Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Folding Bikes
Reload this Page >

Folding Bikes and the Great Divide

Search
Notices
Folding Bikes Discuss the unique features and issues of folding bikes. Also a great place to learn what folding bike will work best for your needs.

Folding Bikes and the Great Divide

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-02-14, 11:10 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 122
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Folding Bikes and the Great Divide

Does anyone know of a tourer or racer who's used a folding bike to do the Great Divide Mountain Bike Route or Tour Divide?

Total distance from Banff, Alberta in Canada to Antelope Wells on the Mexican border = 2700+ miles over gravel, dirt, mud, snow and pavement...not to mention the numerous continental divide crossings.

https://adventurecycling.org/routes-a...divide-canada/
https://adventurecycling.org/routes-a...in-bike-route/
https://tourdivide.org/
https://www.ridethedividemovie.com/ (great documentary -- check your local library for it)

There's a reference made here of a Bike Friday owner doing it some years ago: https://www.cyclechat.net/threads/gre...n-a-lht.82348/ and another mention of a Dahon owner thinking about it for this year: https://dahon.com/single-view-dahon/a...directors.html (see User Comments at bottom of page) + https://www.bikepacking.net/forum/ind....html#msg41235 (see tezza's comments on page 11 of that thread).

Any known folder riders with a full GDMBR under their wheels? It's been done on a recumbent trike (well, a good part of it https://www.crazyguyonabike.com/doc/?doc_id=998) and also on unicycles (yup! https://vimeo.com/17852073 ) but I haven't seen much from the folding bike crowd. Eat, sleep and ride the Divide!

Last edited by AvenirFolder; 01-02-14 at 03:59 PM.
AvenirFolder is offline  
Old 01-02-14, 02:24 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
My Pocket Llama will take 2" wide tires , so gravel roads are no problem.

You might go to CGOAB for more tour journal posts.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 01-02-14, 03:48 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 122
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by fietsbob
My Pocket Llama will take 2" wide tires , so gravel roads are no problem.

You might go to CGOAB for more tour journal posts.
Thanks! CGOAB is where I plucked that account of the recumbent Great Divide tourer. And she was all by her lonesome on 20" tires over some nasty trails and roads.

I assume 20 X 1.75" Schwalbe Marathons would do the trick as well. Those are pretty tough tires. I'd be inclined to pack an extra one along since they aren't easy to find in LBSs.
AvenirFolder is offline  
Old 07-03-15, 04:00 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 122
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Just came across this Facebook page by Alyson Peel: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Bike-...843368?fref=nf (no longer there so try this Google page instead: https://plus.google.com/+AlysonPeel/posts.)

She left home from Bisbee AZ on a Bike Friday equipped with Big Apples and is making her way north up the Great Divide Folding Bike Route (to Banff, Alberta presumably).

Along the way, she ditched her rear panniers, shed 20lbs of stuff and went with a slimmer rear bikepacking rig.





I find this early pre-trip post of interest as well: https://plus.google.com/wm/trollface...ts/fTwbFQBV3EN .

Last edited by AvenirFolder; 10-05-15 at 09:05 AM.
AvenirFolder is offline  
Old 07-03-15, 10:10 PM
  #5  
tcs
Palmer
 
tcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 8,601

Bikes: Mike Melton custom, Alex Moulton AM, Dahon Curl

Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1659 Post(s)
Liked 1,806 Times in 1,052 Posts
Not folder but demountable: A fellow on a Moulton APB did it some years back.
tcs is offline  
Old 07-06-15, 09:01 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 922

Bikes: Wheeler Mtn bike, Strida 5.0, Tern Link Uno, FSIR Spin 2.0, Dahon Mu P8

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
To me if it is alot of rough terrain I would not use my 20" wheeled bike at all and go for my fully rigid 26" with fat tires. This way you'll have an easier time if the terrain gets rough with the bigger wheels you reduce the angle of attack when going over things. If it was just a day ride I wouldn't mind the 20" wheels but you are talking about 2700+ MILES of rough terrain over multiple WEEKS. I would want to save my hands and body in the long run, for those that say there's not much difference I would seriously beg to differ because I have 20" and a 26" bike with 2" fat tires on both and hitting gravel trails I was gliding ALOT easier and faster on my 20 year old fully rigid mtn bike vs my 3 year old folder!

