Help me decide between Swift and Pocket Crusoe!
#26
Eschew Obfuscation
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 3,845
Bikes: 2005 Fuji Professional, 2002 Lemond Zurich, Folders - Strida, Merc, Dahon, Downtube, Recumbent folder
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have a Bike Friday Pocket custom (2x8 speeds). If you would like to test ride it to see what the Pocket frame feels like, you are welcome to come to my house in Half Moon Bay. I also happen to have some other folders you can try out. Also have 2 bikes with the S2C hub if you are curious about them.
__________________
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,821
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Have you consider this
https://www.moultonbicycles.co.uk/models/TSR2.html
Stiff as hell, has the single speed look, great ride quality on both road and unpaved trails (full suspension), no dirty chain to mess with and splits to fit in your trunk.
As for the the BF, another pro is the great service.
https://www.moultonbicycles.co.uk/models/TSR2.html
Stiff as hell, has the single speed look, great ride quality on both road and unpaved trails (full suspension), no dirty chain to mess with and splits to fit in your trunk.
As for the the BF, another pro is the great service.
#28
These go to eleven
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Distrito de Columbia
Posts: 414
Bikes: BF Pocket Crusoe; B Tikit; dust-gathering MTB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm a Crusoe owner so I'll chime in with as objective a post as I can with my likes/dislikes.
PROS:
Fast
Lightweight. I think mine is around 22 pounds with 8X3 gearing (3spd IGH which adds weight).
Good fit: I ordered a custom bike and love the fit.
Solid: I crank at all speeds and the bike "feels" solid--solid construction, not wobbly or creaky.
Standard tires: 406mm easy to find a variety of tires.
Brakes: right from day one, the V-brakes are very responsive. I Like hair-trigger brakes and these fit the bill.
Maintenance: Other than initial gear cable stretch, I have lubed the drivetrain and replaced one set of brake pads, and done nothing else in two years. It's probably time to replace the chain, but my point is the bike is well built in its components.
Customer Service: Bike Friday are awesome.
Rear Rack: the rack is smartly constructed to sit high up, which means you can put a real pannier on it and not have clearance issues. Heel strike also not a problem.
CONS:
chain drops when unfolding bike. Chain retainer (sold separately) doesn't always prevent this.
Fold: The fold is initially very fast (swinging the rear triangle under), but tying down the handlebars (last step) is awkward and I almost always get grease on my hands. I'd upgrade to the folding riser if you buy this bike.
Price: not cheap, as you know.
PROS:
Fast
Lightweight. I think mine is around 22 pounds with 8X3 gearing (3spd IGH which adds weight).
Good fit: I ordered a custom bike and love the fit.
Solid: I crank at all speeds and the bike "feels" solid--solid construction, not wobbly or creaky.
Standard tires: 406mm easy to find a variety of tires.
Brakes: right from day one, the V-brakes are very responsive. I Like hair-trigger brakes and these fit the bill.
Maintenance: Other than initial gear cable stretch, I have lubed the drivetrain and replaced one set of brake pads, and done nothing else in two years. It's probably time to replace the chain, but my point is the bike is well built in its components.
Customer Service: Bike Friday are awesome.
Rear Rack: the rack is smartly constructed to sit high up, which means you can put a real pannier on it and not have clearance issues. Heel strike also not a problem.
CONS:
chain drops when unfolding bike. Chain retainer (sold separately) doesn't always prevent this.
Fold: The fold is initially very fast (swinging the rear triangle under), but tying down the handlebars (last step) is awkward and I almost always get grease on my hands. I'd upgrade to the folding riser if you buy this bike.
Price: not cheap, as you know.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 61
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've got a bike friday, and while the frame is stiff as hell, the steering mast is pretty flexy. That makes for a comfy ride on 20" tires, but it doesn't feel stiff.
After a couple folds now, I can get the friday crazy small in about 2-3 minutes- front wheel off, pop the steering mast off, fold the seat mast, fold the rear triangle, done. It doesn't take a lot of room in the trunk. Figure 5-7 minutes from bike to trunk to bike.
