Folding Bikes and the Great Divide
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 122
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Folding Bikes and the Great Divide
Does anyone know of a tourer or racer who's used a folding bike to do the Great Divide Mountain Bike Route or Tour Divide?
Total distance from Banff, Alberta in Canada to Antelope Wells on the Mexican border = 2700+ miles over gravel, dirt, mud, snow and pavement...not to mention the numerous continental divide crossings.
https://adventurecycling.org/routes-a...divide-canada/
https://adventurecycling.org/routes-a...in-bike-route/
https://tourdivide.org/
https://www.ridethedividemovie.com/ (great documentary -- check your local library for it)
There's a reference made here of a Bike Friday owner doing it some years ago: https://www.cyclechat.net/threads/gre...n-a-lht.82348/ and another mention of a Dahon owner thinking about it for this year: https://dahon.com/single-view-dahon/a...directors.html (see User Comments at bottom of page) + https://www.bikepacking.net/forum/ind....html#msg41235 (see tezza's comments on page 11 of that thread).
Any known folder riders with a full GDMBR under their wheels? It's been done on a recumbent trike (well, a good part of it https://www.crazyguyonabike.com/doc/?doc_id=998) and also on unicycles (yup! https://vimeo.com/17852073 ) but I haven't seen much from the folding bike crowd. Eat, sleep and ride the Divide!
Total distance from Banff, Alberta in Canada to Antelope Wells on the Mexican border = 2700+ miles over gravel, dirt, mud, snow and pavement...not to mention the numerous continental divide crossings.
https://adventurecycling.org/routes-a...divide-canada/
https://adventurecycling.org/routes-a...in-bike-route/
https://tourdivide.org/
https://www.ridethedividemovie.com/ (great documentary -- check your local library for it)
There's a reference made here of a Bike Friday owner doing it some years ago: https://www.cyclechat.net/threads/gre...n-a-lht.82348/ and another mention of a Dahon owner thinking about it for this year: https://dahon.com/single-view-dahon/a...directors.html (see User Comments at bottom of page) + https://www.bikepacking.net/forum/ind....html#msg41235 (see tezza's comments on page 11 of that thread).
Any known folder riders with a full GDMBR under their wheels? It's been done on a recumbent trike (well, a good part of it https://www.crazyguyonabike.com/doc/?doc_id=998) and also on unicycles (yup! https://vimeo.com/17852073 ) but I haven't seen much from the folding bike crowd. Eat, sleep and ride the Divide!
Last edited by AvenirFolder; 01-02-14 at 03:59 PM.
#2
Banned
My Pocket Llama will take 2" wide tires , so gravel roads are no problem.
You might go to CGOAB for more tour journal posts.
You might go to CGOAB for more tour journal posts.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 122
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I assume 20 X 1.75" Schwalbe Marathons would do the trick as well. Those are pretty tough tires. I'd be inclined to pack an extra one along since they aren't easy to find in LBSs.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 122
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Just came across this Facebook page by Alyson Peel: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Bike-...843368?fref=nf (no longer there so try this Google page instead: https://plus.google.com/+AlysonPeel/posts.)
She left home from Bisbee AZ on a Bike Friday equipped with Big Apples and is making her way north up the Great Divide Folding Bike Route (to Banff, Alberta presumably).
Along the way, she ditched her rear panniers, shed 20lbs of stuff and went with a slimmer rear bikepacking rig.
I find this early pre-trip post of interest as well: https://plus.google.com/wm/trollface...ts/fTwbFQBV3EN .
She left home from Bisbee AZ on a Bike Friday equipped with Big Apples and is making her way north up the Great Divide Folding Bike Route (to Banff, Alberta presumably).
Along the way, she ditched her rear panniers, shed 20lbs of stuff and went with a slimmer rear bikepacking rig.
I find this early pre-trip post of interest as well: https://plus.google.com/wm/trollface...ts/fTwbFQBV3EN .
Last edited by AvenirFolder; 10-05-15 at 09:05 AM.
