder
Posts: 1,014

Bikes: MTBs, BMX, Pocket MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
^ Raxel, I've seen the odd one of those "Hummer" foldable mtb's but NEVER in that color. They are a rare sight, not so common even in the internet. Then this afternoon I saw someone riding one with the exact same color, while I was driving home from work!!

This club member of yours, does he happen to live in New Zealand? In a certain coastal city in the BOP?

.
Pocko is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.