Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Folding Bikes Discuss the unique features and issues of folding bikes. Also a great place to learn what folding bike will work best for your needs.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-04-11, 05:26 PM   #1
chagzuki
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Bikes: Brompton, Dahon Vitesse D5
Posts: 1,867
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Curve SL observations

I've been riding an old Curve SL for the last couple of weeks and I've been surprised by the way it rides compared to my Vitesse. When I first got my Vitesse I was not at all happy with the harshness of the ride, it seemed as though the smallest of road imperfections were going straight to my hands/spine so I set about trying to make it more comfortable. I settled on a 2.15 BA on the front wheel and a 1.85 Maxxis tyre on the rear, along with a thudbuster ST with soften-than-recommended elastomer. I found this combination to work pretty well. But I still found that the short wheelbase and small wheels led to a seesaw-type whipping effect when traversing certain sorts of road imperfections which eventually led me to adopt a more upright, 'comfort' riding position so that the Thudbuster can do a lot of work on the rear and my weight is off the unsuspended front wheel. All in all that provides a pretty decent ride.

I expected that all these issues would be intensified with an even smaller bike; shorter wheelbase and smaller wheels. And the rear wheel is closer to the cranks, i.e. more 'under the body', meaning that up and down movements of the rear wheel will be felt more directly. Yet somehow the 16 x 2 Big Apples tyres on my Curve SL seem to work better than the 20 x 2. I don't know what it is. . . maybe it's something to do with the ratio between tyre width and wheel size? They seem to have more 'bounce'.
I do find that vibrations from the front wheel translate to more front-to-back handlebar movement than with the vitesse and there's clearly more handlepost flex, but besides that the ride is pretty much as smooth. On top of that the slightly more reclined angle of the seat tube results in the Thudbuster being more active and it really soaks up ripples effectively. I've commented before that the Thudbuster is designed for a less vertical seat tube angle than is typical on most Dahons and riding the Curve SL appears to confirm this.

My conclusion is that if there were something like a BA tyre in a 16 x 2.35 or 2.5 size the Curve SL would ride more smoothly than a Vitesse with 20 x 2 tyres and of course have the more compact fold. I wish I could get my hands on a tyre that size.
chagzuki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-11, 07:42 PM   #2
owenfinn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Bikes: Marin Muirwoods 29er, Pacific Carryme, Yuba Mundo, Dahon Boardwalk D7
Posts: 476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I`m now riding a 2009 Curve SL but used to ride the 2007 model. I wonder sometimes if I should replace the Marathon Racers on my 2009 with Big Apples. However, where I ride the roads are usually pretty smooth so can`t really justify the switch, besides, the Marathon`s are bit faster, or perhaps that`s my imagination?

Other differences, (in case you are interested) between models, are a longer wheelbase and much less flexy handlepost on the `09.
owenfinn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-11, 08:11 PM   #3
vmaniqui
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bay Area, SF California
Bikes: Citizen Tokyo, A-Bike, Dahon Boardwalk D6, Dahon Boardwalk D7, Dahon Curve D3, Dahon Mu XL, BF Tikit2, Dahon Speed TR, Dahon Curve SL.
Posts: 1,504
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
owenfinn,
i see that you have an ergon bar end grip on your curve sl. can you tell me if rolling the bike is a problem with this grip setup.

thanks,
vic
vmaniqui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-11, 11:24 PM   #4
owenfinn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Bikes: Marin Muirwoods 29er, Pacific Carryme, Yuba Mundo, Dahon Boardwalk D7
Posts: 476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by vmaniqui View Post
owenfinn,
i see that you have an ergon bar end grip on your curve sl. can you tell me if rolling the bike is a problem with this grip setup.

thanks,
vic
http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...1#post12315262
owenfinn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-11, 02:27 PM   #5
brakeless619
Member
 
brakeless619's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Bikes:
Posts: 32
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Time to digg this thread up. I have pretty bumpy roads over here and i think that I am going to switch to 16x2.00 big apple tires on my 2008 Curve SL. I'm sure I'll be needing new inner tubes right? Can't use the marathon racer ones since they're only 1.5

Last edited by brakeless619; 05-07-11 at 02:28 PM. Reason: oops
brakeless619 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-11, 07:22 AM   #6
chagzuki
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Bikes: Brompton, Dahon Vitesse D5
Posts: 1,867
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I've used smaller tubes before without problem. I don't know the extent to which it would increase the chance of failure.
chagzuki is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:07 AM.