#5
Palmer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 8,601
Bikes: Mike Melton custom, Alex Moulton AM, Dahon Curl
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1659 Post(s)
Liked 1,806 Times
in
1,052 Posts
Not folder but demountable: A fellow on a Moulton APB did it some years back.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 922
Bikes: Wheeler Mtn bike, Strida 5.0, Tern Link Uno, FSIR Spin 2.0, Dahon Mu P8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
To me if it is alot of rough terrain I would not use my 20" wheeled bike at all and go for my fully rigid 26" with fat tires. This way you'll have an easier time if the terrain gets rough with the bigger wheels you reduce the angle of attack when going over things. If it was just a day ride I wouldn't mind the 20" wheels but you are talking about 2700+ MILES of rough terrain over multiple WEEKS. I would want to save my hands and body in the long run, for those that say there's not much difference I would seriously beg to differ because I have 20" and a 26" bike with 2" fat tires on both and hitting gravel trails I was gliding ALOT easier and faster on my 20 year old fully rigid mtn bike vs my 3 year old folder!
BUT if you ONLY have a 20" tire and still want to do it, it'll be doable just not as efficient. And make sure you put on the fattest tire you can get on there for comfort, if you get too thin and there's alot of loose gravel you'll end up cutting into the gravel which will suck alot of energy.
BUT if you ONLY have a 20" tire and still want to do it, it'll be doable just not as efficient. And make sure you put on the fattest tire you can get on there for comfort, if you get too thin and there's alot of loose gravel you'll end up cutting into the gravel which will suck alot of energy.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 122
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Agreed. I'd use my 30-year old ATB 26er with 2.25" tires long before I'd think about using a 20 inch folder with Big Apples. Especially with hub clearance and bottom bracket clearance from water/mud in mind. If you run into trouble in the wheel department, you likely aren't going to find rims or tires enroute.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 922
Bikes: Wheeler Mtn bike, Strida 5.0, Tern Link Uno, FSIR Spin 2.0, Dahon Mu P8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Agreed. I'd use my 30-year old ATB 26er with 2.25" tires long before I'd think about using a 20 inch folder with Big Apples. Especially with hub clearance and bottom bracket clearance from water/mud in mind. If you run into trouble in the wheel department, you likely aren't going to find rims or tires enroute.
Probably the main reason why you aren't going to hear anyone doing this on a folder except for that one lady on the llama. Most are like putting everything they have on the line to get through it and won't think about adding things that would hinder their ride.
#9
Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 45
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
When I built my last folder, I designed it to accommodate 20X2.4" tires (with fender). There is a BIG difference between 20X2.0 and the wider 2.4 in how it handles and feels in the rough stuff. I don't think there are any folders commercially available today with 20" tires that will take anything wider than the 2.0. Hopefully that will change. Maybe bikefriday will try it? It can turn a folder into an all-road bike.
I lower the pressure to 20 or 25lbs and it helps a lot on rocky roads and trails. I presently use the Demolition momentum tire, because it is light and supple. The Machete is another option. I use a Sun Bigballer rim that is 33mm wide. The extra width allows it to hold more air and run it at lower pressures without feeling squirrelly. I had a great time riding it on the Oregon outback route, and someday I hope to take it along the tour divide.
The 2.4 width will work with the standard 68mm bottom bracket shell. Anything wider than that needs to have a wider BB, otherwise the chain will rub on the tire when in the lowest gear. More info on the project here.
At trout creek along the Oregon outback route. The advantages to this bike (besides portability) are a very low stand-over height, much stronger wheels, and lots more space to carry stuff over the front and rear wheels.
Folded up. 28x21x11. That adds up to 60"; less than the 62" max allowed by Greyhound bus and all the airlines. Handlebar bag is on the right. The handlebar bag as pictured is double walled/involuted. When unfurled, it opens up so that the folded bike fits inside. Bagged up, it is ready for the train, bus, or plane. The only drawback to using this bike on the tour divide is that it is just too easy to bail out onto some form of motorized transport...
I lower the pressure to 20 or 25lbs and it helps a lot on rocky roads and trails. I presently use the Demolition momentum tire, because it is light and supple. The Machete is another option. I use a Sun Bigballer rim that is 33mm wide. The extra width allows it to hold more air and run it at lower pressures without feeling squirrelly. I had a great time riding it on the Oregon outback route, and someday I hope to take it along the tour divide.
The 2.4 width will work with the standard 68mm bottom bracket shell. Anything wider than that needs to have a wider BB, otherwise the chain will rub on the tire when in the lowest gear. More info on the project here.