I will say that a bottle cage on top of the beam tends to mess everything up. I've since taken it off. I've not had chain dropping problems- so far, it's mostly stayed on, but it can come off.
Mine was cheap- got it used. After selling off the parts I didn't want and supplementing with ebay and my own parts bin, it came out about the same price as a swift.
After a couple folds now, I can get the friday crazy small in about 2-3 minutes- front wheel off, pop the steering mast off, fold the seat mast, fold the rear triangle, done. It doesn't take a lot of room in the trunk. Figure 5-7 minutes from bike to trunk to bike.
I will say that a bottle cage on top of the beam tends to mess everything up. I've since taken it off. I've not had chain dropping problems- so far, it's mostly stayed on, but it can come off.
Mine was cheap- got it used. After selling off the parts I didn't want and supplementing with ebay and my own parts bin, it came out about the same price as a swift.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 736
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I recently purchased a BTO fixed gear Pocket Rocket. It has the pivoting rear dropouts like the Ticket. Very nice setup. Plus, I can simply swap the right dropout for one with a derailleur hanger if I ever want to have multiple gears. Folding & unfolding the bike with the pivoting rear dropouts is easier than with the track dropouts as is fixing a flat, etc. I'm extremely happy with the Bike Friday. I've had a couple of Dahons & I would not recommend them if you want a stiff handle post. However, the Bike Friday's post is very stiff, as is the rest of the frame.
I ordered it from Peter Berra at Bike Friday. He sized it perfectly, the fit is exactly the same as my Surly Cross-Check & Litespeed Classic. I can't speak for the Swift, but I can't imagine not being happy with a Bike Friday.
I ordered it from Peter Berra at Bike Friday. He sized it perfectly, the fit is exactly the same as my Surly Cross-Check & Litespeed Classic. I can't speak for the Swift, but I can't imagine not being happy with a Bike Friday.
#31
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 334
Bikes: Surly CrossCheck, Xootr Swift
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There's a little 98 page thread right next door that would tend to agree with you on that one
#32
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 334
Bikes: Surly CrossCheck, Xootr Swift
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Have you consider this
https://www.moultonbicycles.co.uk/models/TSR2.html
Stiff as hell, has the single speed look, great ride quality on both road and unpaved trails (full suspension), no dirty chain to mess with and splits to fit in your trunk.
As for the the BF, another pro is the great service.
https://www.moultonbicycles.co.uk/models/TSR2.html
Stiff as hell, has the single speed look, great ride quality on both road and unpaved trails (full suspension), no dirty chain to mess with and splits to fit in your trunk.
As for the the BF, another pro is the great service.
#33
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 334
Bikes: Surly CrossCheck, Xootr Swift
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This is good to know! That means the Crusoe could get down to 20lbs in SS/FG.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,821
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I got my TSR27 after test riding his. My usage pattern is similar to yours, no multi modal commute, the bike is stored most of the time in my trunk and I ride both roads and unpaved trails.
Last edited by kamtsa; 10-05-10 at 10:21 PM.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 191
Bikes: Soma Doublecross DC
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't have a ton of experience with folders, but the performance of the Fridays really impress me. I'm fairly particular (anal) about how my bikes ride and had dismissed folder for years. I tried a Friday and the rest is history.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Rafael, California
Posts: 2,097
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
6 Posts
General Information
LITE is RIGHT. Ever wanted to ditch the old clunker for something so light, you'd swear your wheels weren't even touching the ground? Enter the new generation "Lite" Friday, the Crusoe - so named to reflect its positioning as the ultimate elite utility bike.
First Class Ride: Robinson never had it this easy: starting at just 16lbs*, the super responsive Crusoe can best be described as "snappy and agile" - like an extension of your hands and feet.
#37
These go to eleven
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Distrito de Columbia
Posts: 414
Bikes: BF Pocket Crusoe; B Tikit; dust-gathering MTB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So true. As I've posted ad nauseam, my Crusoe is my road bike/touring bike/commuter bike (part-time with a Tikit)/grocery getter/general errand boy bike Myyyyyyyy Presssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhiousssssssssssssss"
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,097
Bikes: Too many....................