BUT if you ONLY have a 20" tire and still want to do it, it'll be doable just not as efficient. And make sure you put on the fattest tire you can get on there for comfort, if you get too thin and there's alot of loose gravel you'll end up cutting into the gravel which will suck alot of energy.
Azreal911 is offline  
Old 07-09-15, 06:39 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 122
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Agreed. I'd use my 30-year old ATB 26er with 2.25" tires long before I'd think about using a 20 inch folder with Big Apples. Especially with hub clearance and bottom bracket clearance from water/mud in mind. If you run into trouble in the wheel department, you likely aren't going to find rims or tires enroute.
AvenirFolder is offline  
Old 07-09-15, 12:56 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 922

Bikes: Wheeler Mtn bike, Strida 5.0, Tern Link Uno, FSIR Spin 2.0, Dahon Mu P8

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by AvenirFolder
Agreed. I'd use my 30-year old ATB 26er with 2.25" tires long before I'd think about using a 20 inch folder with Big Apples. Especially with hub clearance and bottom bracket clearance from water/mud in mind. If you run into trouble in the wheel department, you likely aren't going to find rims or tires enroute.
I saw that trailer you posted of the ride the divide movie at the top and this looks ROUGH! people where pushed to the breaking point and their feet are bleeding! And that is with a full sized mtn bike with fat tires pushing through SNOW and then riding through rough open savanna like fields. Wow to me this is something I would want to have as much advantage as I can get instead of trying something that may be the cause of you not being able to finish. Until you mentioned it I didn't even think about parts along the way in small towns if something did break that was non standard!

Probably the main reason why you aren't going to hear anyone doing this on a folder except for that one lady on the llama. Most are like putting everything they have on the line to get through it and won't think about adding things that would hinder their ride.
Azreal911 is offline  
Old 07-14-15, 01:46 PM
  #9  
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 45
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
When I built my last folder, I designed it to accommodate 20X2.4" tires (with fender). There is a BIG difference between 20X2.0 and the wider 2.4 in how it handles and feels in the rough stuff. I don't think there are any folders commercially available today with 20" tires that will take anything wider than the 2.0. Hopefully that will change. Maybe bikefriday will try it? It can turn a folder into an all-road bike.

I lower the pressure to 20 or 25lbs and it helps a lot on rocky roads and trails. I presently use the Demolition momentum tire, because it is light and supple. The Machete is another option. I use a Sun Bigballer rim that is 33mm wide. The extra width allows it to hold more air and run it at lower pressures without feeling squirrelly. I had a great time riding it on the Oregon outback route, and someday I hope to take it along the tour divide.

The 2.4 width will work with the standard 68mm bottom bracket shell. Anything wider than that needs to have a wider BB, otherwise the chain will rub on the tire when in the lowest gear. More info on the project here.




At trout creek along the Oregon outback route. The advantages to this bike (besides portability) are a very low stand-over height, much stronger wheels, and lots more space to carry stuff over the front and rear wheels.


Folded up. 28x21x11. That adds up to 60"; less than the 62" max allowed by Greyhound bus and all the airlines. Handlebar bag is on the right. The handlebar bag as pictured is double walled/involuted. When unfurled, it opens up so that the folded bike fits inside. Bagged up, it is ready for the train, bus, or plane. The only drawback to using this bike on the tour divide is that it is just too easy to bail out onto some form of motorized transport...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
portable3.jpg (102.9 KB, 437 views)
File Type: jpg
portable1.jpg (97.5 KB, 426 views)

Last edited by sleepycactus; 07-14-15 at 06:00 PM. Reason: fix pictures
sleepycactus is offline  
Old 07-14-15, 05:19 PM
  #10  
jur
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Albany, WA
Posts: 7,393
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 321 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by sleepycactus
When I built my last folder, I designed it to accommodate 20X2.4" tires (with fender). There is a BIG difference between 20X2.0 and the wider 2.4 in how it handles and feels in the rough stuff. I don't think there are any folders commercially available today with 20" tires that will take anything wider than the 2.0. Hopefully that will change. Maybe bikefriday will try it? It can turn a folder into an all-road bike.

I lower the pressure to 20 or 25lbs and it helps a lot on rocky roads and trails. I presently use the Demolition momentum tire, because it is light and supple. The Machete is another option. I use a Sun Bigballer rim that is 33mm wide. The extra width allows it to hold more air and run it at lower pressures without feeling squirrelly. I had a great time riding it on the Oregon outback route, and someday I hope to take it along the tour divide.

The 2.4 width will work with the standard 68mm bottom bracket shell. Anything wider than that needs to have a wider BB, otherwise the chain will rub on the tire when in the lowest gear. More info on the project here.




At trout creek along the Oregon outback route. The advantages to this bike (besides portability) are a very low stand-over height, much stronger wheels, and lots more space to carry stuff over the front and rear wheels.


Folded up. 28x21x11. That adds up to 60"; less than the 62" max allowed by Greyhound bus and all the airlines. Handlebar bag is on the right. The handlebar bag as pictured is double walled/involuted. When unfurled, it opens up so that the folded bike fits inside. Bagged up, it is ready for the train, bus, or plane. The only drawback to using this bike on the tour divide is that it is just too easy to bail out onto some form of motorized transport...
Wow I am impressed.