At trout creek along the Oregon outback route. The advantages to this bike (besides portability) are a very low stand-over height, much stronger wheels, and lots more space to carry stuff over the front and rear wheels.
Folded up. 28x21x11. That adds up to 60"; less than the 62" max allowed by Greyhound bus and all the airlines. Handlebar bag is on the right. The handlebar bag as pictured is double walled/involuted. When unfurled, it opens up so that the folded bike fits inside. Bagged up, it is ready for the train, bus, or plane. The only drawback to using this bike on the tour divide is that it is just too easy to bail out onto some form of motorized transport...
Last edited by sleepycactus; 07-14-15 at 06:00 PM. Reason: fix pictures
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Albany, WA
Posts: 7,393
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 321 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
When I built my last folder, I designed it to accommodate 20X2.4" tires (with fender). There is a BIG difference between 20X2.0 and the wider 2.4 in how it handles and feels in the rough stuff. I don't think there are any folders commercially available today with 20" tires that will take anything wider than the 2.0. Hopefully that will change. Maybe bikefriday will try it? It can turn a folder into an all-road bike.
I lower the pressure to 20 or 25lbs and it helps a lot on rocky roads and trails. I presently use the Demolition momentum tire, because it is light and supple. The Machete is another option. I use a Sun Bigballer rim that is 33mm wide. The extra width allows it to hold more air and run it at lower pressures without feeling squirrelly. I had a great time riding it on the Oregon outback route, and someday I hope to take it along the tour divide.
The 2.4 width will work with the standard 68mm bottom bracket shell. Anything wider than that needs to have a wider BB, otherwise the chain will rub on the tire when in the lowest gear. More info on the project here.
At trout creek along the Oregon outback route. The advantages to this bike (besides portability) are a very low stand-over height, much stronger wheels, and lots more space to carry stuff over the front and rear wheels.
Folded up. 28x21x11. That adds up to 60"; less than the 62" max allowed by Greyhound bus and all the airlines. Handlebar bag is on the right. The handlebar bag as pictured is double walled/involuted. When unfurled, it opens up so that the folded bike fits inside. Bagged up, it is ready for the train, bus, or plane. The only drawback to using this bike on the tour divide is that it is just too easy to bail out onto some form of motorized transport...
I lower the pressure to 20 or 25lbs and it helps a lot on rocky roads and trails. I presently use the Demolition momentum tire, because it is light and supple. The Machete is another option. I use a Sun Bigballer rim that is 33mm wide. The extra width allows it to hold more air and run it at lower pressures without feeling squirrelly. I had a great time riding it on the Oregon outback route, and someday I hope to take it along the tour divide.
The 2.4 width will work with the standard 68mm bottom bracket shell. Anything wider than that needs to have a wider BB, otherwise the chain will rub on the tire when in the lowest gear. More info on the project here.
At trout creek along the Oregon outback route. The advantages to this bike (besides portability) are a very low stand-over height, much stronger wheels, and lots more space to carry stuff over the front and rear wheels.
Folded up. 28x21x11. That adds up to 60"; less than the 62" max allowed by Greyhound bus and all the airlines. Handlebar bag is on the right. The handlebar bag as pictured is double walled/involuted. When unfurled, it opens up so that the folded bike fits inside. Bagged up, it is ready for the train, bus, or plane. The only drawback to using this bike on the tour divide is that it is just too easy to bail out onto some form of motorized transport...
I think the 406mm Ti Swift frame will also take those extra-fat tyres.
#11
Full Member
When I built my last folder, I designed it to accommodate 20X2.4" tires (with fender). There is a BIG difference between 20X2.0 and the wider 2.4 in how it handles and feels in the rough stuff. I don't think there are any folders commercially available today with 20" tires that will take anything wider than the 2.0. Hopefully that will change. Maybe bikefriday will try it? It can turn a folder into an all-road bike.
I lower the pressure to 20 or 25lbs and it helps a lot on rocky roads and trails. I presently use the Demolition momentum tire, because it is light and supple. The Machete is another option. I use a Sun Bigballer rim that is 33mm wide. The extra width allows it to hold more air and run it at lower pressures without feeling squirrelly. I had a great time riding it on the Oregon outback route, and someday I hope to take it along the tour divide.