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
5 Posts
Pocket Rocket Fixie https://community.bikefriday.com/node/11249
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 792
Bikes: Brodie Force w/ Xtracycle, Dahon Helios, Merida Folding, Pacific Carryme, Softride Classic
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
https://www.smartcycles.com/bike_weight.htm
Weight savings is largely a marketing-driven concept to the consumer. There is far more to gain by losing excess body weight and improving your cardiovascular performance than worrying about extra weight on a bicycle. Tire selection & tire pressure will affect the perceived speed of a bike more than an extra 1.5 lbs shaved off the fork or wheels.
Due to human nature however, we are all susceptible to the belief that spending money on a lighter bike will buy us better performance.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 386
Bikes: Xootr Swift, Dahon Speed P8, Jamis Aurora
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
To me, the issue around bicycle weight is not about "performance" per se but actual portability. There are circumstances in which I regularly need to carry my bike up and down flights of stairs--to get it onto a subway/train platform, or to access the bike path near me, or get it up the steps fronting my apartment building. I also have to lift my bike when I put it in a car trunk. So in these circumstances, yes, a lighter-weight bike can make a lot of difference.
#42
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 334
Bikes: Surly CrossCheck, Xootr Swift
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have a Bike Friday Pocket custom (2x8 speeds). If you would like to test ride it to see what the Pocket frame feels like, you are welcome to come to my house in Half Moon Bay. I also happen to have some other folders you can try out. Also have 2 bikes with the S2C hub if you are curious about them.
But I have to admit I'm a bit bummed about the fact that the chain tensioner may not work all that well on the Pocket bikes when it comes to keeping the chain on when un/folding.
#43
Eschew Obfuscation
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 3,845
Bikes: 2005 Fuji Professional, 2002 Lemond Zurich, Folders - Strida, Merc, Dahon, Downtube, Recumbent folder
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think you mean the chain guard. I have one on my BF. It works pretty well. Not 100%, but not a big deal at all. Don't sweat it.
__________________
#44
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 334
Bikes: Surly CrossCheck, Xootr Swift
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
To me, the issue around bicycle weight is not about "performance" per se but actual portability. There are circumstances in which I regularly need to carry my bike up and down flights of stairs--to get it onto a subway/train platform, or to access the bike path near me, or get it up the steps fronting my apartment building. I also have to lift my bike when I put it in a car trunk. So in these circumstances, yes, a lighter-weight bike can make a lot of difference.
I don't think I'm asking too much for a 19-20lb folder with SS configuration. I think most non-folding bikes can easily do this without expensive componentry. I simply want a folder that doesn't sacrifice weight for the ability to fold.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 386
Bikes: Xootr Swift, Dahon Speed P8, Jamis Aurora
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Sir Bikesalot, I think your next step is to go test ride these bikes if at all possible; there's only so much we can tell you in these forums. While I'm a Swift partisan, Bike Fridays have a great reputation and I think it would be hard to go wrong with either bike. Keep us posted!
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 61
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Gain a better understanding about how bike weight affects performance by reading this:
https://www.smartcycles.com/bike_weight.htm
Weight savings is largely a marketing-driven concept to the consumer. There is far more to gain by losing excess body weight and improving your cardiovascular performance than worrying about extra weight on a bicycle. Tire selection & tire pressure will affect the perceived speed of a bike more than an extra 1.5 lbs shaved off the fork or wheels.
Due to human nature however, we are all susceptible to the belief that spending money on a lighter bike will buy us better performance.
https://www.smartcycles.com/bike_weight.htm
Weight savings is largely a marketing-driven concept to the consumer. There is far more to gain by losing excess body weight and improving your cardiovascular performance than worrying about extra weight on a bicycle. Tire selection & tire pressure will affect the perceived speed of a bike more than an extra 1.5 lbs shaved off the fork or wheels.