I think the 406mm Ti Swift frame will also take those extra-fat tyres.
jur is offline  
Old 07-15-15, 10:37 PM
  #11  
Full Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Eastern Idaho
Posts: 366

Bikes: 2-many...2 road bikes, 2 fixed wheels, 3 tandems, 2 recumbents, 2 cyclecross, 3 mtb, 4 folders

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Liked 11 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by sleepycactus
When I built my last folder, I designed it to accommodate 20X2.4" tires (with fender). There is a BIG difference between 20X2.0 and the wider 2.4 in how it handles and feels in the rough stuff. I don't think there are any folders commercially available today with 20" tires that will take anything wider than the 2.0. Hopefully that will change. Maybe bikefriday will try it? It can turn a folder into an all-road bike.

I lower the pressure to 20 or 25lbs and it helps a lot on rocky roads and trails. I presently use the Demolition momentum tire, because it is light and supple. The Machete is another option. I use a Sun Bigballer rim that is 33mm wide. The extra width allows it to hold more air and run it at lower pressures without feeling squirrelly. I had a great time riding it on the Oregon outback route, and someday I hope to take it along the tour divide.

The 2.4 width will work with the standard 68mm bottom bracket shell. Anything wider than that needs to have a wider BB, otherwise the chain will rub on the tire when in the lowest gear. More info on the project here.
A very inspiring post. Loved the project details in your link. I retire in a few weeks and was already thinking of trying the Oregon Outback ride next year either on my Ti Swift or with a mountain bike of some sort. How are the Demolition Momentum or Machete tires for flats? I have 406 Sun Rhyno Lite rims on my Ti Swift that are probably 27.5mm wide. Any guess if they would be OK for the larger diameter 406x55 or larger tires? Pretty bomb-proof wheels with 36-hole rims on Shimano XT hubs. Have not tried any low pressure tire rides yet. Maybe in the next few weeks on the forestry roads near my house. I will see if I can get a couple of the larger Demolition tires or maybe a Schwalbe Big Apple Plus.

I take it that your experience with 2" and smaller tires (406x50) was that they were not up to the challenges of cinder and loose dirt riding. About 15 years ago I tried to ride various sections of the Kettle Valley RR in British Columbia (before the big fires) with a BikeE recumbent tandem with Maxis Hookworm 20x2" tires. Most of the sections were ride-able, but I remember one section of loose pea-sized gravel that we just gave up on when my wife and I could not make any progress on the up-hill segements.

My Ti Swift currently has 1.75 and 2.0" Schwalbe Marathons/Marathon Plus tires. I haven't tried it on seriously loose dirt or gravel yet. Works OK on harder dirt/gravel.

Last edited by Pine Cone; 07-15-15 at 10:42 PM.
Pine Cone is offline  
Old 07-16-15, 08:42 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 922

Bikes: Wheeler Mtn bike, Strida 5.0, Tern Link Uno, FSIR Spin 2.0, Dahon Mu P8

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Pine Cone
My Ti Swift currently has 1.75 and 2.0" Schwalbe Marathons/Marathon Plus tires. I haven't tried it on seriously loose dirt or gravel yet. Works OK on harder dirt/gravel.
The main problem is when you start hitting the loose gravel and dirt where your tires are not fat enough it will start cutting into it like a knife. to find anything fatter with a major brand is tough cause there isn't a big market for them. looking at the schwalbe site they have this:

Jumpin' Jack, 57-406, Black, Wire | Schwalbe North America
for a iso 406 tire size.

And i'm a pretty damn impressed with sleepycactus's creation though! but I don't think most of us here would have the crazy brazing and designing skills that he possesses!
Azreal911 is offline  
Old 07-17-15, 02:27 AM
  #13  
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 45
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
I have used 20x2.4 tires on the Sun CR 18 rim (22.5 mm wide) and that works fine. The machete and momentum tires are not thorn resistant. The momentum is supposed to be the lightest wire bead BMX tire there is. I would like to see a lighter folding tire in 2.4, but the momentum is quite nice. I like the minimal tread vs a knobby, because of the big variety of surfaces out there on rides like the Oregon outback.

I knew there would be a difference between 2.0 and 2.4 in how the bike rides, but I did not expect it to be so big of a difference. The 2.4 is plush; I let it go faster downhills, and cornering feels very secure; theres more grip. Where I may struggle with the 2.0, the 2.4 rolls much more easily. I can roll with less pressure in the fatter tire without issues, like pinch flats.