The 2.4 width will work with the standard 68mm bottom bracket shell. Anything wider than that needs to have a wider BB, otherwise the chain will rub on the tire when in the lowest gear. More info on the project here.
I lower the pressure to 20 or 25lbs and it helps a lot on rocky roads and trails. I presently use the Demolition momentum tire, because it is light and supple. The Machete is another option. I use a Sun Bigballer rim that is 33mm wide. The extra width allows it to hold more air and run it at lower pressures without feeling squirrelly. I had a great time riding it on the Oregon outback route, and someday I hope to take it along the tour divide.
The 2.4 width will work with the standard 68mm bottom bracket shell. Anything wider than that needs to have a wider BB, otherwise the chain will rub on the tire when in the lowest gear. More info on the project here.
I take it that your experience with 2" and smaller tires (406x50) was that they were not up to the challenges of cinder and loose dirt riding. About 15 years ago I tried to ride various sections of the Kettle Valley RR in British Columbia (before the big fires) with a BikeE recumbent tandem with Maxis Hookworm 20x2" tires. Most of the sections were ride-able, but I remember one section of loose pea-sized gravel that we just gave up on when my wife and I could not make any progress on the up-hill segements.
My Ti Swift currently has 1.75 and 2.0" Schwalbe Marathons/Marathon Plus tires. I haven't tried it on seriously loose dirt or gravel yet. Works OK on harder dirt/gravel.
Last edited by Pine Cone; 07-15-15 at 10:42 PM.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 922
Bikes: Wheeler Mtn bike, Strida 5.0, Tern Link Uno, FSIR Spin 2.0, Dahon Mu P8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Jumpin' Jack, 57-406, Black, Wire | Schwalbe North America
for a iso 406 tire size.
And i'm a pretty damn impressed with sleepycactus's creation though! but I don't think most of us here would have the crazy brazing and designing skills that he possesses!
#13
Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 45
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
I have used 20x2.4 tires on the Sun CR 18 rim (22.5 mm wide) and that works fine. The machete and momentum tires are not thorn resistant. The momentum is supposed to be the lightest wire bead BMX tire there is. I would like to see a lighter folding tire in 2.4, but the momentum is quite nice. I like the minimal tread vs a knobby, because of the big variety of surfaces out there on rides like the Oregon outback.
I knew there would be a difference between 2.0 and 2.4 in how the bike rides, but I did not expect it to be so big of a difference. The 2.4 is plush; I let it go faster downhills, and cornering feels very secure; theres more grip. Where I may struggle with the 2.0, the 2.4 rolls much more easily. I can roll with less pressure in the fatter tire without issues, like pinch flats.
It's not a magic carpet ride on all surfaces of course, but it leaves the 2.0 in the dust for divide-style riding. That said, you CAN use 2.0 for the divide or Oregon outback. It's just slower and more work where the riding gets rougher.
I knew there would be a difference between 2.0 and 2.4 in how the bike rides, but I did not expect it to be so big of a difference. The 2.4 is plush; I let it go faster downhills, and cornering feels very secure; theres more grip. Where I may struggle with the 2.0, the 2.4 rolls much more easily. I can roll with less pressure in the fatter tire without issues, like pinch flats.
It's not a magic carpet ride on all surfaces of course, but it leaves the 2.0 in the dust for divide-style riding. That said, you CAN use 2.0 for the divide or Oregon outback. It's just slower and more work where the riding gets rougher.
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 122
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
When I built my last folder, I designed it to accommodate 20X2.4" tires (with fender). There is a BIG difference between 20X2.0 and the wider 2.4 in how it handles and feels in the rough stuff. I don't think there are any folders commercially available today with 20" tires that will take anything wider than the 2.0. Hopefully that will change. .
There's also the 2.15" Schwalbe Big Ben which has a bigger profile than the Big Apple:
https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/901540/+1728 (pics down the page -- you need the right brake clearance and bike for those)
https://bd-1.boo.jp/?p=1898 (more pics of the 2.15" Big Ben)
Last edited by AvenirFolder; 07-31-15 at 06:42 PM.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,380
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 151 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
8 Posts
amazing and inspiring stuff, sleepycactus. i've been a fan for awhile..
https://www.bikeforums.net/folding-bi...l#post16023035
#16
Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 45
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
[QUOTE=smallwheeler;18030747]
amazing and inspiring stuff, sleepycactus. i've been a fan for awhile..