Due to human nature however, we are all susceptible to the belief that spending money on a lighter bike will buy us better performance.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Vancouver, Washington and Ocean Shores, Washington, USA
Posts: 1,319
Bikes: 2 - 2007 Custom Bike Fridays, 2 - 2009 Bike Friday Pocket 8's, Gravity 29'er SS, 2 - 8-spd Windsor City Bikes, 1973 Raleigh 20 & a 1964 Schwinn Tiger
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Sizing:
After doing some studying of the Swift website, I have come to the conclusion that the Xooter Swift is LESS adjustable and friendly to taller riders than the BF Crusoe or even a BF stock model. The culprit is the one-size-fits-all frame of the Swift. They get their 'size adjustment' in three ways: 1) Raising seat lengthens "reach" (only if handle bars are not also raised), 2) Stem can be replaced with longer or shorter one and with up or down orientation 3) Handle bar riser can be trimmed slightly to shorten it - copy doesn't indicate it can be lengthened!
This the same as me 'remaking' my wife's Medium sized BF to fit me.
https://www.xootr.com/swift-folding-b...-geometry.html
The max seat-to-pedal distance listed is 38" - same as my Dahon S1 and the max "Reach" is listed as 20.1" + 1.5" from changing to a 100mm stem + .5" gained by moving seat back on rails = 22.1". That is basically the reach on my Fridays, but their seat height is 38.5"-39". In addition, based upon these modifications, the seat and handle bars are likely NOT still of equal height as they are on my Fridays.
Conclusion, The tall person (I'm 6'3") has to make a couple of sacrifices.
Folding:
The Swift and the Crusoe fold about the same (both have "floppy" handle bars), but the Crusoe can be equipped with a Folding Stem Riser, such as my wife has on hers, and then the Crusoe folds better. (FYI: Crusoe typically comes with a folding seat mast.)
https://www.xootr.com/swift-folding-instructions.html
Misc:
That said, Swift lacks the low step over of a Friday, but is easier to equip as a Fixie or SS.
Lou
After doing some studying of the Swift website, I have come to the conclusion that the Xooter Swift is LESS adjustable and friendly to taller riders than the BF Crusoe or even a BF stock model. The culprit is the one-size-fits-all frame of the Swift. They get their 'size adjustment' in three ways: 1) Raising seat lengthens "reach" (only if handle bars are not also raised), 2) Stem can be replaced with longer or shorter one and with up or down orientation 3) Handle bar riser can be trimmed slightly to shorten it - copy doesn't indicate it can be lengthened!
This the same as me 'remaking' my wife's Medium sized BF to fit me.
https://www.xootr.com/swift-folding-b...-geometry.html
The max seat-to-pedal distance listed is 38" - same as my Dahon S1 and the max "Reach" is listed as 20.1" + 1.5" from changing to a 100mm stem + .5" gained by moving seat back on rails = 22.1". That is basically the reach on my Fridays, but their seat height is 38.5"-39". In addition, based upon these modifications, the seat and handle bars are likely NOT still of equal height as they are on my Fridays.
Conclusion, The tall person (I'm 6'3") has to make a couple of sacrifices.
Folding:
The Swift and the Crusoe fold about the same (both have "floppy" handle bars), but the Crusoe can be equipped with a Folding Stem Riser, such as my wife has on hers, and then the Crusoe folds better. (FYI: Crusoe typically comes with a folding seat mast.)
https://www.xootr.com/swift-folding-instructions.html
Misc:
That said, Swift lacks the low step over of a Friday, but is easier to equip as a Fixie or SS.
Lou
Last edited by Foldable Two; 10-07-10 at 01:30 PM.
#48
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 334
Bikes: Surly CrossCheck, Xootr Swift
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just a quick update: I just ordered the Swift!
I think both bikes would be fantastic for my purposes, but I need to know a little more what I want from a folder (and how best to set it up) before I plunk down the big bucks for the Crusoe. I think the Swift would be a great platform for me to experiment and learn on in the meantime.
Thanks to everyone for your inputs, very helpful as expected. Look for my updates in the "swift folders" megathread
I think both bikes would be fantastic for my purposes, but I need to know a little more what I want from a folder (and how best to set it up) before I plunk down the big bucks for the Crusoe. I think the Swift would be a great platform for me to experiment and learn on in the meantime.
Thanks to everyone for your inputs, very helpful as expected. Look for my updates in the "swift folders" megathread