It's not a magic carpet ride on all surfaces of course, but it leaves the 2.0 in the dust for divide-style riding. That said, you CAN use 2.0 for the divide or Oregon outback. It's just slower and more work where the riding gets rougher.
sleepycactus is offline  
Old 07-30-15, 03:07 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 122
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by sleepycactus
When I built my last folder, I designed it to accommodate 20X2.4" tires (with fender). There is a BIG difference between 20X2.0 and the wider 2.4 in how it handles and feels in the rough stuff. I don't think there are any folders commercially available today with 20" tires that will take anything wider than the 2.0. Hopefully that will change. .
It is changing... Verge S27h | Tern Folding Bike and Folding Bicycle Accessories | Worldwide with 20X2.15" Big Apples: Tern Verge S27h folding touring bicycle ? A gravel-road-touring review - 14degrees Off The Beaten Track . Looks like a rig that could handle the Great Divide.

There's also the 2.15" Schwalbe Big Ben which has a bigger profile than the Big Apple:
https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/901540/+1728 (pics down the page -- you need the right brake clearance and bike for those)
https://bd-1.boo.jp/?p=1898 (more pics of the 2.15" Big Ben)

Last edited by AvenirFolder; 07-31-15 at 06:42 PM.
AvenirFolder is offline  
Old 07-31-15, 07:46 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
smallwheeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,380
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 151 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by sleepycactus
When I built my last folder, I designed it to accommodate 20X2.4" tires (with fender).




amazing and inspiring stuff, sleepycactus. i've been a fan for awhile..

https://www.bikeforums.net/folding-bi...l#post16023035

smallwheeler is offline  
Old 08-01-15, 05:52 PM
  #16  
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 45
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
[QUOTE=smallwheeler;18030747]



amazing and inspiring stuff, sleepycactus. i've been a fan for awhile..


Thanks smallwheeler. I have really enjoyed studying the enormous variety of bikes you have posted in the forum.


It’s good to see the Tern break the 2.0 barrier! Thanks for posting that avenirfolder. For most of my riding on small wheels, I find wider is better. It seems to me that 2.4 on a 406 wheel is fat enough/a good compromise, for an all-road folder. At any rate, with my design, a 3” wide tire would require changes that may push it beyond the boundaries of the 62” max volume size for bus/plane transport. I don’t see advancing it beyond 2.4.


But… I could push it a little further by using even wider rims. Presently, with the 32.5mm wide Sun bigballer rims the tires have a nice round profile. The Stranger XXL 42mm wide BMX rim would spread the 2.4 tire out a little more, increasing the air volume, giving a flatter profile and a slightly wider footprint. The sidewalls would be better supported, making even lower riding pressures possible. It may cause the chain to contact the tire a bit in the very lowest gear, but I don’t think it would be a big deal. I may need to move the fork brazeons for the linear pull brakes to accommodate the wider rims. The rim upgrade would add to each wheel about a quarter pound of rolling weight. But it’s already a rather portly bike though (33 lbs as pictured with racks/generator lights/brass bell etc, but without any luggage).
sleepycactus is offline  
Old 10-17-16, 06:29 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,174
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 381 Post(s)
Liked 145 Times in 93 Posts
More and more I am wanting to attempt the tour divide on a 20" folder ; ). That tern bike seems a ripoff in components for the price.
BikeLite is offline  
Old 10-17-16, 08:54 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 663
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 239 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Sleepycactus---awesome bike.

I know what you mean by the huge difference between 2.0 and 2.4 tires. It is amazing on full size wheels 26, 27.5. I believe you when you sayit makes a huge difference on 20" wheels that it would.

So Jur? How wide of 406's will the Ti Swift take? How does one go about getting a Ti Swift frame?
Rick Imby is offline  
Old 10-17-16, 09:23 PM
  #19  
jur
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Albany, WA
Posts: 7,393
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 321 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Rick Imby
Sleepycactus---awesome bike.

I know what you mean by the huge difference between 2.0 and 2.4 tires. It is amazing on full size wheels 26, 27.5. I believe you when you sayit makes a huge difference on 20" wheels that it would.

So Jur? How wide of 406's will the Ti Swift take? How does one go about getting a Ti Swift frame?
Currently there is an effort under way, and a group of 5 will mean 20% discount.

The Ti Swift can accommodate 2.4" with current build meant for 406 wheels.

Frames are customisable almost without limit.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
swift_fork2.jpg (20.9 KB, 81 views)
File Type: jpg
swirt_fork1.jpg (19.6 KB, 79 views)
jur is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
joaozinho
Folding Bikes
0
03-24-14 09:09 AM
SesameCrunch
Folding Bikes
32
05-08-13 08:48 PM
Casbah
Folding Bikes
48
03-18-12 03:55 PM
fwd-bwd
Folding Bikes
3
05-30-11 08:43 AM
thatsut
Folding Bikes
6
05-25-11 06:04 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.