Thanks smallwheeler. I have really enjoyed studying the enormous variety of bikes you have posted in the forum.
It’s good to see the Tern break the 2.0 barrier! Thanks for posting that avenirfolder. For most of my riding on small wheels, I find wider is better. It seems to me that 2.4 on a 406 wheel is fat enough/a good compromise, for an all-road folder. At any rate, with my design, a 3” wide tire would require changes that may push it beyond the boundaries of the 62” max volume size for bus/plane transport. I don’t see advancing it beyond 2.4.
But… I could push it a little further by using even wider rims. Presently, with the 32.5mm wide Sun bigballer rims the tires have a nice round profile. The Stranger XXL 42mm wide BMX rim would spread the 2.4 tire out a little more, increasing the air volume, giving a flatter profile and a slightly wider footprint. The sidewalls would be better supported, making even lower riding pressures possible. It may cause the chain to contact the tire a bit in the very lowest gear, but I don’t think it would be a big deal. I may need to move the fork brazeons for the linear pull brakes to accommodate the wider rims. The rim upgrade would add to each wheel about a quarter pound of rolling weight. But it’s already a rather portly bike though (33 lbs as pictured with racks/generator lights/brass bell etc, but without any luggage).
amazing and inspiring stuff, sleepycactus. i've been a fan for awhile..
Thanks smallwheeler. I have really enjoyed studying the enormous variety of bikes you have posted in the forum.
It’s good to see the Tern break the 2.0 barrier! Thanks for posting that avenirfolder. For most of my riding on small wheels, I find wider is better. It seems to me that 2.4 on a 406 wheel is fat enough/a good compromise, for an all-road folder. At any rate, with my design, a 3” wide tire would require changes that may push it beyond the boundaries of the 62” max volume size for bus/plane transport. I don’t see advancing it beyond 2.4.
But… I could push it a little further by using even wider rims. Presently, with the 32.5mm wide Sun bigballer rims the tires have a nice round profile. The Stranger XXL 42mm wide BMX rim would spread the 2.4 tire out a little more, increasing the air volume, giving a flatter profile and a slightly wider footprint. The sidewalls would be better supported, making even lower riding pressures possible. It may cause the chain to contact the tire a bit in the very lowest gear, but I don’t think it would be a big deal. I may need to move the fork brazeons for the linear pull brakes to accommodate the wider rims. The rim upgrade would add to each wheel about a quarter pound of rolling weight. But it’s already a rather portly bike though (33 lbs as pictured with racks/generator lights/brass bell etc, but without any luggage).
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 663
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 239 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Sleepycactus---awesome bike.
I know what you mean by the huge difference between 2.0 and 2.4 tires. It is amazing on full size wheels 26, 27.5. I believe you when you sayit makes a huge difference on 20" wheels that it would.
So Jur? How wide of 406's will the Ti Swift take? How does one go about getting a Ti Swift frame?
I know what you mean by the huge difference between 2.0 and 2.4 tires. It is amazing on full size wheels 26, 27.5. I believe you when you sayit makes a huge difference on 20" wheels that it would.
So Jur? How wide of 406's will the Ti Swift take? How does one go about getting a Ti Swift frame?
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Albany, WA
Posts: 7,393
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 321 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Sleepycactus---awesome bike.
I know what you mean by the huge difference between 2.0 and 2.4 tires. It is amazing on full size wheels 26, 27.5. I believe you when you sayit makes a huge difference on 20" wheels that it would.
So Jur? How wide of 406's will the Ti Swift take? How does one go about getting a Ti Swift frame?
I know what you mean by the huge difference between 2.0 and 2.4 tires. It is amazing on full size wheels 26, 27.5. I believe you when you sayit makes a huge difference on 20" wheels that it would.
So Jur? How wide of 406's will the Ti Swift take? How does one go about getting a Ti Swift frame?
The Ti Swift can accommodate 2.4" with current build meant for 406 wheels.
Frames are customisable almost without limit.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Casbah
Folding Bikes
48
03-18-12 03:55 PM